The sortslice analyzer warns the user when they're
using a non-slice parameter to sort.Slice. It can
also suggest fixes for 3 different cases of misuse:
1. The parameter is a pointer to a slice.
2. The parameter is an array
3. The parameter is a function with no arguments
that returns a slice.
Change-Id: If6327b19ab3c476cf17ca3c5fd75bc43bb8683e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195898
Run-TryBot: Johan Brandhorst <johan.brandhorst@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
If we encounter `go list` errors when loading a user's package, we
should try to see if they've encountered any of our common error cases.
They are: 1) a user has GO111MODULE=off, but is outside of their GOPATH,
and 2) a user is in module mode but doesn't have a go.mod file.
Fortunately, go/packages does a great job handling edge cases so gopls
will work well for most of them. The main issue will be unresolved
imports. These show up in DepErrors in `go list`, so go/packages doesn't
propagate them through to the list of errors. This will require changes
to go/packages.
Updates golang/go#31668
Change-Id: Ibd5253b33b38caffeaad54a403c74c0b861fcc14
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194018
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Parse errors need to be treated separately from actual errors when
parsing a file. Parse errors are treated more like values, whereas
actual errors should not be propagated to the user. This enables us to
delete some of the special handling for context.Canceled errors.
Change-Id: I93a02f22b3f54beccbd6bcf26f04bb8da0202c25
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195997
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
We had too many options for functions to use to get type information for
a package. Now we stick with having one option to get the check package
handles, and then the caller can refine the results as needed.
Change-Id: I81f69a670e1539854ee23b6f364159a7de9b782f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194457
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
This function incorrectly used cached packages to get ASTs and type
information that should have been directly found from the origin
package. Shift to using pkg.FindFile instead.
Change-Id: I9f73209bb1a1343f53b430150e78ffd180e14a44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195797
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Tweak a couple things to improve how we reduce our search scope based
on remaining time budget:
- Check our budget on the first candidate rather than waiting for the
1000th candidate. If type checking is slow you can be out of budget
before you even begin.
- Reduce our budget check interval from 1000 candidates to 100
candidates. This just helps us adjust our search scope faster.
The first tweak required me to raise the completion budget for tests
because 100ms is not always enough. I moved the budget into the
completion options so that tests can raise it.
Change-Id: I1aa7909d7baf9c998bc830c960dc579eb33db12a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195419
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Revert my previous change to include fuzzy matches with a score of
zero. Zero scorers have some characters that match, but they are
pretty poor overall. Pulling in all the extra junk candidates was
slowing things down in certain cases.
Change-Id: I560f46903281f21b0628c9b14848cddf1e3c0a38
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195418
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change allows to remove some of the special handling for the
builtin package.
Change-Id: I105fcefd8812af2d42ff42edca954824c98db429
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195758
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
A mapper is always uniquely tied to a file at a specific version, so
just build it when we get a new *ast.File. We build the mapper using the
*token.File associated with the particular *ast.File, which is why there
is one per ParseGoHandle instead of FileHandle.
Change-Id: Ida40981ef91f6133cdd07e9793337fcd67510fba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194517
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
I wasn't sure if we should just manually construct the URI here or use
the URL unescaping function. Let me know which you think is best.
Updates golang/go#34270
Change-Id: Idb48fc2650d39f3e54cac141a70f356c31e303ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195618
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
protocol.Position doesn't implement String(), so don't use "%s"
formatting directive. We could implement String(), but it is generated
code, so its a bit iffy.
Change-Id: If21b5fee66c6e1bd59f19b520c7d36f0e648cb71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195042
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We turned them off for the release, but let's keep them on at master so
that we can get more feedback.
Change-Id: Iaadf27d59ef925ba8ee2bc02acbb9c77c2935ce2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/195059
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Previous changes to the config mechanism made the config options
per-view, not per-session. We should now make sure to obey config
changes per-view. This does not fix the configuration handling for
"watchChangedFile" however. This should be done in a future CL.
Change-Id: I73f6236386c36d2587fdb9c0601670833a4366c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194818
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This fixes the issue of config options not being applied.
Also, handle config errors and deprecation by showing a message to the
user.
Change-Id: I850d5303a7a1e301c97324060a87929710ee6700
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194682
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
This change temporarily disables fuzzy matching and deep completion by
default, leaving them opt-in for the tagged versions. These will be
re-enabled after the tag on master to continue iterating on them.
Also, update the hard-coded version string.
Change-Id: I0aa688ce067abfe8ae8ebe52a25c8514ec2c7e48
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194777
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also, handle *ast.StarExpr in the identifier code. This fixes a specific
case with deep completions and documentation.
