The fix is just a missing return.
Also clean up a staticcheck thing, regenerate the golden files.
Fixesgolang/go#38417
Change-Id: I290b63df9d97211c59d6399fda7a273bc700fbdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/228297
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
This change is the first step in handling golang/go#38136. Instead of
creating multiple diagnostic reports for type error analyzers, we add
suggested fixes to the existing reports. To match the analyzers for
FindAnalysisError, we add an ErrorMatch function to source.Analyzer.
This is not an ideal solution, but it was the best one I could come up
with without modifying the go/analysis API. analysisinternal could be
used for this purpose, but it seemed to complicated to be worth it, and
this is fairly simple. I think that go/analysis itself might need to be
extended for type error analyzers, but these temporary measures will
help us understand the kinds of features we need for type error
analyzers.
A follow-up CL might be to not add reports for type error analyzers
until the end of source.Diagnostic, which would remove the need for the
look-up.
Fixesgolang/go#38136
Change-Id: I25bc6396b09d49facecd918bf5591d2d5bdf1b3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Turns out that these were already disabled in the
golang.org/x/tools/internal/lsp tests, which is why we only ever save
the failures in golang.org/x/tools/internal/lsp/source tests. Discussing
the reasons that this is necessary on the issue, but I think completion
scoring in general needs to be centralized and documented, so hopefully
we can handle this case as part of that larger fix.
Fixesgolang/go#38269
Change-Id: Ie1b615315e417ab8211a3580cf8f27cbdc3b74e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227417
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
I originally made this change to see if it would help with the timeouts.
Based on the TryBot results, it doesn't -- but I still think it's more
correct to have the contexts this way. It was my mistake to put the
context on the completer in the first place, I think.
Change-Id: Ib77c8f0ac0b0d0922b82db4120820fb96cb664f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227303
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Instead of checking the context, check the error. This may expose some
errors that are not wrapped correctly. Replaced all uses of errors
with golang.org/x/xerrors.
Change-Id: Ia40160f8ea352e02618765f2a9415a4ece0dcd94
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227036
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
The modifications in CL 226559 introduced a new call to
RunProcessEnvFunc that was not using the context with a timeout, so deep
completion tests were hitting the timeout early (I think?).
Also, fix a staticcheck warning that's been bugging me today.
Change-Id: Iac894f630ebfa1cbc5588ae3a5490a93fa53aba2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227057
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
We need to search all transitive dependencies of a package, not just its
immediate imports.
Fixesgolang/go#38100
Change-Id: I15b4dbe226ba851691ca0c95460c3648ede32f04
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227030
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
When proposing unimported package members, we start with packages loaded
in-memory first, for three reasons: we know that they're fast, they're
fully typed, and they're probably pretty relevant. I hadn't bothered
doing that for package names, because the first two reasons aren't very
relevant. But the third still is -- loaded packages are a pretty good
approximation for in module scope, etc.
With this change we do package names the same as members, so relevance
should be about as good. Not perfect, but nobody's complained much yet.
Fair bit of copy-and-paste, but I don't want to extend the
getAllCandidates abstraction outside of the imports package yet.
Updates #38104.
Change-Id: Ia479181607dff898baee3cd6aa84d1ab61715d19
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226559
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
If we release gopls/v0.4.0 soon, we should keep these new analyzers off
by default. They were just merged, so they haven't been used enough to
be enabled, I think. We'll turn them on by default for gopls/v0.5.0.
Also, ended up creating a helper function to check if analysis has been
abled (which fixed a small bug in FindAnalysisError), and another helper
function to enable all analyses for testing purposes.
Updates golang/go#38212
Change-Id: I5ee94b3582dfc0863978650fc6ce51bfa0606c13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226962
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
This change ports the functionality of https://github.com/sqs/goreturns
to be used as code actions on diagnostics that have missing
return values. It improves on the original goreturns functionality by:
- filling out empty return statements
- trying to match existing return values to the required return
values and then filling in missing parameters
Fixesgolang/go#37091
Change-Id: Ifaf9bf571c3bc3c61e672b0a2f725d8d734d432d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/224960
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change makes sure that all errors in code actions are returned,
instead of ignored. There is also a refactoring of the suggested fixes
for go.mod files so that we don't compute them unless there is already a
matching diagnostic.
