Print the bytes of the instruction that generated a SIGILL.
This should help us respond to bug reports without having to
go back-and-forth with the reporter to get the instruction involved.
Might also help with SIGILL problems that are difficult to reproduce.
Update #37513
Change-Id: I33059b1dbfc97bce16142a843f32a88a6547e280
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221431
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Open-coded defers were fixed and re-enabled on riscv64, however this test was
inadvertantly left disabled.
Updates #36786
Change-Id: I128fc84baa3d51f50d173e19e52051dc4d9a07c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220920
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The existing implementation outputs inline cost iff function cannot be inlined with Debug['m'] > 1, the cost info is also useful if the function is inlineable.
Fixes#36780
Change-Id: Ic96f6baf96aee25fb4b33d31d4d644dc2310e536
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216778
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The generic Greater and Geq ops can always be replaced with the Less and
Leq ops. This CL therefore removes them. This simplifies the compiler since
it reduces the number of operations that need handling in both code and in
rewrite rules. This will be especially true when adding control flow
optimizations such as the integer-in-range optimizations in CL 165998.
Change-Id: If0648b2b19998ac1bddccbf251283f3be4ec3040
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220417
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Ensure that any comparison between two values has the same argument
order. This helps ensure that they can be eliminated during the
lowered CSE pass which will be particularly important if we eliminate
the Greater and Geq ops (see #37316).
Example:
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R1, R0 // different order, cannot eliminate
BEQ L2
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R0, R1 // same order, can eliminate
BEQ L2
This does have some drawbacks. Notably comparisons might 'flip'
direction in the assembly output after even small changes to the
code or compiler. It should help make optimizations more reliable
however.
compilecmp master -> HEAD
master (218f4572f5): text/template: make reflect.Value indirections more robust
HEAD (f1661fef3e): cmd/compile: canonicalize comparison argument order
platform: linux/amd64
file before after Δ %
api 6063927 6068023 +4096 +0.068%
asm 5191757 5183565 -8192 -0.158%
cgo 4893518 4901710 +8192 +0.167%
cover 5330345 5326249 -4096 -0.077%
fix 3417778 3421874 +4096 +0.120%
pprof 14889456 14885360 -4096 -0.028%
test2json 2848138 2844042 -4096 -0.144%
trace 11746239 11733951 -12288 -0.105%
total 132739173 132722789 -16384 -0.012%
Change-Id: I11736b3fe2a4553f6fc65018f475e88217fa22f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220425
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This reverts CL 213477.
Reason for revert: tests are failing on linux-mips*-rtrk builders.
Change-Id: I8168f7450890233f1bd7e53930b73693c26d4dc0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220897
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We store 32-bit floating point constants in a 64-bit field, by
converting that 32-bit float to 64-bit float to store it, and convert
it back to use it.
That works for *almost* all floating-point constants. The exception is
signaling NaNs. The round trip described above means we can't represent
a 32-bit signaling NaN, because conversions strip the signaling bit.
To fix this issue, just forbid NaNs as floating-point constants in SSA
form. This shouldn't affect any real-world code, as people seldom
constant-propagate NaNs (except in test code).
Additionally, NaNs are somewhat underspecified (which of the many NaNs
do you get when dividing 0/0?), so when cross-compiling there's a
danger of using the compiler machine's NaN regime for some math, and
the target machine's NaN regime for other math. Better to use the
target machine's NaN regime always.
This has been a bug since 1.10, and there's an easy workaround
(declare a global varaible containing the signaling NaN pattern, and
use that as the argument to math.Float32frombits) so we'll fix it in
1.15.
Fixes#36400
Update #36399
Change-Id: Icf155e743281560eda2eed953d19a829552ccfda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213477
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The address calculations in the example end up doing x << 4 + y + 0.
Before this CL we use a SHLQ+LEAQ. Since the constant offset is 0,
we can use SHLQ+ADDQ instead.
Change-Id: Ia048c4fdbb3a42121c7e1ab707961062e8247fca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209959
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The wrapper takes a pointer to the argument, not the argument itself.
Fixes#36705
Change-Id: I566d4457d00bf5b84e4a8315a26516975f0d7e10
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/215942
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
We should panic in this situation. Rewriting to a SSA op just leads
to a compiler panic.
Fixes#36259
Change-Id: I6e0bccbed7dd0fdac7ebae76b98a211947947386
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/212405
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
• Inline check function because it's more readable.
• Delete toolPath because it was unused.
• Use strings.TrimPrefix because it's simpler.
• Remove out variable because its value was unused.
• Rename serr to err because it's more consistent.
Change-Id: I084fb4f8b399578834d5eea29a673c386cf3a357
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/218701
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Hajime Hoshi <hajimehoshi@gmail.com>
The error message is now positioned at the statement position (which is
an identifing token, such as the '=' for assignments); and in case of
assignments it emphasizes the assignment by putting the Lhs and Rhs
in parentheses. Finally, the wording is changed from "use of * as value"
to the stronger "cannot use * as value" (for which there is precedent
elsewhere in the parser).
Fixes#36858.
Change-Id: Ic3f101bba50f58e3a1d9b29645066634631f2d61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/218337
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Brad's battery died on a plane and the file stayed open for 8 years
without anyone noticing. 😄
Someone noticed in https://github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs/pull/950.
