The general policy for the current state of js/wasm is that it only
has to support tests that are also supported by nacl.
The test nilptr3.go makes assumptions about which nil checks can be
removed. Since WebAssembly does not signal on reading a null pointer,
all nil checks have to be explicit.
Updates #18892
Change-Id: I06a687860b8d22ae26b1c391499c0f5183e4c485
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/110096
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When a loop has bound len(s)-delta, findIndVar detected it and
returned len(s) as (conservative) upper bound. This little lie
allowed loopbce to drop bound checks.
It is obviously more generic to teach prove about relations like
x+d<w for non-constant "w"; we already handled the case for
constant "w", so we just want to learn that if d<0, then x+d<w
proves that x<w.
To be able to remove the code from findIndVar, we also need
to teach prove that len() and cap() are always non-negative.
This CL allows to prove 633 more checks in cmd+std. Most
of them are cases where the code was already testing before
accessing a slice but the compiler didn't know it. For instance,
take strings.HasSuffix:
func HasSuffix(s, suffix string) bool {
return len(s) >= len(suffix) && s[len(s)-len(suffix):] == suffix
}
When suffix is a literal string, the compiler now understands
that the explicit check is enough to not emit a slice check.
I also found a loopbce test that was incorrectly
written to detect an overflow but had a off-by-one (on the
conservative side), so it unexpectly passed with this CL; I
changed it to really trigger the overflow as intended.
Change-Id: Ib5abade337db46b8811425afebad4719b6e46c4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105635
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
To be effective, this also requires being able to relax constraints
on min/max bound inclusiveness; they are now exposed through a flags,
and prove has been updated to handle it correctly.
Change-Id: I3490e54461b7b9de8bc4ae40d3b5e2fa2d9f0556
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104041
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Test both minimum and maximum bound, and prepare
formatting for more advanced tests (inclusive / esclusive bounds).
Change-Id: Ibe432916d9c938343bc07943798bc9709ad71845
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104040
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reuse findIndVar to discover induction variables, and then
register the facts we know about them into the facts table
when entering the loop block.
Moreover, handle "x+delta > w" while updating the facts table,
to be able to prove accesses to slices with constant offsets
such as slice[i-10].
Change-Id: I2a63d050ed58258136d54712ac7015b25c893d71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104038
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
When a branch is followed, we apply the relation as described
in the domain relation table. In case the relation is in the
positive domain, we can also infer an unsigned relation if,
by that point, we know that both operands are non-negative.
Fixes#20393
Change-Id: Ieaf0c81558b36d96616abae3eb834c788dd278d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/100278
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
mips64 softfloat support is based on mips implementation and introduces
new enviroment variable GOMIPS64.
GOMIPS64 is a GOARCH=mips64{,le} specific option, for a choice between
hard-float and soft-float. Valid values are 'hardfloat' (default) and
'softfloat'. It is passed to the assembler as
'GOMIPS64_{hardfloat,softfloat}'.
Change-Id: I7f73078627f7cb37c588a38fb5c997fe09c56134
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108475
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On amd64, Ctz must include special handling of zeros.
But the prove pass has enough information to detect whether the input
is non-zero, allowing a more efficient lowering.
Introduce new CtzNonZero ops to capture and use this information.
Benchmark code:
func BenchmarkVisitBits(b *testing.B) {
b.Run("8", func(b *testing.B) {
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
x := uint8(0xff)
for x != 0 {
sink = bits.TrailingZeros8(x)
x &= x - 1
}
}
})
// and similarly so for 16, 32, 64
}
name old time/op new time/op delta
VisitBits/8-8 7.27ns ± 4% 5.58ns ± 4% -23.35% (p=0.000 n=28+26)
VisitBits/16-8 14.7ns ± 7% 10.5ns ± 4% -28.43% (p=0.000 n=30+28)
VisitBits/32-8 27.6ns ± 8% 19.3ns ± 3% -30.14% (p=0.000 n=30+26)
VisitBits/64-8 44.0ns ±11% 38.0ns ± 5% -13.48% (p=0.000 n=30+30)
Fixes#25077
Change-Id: Ie6e5bd86baf39ee8a4ca7cadcf56d934e047f957
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/109358
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This change implements math.Round as an intrinsic on ppc64x so it can be
done using a single instruction.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkRound-16 2.60 0.69 -73.46%
Change-Id: I9408363e96201abdfc73ced7bcd5f0c29db006a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/109395
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The previous change sped up the pure computation form of LeadingZeros8.
