Currently mcaches are flushed to mcentral after a bunch of memstats have
already been read. This is not safe (in the sense that it doesn't ensure
consisent memstats) since memstats may in general change when mcentral
data structures are manipulated.
Note that prior to the new mcentral implementation this was not a
problem because mcentral operations happened to never modify certain
memstats. As of the new mcentral implementation, we might for example
persistentalloc when uncaching a span, which would change memstats. This
can cause a skew between the value of sys (which currently is calculated
before mcaches are flushed) and the value of gc_sys and other_sys.
Fix this by moving mcache flushing to the very top of updatememstats.
Also leave a comment explaining that this must be done first, in
general, because mcentrals make no guarantee that they will not
influence memstats (and doing so would be unnecessarily restrictive).
Fixes#38712.
Change-Id: I15bacb313c54a46e380a945a71bb75db67169c1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230498
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This change is just the mechanical work of moving the wavefront past
address.
Change-Id: I519ec49fa8ba50760c7d23fc084fcd3bb0544546
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229700
Run-TryBot: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a second attempt at CL 230024, with
cmd/go/testdata/script/mod_retention.txt updated to perform a
version-independent comparison on the 'go' version added to a go.mod
file that lacks one.
Fixes#38708
Change-Id: I15dcd83b51ed5ec57946b419bcbaec41e85a46f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230382
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
This reverts CL 229994.
Reason for revert: break AIX build.
This is nice to have but isn't critical. We can revisit later.
Change-Id: Ifc56a0a4c0fb36859cf7666ab149e25e0e5d4cc0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230459
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
ctxt.Tlsg2 is supposed to be the embedded ArchSyms.Tlsg2.
Change-Id: I4f9711f83999d4a98bcf6d99c24fab756c580905
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230379
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Convert some optimizations rules to strongly-typed versions. So far, I
have only converted the rules that need no additional changes (i.e: only
need to change '->' to "=>").
This CL covers the rules from line 478 - line 800 in S390X.rules file.
Some compare and branch rules also fall in this range, but they were
already done previously in another CL.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I9167c5f1a32f4fd6c29bacc13fff95e83b0533e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230338
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The compiler has better error messages for methods called without a
pointer receiver when one is expected. This change is similar to
CL 229801, but for method calls.
Also, added better error messages for functions called with the wrong
capitalization. I left the third TODO in this switch statement almost
as-is because I'm not sure that the extra complexity is worth it -
I adjusted the error to look like the one the compiler reports.
Fixesgolang/go#38658
Change-Id: Ie0ca2503e12f3659f112f0135cc27db1b027fdcb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230380
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Linux 4.5 introduced (and Linux 5.3 refined) the copy_file_range
system call, which allows file systems the opportunity to implement
copy acceleration techniques. This commit adds support for
copy_file_range(2) to the os package.
Introduce a new ReadFrom method on *os.File, which makes *os.File
implement the io.ReaderFrom interface. If dst and src are both files,
this enables io.Copy(dst, src) to call dst.ReadFrom(src), which, in
turn, will call copy_file_range(2) if possible. If copy_file_range(2)
is not supported by the host kernel, or if either of dst or src
refers to a non-regular file, ReadFrom falls back to the regular
io.Copy code path.
Add internal/poll.CopyFileRange, which acquires locks on the
appropriate poll.FDs and performs the actual work, as well as
internal/syscall/unix.CopyFileRange, which wraps the copy_file_range
system call itself at the lowest level.
Rework file layout in internal/syscall/unix to accomodate the
additional system call numbers needed for copy_file_range.
Merge these definitions with the ones used by getrandom(2) into
sysnum_linux_$GOARCH.go files.
A note on additional optimizations: if dst and src both refer to pipes
in the invocation dst.ReadFrom(src), we could, in theory, use the
existing splice(2) code in package internal/poll to splice directly
from src to dst. Attempting this runs into trouble with the poller,
however. If we call splice(src, dst) and see EAGAIN, we cannot know
if it came from src not being ready for reading or dst not being
ready for writing. The write end of src and the read end of dst are
not under our control, so we cannot reliably use the poller to wait
for readiness. Therefore, it seems infeasible to use the new ReadFrom
method to splice between pipes directly. In conclusion, for now, the
only optimization enabled by the new ReadFrom method on *os.File is
the copy_file_range optimization.