Updates #2833
Change-Id: I46b28ac014a8c355be94e026615f119f96e5d51a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/218700
Run-TryBot: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
The R_CALLRISCV relocation marker is on the JALR instruction, however the actual
relocation is currently two instructions previous for the AUIPC+ADDI sequence.
Adjust the platform dependent offset accordingly and re-enable open-coded defers.
Fixes#36786.
Change-Id: I71597c193c447930fbe94ce44b7355e89ae877bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216797
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This test expects that open-coded defers are enabled, which is not currently
the case on riscv64.
Updates issue #27532 and #36786.
Change-Id: I94bb558c5b0734b4cfe5ae12873be81026009bcf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216777
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Open-coded defers are currently broken on riscv64 - disable them for the
time being. All of the standard package tests now pass on linux/riscv64.
Updates issue #27532 and #36786
Change-Id: I20fc25ce91dfad48be32409ba5c64ca9a6acef1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216517
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On PPC64, MOVWload, MOVDload, and MOVDstore are assembled to a
"DS from" instruction which requiers the offset is a multiple of
4. Only fold offset to such instructions if it is a multiple of 4.
Fixes#36723.
"GOARCH=ppc64 GOOS=linux go build -gcflags=all=-d=ssa/check/on std cmd"
passes now.
Change-Id: I67f2a6ac02f0d33d470f68ff54936c289a4c765b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216379
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This disables some tests that are unsupported on riscv64 and adds support
for risc64 to test/nosplit.
Updates #27532, #36739 and #36765
Change-Id: I0a57797a05bc80236709fc240c0a0efb0ee0d16b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/216263
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
CL 214679 added a -race test which shouldn't be run when cgo is not
enabled.
Fixes the nocgo builder.
Change-Id: Iceddf802c4ef6c0de2c3a968e86342303d2d27d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/215477
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This avoids the security problem in #29312 where two very deep, but
distinct, types are given the same name. They both make it to the
linker which chooses one, and the use of the other is now type unsafe.
Instead, give every very deep type its own name. This errs on the
other side, in that very deep types that should be convertible to each
other might now not be. But at least that's not a security hole.
Update #29312.
Change-Id: Iac0ebe73fdc50594fd6fbf7432eef65f9a053126
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213517
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The gccgo compiler did not generate type descriptor for a pointer
to a type alias defined in another package, causing linking error.
The fix is CL 210787. This CL adds a test.
Updates #36085.
Change-Id: I3237c7fedb4d92fb2dc610ee2b88087f96dc2a1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/210858
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This test was recently added in CL 209961.
Apparently Windows can't seek a directory filehandle?
And move the test from test/fixedbugs (which is mostly for compiler bugs) to
an os package test.
Updates #36019
Change-Id: I626b69b0294471014901d0ccfeefe5e2c7651788
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/210283
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The first Readdirnames calls opendir and caches the result.
The behavior of that cached opendir result isn't specified on a seek
of the underlying fd. Free the opendir result on a seek so that
we'll allocate a new one the next time around.
Also fix wasm behavior in this regard, so that a seek to the
file start resets the Readdirnames position, regardless of platform.
p.s. I hate the Readdirnames API.
Fixes#35767.
Change-Id: Ieffb61b3c5cdd42591f69ab13f932003966f2297
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209961
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The fix for #35652 did not guarantee that it was using a non-empty
src position to replace an empty one. The new code checks again
and falls back to a more certain position. (The input in question
compiles to a single empty infinite loop, and none of the actual instructions
had any source position at all. That is a bug, but given the pathology
of this input, not one worth dealing with this late in the release cycle,
if ever.)
Literally:
00000 (5) TEXT "".f(SB), ABIInternal
00001 (5) PCDATA $0, $-2
00002 (5) PCDATA $1, $-2
00003 (5) FUNCDATA $0, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
00004 (5) FUNCDATA $1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
00005 (5) FUNCDATA $2, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
b2
00006 (?) XCHGL AX, AX
b6
00007 (+1048575) JMP 6
00008 (?) END
TODO: Add runtime.InfiniteLoop(), replace infinite loops with a call to
that, and use an eco-friendly runtime.gopark instead. (This was Cherry's
excellent idea.)
Updates #35652Fixes#35695
Change-Id: I4b9a841142ee4df0f6b10863cfa0721a7e13b437
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207964
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The old recipe for making an infinite loop not be infinite
in the debugger could create an instruction (Prog) with a
line number not tied to any file (index == 0). This caused
downstream failures in DWARF processing.
So don't do that. Also adds a test, also adds a check+panic
to ensure that the next time this happens the error is less
mystifying.
Fixes#35652
Change-Id: I04f30bc94fdc4aef20dd9130561303ff84fd945e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207613
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This reverts CL 207477, restoring CL 207352 with a fix for the
regression observed in the Windows builders.
cmd/compile evidently does not fully support NUL as an output on
Windows, so this time we write ignored 'compile' outputs
to temporary files (instead of os.DevNull as in CL 207352).
Updates #28387Fixes#35619
Change-Id: I2edc5727c3738fa1bccb4b74e50d114cf2a7fcff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207602
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This allows maphash.Hash to be allocated on the stack for typical uses.
