The current implementation uses a max of 28 bits when decoding an
ObjectIdentifier. This change makes it so that an int64 is used to
accumulate up to 35 bits. If the resulting data would not overflow
an int32, it is used as an int. Thus up to 31 bits may be used to
represent each subidentifier of an ObjectIdentifier.
Fixes#19933
Change-Id: I95d74b64b24cdb1339ff13421055bce61c80243c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40436
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
The header is literally
Key: Value
If the value or the key has leading or trailing spaces, those will
be lost by the round trip.
Found because testing/quick returns different values now.
Change-Id: I0f574bdbb5990689509c24309854d8f814b5efa0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39211
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When unmarshaling, if an element is empty, eg. '<tag></tag>', and
destination type is int, uint, float or bool, do not attempt to parse
value (""). Set to its zero value instead.
Fixes#13417
Change-Id: I2d79f6d8f39192bb277b1a9129727d5abbb2dd1f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38386
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Change-Id: I2d155c838935cd8427abd142a462ff4c56829715
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37948
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This paragraph has been added, as the notion was missing from the
documentation.
If a value is passed to Encode and the type is not a struct (or pointer to struct,
etc.), for simplicity of processing it is represented as a struct of one field.
The only visible effect of this is to encode a zero byte after the value, just as
after the last field of an encoded struct, so that the decode algorithm knows when
the top-level value is complete.
Fixes#16978
Change-Id: I5f008e792d1b6fe80d2e026a7ff716608889db32
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38414
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
JSON decoding performs poorly for unmapped and ignored fields. We noticed better
performance when unmarshalling unused fields. The loss comes mostly from calls
to scanner.error as described at #17914.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkIssue10335-8 431 408 -5.34%
BenchmarkUnmapped-8 1744 1314 -24.66%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkIssue10335-8 4 3 -25.00%
BenchmarkUnmapped-8 18 4 -77.78%
benchmark old bytes new bytes delta
BenchmarkIssue10335-8 320 312 -2.50%
BenchmarkUnmapped-8 568 344 -39.44%
Fixes#17914, improves #10335
Change-Id: I7d4258a94eb287c0fe49e7334795209b90434cd0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33276
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Tinkering with the gob package shows that is currently possible to
*completely destroy* Int slices encoding without triggering a single
test failure.
The various encInt{8,16,32,64}Slice methods are only called during the
execution of the GobMapInterfaceEncode test, which only encodes a few
slices of length exactly 1 and then just checks that the error
returned by Encode is nil (without trying to Decode back the data).
This patch adds a few tests for signed integer slices encoding.
Change-Id: Ifaaee2f32132873118b241f79aa8203e4ad31416
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38066
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Replace 'does not contains' with 'does not contain' where it appears
in the source code.
Change-Id: Ie7266347c429512c8a41a7e19142afca7ead3922
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37887
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Document and check that the alphabet cannot contain '\n' or '\r'.
Document that the alphabet cannot contain the padding character.
Document that the padding character must be equal or bellow '\xff'.
Document that the padding character must not be '\n' or '\r'.
Fixes#19343Fixes#19318
Change-Id: I6de0034d347ffdf317d7ea55d6fe38b01c2c4c03
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37838
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fix Decode to return the correct illegal data index from a corrupted
input that contains whitespaces.
Fixes#19406
Change-Id: Ib2b2b6ed7e41f024d0da2bd035caec4317c2869c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37837
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Found by github.com/mvdan/unparam.
Change-Id: Ic97f05a2ecb5b17caa36aafe403e2266abea3e0e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37836
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Found by github.com/mvdan/unparam.
Change-Id: I5a6664cceeba1cf1c2f3236ddf4db5ce7a64b02a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37835
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously the code didn't check for extra data after the final five
dashes of the ending line of a PEM block.
Fixes#19147Fixes#7042
Change-Id: Idaab2390914a2bed8c2c12b14dfb6d68233fdfec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37147
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
The new tests in this CL have been checked against Go 1.7 as well
and all pass in Go 1.7, with the one exception noted in a comment
(an intentional change to omitempty already present before this CL).
CL 15684 made the intentional change to omitempty.
This CL fixes bugs introduced along the way.