Change-Id: I630ae4e8f1c123ba1fdea85e6862ae93396e2cd4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194564
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Our original caching plan was to use only the file ParseGoHandles as
cache keys to define a given package. However, because of package test
variants, we cannot rely on files alone. A package may have the exact
same set of files, but be a test variant. Add the ID to the key to avoid
clobbering entries in the cache.
Also, remove the unused metadata ID cache.
Change-Id: I4b33de1f83f6c769d23441e98a2a7324ff0fa1b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194571
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Now when a file is deleted we force the file's packages to refresh
go/packages metadata, and kick off diagnostics.
I made a couple other changes to watched file handling:
- Kick off diagnostics in a goroutine to match how DidChange works.
This will allow us to work through big sets of file changes faster,
and will save duplicated work once type checking can be canceled.
- Don't assume a watched file is only part of one view.
Two interesting cases we don't handle yet:
- If the deleted file was the only file in the package, we don't
currently update diagnostics for dependent packages. This requires
rejiggering how diagnostics are invoked a bit.
- If the deleted file is still open in the editor and then later
closed, we don't trigger metadata/diagnostics refresh on DidClose.
Updates golang/go#31553
Change-Id: I65768614c24d9800ffea149ccdbdbd3cb7b2f3d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193121
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
We now wait to build views until we have the options for that view,
and pass the options in to the view constructor.
The environment and build flags are now part of the view options.
Change-Id: I303c8ba1eefd01b66962ba9cadb4847d3d2e1d3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194278
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In the case of documentation items for completion items, we should make
sure to use the ASTs and type information for the originating package.
To do this while avoiding race conditions, we have to do this by
breadth-first searching the top-level package and its dependencies.
Change-Id: Id657be969ca3e400bb2bbd769a82d88e91865764
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194477
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
I moved the "usePlaceholders" config field on to CompletionOptions.
This way the completion code generates a single snippet with a little
conditional logic based on the "WantPlaceholders" option instead of
juggling the generation of two almost identical "plain" and
"placeholder" snippets at the same time. It also reduces the work done
generating completion candidates a little.
I also made a minor tweak to the snippet builder where empty
placeholders are now always represented as e.g "${1:}" instead of
"${1}" or "${1:}", depending on if you passed a callback to
WritePlaceholder() or not.
Change-Id: Ib84cc0cd729a11b9e13ad3ac4b6fd2d82460acd5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193697
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Add a new @completePartial note that does not require you to specify
the full list of completions. This gets rid of a lot of noise when you
just want to test the relative order of some completion candidates but
don't care about all the other candidates in scope.
I changed one existing test to use @completePartial as an example.
Change-Id: I56005405477e562803f094c0cac05ef2b854ad1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192657
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Remove the wantSuggestedFixes flag, and run the flagged code
by default.
Add test cases for suggested fixes.
Generate a suggested fix to the assign analysis that suggests removing redundant assignments.
Fix the propagation of suggested fixes (using rstambler's code).
Change-Id: I342c8e0b75790518f228b00ebd2979d24338be3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193265
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
CL 193726 accidentally turned off deep completions and fuzzy matching by default.
Re-enabling them now.
Change-Id: Ia120766b3a72243efe9c398c0efd6d1a101d0e7f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/194020
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Improve the existing fix-the-AST code to better identify the
expression following the "go" or "defer" keywords:
- Don't slurp the expression start outside the loop since the
expression might only have a single token.
- Set expression end to the position after the final token, not the
position of the final token.
- Track curly brace nesting to properly capture an entire "func() {}"
expression.
- Fix parent node detection to work when BadStmt isn't first statement
of block.
- Add special case to detect dangling period, e.g. "defer fmt.". We
insert phantom "_" selectors like go/parser does to prevent the
dangling "." from messing up the AST.
- Use reflect in offsetPositions so it updates positions in all node
types. This code shouldn't be called often, so I don't think
performance is a concern.
I also tweaked the function snippet code so it properly expands
"defer" and "go" expressions to function calls. It thought it didn't
have to expand since there was already a *ast.CallExpr, but the
CallExpr was faked by us and the source doesn't actually contain the
"()" calling parens.
Note that this does not work for nested go/defer statements. For
example, completions won't work properly in cases like this:
go func() {
defer fmt.<>
}
I think we can fix this as well with some more work.
Change-Id: I8f9753fda76909b0e3a83489cdea69ad04ee237a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193997
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Downranking builtins causes weird interplay with other completion
candidates due to fuzzy matching. For example:
notNil := 123
var foo *int = nil<>
ranks "notNil" before "nil" in the builtin list, which is counter
productive.