Fixes#35636
Change-Id: I8366507d26ea717f47a9fb46d3bd69ba799845ac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/207444
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This CL detects infinite loops due to negative dereference cycles
during escape analysis, and terminates the loop gracefully. We still
fail to print a complete explanation of the escape path, but esc.go
didn't print *any* explanation for these test cases, so the release
blocking issue here is simply that we don't infinite loop.
Updates #35518.
Change-Id: I39beed036e5a685706248852f1fa619af3b7abbc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/206619
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Unlike function calls, when processing instructions that directly
fault we must not subtract 1 from the pc before looking up the
file/line information.
Since the file/line lookup unconditionally subtracts 1, add 1 to
the faulting instruction PCs to compensate.
Fixes#34123
Change-Id: Ie7361e3d2f84a0d4f48d97e5a9e74f6291ba7a8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196962
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
This API was added for #25819, where it was discussed as math.FMA.
The commit adding it used math.Fma, presumably for consistency
with the rest of the unusual names in package math
(Sincos, Acosh, Erfcinv, Float32bits, etc).
I believe that using an idiomatic Go name is more important here
than consistency with these other names, most of which are historical
baggage from C's standard library.
Early additions like Float32frombits happened before "uppercase for export"
(so they were originally like "float32frombits") and they were not properly
reconsidered when we uppercased the symbols to export them.
That's a mistake we live with.
The names of functions we have added since then, and even a few
that were legacy, are more properly Go-cased, such as IsNaN, IsInf,
and RoundToEven, rather than Isnan, Isinf, and Roundtoeven.
And also constants like MaxFloat32.
For new API, we should keep using proper Go-cased symbols
instead of minimally-upper-cased-C symbols.
So math.FMA, not math.Fma.
This API has not yet been released, so this change does not break
the compatibility promise.
This CL also modifies cmd/compile, since the compiler knows
the name of the function. I could have stopped at changing the
string constants, but it seemed to make more sense to use a
consistent casing everywhere.
Change-Id: I0f6f3407f41e99bfa8239467345c33945088896e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205317
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We seem to lack any tests for some corner cases of itab.init
(multiple methods with the same name, breaking itab.init doesn't
seem to fail any tests). We also lack tests that fix text of panics.
Add more tests for itab.init.
Change-Id: Id6b536179ba6b0d45c3cb9dc1c66b9311d0ab85e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202451
Run-TryBot: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
In the dev.link branch we implemented the new object file format
and (part of) the linker improvements described in
https://golang.org/s/better-linker
The new object file is index-based and provides random access.
The linker maps the object files into read-only memory, and
access symbols on-demand using indices, as opposed to reading
all object files sequentially into the heap with the old format.
The linker carries symbol informations using indices (as opposed
to Symbol data structure). Symbols are created after the
reachability analysis, and only created for reachable symbols.
This reduces the linker's memory usage.
Linking cmd/compile, it creates ~25% fewer Symbols, and reduces
memory usage (inuse_space) by ~15%. (More results from Than.)
Currently, both the old and new object file formats are supported.
The old format is used by default. The new format can be turned
on by using the compiler/assembler/linker's -newobj flag. Note
that the flag needs to be specified consistently to all
compilations, i.e.
go build -gcflags=all=-newobj -asmflags=all=-newobj -ldflags=-newobj
Change-Id: Ia0e35306b5b9b5b19fdc7fa7c602d4ce36fa6abd
The logic for keeping arguments alive for calls to //go:uintptrescapes
functions was only applying to direct function calls. This CL changes
it to also apply to direct method calls, which should address most
uses of Proc.Call and LazyProc.Call.
It's still an open question (#34684) whether other call forms (e.g.,
method expressions, or indirect calls via function values, method
values, or interfaces).
Fixes#34474.
Change-Id: I874f97145972b0e237a4c9e8926156298f4d6ce0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198043
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
CL 200958 adds skipping empty init function feature without any tests
for it. A codegen test sounds ideal, but it's unlikely that we can make
one for now, so use a program to manipulate runtime/proc.go:initTask
directly.
Updates #34869
Change-Id: I2683b9a1ace36af6861af02a3a9fb18b3110b282
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204217
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When we do a successful recover of a panic, we resume normal execution by
returning from the frame that had the deferred call that did the recover (after
executing any remaining deferred calls in that frame).
However, suppose we have called runtime.Goexit and there is a panic during one of the
deferred calls run by the Goexit. Further assume that there is a deferred call in
the frame of the Goexit or a parent frame that does a recover. Then the recovery
process will actually resume normal execution above the Goexit frame and hence
abort the Goexit. We will not terminate the thread as expected, but continue
running in the frame above the Goexit.
To fix this, we explicitly create a _panic object for a Goexit call. We then
change the "abort" behavior for Goexits, but not panics. After a recovery, if the
top-level panic is actually a Goexit that is marked to be aborted, then we return
to the Goexit defer-processing loop, so that the Goexit is not actually aborted.
Actual code changes are just panic.go, runtime2.go, and funcid.go. Adjusted the
test related to the new Goexit behavior (TestRecoverBeforePanicAfterGoexit) and
added several new tests of aborted panics (whose behavior has not changed).
Fixes#29226
Change-Id: Ib13cb0074f5acc2567a28db7ca6912cfc47eecb5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200081
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
"declared and not used" is technically correct, but might confuse
the user. Switching "and" to "but" will hopefully create the
contrast for the users: they did one thing (declaration), but
not the other --- actually using the variable.