Change-Id: I34afda0116f3cc7e47809d980a0171487787e55e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221221
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
This change adds a helper function that checks if the context is
canceled, and if so, doesn't log the error. Tried to use it everywhere
in internal/lsp where it fits, which resulted in changing a few pieces
of error handling throughout.
Updates golang/go#37875
Change-Id: I59cbc6f893e3b70cf84524d9944ff7f4b4febd78
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226371
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This change makes working with tests easier by trimming the folder name
up to "testdata". This will remove any ellipses from the test folder name.
Fixesgolang/go#38103
Change-Id: I33b931e527de63713b8fc370c50b1c382796b2b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/226377
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for type errors of the type "no new vars on left side of :=". It will replace the ":=" with an "=".
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I91af8eb82956104229c3b4f3d0fce60fdfdbb5ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225477
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for type errors of the type "no result values expected". It will replace the return statment with an empty return statement.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I3885748dfc69a2d19f8e7a2e81f36f6d0a20d25b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223666
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change uses the new unusedparams analyzer to remove any unused parameters from functions inside of internal/lsp/source :)
Change-Id: I220100e832971b07cd80a701cd8b293fe708af3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225997
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds a quick fix for diagnostics that have an error message of the form "undeclared name: %s". It provides a quick fix to add a new variable with that name.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: I6534ee79d1770d1a62bac169c3c7e52e2443f39e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222237
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds support within gopls for analyzers that work with type errors to provide suggested fixes.
Updates golang/go#34644
Change-Id: Ia8929173752fda6bd84a9edaabd310e758f25fe8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222761
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
As part of investigating golang/go#38100, I noticed a few things that I
wanted to clean up. Mostly, for renames, we were calling
qualifiedObjAtProtocolPos twice, so I factored out a shared helper
function. I also added an error return for builtins so that callers
don't have to check.
Change-Id: I28c75c801cbec1611736af931cfa72befd219201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225777
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
This is one of the simplifications that "gofmt -s" applies.
https://golang.org/cmd/gofmt/#hdr-The_simplify_command
A slice expression of the form:
s[a:len(s)]
will be simplified to:
s[a:]
Updates golang/go#37221
Change-Id: Ibd4dedaadc9b129d5d39524f0c1ccc8a95bf7e0d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223659
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
This is one of the simplifications that "gofmt -s" applies.
https://golang.org/cmd/gofmt/#hdr-The_simplify_command
An array, slice, or map composite literal of the form:
[]T{T{}, T{}}
will be simplified to:
[]T{{}, {}}
Updates golang/go#37221
Change-Id: I2dca46501983c8af3581c9319d973da5cf690388
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223660
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
This change adds a pass that checks for unused parameters inside of a function. It is disabled by default.
Updates golang/go#36602
Change-Id: I9e8de3368f16f27e7816ec4ddb16935e1a05584e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222817
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This is one of the simplifications that "gofmt -s" applies.
https://golang.org/cmd/gofmt/#hdr-The_simplify_command
A range of the form:
for x, _ = range v {...}
will be simplified to:
for x = range v {...}
A range of the form:
for _ = range v {...}
will be simplified to:
for range v {...}
Updates golang/go#37221
Change-Id: Ic6babbd0b8ab961ebb4d0d6df72df52d9acde6e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223661
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds support for analyzers that have suggested fixes of the kind Source.FixAll. This will allow these fixes to be applied on save if the user desires.
To auto apply these fixes on save, make sure your settings.json looks like:
"[go]": {
"editor.codeActionsOnSave": {
...
"source.fixAll": true,
...
},
...