Fixes#36817.
Change-Id: I696372639fa0cdf704e3f65414f7321fc7d30adb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229101
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
IntSize is an untyped constant that does not need explicit conversion.
Annotating IntSize as an int and running github.com/mdempsky/unconvert
reveals these two cases.
Fixes#38682.
Change-Id: I014646b7457ddcde32474810153229dcf0c269c6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230306
Run-TryBot: Akhil Indurti <aindurti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Currently allocToCache assumes it can move the search address past the
block it allocated the cache from, which violates the property that
searchAddr should always point to mapped memory (i.e. memory represented
by pageAlloc.inUse).
This bug was already fixed once for pageAlloc.alloc in the Go 1.14
release via CL 216697, but that changed failed to take into account
allocToCache.
Fixes#38605.
Change-Id: Id08180aa10d19dc0f9f551a1d9e327a295560dff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229577
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Originally, we use an assembly function that returns a boolean result to
tell whether the machine has vector facility or not. It is now no longer
needed when we can directly use cpu.S390X.HasVX variable. This CL
also removes the last occurence of hasVectorFacility function on s390x.
Change-Id: Id20cb746c21eacac5e13344b362e2d87adfe4317
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230337
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
symGroupType was needed for dodata. Now that we have converted
dodata to using the loader, stop overwriting it.
Change-Id: Ie94109c0b35dd2f71a19ebb38f8cf20b6a37c624
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229994
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
In dodata we overwrite symbol types to SDATA. Now we'll stop
doing that, so accept more symbol types here. This is basically
a list of all writeable types handled in dodata that could appear
in XCOFF.
Change-Id: Iee35369162f5acd59806a3f0e6c8d3682620067e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230310
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Originally, we use an assembly function that returns a boolean result to
tell whether the machine has vector facility or not. It is now no longer
needed when we can directly use cpu.S390X.HasVX variable.
Change-Id: Ic1dae851982532bcfd9a9453416c112347f21d87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230318
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Originally, we use an assembly function that returns a boolean result to
tell whether the machine has vector facility or not. It is now no longer
needed when we can directly use cpu.S390X.HasVX variable.
Change-Id: Ic3ffeb9e63238ef41406d97cdc42502145ddb454
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230319
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL allows the usage of KDSA instruction when it is available. The
instruction is designed to be resistant to side channel attacks and
offers performance improvement for ed25519.
Benchmarks:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Signing-8 120µs ±20% 62µs ±12% -48.40% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Verification-8 325µs ±17% 69µs ±10% -78.80% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Signing-8 448B ± 0% 0B -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Verification-8 288B ± 0% 0B -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Signing-8 5.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Verification-8 2.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: I0330ce83d807370b419ce638bc2cae4cb3c250dc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202578
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
This reverts CL 33677.
Reason for revert: NetBSD is broken
Updates #38649
Change-Id: Id60e3c97d3cb4fb0053dea03b95dbbb0b850c883
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230038
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Several new ones came from my testing (long, repeated runs) and one (assistQueue ->
spine) came from the staticlockranking builder (filed as issue 38441).
Fixes#38441
Change-Id: I4268da0d8b8cc51251eba6bd936110c8ab4c4e61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229480
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Currently, the small object sweeper will sweep until it finds a free
slot or there are no more spans of that size class to sweep. In dense
heaps, this can cause sweeping for a given size class to take
unbounded time, and gets worse with larger heaps.
This CL limits the small object sweeper to try at most 100 spans
before giving up and allocating a fresh span. Since it's already shown
that 100 spans are completely full at that point, the space overhead
of this fresh span is at most 1%.
This CL is based on an experimental CL by Austin Clements (CL 187817)
and is updated to be part of the mcentral implementation, gated by
go115NewMCentralImpl.