This places it somewhat close to the table lookup form.
Depending on something that varies from toolchain to toolchain
(alignment, perhaps?), the slowdown from ditching the table lookup
is either 20% or 5%.
This benchmark is the best case scenario for the table lookup:
It is in the L1 cache already.
I think we're close enough that we can switch to the computational version,
and trust that the memory effects and binary size savings will be worth it.
Code:
func f8(x uint8) { z = bits.LeadingZeros8(x) }
Before:
"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=34 args=0x8 locals=0x0
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) TEXT "".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX "".x+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX AL, AX
0x0008 00008 (x.go:7) LEAQ math/bits.len8tab(SB), CX
0x000f 00015 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX (CX)(AX*1), AX
0x0013 00019 (x.go:7) ADDQ $-8, AX
0x0017 00023 (x.go:7) NEGQ AX
0x001a 00026 (x.go:7) MOVQ AX, "".z(SB)
0x0021 00033 (x.go:7) RET
After:
"".f8 STEXT nosplit size=30 args=0x8 locals=0x0
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) TEXT "".f8(SB), NOSPLIT, $0-8
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $0, gclocals·2a5305abe05176240e61b8620e19a815(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) FUNCDATA $1, gclocals·33cdeccccebe80329f1fdbee7f5874cb(SB)
0x0000 00000 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX "".x+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 (x.go:7) MOVBLZX AL, AX
0x0008 00008 (x.go:7) LEAL 1(AX)(AX*1), AX
0x000c 00012 (x.go:7) BSRL AX, AX
0x000f 00015 (x.go:7) ADDQ $-8, AX
0x0013 00019 (x.go:7) NEGQ AX
0x0016 00022 (x.go:7) MOVQ AX, "".z(SB)
0x001d 00029 (x.go:7) RET
Change-Id: Icc7db50a7820fb9a3da8a816d6b6940d7f8e193e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108942
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
We currently rewrite
(TESTQ (MOVQconst [c] x)) into (TESTQconst [c] x)
and (TESTQconst [-1] x) into (TESTQ x x)
if x is a (MOVQconst [-1]) we will be stuck in the endless rewrite loop.
Don't perform the rewrite in such cases.
Fixes#25006
Change-Id: I77f561ba2605fc104f1e5d5c57f32e9d67a2c000
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108879
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Rewrite x<<1+c into x+x+c, which can be expressed as a single LEAQ/LEAL.
Bit of a special case, but the single-instruction
LEA is both shorter and faster than SHL then ADD.
Triggers 293 times during make.bash.
Change-Id: I3f09c8e9a8f3859d1eeed336f095fc3ada79c2c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108938
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This triggers three times while building std,
once in image/png and twice in go/internal/gccgoimporter.
There are no instances in std in which a more aggressive
optimization would have triggered.
This doesn't necessarily avoid an allocation,
because escape analysis is already able in many cases
to use a temporary backing for the string,
but it does at a minimum avoid the runtime call and copy.
Fixes#24937
Change-Id: I7019e85638ba8cd7e2f03890e672558b858579bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/108035
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Due to some recent optimizations related to the compare
instruction, DS-form load instructions started to be used
to load 8-byte go.strings. This can cause link time errors
if the go.string is not aligned to 4 bytes.
For DS-form instructions, the value in the offset field must
be a multiple of 4. If the offset is known at the time the
rules are processed, a DS-form load will not be chosen. But for
go.strings, the offset is not known at that time, but a
relocation is generated indicating that the linker should fill
in the DS relocation. When the linker tries to fill in the
relocation, if the offset is not aligned properly, a link error
will occur.
To fix this, when loading a go.string using MOVDload, the full
address of the go.string is generated and loaded into the base
register. Then the go.string is loaded with a 0 offset field.