This new message is still not ideal (specifically, declared is not
entirely precise here), but at least it matches the other parsers
and is one step in the right direction.
Change-Id: I725c7c663535f9ab9725c4b0bf35b4fa74b0eb20
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203282
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Updates #35157 (the bug there was fixed by CL200861)
Change-Id: I67069207b4cdc2ad4a475dd0bbc8555ecc5f534f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203598
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Generate inline code at defer time to save the args of defer calls to unique
(autotmp) stack slots, and generate inline code at exit time to check which defer
calls were made and make the associated function/method/interface calls. We
remember that a particular defer statement was reached by storing in the deferBits
variable (always stored on the stack). At exit time, we check the bits of the
deferBits variable to determine which defer function calls to make (in reverse
order). These low-cost defers are only used for functions where no defers
appear in loops. In addition, we don't do these low-cost defers if there are too
many defer statements or too many exits in a function (to limit code increase).
When a function uses open-coded defers, we produce extra
FUNCDATA_OpenCodedDeferInfo information that specifies the number of defers, and
for each defer, the stack slots where the closure and associated args have been
stored. The funcdata also includes the location of the deferBits variable.
Therefore, for panics, we can use this funcdata to determine exactly which defers
are active, and call the appropriate functions/methods/closures with the correct
arguments for each active defer.
In order to unwind the stack correctly after a recover(), we need to add an extra
code segment to functions with open-coded defers that simply calls deferreturn()
and returns. This segment is not reachable by the normal function, but is returned
to by the runtime during recovery. We set the liveness information of this
deferreturn() to be the same as the liveness at the first function call during the
last defer exit code (so all return values and all stack slots needed by the defer
calls will be live).
I needed to increase the stackguard constant from 880 to 896, because of a small
amount of new code in deferreturn().
The -N flag disables open-coded defers. '-d defer' prints out the kind of defer
being used at each defer statement (heap-allocated, stack-allocated, or
open-coded).
Cost of defer statement [ go test -run NONE -bench BenchmarkDefer$ runtime ]
With normal (stack-allocated) defers only: 35.4 ns/op
With open-coded defers: 5.6 ns/op
Cost of function call alone (remove defer keyword): 4.4 ns/op
Text size increase (including funcdata) for go binary without/with open-coded defers: 0.09%
The average size increase (including funcdata) for only the functions that use
open-coded defers is 1.1%.
The cost of a panic followed by a recover got noticeably slower, since panic
processing now requires a scan of the stack for open-coded defer frames. This scan
is required, even if no frames are using open-coded defers:
Cost of panic and recover [ go test -run NONE -bench BenchmarkPanicRecover runtime ]
Without open-coded defers: 62.0 ns/op
With open-coded defers: 255 ns/op
A CGO Go-to-C-to-Go benchmark got noticeably faster because of open-coded defers:
CGO Go-to-C-to-Go benchmark [cd misc/cgo/test; go test -run NONE -bench BenchmarkCGoCallback ]
Without open-coded defers: 443 ns/op
With open-coded defers: 347 ns/op
Updates #14939 (defer performance)
Updates #34481 (design doc)
Change-Id: I63b1a60d1ebf28126f55ee9fd7ecffe9cb23d1ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202340
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This change introduces an arm intrinsic that generates the FMULAD
instruction for the fused-multiply-add operation on systems that
support it. System support is detected via cpu.ARM.HasVFPv4. A rewrite
rule translates the generic intrinsic to FMULAD.
Updates #25819.
Change-Id: I8459e5dd1cdbdca35f88a78dbeb7d387f1e20efa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/142117
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
To permit ssa-level optimization, this change introduces an amd64 intrinsic
that generates the VFMADD231SD instruction for the fused-multiply-add
operation on systems that support it. System support is detected via
cpu.X86.HasFMA. A rewrite rule can then translate the generic ssa intrinsic
("Fma") to VFMADD231SD.
The benchmark compares the software implementation (old) with the intrinsic
(new).
name old time/op new time/op delta
Fma-4 27.2ns ± 1% 1.0ns ± 9% -96.48% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Updates #25819.
Change-Id: I966655e5f96817a5d06dff5942418a3915b09584
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/137156
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In order to make math.FMA a compiler intrinsic for ISAs like ARM64,
PPC64[le], and S390X, a generic 3-argument opcode "Fma" is provided and
rewritten as
ARM64: (Fma x y z) -> (FMADDD z x y)
PPC64: (Fma x y z) -> (FMADD x y z)
S390X: (Fma x y z) -> (FMADD z x y)
Updates #25819.
Change-Id: Ie5bc628311e6feeb28ddf9adaa6e702c8c291efa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/131959
Run-TryBot: Akhil Indurti <aindurti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We need to explicitly convert pointers to unsafe.Pointer before
passing to the runtime checkptr instrumentation in case the user
declared their own type with underlying type unsafe.Pointer.
Updates #22218.
Fixes#34966.
Change-Id: I3baa2809d77f8257167cd78f57156f819130baa8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201782
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Generate inline code at defer time to save the args of defer calls to unique
(autotmp) stack slots, and generate inline code at exit time to check which defer
calls were made and make the associated function/method/interface calls. We
remember that a particular defer statement was reached by storing in the deferBits
variable (always stored on the stack). At exit time, we check the bits of the
deferBits variable to determine which defer function calls to make (in reverse
order). These low-cost defers are only used for functions where no defers
appear in loops. In addition, we don't do these low-cost defers if there are too
many defer statements or too many exits in a function (to limit code increase).