Updates #18155.
Change-Id: I37a72c2dcc61dd6f802d1d0eac3683e6642b6ef8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229998
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Currently mcentral is implemented as a couple of linked lists of spans
protected by a lock. Unfortunately this design leads to significant lock
contention.
The span ownership model is also confusing and complicated. In-use spans
jump between being owned by multiple sources, generally some combination
of a gcSweepBuf, a concurrent sweeper, an mcentral or an mcache.
So first to address contention, this change replaces those linked lists
with gcSweepBufs which have an atomic fast path. Then, we change up the
ownership model: a span may be simultaneously owned only by an mcentral
and the page reclaimer. Otherwise, an mcentral (which now consists of
sweep bufs), a sweeper, or an mcache are the sole owners of a span at
any given time. This dramatically simplifies reasoning about span
ownership in the runtime.
As a result of this new ownership model, sweeping is now driven by
walking over the mcentrals rather than having its own global list of
spans. Because we no longer have a global list and we traditionally
haven't used the mcentrals for large object spans, we no longer have
anywhere to put large objects. So, this change also makes it so that we
keep large object spans in the appropriate mcentral lists.
In terms of the static lock ranking, we add the spanSet spine locks in
pretty much the same place as the mcentral locks, since they have the
potential to be manipulated both on the allocation and sweep paths, like
the mcentral locks.
This new implementation is turned on by default via a feature flag
called go115NewMCentralImpl.
Benchmark results for 1 KiB allocation throughput (5 runs each):
name \ MiB/s go113 go114 gotip gotip+this-patch
AllocKiB-1 1.71k ± 1% 1.68k ± 1% 1.59k ± 2% 1.71k ± 1%
AllocKiB-2 2.46k ± 1% 2.51k ± 1% 2.54k ± 1% 2.93k ± 1%
AllocKiB-4 4.27k ± 1% 4.41k ± 2% 4.33k ± 1% 5.01k ± 2%
AllocKiB-8 4.38k ± 3% 5.24k ± 1% 5.46k ± 1% 8.23k ± 1%
AllocKiB-12 4.38k ± 3% 4.49k ± 1% 5.10k ± 1% 10.04k ± 0%
AllocKiB-16 4.31k ± 1% 4.14k ± 3% 4.22k ± 0% 10.42k ± 0%
AllocKiB-20 4.26k ± 1% 3.98k ± 1% 4.09k ± 1% 10.46k ± 3%
AllocKiB-24 4.20k ± 1% 3.97k ± 1% 4.06k ± 1% 10.74k ± 1%
AllocKiB-28 4.15k ± 0% 4.00k ± 0% 4.20k ± 0% 10.76k ± 1%
Fixes#37487.
Change-Id: I92d47355acacf9af2c41bf080c08a8c1638ba210
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221182
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This change implements the spanSet data structure which is based off of
the gcSweepBuf data structure. While the general idea is the same (one
has two of these which one switches between every GC cycle; one to push
to and one to pop from), there are some key differences.
Firstly, we never have a need to iterate over this data structure so
delete numBlocks and block. Secondly, we want to be able to pop from the
front of the structure concurrently with pushes to the back. As a result
we need to maintain both a head and a tail and this change introduces an
atomic headTail structure similar to the one used by sync.Pool. It also
implements popfirst in a similar way.
As a result of this headTail, we need to be able to explicitly reset the
length, head, and tail when it goes empty at the end of sweep
termination, so add a reset method.
Updates #37487.
Change-Id: I5b8ad290ec32d591e3c8c05e496c5627018074f6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221181
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This change adds a global pool of spanSetBlocks to the spanSet data
structure and adds support for eagerly freeing these blocks back to the
pool if the block goes empty.
This change prepares us to use this data structure in more places in the
runtime by allowing reuse of spanSetBlock.
Updates #37487.