}
Update golang/go#37221
Change-Id: I534e4f6c8c51ec2848cf2899aab68f587ba68423
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223658
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change removes the disabledAnalyses setting and replaces it with a more general feature named "analyses". This will allow users to opt in as well as opt out of analyzers that they do not find useful. This also updates some documentation to show users what analyzers gopls is using and which are enabled by default.
Change-Id: Id3239b4c4c9667e834f262c889270d14fdba0f93
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223662
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Noticed this in https://github.com/fatih/vim-go/issues/2786. I don't
think that this will fix the problem in this issue, but we should avoid
nil pointers as much as possible. Also, remove a bit of extra whitespace
so that the style closer matches that of the rest of the project.
Change-Id: I94b924ea14e4a296382e3e68c52eeb43f6cd86a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225523
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
In support of https://golang.org/cl/224960, add utility functions that
create zero value expressions for a given types.Type. There are probably
some bugs here but they pass the basic tests in that CL.
Known problems: it skips through type aliases, and can't handle
anonymous structs/interfaces. Hopefully it's pretty unusual to return
those.
Change-Id: I69a388d9ce9bd60bc230e4a3d2b30f581ec25698
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225177
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
For debugging purposes, we print the output of `go env` on start. Now,
we print a view-specific `go env`, which will helps us when debugging
multi-project workspaces. Additional information included: the folder of
the view, if the view has a valid build configuration, and the build
flags for the view.
Updates golang/go#37978
Change-Id: Iadffd46f8ac5410971558a304b8bbcb2f9bdbcc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/225137
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
A common annoying mis-completion is as follows:
type foo struct {
field int
}
func (f foo) Field() int { return f.field }
func (f foo) logic() {
if f.f<>
}
Now at <> we prefer "field" over "Field()". Similarly:
type foo struct {
}
func (f foo) DoSomething() { }
func (f foo) doSomething() { }
func (f foo) logic() {
f.d<>
}
Now at <> we prefer "doSomething()" over "DoSomething()". All else
being equally, you normally want private objects over public objects
when the private objects are available.
The same logic is applied to deep completions so we prefer "c.foo.bar"
over "c.Foo().bar".
Change-Id: Ic91cba7721ddb1f2a30338037693ddcce8c621f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223877
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
While experimenting with different static analysis on x/tools, I noticed
that there are many actionable diagnostics found by staticcheck. Fix the
ones that were not false positives.
Change-Id: I0b68cf1f636b57b557db879fad84fff9b7237a89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222248
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
It encourages poor performing log lines, and also reduces the readability of
those lines.
Also delete the Key.With method which was unused, and should never be used
instead of the event.Label function anyway.
Change-Id: I9b55102864ee49a7d03e60af022a2002170c0fb1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222851
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Move the lsp specific telemetry package that just declares the labels under the
debug package and call it tag, to make all the usages much more readable.
Change-Id: Ic89b3408dd3b8b3d914cc69d81f41b8919aaf424
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222850
Run-TryBot: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
When searching for deep completions, we can end up enumerating struct
types' fields a lot. Optimize fieldSelections to reduce work:
- Wait until we see an embedded field before we create the "seen"
map.
- Use a callback style to iterate over the struct's fields rather than
returning a slice of fields.
- Change "seen" checking strategy back to track struct types rather
than each individual field.
Struct with 5 non-embedded fields:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Fields-16 293ns ± 1% 20ns ± 2% -93.13% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Fields-16 120B ± 0% 0B -100.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Fields-16 4.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Same struct but add an embedded struct with 2 fields:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Fields-16 389ns ± 1% 142ns ± 1% -63.53% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Fields-16 120B ± 0% 144B ± 0% +20.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Fields-16 4.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -50.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
I think the alloc/op went up because the "seen" map is no longer
allocated on the stack. There is more room for more optimization, but
it's probably not worth making things more complicated.
Change-Id: I6f9f2124334a8594ef9d6f9b5ac4b3a8aead5f49
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/223419
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change fixes breadcrumbs when the cursor is inside of a method by making the method a top level symbol and removing it from the struct's hierarchy.