When a function uses open-coded defers, we produce extra
FUNCDATA_OpenCodedDeferInfo information that specifies the number of defers, and
for each defer, the stack slots where the closure and associated args have been
stored. The funcdata also includes the location of the deferBits variable.
Therefore, for panics, we can use this funcdata to determine exactly which defers
are active, and call the appropriate functions/methods/closures with the correct
arguments for each active defer.
In order to unwind the stack correctly after a recover(), we need to add an extra
code segment to functions with open-coded defers that simply calls deferreturn()
and returns. This segment is not reachable by the normal function, but is returned
to by the runtime during recovery. We set the liveness information of this
deferreturn() to be the same as the liveness at the first function call during the
last defer exit code (so all return values and all stack slots needed by the defer
calls will be live).
I needed to increase the stackguard constant from 880 to 896, because of a small
amount of new code in deferreturn().
The -N flag disables open-coded defers. '-d defer' prints out the kind of defer
being used at each defer statement (heap-allocated, stack-allocated, or
open-coded).
Cost of defer statement [ go test -run NONE -bench BenchmarkDefer$ runtime ]
With normal (stack-allocated) defers only: 35.4 ns/op
With open-coded defers: 5.6 ns/op
Cost of function call alone (remove defer keyword): 4.4 ns/op
Text size increase (including funcdata) for go cmd without/with open-coded defers: 0.09%
The average size increase (including funcdata) for only the functions that use
open-coded defers is 1.1%.
The cost of a panic followed by a recover got noticeably slower, since panic
processing now requires a scan of the stack for open-coded defer frames. This scan
is required, even if no frames are using open-coded defers:
Cost of panic and recover [ go test -run NONE -bench BenchmarkPanicRecover runtime ]
Without open-coded defers: 62.0 ns/op
With open-coded defers: 255 ns/op
A CGO Go-to-C-to-Go benchmark got noticeably faster because of open-coded defers:
CGO Go-to-C-to-Go benchmark [cd misc/cgo/test; go test -run NONE -bench BenchmarkCGoCallback ]
Without open-coded defers: 443 ns/op
With open-coded defers: 347 ns/op
Updates #14939 (defer performance)
Updates #34481 (design doc)
Change-Id: I51a389860b9676cfa1b84722f5fb84d3c4ee9e28
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190098
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Switch the default to new object files.
Internal linking cgo is disabled for now, as it does not work yet
in newobj mode.
Shared libraries are also broken.
Disable some tests that are known broken for now.
Change-Id: I8ca74793423861d607a2aa7b0d89a4f4d4ca7671
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200161
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
The Go spec requires
If a deferred function value evaluates to nil, execution
panics when the function is invoked, not when the "defer"
statement is executed.
On Wasm and AIX, currently we actually emit a nil check at the
point of defer statement, which will make it panic too early.
This CL fixes this.
Also, on Wasm, now the nil function will be passed through
deferreturn to jmpdefer, which does an explicit nil check and
calls sigpanic if it is nil. This sigpanic, being called from
assembly, is ABI0. So change the assembler backend to also
handle sigpanic in ABI0.
Fixes#34926.
Updates #8047.
Change-Id: I28489a571cee36d2aef041f917b8cfdc31d557d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201297
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When a subsequent load/store of a ptr makes the nil check of that pointer
unnecessary, if their lines differ, change the line of the load/store
to that of the nilcheck, and attempt to rehome the load/store position
instead.
This fix makes profiling less accurate in order to make panics more
informative.
Fixes#33724
Change-Id: Ib9afaac12fe0d0320aea1bf493617facc34034b3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200197
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Add to the testcase originally created for issue 34577 so
as to also trigger the error condition for issue 34852 (the
two bugs are closely related).
Updates #34577.
Updates #34852.
Change-Id: I2347369652ce500184347606b2bb3e76d802b204
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201017
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When assessing whether A <= B, the poset's OrderedOrEqual has a passing
condition which permits A <= B, but is not sufficient to infer that A <= B.
This CL removes that incorrect passing condition.
Having identified that A and B are in the poset, the method will report that
A <= B if any of these three conditions are true:
(1) A and B are the same node in the poset.
- This means we know that A == B.
(2) There is a directed path, strict or not, from A -> B
- This means we know that, at least, A <= B, but A < B is possible.
(3) There is a directed path from B -> A, AND that path has no strict edges.
- This means we know that B <= A, but do not know that B < A.
In condition (3), we do not have enough information to say that A <= B, rather
we only know that B == A (which satisfies A <= B) is possible. The way I
understand it, a strict edge shows a known, strictly-ordered relation (<) but
the lack of a strict edge does not show the lack of a strictly-ordered relation.
The difference is highlighted by the example in #34802, where a bounds check is
incorrectly removed by prove, such that negative indexes into a slice
succeed:
n := make([]int, 1)
for i := -1; i <= 0; i++ {
fmt.Printf("i is %d\n", i)
n[i] = 1 // No Bounds check, program runs, assignment to n[-1] succeeds!!