Change-Id: I0752226e3667a9e3e1d87c9b66edaedeae1ac23f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221180
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This change copies the gcSweepBuf data structure into a new file and
renames it spanSet. It will serve as the basis for a heavily modified
version of the gcSweepBuf data structure for the new mcentral
implementation.
We move it into a separate file now for two reasons:
1. We will need both implementations as they will coexist simultaneously
for a time.
2. By creating it now in a new change it'll make future changes which
modify it easier to review (rather than introducing the new file then).
Updates #37487.
Change-Id: If80603cab6e813a1ee2e5ecd49dcde5d8045a6c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221179
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Implement multi-control branches for riscv64, switching to using the BNEZ
pseudo-instruction when rewriting conditionals. This will allow for further
branch optimisations to later be performed via rewrites.
Change-Id: I7f2c69f3c77494b403f26058c6bc8432d8070ad0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/226399
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
type T [3]string
Prior to this change, we generated this equality alg for T:
func eqT(p, q *T) (r bool) {
for i := range *p {
if len(p[i]) == len(q[i]) {
} else {
return
}
}
for j := range *p {
if runtime.memeq(p[j].ptr, q[j].ptr, len(p[j])) {
} else {
return
}
}
return true
}
That first loop can be profitably eliminated;
it's cheaper to spell out 3 length equality checks.
We now generate:
func eqT(p, q *T) (r bool) {
if len(p[0]) == len(q[0]) &&
len(p[1]) == len(q[1]) &&
len(p[2]) == len(q[2]) {
} else {
return
}
for i := 0; i < len(p); i++ {
if runtime.memeq(p[j].ptr, q[j].ptr, len(p[j])) {
} else {
return
}
}
return true
}
We now also eliminate loops for small float arrays as well,
and for any array of size 1.
These cutoffs were selected to minimize code size on amd64
at this moment, for lack of a more compelling methodology.
Any smallish number would do.
The switch from range loops to plain for loops allowed me
to use a temp instead of a named var, which eliminated
a pointless argument to checkAll.
The code to construct them is also a bit clearer, in my opinion.
Change-Id: I1bdd8ee4a2739d00806e66b17a4e76b46e71231a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230210
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Add linux/{ppc64,ppc64le} and aix/ppc64 arch support for the new
dodata() phase.
This completes the picture in terms of architecture support for the
new dodata(), but to be safe this patch leaves the command line flag
in place there are problems on the builders (especially given that we
have a dead aix-ppc64 builder).
Change-Id: I78da615c3b540d8925ed7b3226e199280eb7451d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229983
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
type T [8]string
Prior to this change, we generated this equality algorithm for T:
func eqT(p, q *T) (r bool) {
for i := range *p {
if p[i] == q[i] {
} else {
return
}
}
return true
}
This change splits this into two loops, so that we can do the
cheap (length) half early and only then do the expensive (contents) half.
We now generate:
func eqT(p, q *T) (r bool) {
for i := range *p {
if len(p[i]) == len(q[i]) {
} else {
return
}
}
for j := range *p {
if runtime.memeq(p[j].ptr, q[j].ptr, len(p[j])) {
} else {
return
}
}
return true
}
The generated code is typically ~17% larger because it contains
two loops instead of one. In the future, we might want to unroll
the first loop when the array is small.
Change-Id: I26b2793b90ec6aff21766a411b15a4ff1096c03f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230209
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
type T [8]interface{}
Prior to this change, we generated this equality algorithm for T:
func eqT(p, q *T) bool {
for i := range *p {
if p[i] != q[i] {
return false
}
}
return true
}
This change splits this into two loops, so that we can do the
cheap (type) half early and only then do the expensive (data) half.
We now generate:
func eqT(p, q *T) (r bool) {
for i := range *p {
if p[i].type == q[i].type {
} else {
return
}
}
for j := range *p {
if runtime.efaceeq(p[j].type, p[j].data, q[j].data) {
} else {
return
}
}
return true
}
The use of a named return value and a bare return is to work
around some typechecking problems that stymied me.
