There are some symbol attributes that are encoded in the object
file. Currently, they are lost when cloning a symbol to external.
Copy them over.
Also delete CopyAttributes as it is no longer called anywhere.
Change-Id: I1497e3223a641704bf35aa3e904dd0eda2f8ec3e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400574
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
No separate test because this makes no difference for valid PE files.
Fixes#52350
Change-Id: I2aa011a4e8b34cb08052222e94c52627ebe99fbf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400378
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The current implementation, although more succinct, relies on a runtime
lookup to a "constant" unexported map (which also needs to be
initialized at runtime).
The proposed implementation is able to be optimized by the compiler at
build-time, resulting in *much* more efficient instructions.
Additionally, unused string literals may even be removed altogether
from the generated binary in some cases.
This change is fully backwards-compatible behavior-wise with the
existing implementation.
Change-Id: I36450320aacff5b322195820552f2831d4fecd52
GitHub-Last-Rev: e2058f132e
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#49811
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/367201
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Refuse to create certificates with negative serial numbers, as they
are explicitly disallowed by RFC 5280.
We still allow parsing certificates with negative serial numbers,
because in the past there were buggy CA implementations which would
produce them (although there are currently *no* trusted certificates
that have this issue). We may want to revisit this decision if we can
find metrics about the prevalence of this issue in enterprise settings.
Change-Id: I131262008db99b6354f542f335abc68775a2d6d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400494
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#52239
Change-Id: I08b75e613e3c976855e39d01a6757d94e4207bf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399155
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
This adds a straight-forward implementation of the functionality.
A more performant version could be added that unrolls the loop
as is done in google.golang.org/protobuf/encoding/protowire,
but usages that demand high performance can use that package instead.
Fixes#51644
Change-Id: I9d3b615a60cdff47e5200e7e5d2276adf4c93783
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400176
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
In issue #17671, there are a endless loop if printing
the panic value panics, CL 30358 has fixed that.
As issue #52257 pointed out, above change should not
discard the value from panic while panicking.
With this CL, when we recover from a panic in error.Error()
or stringer.String(), and the recovered value is string,
then we can print it normally.
Fixes#52257
Change-Id: Icfcc4a1a390635de405eea04904b4607ae9e3055
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399874
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
The noopt builder is broken, because with -N we get two OpSB opcodes
(one for the function as a whole, one introduced by the jumptable
rewrite rule), and they fight each other for a register.
Without -N, the two OpSB get CSEd, so optimized builds are ok.
Maybe we fix regalloc to deal with this case, but it's simpler
(and maybe more correct?) to disable jump tables with -N.
Change-Id: I75c87f12de6262955d1df787f47c53de976f8a5f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400455
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Don't create certificates that have serial numbers that are longer
than 20 octets (when encoded), since these are explicitly disallowed
by RFC 5280.
Change-Id: I292b7001f45bed0971b2d519b6de26f0b90860ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400377
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reorganize the way we rewrite expression switches on strings, so that
jump tables are naturally used for the outer switch on the string length.
The changes to the prove pass in this CL are required so as to not repeat
the test for string length in each case.
name old time/op new time/op delta
SwitchStringPredictable 2.28ns ± 9% 2.08ns ± 5% -9.04% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
SwitchStringUnpredictable 10.5ns ± 1% 9.5ns ± 1% -9.08% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Update #5496
Update #34381
Change-Id: Ie6846b1dd27f3e472f7c30dfcc598c68d440b997
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/395714
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
So that the inliner knows all the other cases are dead and doesn't
accumulate any cost for them.
The canonical case for this is switching on runtime.GOOS, which occurs
several places in the stdlib.
Fixes#50253
Change-Id: I44823aaebb6c1b03c9b0c12d10086db81954350f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399694
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Performance is kind of hard to exactly quantify.
One big difference between jump tables and the old binary search
scheme is that there's only 1 branch statement instead of O(n) of
them. That can be both a blessing and a curse, and can make evaluating
jump tables very hard to do.