Most of these are corner cases that are arguably not that important,
but they've always worked all the way back to Go 1, and someone
cared enough to file #19063. The most significant problem found
while adding tests is that in the case of a nil *string field with
`xml:",chardata"`, the existing code silently stops processing not just
that field but the entire remainder of the struct.
Even if #19063 were not worth fixing, this chardata bug would be.
Fixes#19063.
Change-Id: I318cf8f9945e1a4615982d9904e109fde577ebf9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36954
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
... and same for stores. This does for binary.BigEndian.Uint16() what
was already done for Uint32 and Uint64 with BSWAP in 10f75748 (CL 32222).
Here is how generated code changes e.g. for the following function
(omitting saying the same prologue/epilogue):
func get16(b [2]byte) uint16 {
return binary.BigEndian.Uint16(b[:])
}
"".get16 t=1 size=21 args=0x10 locals=0x0
// before
0x0000 00000 (x.go:15) MOVBLZX "".b+9(FP), AX
0x0005 00005 (x.go:15) MOVBLZX "".b+8(FP), CX
0x000a 00010 (x.go:15) SHLL $8, CX
0x000d 00013 (x.go:15) ORL CX, AX
// after
0x0000 00000 (x.go:15) MOVWLZX "".b+8(FP), AX
0x0005 00005 (x.go:15) ROLW $8, AX
encoding/binary is speedup overall a bit:
name old time/op new time/op delta
ReadSlice1000Int32s-4 4.83µs ± 0% 4.83µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.206 n=4+5)
ReadStruct-4 1.29µs ± 2% 1.28µs ± 1% -1.27% (p=0.032 n=4+5)
ReadInts-4 384ns ± 1% 385ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.968 n=4+5)
WriteInts-4 534ns ± 3% 526ns ± 0% -1.54% (p=0.048 n=4+5)
WriteSlice1000Int32s-4 5.02µs ± 0% 5.11µs ± 3% ~ (p=0.175 n=4+5)
PutUint16-4 0.59ns ± 0% 0.49ns ± 2% -16.95% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
PutUint32-4 0.52ns ± 0% 0.52ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
PutUint64-4 0.53ns ± 0% 0.53ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
PutUvarint32-4 19.9ns ± 0% 19.9ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.556 n=4+5)
PutUvarint64-4 54.5ns ± 1% 54.2ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.333 n=4+5)
name old speed new speed delta
ReadSlice1000Int32s-4 829MB/s ± 0% 828MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.190 n=4+5)
ReadStruct-4 58.0MB/s ± 2% 58.7MB/s ± 1% +1.30% (p=0.032 n=4+5)
ReadInts-4 78.0MB/s ± 1% 77.8MB/s ± 1% ~ (p=0.968 n=4+5)
WriteInts-4 56.1MB/s ± 3% 57.0MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.063 n=4+5)
WriteSlice1000Int32s-4 797MB/s ± 0% 783MB/s ± 3% ~ (p=0.190 n=4+5)
PutUint16-4 3.37GB/s ± 0% 4.07GB/s ± 2% +20.83% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
PutUint32-4 7.73GB/s ± 0% 7.72GB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.556 n=4+5)
PutUint64-4 15.1GB/s ± 0% 15.1GB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.905 n=4+5)
PutUvarint32-4 201MB/s ± 0% 201MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.905 n=4+5)
PutUvarint64-4 147MB/s ± 1% 147MB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.286 n=4+5)
( "a bit" only because most of the time is spent in reflection-like things
there, not actual bytes decoding. Even for direct PutUint16 benchmark the
looping adds overhead and lowers visible benefit. For code-generated encoders /
decoders actual effect is more than 20% )
Adding Uint32 and Uint64 raw benchmarks too for completeness.