}
When prove is checking the negative/failed branch from the bounds check at n[i],
in the signed domain we learn (0 > i || i >= len(n)). Because prove can't learn
the OR condition, we check whether we know that i is non-negative so we can
learn something, namely that i >= len(n). Prove uses the poset to check whether
we know that i is non-negative. At this point the poset holds the following
relations as a directed graph:
-1 <= i <= 0
-1 < 0
In poset.OrderedOrEqual, we are testing for 0 <= i. In this case, condition (3)
above is true because there is a non-strict path from i -> 0, and that path
does NOT have any strict edges. Because this condition is true, the poset
reports to prove that i is known to be >= 0. Knowing, incorrectly, that i >= 0,
prove learns from the failed bounds check that i >= len(n) in the signed domain.
When the slice, n, was created, prove learned that len(n) == 1. Because i is
also the induction variable for the loop, upon entering the loop, prove previously
learned that i is in [-1,0]. So when prove attempts to learn from the failed
bounds check, it finds the new fact, i > len(n), unsatisfiable given that it
previously learned that i <= 0 and len(n) = 1.
Fixes#34802
Change-Id: I235f4224bef97700c3aa5c01edcc595eb9f13afc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200759
Run-TryBot: Zach Jones <zachj1@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Increases the exec timeout from 5sec to 1min, but
also print out the error value on any test failure.
Fixes#34836
Change-Id: Ida2b8bd460243491ef0f90dfe0f978dfe02a0703
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200519
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Test case with code that caused a gccgo error while emitting export
data for an inlinable function.
Updates #34577.
Change-Id: I28b598c4c893c77f4a76bb4f2d27e5b42f702992
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198057
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently, escape analysis is able to record at most one dereference
when a parameter leaks to the heap; that is, at call sites, it can't
distinguish between any of these three functions:
func x1(p ****int) { sink = *p }
func x2(p ****int) { sink = **p }
func x3(p ****int) { sink = ***p }
Similarly, it's limited to recording parameter leaks to only the first
4 parameters, and only up to 6 dereferences.
All of these limitations are due to the awkward encoding scheme used
at the moment.
This CL replaces the encoding scheme with a simple [8]uint8 array,
which can handle up to the first 7 parameters, and up to 254
dereferences, which ought to be enough for anyone. And if not, it's
much more easily increased.
Shrinks export data size geometric mean for Kubernetes by 0.07%.
Fixes#33981.
Change-Id: I10a94b9accac9a0c91490e0d6d458316f5ca1e13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197680
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
CL 170950 had a regression that makes the compiler produce
an invalid wasm binary if the data section is too large.
Loading such a binary gives the following error:
"LinkError: WebAssembly.instantiate(): data segment is out of bounds"
This change fixes the issue by ensuring that the minimum size of the
linear memory is larger than the end of the data section.
Fixes#34395.
Change-Id: I0c8629de7ffd0d85895ad31bf8c9d45fef197a57
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/199358
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We're allowed to remove a write barrier when both the old
value in memory and the new value we're writing are not heap pointers.
Improve both those checks a little bit.
A pointer is known to not be a heap pointer if it is read from
read-only memory. This sometimes happens for loads of pointers
from string constants in read-only memory.
Do a better job of tracking which parts of memory are known to be
zero. Before we just kept track of a range of offsets in the most
recently allocated object. For code that initializes the new object's
fields in a nonstandard order, that tracking is imprecise. Instead,
keep a bit map of the first 64 words of that object, so we can track
precisely what we know to be zeroed.
The new scheme is only precise up to the first 512 bytes of the object.
After that, we'll use write barriers unnecessarily. Hopefully most
initializers of large objects will use typedmemmove, which does only one
write barrier check for the whole initialization.
Fixes#34723
Update #21561
Change-Id: Idf6e1b7d525042fb67961302d4fc6f941393cac8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/199558
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
For commuting ops, check whether the second argument is dead before
checking if the first argument is rematerializeable. Reusing the register
holding a dead value is always best.
Fixes#33580
Change-Id: I7372cfc03d514e6774d2d9cc727a3e6bf6ce2657
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/199559
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
CL 188317 introduced a compiler crash during dwarf generation which
was reported as Issue #34520. After CL 188217, the issue appears to be
fixed. Add a testcase to avoid future regressions.
Fixes#34520
Change-Id: I73544a9e9baf8dbfb85c19eb6d202beea05affb6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198546
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Nilcheck would move statements from NilCheck values to others that
turned out were already dead, which leads to lost statements. Better
to eliminate the dead code first.
One "error" is removed from test/prove.go because the code is
actually dead, and the additional deadcode pass removes it before
prove can run.
Change-Id: If75926ca1acbb59c7ab9c8ef14d60a02a0a94f8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198479
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
During package initialization, the compiler tries to optimize:
var A = "foo"
var B = A
into
var A = "foo"
var B = "foo"
so that we can statically initialize both A and B and skip emitting
dynamic initialization code to assign "B = A".
However, this isn't safe in the presence of cmd/link's -X flag, which
might overwrite an initialized string-typed variable at link time. In
particular, if cmd/link changes A's static initialization, it won't
know it also needs to change B's static initialization.
To address this, this CL disables this optimization for string-typed
variables.
Fixes#34675.
Change-Id: I1c18f3b855f6d7114aeb39f96aaaf1b452b88236
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/198657
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
By lazily starting the signal watch loop only on Notify,
we are able to have deadlock detection even when
"os/signal" is imported.