The single branch can become a choke point for the hardware branch
predictor. A branch table jump must fit all of its state in a single
branch predictor entry (technically, a branch target predictor entry).
With binary search that predictor state can be spread among lots of
entries. In cases where the case selection is repetitive and thus
predictable, binary search can perform better.
The big win for a jump table is that it doesn't consume so much of the
branch predictor's resources. But that benefit is essentially never
observed in microbenchmarks, because the branch predictor can easily
keep state for all the binary search branches in a microbenchmark. So
that benefit is really hard to measure.
So predictable switch microbenchmarks are ~useless - they will almost
always favor the binary search scheme. Fully unpredictable switch
microbenchmarks are better, as they aren't lying to us quite so
much. In a perfectly unpredictable situation, a jump table will expect
to incur 1-1/N branch mispredicts, where a binary search would incur
lg(N)/2 of them. That makes the crossover point at about N=4. But of
course switches in real programs are seldom fully unpredictable, so
we'll use a higher crossover point.
Beyond the branch predictor, jump tables tend to execute more
instructions per switch but have no additional instructions per case,
which also argues for a larger crossover.
As far as code size goes, with this CL cmd/go has a slightly smaller
code segment and a slightly larger overall size (from the jump tables
themselves which live in the data segment).
This is a case where some FDO (feedback-directed optimization) would
be really nice to have. #28262
Some large-program benchmarks might help make the case for this
CL. Especially if we can turn on branch mispredict counters so we can
see how much using jump tables can free up branch prediction resources
that can be gainfully used elsewhere in the program.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Switch8Predictable 1.89ns ± 2% 1.27ns ± 3% -32.58% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Switch8Unpredictable 9.33ns ± 1% 7.50ns ± 1% -19.60% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Switch32Predictable 2.20ns ± 2% 1.64ns ± 1% -25.39% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
Switch32Unpredictable 10.0ns ± 2% 7.6ns ± 2% -24.04% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Fixes#5496
Update #34381
Change-Id: I3ff56011d02be53f605ca5fd3fb96b905517c34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/357330
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Check for insane statement list attribute values when
constructing LineReader's for a compilation unit.
Fixes#52354.
Change-Id: Icb5298db31f6c5fe34c44e0ed4fe277a7cd676b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400255
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Name the arguments in a way that is more self-describing.
Many code editor tools show a snippet of the function and
its arguments. However, "x" and "y" are not helpful in determining
which is the sign and which is the magnitude,
short of reading the documentation itself.
Name the sign argument as "sign" to be explicit.
This follows the same naming convention as IsInf.
Change-Id: Ie3055009e475f96c92d5ea7bfe9828eed908c78b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400177
Run-TryBot: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
We should prefer a constant shift op to a X shift op.
That way we don't have to materialize the constant to shift by.
Should fix GOAMD64=v3 builder
Change-Id: I56b45d2940c959382b970e3f962ed4a09cc2a239
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400254
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Wayne Zuo <wdvxdr@golangcn.org>
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
This offR accumulation isn't used and some really similar code is done
later in the Load results block.
Change-Id: I2f77a7bfd568e7e5eb9fc519e7c552401b3af9b8
GitHub-Last-Rev: 2c91e5c898
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#52316
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400094
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Otherwise we panic if either pool is nil.
Change-Id: I8598e3c0f3a5294135f1c330e319128d552ebb67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399161
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
In CreateCertificate, if there are no extensions, don't include the
extensions SEQUENCE in the encoded certificate.
Why, you might ask, does the encoding/asn1 tag 'optional' not do
the same thing as 'omitempty'? Good question, no clue, fixing that
would probably break things in horrific ways.
Fixes#52319
Change-Id: I84fdd5ff3e4e0b0a59e3bf86e7439753b1e1477b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399827
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
This allows memmove and memclr to be invoked using the new
register ABI on riscv64.