Added a testcase that reproduces this problem.
Fixes#24799
Change-Id: I6a154e8e1cba64eae290be0fbcb608b75884ecdd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107855
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The escape analysis models the flow of "content" of X with a
level of "indirection" (OIND node) of X. This content can be
pointer dereference, or slice/string element. For the latter
case, the type of the OIND node should be the element type of
the slice/string. This CL fixes this. In particular, this
matters when the element type is pointerless, where the data
flow should not cause any escape.
Fixes#15730.
Change-Id: Iba9f92898681625e7e3ddef76ae65d7cd61c41e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107597
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
If both inputs are constant offsets from the same pointer then we
can evaluate NeqPtr and EqPtr at compile time. Triggers a few times
during all.bash. Removes a conditional branch in the following
code:
copy(x[1:], x[:])
This branch was recently added as an optimization in CL 94596. We
now skip the memmove if the pointers are equal. However, in the
above code we know at compile time that they are never equal.
Also, when the offset is variable, check if the offset is zero
rather than if the pointers are equal. For example:
copy(x[a:], x[:])
This would now skip the copy if a == 0, rather than if x + a == x.
Finally I've also added a rule to make IsNonNil true for pointers
to values on the stack. The nil check elimination pass will catch
these anyway, but eliminating them here might eliminate branches
earlier.
Change-Id: If72f436fef0a96ad0f4e296d3a1f8b6c3e712085
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/106635
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
While writing CL 107315, I went back and forth for the syntax used for
constraints of build environments in which the architecture did not
support varitants ("plan9/amd64" vs "plan9/amd64/"). I eventually
settled for the latter because the code required less heuristics
(think parsing "plan9/386" vs "386/sse2") but there were a few
leftovers in code and comments.
Change-Id: I9d9a008f3814f9a1642609650eb571e7f1a675cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107338
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This CL makes the codegen testsuite automatically test all
architecture variants for architecture specified in tests. For
instance, if a test file specifies a "arm" test, it will be
automatically run on all GOARM variants (5,6,7), to increase
the coverage.
The CL also introduces a syntax to specify only a specific
variant (eg: "arm/7") in case the test makes sense only there.
The same syntax also allows to specify the operating system
in case it matters (eg: "plan9/386/sse2").
Fixes#24658
Change-Id: I2eba8b918f51bb6a77a8431a309f8b71af07ea22
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107315
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
And remove it from asmtest. Next CL will remove the whole
asmtest infrastructure.
Change-Id: I5851bf7c617456d62a3c6cffacf70252df7b056b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/107335
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The escape analysis models "loop depth". If the address of an
expression is assigned to something defined at a lower (outer)
loop depth, the escape analysis decides it escapes. However, it
uses the loop depth of the address operator instead of where
the RHS is defined. This causes an unnecessary escape if there is
an assignment inside a loop but the RHS is defined outside the
loop. This CL propagates the loop depth.
Fixes#24730.
Change-Id: I5ff1530688bdfd90561a7b39c8be9bfc009a9dae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105257
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
I was wrong. There was a need to loop here.
Fixes#24761
Change-Id: If13b3ab72febde930bdaebdddd1c05e0d0446020
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105615
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
And delete them from asm_test.
Also delete an arm64 cmov test has been already ported to the new test
harness.
Change-Id: I4458721e1f512bc9ecbbe1c22a2c9c7109ad68fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/106335
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
The check was previously disallowing package main from even importing
a non-function symbol named "main".
Fixes#24801.
Change-Id: I849b9713890429f0a16860ef16b5dc7e970d04a4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/106120
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
And delete them from asm_test.
Change-Id: I24f421b87e8cb4770c887a6dfd58eacd0088947d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/106056
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
And delete them from asm_test.
Change-Id: I9a75efe9858ef9d7ac86065f860c2ae3f25b0941
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105597
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Also, when statically building itabs, compare *types.Sym instead of
name alone so that method sets with duplicate non-exported methods are
handled correctly.
Fixes#24693.