Thanks to Ian Lance Taylor for the solution and discussion.
With this change in, fix a runtime gorountine count test that
assumed that os/signal.init would unconditionally start the
signal watching goroutine, but alas no more.
Fixes#21576.
Change-Id: I6eecf82a887f59f2ec8897f1bcd67ca311ca42ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/101036
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
ORUNESTR represents the special case of integer->string conversion. If
the integer is a constant, then the string is a constant too, so
evconst needs to perform constant folding here.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#34563.
Change-Id: Ieab3d76794d8ce570106b6b707a4bcd725d156e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197677
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
prove wasn't able to detect induction variables that was bound
by another inducation variable. This happened because an indvar
is a Phi, and thus in case of a dependency, the loop bounding
condition looked as Phi < Phi. This triggered an existing
codepath that checked whether the upper bound was a Phi to
detect loop conditions written in reversed order respect to the
idiomatic way (eg: for i:=0; len(n)>i; i++).
To fix this, we call the indvar pattern matching on both operands
of the loop condition, so that the first operand that matches
will be treated as the indvar.
Updates #24660 (removes a boundcheck from Fannkuch)
Change-Id: Iade83d8deb54f14277ed3f2e37b190e1ed173d11
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195220
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Previously, we would recognize &(T{...}) expressions during type
checking, rewrite them into (*T){...}, and then do a lot of extra work
to make sure the user doesn't write (*T){...} themselves and
resynthesizing the OPTRLIT later on.
This CL simply handles &T{...} directly in the straight forward
manner, by changing OADDR directly to OPTRLIT when appropriate.
While here, match go/types's invalid composite literal type error
message.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I902b14c7e2cd9fa93e6915dd58272d2352ba38f8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197120
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Now that OpSliceMake is called by runtime.makeslice callers,
prove can see and record the actual length and cap of each
slice being constructed.
This small patch is enough to remove 260 additional bound checks
from cmd+std.
Thanks to Martin Möhrmann for pointing me to CL141822 that
I had missed.
Updates #24660
Change-Id: I14556850f285392051f3f07d13b456b608b64eb9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196784
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Add a bunch of extra tests and benchmarks for defer, in preparation for new
low-cost (open-coded) implementation of defers (see #34481),
- New file defer_test.go that tests a bunch more unusual defer scenarios,
including things that might have problems for open-coded defers.
- Additions to callers_test.go actually verifying what the stack trace looks like
for various panic or panic-recover scenarios.
- Additions to crash_test.go testing several more crash scenarios involving
recursive panics.
- New benchmark in runtime_test.go measuring speed of panic-recover
- New CGo benchmark in cgo_test.go calling from Go to C back to Go that
shows defer overhead
Updates #34481
Change-Id: I423523f3e05fc0229d4277dd00073289a5526188
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197017
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Currently, when we create an OPTRLIT node, it defaults to the
OCOMPLIT's final element's position. But it improves error messages to
use the OCOMPLIT's own position instead.
Change-Id: Ibb031f543c7248d88d99fd0737685e01d86e2500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197119
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This commit just adds a regress test for a few of the important corner
cases that I identified in #27557, which turn out to not be tested
anywhere.
While here, annotate a few of the existing test cases where we could
improve escape analysis.
Updates #27557.
Change-Id: Ie57792a538f7899bb17915485fabc86100f469a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197137
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
On modern 64bit CPUs a SHR, SHL or AND instruction take 1 cycle to execute.
A pair of shifts that operate on the same register will take 2 cycles
and needs to wait for the input register value to be available.
Large constants used to mask the high bits of a register with an AND
instruction can not be encoded as an immediate in the AND instruction
on amd64 and therefore need to be loaded into a register with a MOV
instruction.
However that MOV instruction is not dependent on the output register and
on many CPUs does not compete with the AND or shift instructions for
execution ports.
Using a pair of shifts to mask high bits instead of an AND to mask high
bits of a register has a shorter encoding and uses one less general
purpose register but is slower due to taking one clock cycle longer
if there is no register pressure that would make the AND variant need to
generate a spill.
For example the instructions emitted for (x & 1 << 63) before this CL are:
48c1ea3f SHRQ $0x3f, DX
48c1e23f SHLQ $0x3f, DX
after this CL the instructions are the same as GCC and LLVM use:
48b80000000000000080 MOVQ $0x8000000000000000, AX
4821d0 ANDQ DX, AX
Some platforms such as arm64 already have SSA optimization rules to fuse
two shift instructions back into an AND.
Removing the general rule to rewrite AND to SHR+SHL speeds up this benchmark:
var GlobalU uint
func BenchmarkAndHighBits(b *testing.B) {
x := uint(0)
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
x &= 1 << 63
}
GlobalU = x
}
amd64/darwin on Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AndHighBits-4 0.61ns ± 6% 0.42ns ± 6% -31.42% (p=0.000 n=25+25):
'go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen' passes with following adjustments:
ARM64: The BFXIL pattern ((x << lc) >> rc | y & ac) needed adjustment
since ORshiftRL generation fusing '>> rc' and '|' interferes
with matching ((x << lc) >> rc) to generate UBFX. Previously
ORshiftLL was created first using the shifts generated for (y & ac).
S390X: Add rules for abs and copysign to match use of AND instead of SHIFTs.