Change-Id: I3308d52e06547836cffcc533740fe535624e78d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/361975
Run-TryBot: mzh <mzh@golangcn.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The ABI mangling code skips symbols that are not loaded from Go
objects. Usually that is fine, as other symbols don't need name
mangling. But trampolines are linker generated and have the same
symbol version (ABI) as the underlying symbol. We need to avoid
symbol name collisions for trampolines, such as a trampoline to
f<ABI0> and a trampoline to f<ABIInternal>. We could explicitly
incorportate the ABI into the trampoline name. But as we already
have the name mangling scheme we could just use that.
The original code excludes external symbols probably because
symbols from C object don't need mangling. But a C symbol and a
Go symbol shouldn't have same name, and so the condition won't
apply.
Also exclude static symbols as they don't need mangling.
Change-Id: I298eb1d64bc0c3da0154f0146b95c4d26ca2f47a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399894
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
They are already in a good order. The sort here does nothing, as
all the SymValues are 0. Sorting just arbitrarily permutes items
because everything is equal and the sort isn't stable.
Not sure why the ordering of these symbols matter. That ordering was
added in CL 243223.
Change-Id: Iee153394afdb39387701cfe0375bc022cf4bd489
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399540
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
check_testdata/check_testdata.go used the encoding of the corpus entry
file, rather than the input string itself, when checking the expected
size of the minimized value. Instead, use the actual byte length, which
should bypass flakiness.
While we are here, use somewhat simpler fuzz targets, that use byte
slices rather than strings, and only execute the targets when fuzzing (
skipping the 'run' phase.)
Fixes#52285
Change-Id: I48c3780934891eec4a9e38d93abb4666091cb580
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399814
Run-TryBot: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
The Faccessat call checks the user, group, or other permission bits of a
file to see if the calling process can access it. The test to see if the
group permissions should be used was made with the wrong group id, using
the process's group id rather than the file's group id. Fix this to use
the correct group id.
No test since we cannot easily change file permissions when not running
as root and the test is meaningless if running as root.
For #52313
Change-Id: I4e2c84754b0af7830b40fd15dedcbc58374d75ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399539
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
When we added VCS stamping in the Go 1.18 release, we defaulted to
-buildvcs=true, on the theory that most folks will actually want VCS
information stamped.
We also made -buildvcs=true error out if a VCS directory is found and
no VCS tool is available, on the theory that a user who builds with
'-buildvcs=true' will be very surprised if the VCS metadata is
silently missing.
However, that causes a problem for CI environments that don't have the
appropriate VCS tool installed. (And we know that's a common situation
because we're in that situation ourselves — see #46693!)
The new '-buildvcs=auto' setting provides a middle ground: it stamps
VCS information by default when the tool is present (and reports
explicit errors if the tool errors out), but omits the metadata
when the tool isn't present at all.
Fixes#51748.
Updates #51999.
Change-Id: Iebc955c2af0abca9b7517f62ca48b1d944eb2df4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/398855
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
runtime.getitab need filled fun[0] to identify whether
implemented the interface.
Fixes#51700Fixes#52228
Change-Id: I0173b98f4e1b45e3a0183a5b60229d289140d1e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399058
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The existing implementation of `load.resolveEmbed`
uses an expression like `path[len(pkgdir)+1:]`.
Though the `+1` is intended to remove a prefix slash,
the expression returns an incorrect path when `pkgdir`
is "/". (ex.: when removing "/" from "/foo", want "foo",
but got "oo")
It seems that `str.TrimFilePathPrefix` would solve
the problem, but the function contains the same bug.
So, this commit fixes `str.TrimFilePathPrefix` then
applies it to `load.resolveEmbed` to solve the issue.
The fix is quite simple. First, remove prefix. Then
check whether the remained first letter is equal to
`filepath.Separator`. If so, remove it then return.