Fixesgolang/go#36949
Change-Id: I8da5f453a5c78ade1e7688fc4eeebf79ce96f1e1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221819
Run-TryBot: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds support for recognizing a //go:generate directive
and offering a CodeLens that will then send a "generate" command to
the server to run "go generate" or "go generate ./...". Because
"go generate" can only be executed per package, there is no need to show
the CodeLens on top of every //go:generate comment. Therefore, only the
top directive will be considered.
The stdout/stderr of the go generate command will be piped to the logger
while stderr will also be sent to the editor as a window/showMessage
The user will only know when the process starts and when it ends so that they wouldn't
get bogged with a large number of message windows popping up. However, they can
check the logs for all the details.
If a user wants to cancel the "go generate" command, they will be able
to do so with a "Cancel" ActionItem that the server will offer to the client
Fixesgolang/go#37680
Change-Id: I89a9617521eab20859cb2215db133f34fda856c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222247
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we properly offer "case" and "default" keyword completion in cases
like:
switch {
<>
}
First I had to add an AST fix for empty switch statements to move the
closing brace down. For example, say the user is completing:
switch {
ca<>
}
This gets parsed as:
switch {
}
Even if we manually recover the "ca" token, "<>" is not positioned
inside the switch statement anymore, so we don't know to offer "case"
and "default" candidates. To work around this, we move the closing
brace down one line yielding:
switch {
}
Second I had to add logic to manually extract the completion prefix
inside empty switch statements, and finally some logic to offer (only)
"case" and "default" candidates in empty switch statements.
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I624f17da1c5e73faf91fe5f69e872d86f1cf5482
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220579
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Change AllImportsFixes to get the ParseGoHandle directly rather than
using getParsedFile. The latter also type checks the containing
package, which is slow in general and can be really slow in certain
circumstances. This should speed up the organizeImports code action.
Change-Id: Ic505873db41d5d76c398cee42f0323e390d9e034
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222780
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Now we offer an error-check-and-return completion candidate when
appropriate:
func myFunc() (int, error) {
f, err := os.Open("foo")
<>
}
offers the candidate:
if err != nil {
return 0, <err>
}
where <> denotes a placeholder so you can easily alter "err".
The completion will only be offered when:
1. The position is in a function that returns an error as final result
value, and
2. The statement preceding position is an assignment whose final LHS
value is an error.
The completion will contain zero values for the non-error return values
as necessary.
Using the above example, the completion will be offered after the user
has typed:
i
if
if err
Basically the candidate will be offered after every keystroke as the
user types "if err".
I call this new type of completion a statement completion - perfect
for when you want to make a statement!
Change-Id: I0a330e1c1fa81a2757d3afc84c24e853f46f26b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221613
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Editors typically trigger completion automatically after ".". This
pops up annoying, useless completions after "..." variadic param, such
as "foo(bar...<>)". We now suppress completions in or directly after
the ellipsis.
Fixesgolang/go#37358.
Change-Id: I9fc94fbdf69429bd787bcb2c643f4f730e24154d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/222200
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We now offer "range" keyword in the for loop init statement:
for i := r<> // offer "range" completion candidate
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I2e4c1db11c37127406c78191681c39b9dd3439f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220504
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Offer "struct", "interface", "map", "chan", and "func" keywords when
we expect a type. For example "var foo i<>" will offer "interface".
Because "struct" and "interface" are more often used when declaring
named types, they get a higher score in type declarations. Otherwise,
"map", "chan" and "func" get a higher score.
I also got rid of the special keyword scoring. Now keywords just use
stdScore and highScore. This makes the interplay with other types of
candidates more predictable. Keywords are offered in pretty limited
contexts, so I don't think they will be annoying.
Finally, keyword candidate score is now to be scaled properly based on
how well they match the prefix. Previously they weren't penalized for
not matching well, so there were probably some situations where
keywords were ranked too high.
Updates golang/go#34009.
Change-Id: I0b659c00a8503cd72da28853dfe54fcb67f734ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/220503
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