NOTE I had to adjust load-combining rule for bswap case to match first 2 bytes
loads as result of "2-bytes load+shift" -> "loadw + rorw 8" rewrite. Reason is:
for loads+shift, even e.g. into uint16 var
var b []byte
var v uin16
v = uint16(b[1]) | uint16(b[0])<<8
the compiler eventually generates L(ong) shift - SHLLconst [8], probably
because it is more straightforward / other reasons to work on the whole
register. This way 2 bytes rewriting rule is using SHLLconst (not SHLWconst) in
its pattern, and then it always gets matched first, even if 2-byte rule comes
syntactically after 4-byte rule in AMD64.rules because 4-bytes rule seemingly
needs more applyRewrite() cycles to trigger. If 2-bytes rule gets matched for
inner half of
var b []byte
var v uin32
v = uint32(b[3]) | uint32(b[2])<<8 | uint32(b[1])<<16 | uint32(b[0])<<24
and we keep 4-byte load rule unchanged, the result will be MOVW + RORW $8 and
then series of byte loads and shifts - not one MOVL + BSWAPL.
There is no such problem for stores: there compiler, since it probably knows
store destination is 2 bytes wide, uses SHRWconst 8 (not SHRLconst 8) and thus
2-byte store rule is not a subset of rule for 4-byte stores.
Fixes#17151 (int16 was last missing piece there)
Change-Id: Idc03ba965bfce2b94fef456b02ff6742194748f6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34636
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Mention that it specifically returns x / 2, and do the same for
EncodedLen.
Change-Id: Ie334f5abecbc487caf4965abbcd14442591bef2a
Change-Id: Idfa413faad487e534489428451bf736b009293d6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33191
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The tree is inconsistent about single l vs double l in those
words in documentation, test messages, and one error value text.
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshall(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
42
$ git grep -E '[Mm]arshal(|s|er|ers|ed|ing)' | wc -l
1694
Make it consistently a single l, per earlier decisions. This means
contributors won't be confused by misleading precedence, and it helps
consistency.
Change the spelling in one error value text in newRawAttributes of
crypto/x509 package to be consistent.
This change was generated with:
perl -i -npe 's,([Mm]arshal)l(|s|er|ers|ed|ing),$1$2,' $(git grep -l -E '[Mm]arshall' | grep -v AUTHORS | grep -v CONTRIBUTORS)
Updates #12431.
Follows https://golang.org/cl/14150.
Change-Id: I85d28a2d7692862ccb02d6a09f5d18538b6049a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33017
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We only support unmarshaling into a string or a []byte, but we
previously would try (and panic while) setting a slice of a different
type. The docs say ",innerxml" is ignored if the type is not string or
[]byte, so do that for other slices as well.
Fixes#15600.
Change-Id: Ia64815945a14c3d04a0a45ccf413e38b58a69416
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32919
Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
I used the slowtests.go tool as described in
https://golang.org/cl/32684 on packages that stood out.
go test -short std drops from ~56 to ~52 seconds.
This isn't a huge win, but it was mostly an exercise.
Updates #17751
Change-Id: I9f3402e36a038d71e662d06ce2c1d52f6c4b674d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32751
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This CL expands upon a change made in (http://golang.org/cl/21811)
to ensure that a nil RawMessage gets serialized as "null" instead of
being a nil slice.
The added check only triggers when the RawMessage is nil. We do not
handle the case when the RawMessage is non-nil, but empty.
Fixes#17704
Updates #14493
Change-Id: I0fbebcdd81f7466c5b78c94953afc897f162ceb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32472
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
- Like ",any" for elements, add ",any,attr" for attributes to allow
a mop-up field that gets any otherwise unmapped attributes.
- Map attributes to fields of type slice by extending the slice,
just like for elements.
- Allow storing an attribute into an xml.Attr directly, to provide
a way to record the name.
Combined, these three independent features allow
AllAttrs []Attr `xml:",any,attr"`
to collect all attributes not otherwise spoken for in a particular struct.
Tests based on CL 16292 by Charles Weill.
Fixes#3633.
Change-Id: I2d75817f17ca8752d7df188080a407836af92611
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30946
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
1. Define behavior for Unmarshal of JSON null into Unmarshaler and
TextUnmarshaler. Specifically, an Unmarshaler will be given the
literal null and can decide what to do (because otherwise
json.RawMessage is impossible to implement), and a TextUnmarshaler
will be skipped over (because there is no text to unmarshal), like
most other inappropriate types. Document this in Unmarshal, with a
reminder in UnmarshalJSON about handling null.
2. Test all this.
3. Fix the TextUnmarshaler case, which was returning an unmarshalling
error, to match the definition.