The structure of using equals and else (instead of not equals and then)
was for implementation convenience and clarity. As a bonus,
it generates slightly shorter code on AMD64, because zeroing a register
to return is cheaper than writing $1 to it.
The generated code is typically ~17% larger because it contains
two loops instead of one. In the future, we might want to unroll
the first loop when the array is small.
Change-Id: I5b2c8dd3384852f085c4f3e1f6ad20bc5ae59062
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230208
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
type T struct {
s interface{}
i int
}
Prior to this change, we generated this equality algorithm for T:
func eqT(p, q *T) bool {
return p.s.type == q.s.type &&
runtime.efaceeq(p.s.type, p.s.data, q.s.data) &&
p.i == q.i
}
This change splits the two halves of the interface equality,
so that we can do the cheap (type) half early and the expensive
(data) half late. We now generate:
func eqT(p, q *T) bool {
return p.s.type == q.s.type &&
p.i == q.i &&
runtime.efaceeq(p.s.type, p.s.data, q.s.data)
}
The generated code tends to be a bit smaller. Examples:
go/ast
.eq."".ForStmt 306 -> 304 (-0.65%)
.eq."".TypeAssertExpr 221 -> 219 (-0.90%)
.eq."".TypeSwitchStmt 228 -> 226 (-0.88%)
.eq."".ParenExpr 150 -> 148 (-1.33%)
.eq."".IndexExpr 221 -> 219 (-0.90%)
.eq."".SwitchStmt 228 -> 226 (-0.88%)
.eq."".RangeStmt 334 -> 332 (-0.60%)
Change-Id: Iec9e24f214ca772416202b9fb9252e625c22380e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230207
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Refactor out creating the two Nodes needed to check interface equality.
Preliminary work to other optimizations.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: Id6b39e8e78f07289193423d0ef905d70826acf89
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230206
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
type T struct {
s string
i int
}
Prior to this change, we generated this equality algorithm for T:
func eqT(p, q *T) bool {
return len(p.s) == len(q.s) &&
runtime.memequal(p.s.ptr, q.s.ptr, len(p.s)) &&
p.i == q.i
}
This change splits the two halves of the string equality,
so that we can do the cheap (length) half early and the expensive
(contents) half late. We now generate:
func eqT(p, q *T) bool {
return len(p.s) == len(q.s) &&
p.i == q.i &&
runtime.memequal(p.s.ptr, q.s.ptr, len(p.s))
}
The generated code for these functions tends to be a bit shorter. Examples:
runtime
.eq."".Frame 274 -> 272 (-0.73%)
.eq."".funcinl 249 -> 247 (-0.80%)
.eq."".modulehash 207 -> 205 (-0.97%)
Change-Id: I4efac9f7d410f0a11a94dcee2bf9c0b49b60e301
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230205
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Refactor out creating the two Nodes needed to check string equality.
Preliminary work to other optimizations.
Passes toolstash-check.
Change-Id: I72e824dac904e579b8ba9a3669a94fa1471112d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230204
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We only generate if statements via CondBreak, which is nice as the
control flow is simple and easy to work with. It seems like the If type
was added but never used, so remove it to avoid confusion.
We had a TODO about replacing CondBreak with If instead. I gave that a
try, but it doesn't seem worth the effort. The code gets more complex
and we don't really win anything in return.
While at it, don't use op strings as format strings in exprf. This
doesn't cause any issue at the moment, but it's best to be explicit
about the operator not containing any formatting verbs.
Change-Id: Ib59ad72d3628bf91594efc609e222232ad1e8748
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/230257
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The ReadOnly attribute was used to do copy on write when applying
relocations to symbols with read-only backing stores. Now that we
always apply relocations in the output buffer (mmap or heap), it
is always writeable. No need to tamper with the ReadOnly
attribute anymore.
Wasm is an exception, where we don't copy symbol contents to the
output buffer first. Do copy-on-write there.
This is in preparation of converting reloc to using the loader.
Change-Id: I15e53b7c162b9124e6689dfd8eb45cbe2ffd7153
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229991
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Faller <jeremy@golang.org>