Fixed#49570
Change-Id: I26ab727ee4dfcbf51ed9bd0a573957ced2154515
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/396694
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Previously, Decode called decodeError, a recursive function that was
prone to stack overflows when given a large PEM file containing errors.
Credit to Juho Nurminen of Mattermost who reported the error.
Fixes CVE-2022-24675
Fixes#51853
Change-Id: Iffe768be53c8ddc0036fea0671d290f8f797692c
Reviewed-on: https://team-review.git.corp.google.com/c/golang/go-private/+/1391157
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <valsorda@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 794ea5e828010e8b68493b2fc6d2963263195a02)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399820
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
gofmt is rewriting +build comments into //go:build anyway, so update
the test script to support both.
Change-Id: Ia6d950cfaa2fca9f184b8b2d3625a551bff88dde
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399794
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Code generators may reasonably expect to find the GOROOT for which the
code is being generated.
If the generator invokes 'go run' (which ought to be reasonable to do)
and the user has set 'GOFLAGS=trimpath' (which also ought to be
reasonable), then either 'go generate' or 'go run' needs to set GOROOT
explicitly.
I would argue that it is more appropriate for 'go generate' to set
GOROOT than for 'go run' to do so, since a user may reasonably invoke
'go run' to reproduce a user-reported bug in a standalone Go program,
but should not invoke 'go generate' except to regenerate code for a Go
package.
Updates #51461.
Change-Id: Iceba233b4eebd57c40cf5dcd4af9031d210dc9d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399157
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
For TestLogOpt test case, add loong64 support to test the host
architecture and os.
The Ctz64 is not intrinsified on loong64 for TestIntendedInlining.
Contributors to the loong64 port are:
Weining Lu <luweining@loongson.cn>
Lei Wang <wanglei@loongson.cn>
Lingqin Gong <gonglingqin@loongson.cn>
Xiaolin Zhao <zhaoxiaolin@loongson.cn>
Meidan Li <limeidan@loongson.cn>
Xiaojuan Zhai <zhaixiaojuan@loongson.cn>
Qiyuan Pu <puqiyuan@loongson.cn>
Guoqi Chen <chenguoqi@loongson.cn>
This port has been updated to Go 1.15.6:
https://github.com/loongson/go
Updates #46229
Change-Id: I4ca290bf725425a9a6ac2c6767a5bf4ff2339d0e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/367043
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
No test because I'm too lazy to figure out how to create such files.
Fixes#52259
Change-Id: I7a07f49993cf046888729e9206ed53dddcf9cb13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399435
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
After CL 398014 fixed a compiler deadlock on syntax errors,
this CL adds a test case and more details for that.
How it was fixed:
CL 57751 introduced a channel "sem" to limit the number of
simultaneously open files.
Unfortunately, when the number of syntax processing goroutines
exceeds this limit, will easily trigger deadlock.
In the original implementation, "sem" only limited the number
of open files, not the number of concurrent goroutines, which
will cause extra goroutines to block on "sem". When the p.err
of the following iteration happens to be held by the blocking
goroutine, it will fall into a circular wait, which is a deadlock.
CL 398014 fixed the above deadlock, also see issue #52127.
First, move "sem <- struct{}{}" to the outside of the syntax
processing goroutine, so that the number of concurrent goroutines
does not exceed the number of open files, to ensure that all
goroutines in execution can eventually write to p.err.
Second, move the entire syntax processing logic into a separate
goroutine to avoid blocking on the producer side.
Change-Id: I1bb89bfee3d2703784f0c0d4ded82baab2ae867a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399054
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Fixes#52278
Change-Id: Ibf67c7b019feec277d316e04d93b458efea133fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/399574
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
CL 372774 is for reflect, this CL is for _type in runtime.
Add a test case to ensure the name method of _type can be exercised.
Updates #50208
Change-Id: I26ccf8c5c574dd9e78510cf29eb40ae7c8d449ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/393917
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