Change-Id: I2db8a3d6e80991a71fef5586a15134b6de116269
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105039
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, constant pointer-typed expressions could use either Mpint
or NilVal as their Val depending on their construction, but const.go
expects each type to have a single corresponding Val kind.
This CL changes pointer-typed expressions to exclusively use Mpint.
Fixes#21221.
Change-Id: I6ba36c9b11eb19a68306f0b296acb11a8c254c41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105315
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Multi-byte comparison operations were used on amd64, arm64, i386
and s390x for comparisons with constant arrays, but only amd64 and
i386 for comparisons with string constants. This CL combines the
check for platform capability, since they have the same requirements,
and also enables both on ppc64le which also supports load merging.
Note that these optimizations currently use little endian byte order
which results in byte reversal instructions on s390x. This should
be fixed at some point.
Change-Id: Ie612d13359b50c77f4d7c6e73fea4a59fa11f322
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/102558
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
And delete them from asm_test.
Change-Id: I0e33d58274951ab5acb67b0117b60ef617ea887a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105735
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Method expressions with anonymous receiver types like "struct { T }.m"
require wrapper functions, which we weren't always creating. This in
turn resulted in linker errors.
This CL ensures that we generate wrapper functions for any anonymous
receiver types used in a method expression.
Fixes#22444.
Change-Id: Ia8ac27f238c2898965e57b82a91d959792d2ddd4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/105044
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
There were multiple ad hoc ways to create method symbols, with subtle
and confusing differences between them. This CL unifies them into a
single well-documented encoding and implementation.
This introduces some inconsequential changes to symbol format for the
sake of simplicity and consistency. Two notable changes:
1) Symbol construction is now insensitive to the package currently
being compiled. Previously, non-exported methods on anonymous types
received different method symbols depending on whether the method was
local or imported.
2) Symbols for method values parenthesized non-pointer receiver types
and non-exported method names, and also always package-qualified
non-exported method names. Now they use the same rules as normal
method symbols.
The methodSym function is also now stricter about rejecting
non-sensical method/receiver combinations. Notably, this means that
typecheckfunc needs to call addmethod to validate the method before
calling declare, which also means we no longer emit errors about
redeclaring bogus methods.
Change-Id: I9501c7a53dd70ef60e5c74603974e5ecc06e2003
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104876
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Since it's been reliably failing on one of the linux-arm builders
(arm5spacemonkey) for a long time.
Updates #24221.
Change-Id: I8fccc7e16631de497ccc2c285e510a110a93ad95
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104535
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
And delete them from asm_test.
Change-Id: Id533130470da9176a401cb94972f626f43a62148
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/103656
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
The logic in addBranchRestrictions didn't allow to correctly
model OpIs(Slice)Bound for signed domain, and it was also partly
implemented within addRestrictions.
Thanks to the previous changes, it is now possible to handle
the negative conditions correctly, so that we can learn
both signed/LT + unsigned/LT on the positive side, and
signed/GE + unsigned/GE on the negative side (but only if
the index can be proved to be non-negative).
This is able to prove ~50 more slice accesses in std+cmd.
Change-Id: I9858080dc03b16f85993a55983dbc4b00f8491b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104037
Run-TryBot: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Don't report errors if we don't have a correct type switch
guard; instead ignore it and leave it to the type-checker
to report the error. This leads to better error messages
concentrating on the type switch guard rather than errors
around (confusing) syntactic details.
Also clean up some code setting up AssertExpr (they never
have a nil Type field) and remove some incorrect TODOs.
Fixes#24470.
Change-Id: I69512f36e0417e3b5ea9c8856768e04b19d654a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/103615
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When test/run script was removed, these two tests
were changed to be executed by test/run.go.
Because errchk does not exit with non-zero status on
errors, they were silently failing for a while.
This change makes 2 things:
1. Compile tested packages in GOROOT/test to match older runner script
behavior (strictly required only in bug345, optional in bug248)
2. Check command output with "(?m)^BUG" regexp.
It approximates older `grep -q '^BUG' that was used before.
See referenced issue for detailed explanation.
Fixes#24629
Change-Id: Ie888dcdb4e25cdbb19d434bbc5cb03eb633e9ee8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/104095
Run-TryBot: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