4. Fix the error that had been used for the TextUnmarshaler, since it
was claiming that there was a JSON string when in fact the problem was
NOT having a string.
5. Adjust time.Time and big.Int's UnmarshalJSON to ignore null, as is
conventional.
Fixes#9037.
Change-Id: If78350414eb8dda712867dc8f4ca35a9db041b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30944
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
No functional changes here. Just makes next CL easier to read.
Change-Id: Icf7b2281b4da6cb59ff4edff05943b2ee288576a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30945
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
There was an inconsistency between the (json encoding + documentation)
and the xml encoding implementation. Pointer to an empty value was
not being serialized (i.e simply ignored). Which had the effect of making
impossible to have a struct with a string field for which we wanted to
serialize the value ""
Fixes#5452
Change-Id: Id858701801158409be01e962d2cda843424bd22a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15684
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
If strict option is enabled, when decoding, instead of skip the padding
bits, it will do strict check to enforce they are set to zero.
Fixes#15656
Change-Id: I869fb725a39cc9dde44dbc4ff0046446e7abc642
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24964
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Struct fields can be suppressed in JSON serialization by "-" tags, but
that doesn't preclude generation of "-" object keys.
Document and verify the mechanism for doing so.
Change-Id: I7f60e1759cfee15cb7b2447cd35fab91c5b004e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21204
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The UnmarshalTypeError has two new fields Struct and Field,
used when constructing the error message.
Fixes#6716.
Change-Id: I67da171480a9491960b3ae81893770644180f848
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18692
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Change float32/float64 formatting to use non-exponential form
for a slightly wider range, to more closely match ES6 JSON.stringify
and other JSON generators.
Most notably:
1e20 now formats as 100000000000000000000 (previously 1e+20)
1e-6 now formats as 0.000001 (previously 1e-06)
1e-7 now formats as 1e-7 (previously 1e-07)
This also brings the int64 and float64 formatting in line with each other,
for all shared representable values. For example both int64(1234567)
and float64(1234567) now format as "1234567", where before the
float64 formatted as "1.234567e+06".
The only variation now compared to ES6 JSON.stringify is that
Go continues to encode negative zero as "-0", not "0", so that
the value continues to be preserved during JSON round trips.
Fixes#6384.
Fixes#14135.
Change-Id: Ib0e0e009cd9181d75edc0424a28fe776bcc5bbf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30371
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This commit changes parseRecord to allocate a single string per record,
instead of per field, by using indexes into the raw record.
Benchstat (done with f69991c17)
name old time/op new time/op delta
Read-8 3.17µs ± 0% 2.78µs ± 1% -12.35% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
ReadWithFieldsPerRecord-8 3.18µs ± 1% 2.79µs ± 1% -12.23% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ReadWithoutFieldsPerRecord-8 4.59µs ± 0% 2.77µs ± 0% -39.58% (p=0.016 n=4+5)
ReadLargeFields-8 57.0µs ± 0% 55.7µs ± 0% -2.18% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Read-8 660B ± 0% 664B ± 0% +0.61% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ReadWithFieldsPerRecord-8 660B ± 0% 664B ± 0% +0.61% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ReadWithoutFieldsPerRecord-8 1.14kB ± 0% 0.66kB ± 0% -41.75% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ReadLargeFields-8 3.86kB ± 0% 3.94kB ± 0% +1.86% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Read-8 30.0 ± 0% 18.0 ± 0% -40.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ReadWithFieldsPerRecord-8 30.0 ± 0% 18.0 ± 0% -40.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ReadWithoutFieldsPerRecord-8 50.0 ± 0% 18.0 ± 0% -64.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ReadLargeFields-8 66.0 ± 0% 24.0 ± 0% -63.64% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
For a simple application that I wrote, which reads in a CSV file (via
ReadAll) and outputs the number of rows read (15857625 rows), this change
reduces the total time on my notebook from ~58 seconds to ~48 seconds.
This reduces time and allocations (bytes) each by ~6% for a real world
CSV file at work (~230000 rows, 13 colums).
Updates #16791
Change-Id: Ia07177c94624e55cdd3064a7d2751fb69322d3e4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24723
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