Updates #33826
Updates #32781
Change-Id: I5a59f6239660d53c029cd22dfb44ddf39f93a56c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196810
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On modern 64bit CPUs a SHR, SHL or AND instruction take 1 cycle to execute.
A pair of shifts that operate on the same register will take 2 cycles
and needs to wait for the input register value to be available.
Large constants used to mask the high bits of a register with an AND
instruction can not be encoded as an immediate in the AND instruction
on amd64 and therefore need to be loaded into a register with a MOV
instruction.
However that MOV instruction is not dependent on the output register and
on many CPUs does not compete with the AND or shift instructions for
execution ports.
Using a pair of shifts to mask high bits instead of an AND to mask high
bits of a register has a shorter encoding and uses one less general
purpose register but is slower due to taking one clock cycle longer
if there is no register pressure that would make the AND variant need to
generate a spill.
For example the instructions emitted for (x & 1 << 63) before this CL are:
48c1ea3f SHRQ $0x3f, DX
48c1e23f SHLQ $0x3f, DX
after this CL the instructions are the same as GCC and LLVM use:
48b80000000000000080 MOVQ $0x8000000000000000, AX
4821d0 ANDQ DX, AX
Some platforms such as arm64 already have SSA optimization rules to fuse
two shift instructions back into an AND.
Removing the general rule to rewrite AND to SHR+SHL speeds up this benchmark:
var GlobalU uint
func BenchmarkAndHighBits(b *testing.B) {
x := uint(0)
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
x &= 1 << 63
}
GlobalU = x
}
amd64/darwin on Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AndHighBits-4 0.61ns ± 6% 0.42ns ± 6% -31.42% (p=0.000 n=25+25):
'go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen' passes with following adjustments:
ARM64: The BFXIL pattern ((x << lc) >> rc | y & ac) needed adjustment
since ORshiftRL generation fusing '>> rc' and '|' interferes
with matching ((x << lc) >> rc) to generate UBFX. Previously
ORshiftLL was created first using the shifts generated for (y & ac).
S390X: Add rules for abs and copysign to match use of AND instead of SHIFTs.
Updates #33826
Updates #32781
Change-Id: I43227da76b625de03fbc51117162b23b9c678cdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/194297
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
i32.eqz instructions don't appear unless needed in if conditions anymore
after CL 195204. I forgot to run the codegen tests while submitting the CL.
Thanks to @martisch for catching it.
Fixes#34442
Change-Id: I177b064b389be48e39d564849714d7a8839be13e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196580
Run-TryBot: Agniva De Sarker <agniva.quicksilver@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
When compiling expression switches, we try to optimize runs of
constants into binary searches. The ordering used isn't visible to the
application, so it's unimportant as long as we're consistent between
sorting and searching.
For strings, it's much cheaper to compare string lengths than strings
themselves, so instead of ordering strings by "si <= sj", we currently
order them by "len(si) < len(sj) || len(si) == len(sj) && si <= sj"
(i.e., the lexicographical ordering on the 2-tuple (len(s), s)).
However, it's also somewhat cheaper to compare strings for equality
(i.e., ==) than for ordering (i.e., <=). And if there were two or
three string constants of the same length in a switch statement, we
might unnecessarily emit ordering comparisons.
For example, given:
switch s {
case "", "1", "2", "3": // ordered by length then content
goto L
}
we currently compile this as:
if len(s) < 1 || len(s) == 1 && s <= "1" {
if s == "" { goto L }
else if s == "1" { goto L }
} else {
if s == "2" { goto L }
else if s == "3" { goto L }
}
This CL switches to using a 2-level binary search---first on len(s),
then on s itself---so that string ordering comparisons are only needed
when there are 4 or more strings of the same length. (4 being the
cut-off for when using binary search is actually worthwhile.)
So the above switch instead now compiles to:
if len(s) == 0 {
if s == "" { goto L }
} else if len(s) == 1 {
if s == "1" { goto L }
else if s == "2" { goto L }
else if s == "3" { goto L }
}
which is better optimized by walk and SSA. (Notably, because there are
only two distinct lengths and no more than three strings of any
particular length, this example ends up falling back to simply using
linear search.)
Test case by khr@ from CL 195138.
Fixes#33934.
Change-Id: I8eeebcaf7e26343223be5f443d6a97a0daf84f07
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195340
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
golang.org/cl/109517 optimized the compiler to avoid the allocation for make in
append(x, make([]T, y)...). This was only implemented for the case that y has type int.
This change extends the optimization to trigger for all integer types where the value
is known at compile time to fit into an int.
name old time/op new time/op delta
ExtendInt-12 106ns ± 4% 106ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.351 n=10+6)
ExtendUint64-12 1.03µs ± 5% 0.10µs ± 4% -90.01% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ExtendInt-12 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12 13.6kB ± 0% 0.0kB -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ExtendInt-12 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12 1.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Updates #29785
Change-Id: Ief7760097c285abd591712da98c5b02bc3961fcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182559
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL expands the test for #29612 to check that type switches also
work correctly when type hashes collide.
Change-Id: Ia153743e6ea0736c1a33191acfe4d8ba890be527
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195782
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Support for overlapping interfaces is a new (proposed) Go language
feature to be supported in Go 1.14, so it shouldn't be supported under
-lang=go1.13 or earlier.
Fixes#34329.
Change-Id: I5fea5716b7d135476980bc40b4f6e8c611b67735
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195678
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