Change it to not downrank builtins. In my testing with this change,
builtins never were ranked above lexical items with similar names. I
think this is because the "natural" order of completion items puts
builtins last, and we stable sort items by score, so their relative
order is preserved.
Change-Id: Ifbad02be205e3cb26c1d4ce500b77690e7ac5b04
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193897
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The next in the sequence of CLs to convert to using protocol positions.
Change-Id: Ib3421bfc73af1b546b60c328ca66528cb9031e19
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193719
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
This cl is the first in a set that change the configuration behaviour.
This one should have no behaviour differences, but makes a lot of preparatory changes.
The same options are set to the same values in the same places.
The options are now stored on the Session instead of the Server
The View supports options, but does not have any yet.
Change-Id: Ie966cceca6878861686a1766d63bb8a78021259b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193726
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Folding ranges need to be computed to present folding ranges that make
sense when lineFoldingOnly is true. This change computes the folding
ranges to include the lines that are contained within the start and end
parenthesis/braces when applicable.
Folding ranges are not returned when the contained nodes begin or end on
the same lines as the parenthesis/brace. This is to avoid misleading
folding ranges like the following in unformatted code:
if true {
fmt.Println("true") } else {
fmt.Println("false")
}
---folding "if true {}"--->
if true {
fmt.Println("false")
}
Change-Id: I2931d02837ad5f2dd96cc93da5ede59afd6bcdce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192678
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This feature has been in an experimental state for a long enough time
that I think we can enable it by default at master.
Change-Id: I9bbb8b41377719f0e97f608f6e5163a883a176b3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192259
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
If the client registers with foldingRange.lineFoldingOnly = true, only
return folding ranges that span multiple lines. Do this as they are
computed, so that if other filtering is applied later, we do not include
ranges that would go unused by the client anyway.
Change-Id: I27ea24428d25f180e26892de0f6d16c211225bf7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192477
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
FoldingRanges may be nested. Test nested folding ranges by separating
out the folding ranges by nested level and checking each level.
Change-Id: I12c72daa3e6c6b9d4959209b3a41b27e2b59866f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192398
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The existing implementation did not suggest struct field names
when running completion from within a slice literal of
pointers. Now, struct field names are suggested in that case.
Fixesgolang/go#33211
Change-Id: I6028420a9a789846b070fcc6e45ec89dc4d898d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192277
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Invert "useDeepCompletions" config flag to "disableDeepCompletion" and
separate out "disableFuzzyMatching" which reverts to the previous
prefix matching behavior.
I separated fuzzy matching tests out to a separate file so they aren't
entangled with deep completion tests. In coming up with representative
test cases I found a couple issues which I fixed:
- We were treating a fuzzy matcher score of 0 as no match, but the
matcher returns 0 for candidates that match but have no bonuses. I
changed the matcher interface so that a score of 0 counts as a
match. For example, this was preventing a pattern of "o" from
matching "foo".
- When we lower a candidate's score based on its depth, we were
subtracting a static multiplier which could result in the score
going negative. A negative score messes up future score weighting
because multiplying it by a value in the range [0, 1) makes it
bigger instead of smaller. Fix by scaling a candidate's score based
on its depth rather than subtracting a constant factor.
Updates golang/go#32754
Change-Id: Ie6f9111f1696b0d067d08f7eed7b0a338ad9cd67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192137
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Prepare rename gets the range of the identifier to rename. Returns an
error when there is no identifier to rename.
Change-Id: I5e5865bc9ff97e6a95ac4f0c48edddcfd0f9ed67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/191170
Run-TryBot: Suzy Mueller <suzmue@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Deep completions can take a long time (500ms+) if there are many
large, deeply nested structs in scope. To make sure we return
completion results in a timely manner we now notice if we have spent
"too long" searching for deep completions and reduce the search scope.
In particular, our overall completion budget is 100ms. This value is
often cited as the longest latency that still feels instantaneous to
most people. As we spend 25%, 50%, and 75% of our budget we limit our
deep completion candidate search depth to 4, 3, and 2,
respectively. If we hit 90% of our budget, we disable deep completions
entirely.
In my testing, limiting the search scope to 4 normally makes even
enormous searches finish in a few milliseconds. Of course, you can
have arbitrarily many objects in scope with arbitrarily many fields,
so to cover our bases we continue to dial down the search depth as
needed.
I replaced the "enabled" field with a "maxDepth" field that disables
deep search when set to 0.
Change-Id: I9b5a07de70709895c065503ae6082d1ea615d1af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190978
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
