1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-10-04 22:21:22 -06:00
Commit Graph

129 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dmitriy Vyukov
c14b2689f0 runtime: faster finalizers
Linux/amd64, 2 x Intel Xeon E5620, 8 HT cores, 2.40GHz
benchmark                    old ns/op    new ns/op    delta
BenchmarkFinalizer              420.00       261.00  -37.86%
BenchmarkFinalizer-2            985.00       201.00  -79.59%
BenchmarkFinalizer-4           1077.00       244.00  -77.34%
BenchmarkFinalizer-8           1155.00       180.00  -84.42%
BenchmarkFinalizer-16          1182.00       184.00  -84.43%

BenchmarkFinalizerRun          2128.00      1378.00  -35.24%
BenchmarkFinalizerRun-2        1655.00      1418.00  -14.32%
BenchmarkFinalizerRun-4        1634.00      1522.00   -6.85%
BenchmarkFinalizerRun-8        2213.00      1581.00  -28.56%
BenchmarkFinalizerRun-16       2424.00      1599.00  -34.03%

Darwin/amd64, Intel L9600, 2 cores, 2.13GHz
benchmark                    old ns/op    new ns/op    delta
BenchmarkChanCreation          1451.00       926.00  -36.18%
BenchmarkChanCreation-2        3124.00      1412.00  -54.80%
BenchmarkChanCreation-4        6121.00      2628.00  -57.07%

BenchmarkFinalizer              684.00       420.00  -38.60%
BenchmarkFinalizer-2          11195.00       398.00  -96.44%
BenchmarkFinalizer-4          15862.00       654.00  -95.88%

BenchmarkFinalizerRun          2025.00      1397.00  -31.01%
BenchmarkFinalizerRun-2        3920.00      1447.00  -63.09%
BenchmarkFinalizerRun-4        9471.00      1545.00  -83.69%

R=golang-dev, cw, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4963057
2011-10-06 18:42:51 +03:00
Russ Cox
d324f2143b runtime: parallelize garbage collector mark + sweep
Running test/garbage/parser.out.

On a 4-core Lenovo X201s (Linux):
31.12u 0.60s 31.74r 	 1 cpu, no atomics
32.27u 0.58s 32.86r 	 1 cpu, atomic instructions
33.04u 0.83s 27.47r 	 2 cpu

On a 16-core Xeon (Linux):
33.08u 0.65s 33.80r 	 1 cpu, no atomics
34.87u 1.12s 29.60r 	 2 cpu
36.00u 1.87s 28.43r 	 3 cpu
36.46u 2.34s 27.10r 	 4 cpu
38.28u 3.85s 26.92r 	 5 cpu
37.72u 5.25s 26.73r	 6 cpu
39.63u 7.11s 26.95r	 7 cpu
39.67u 8.10s 26.68r	 8 cpu

On a 2-core MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.26 (circa 2009, MacBookPro5,5):
39.43u 1.45s 41.27r 	 1 cpu, no atomics
43.98u 2.95s 38.69r 	 2 cpu

On a 2-core Mac Mini Core 2 Duo 1.83 (circa 2008; Macmini2,1):
48.81u 2.12s 51.76r 	 1 cpu, no atomics
57.15u 4.72s 51.54r 	 2 cpu

The handoff algorithm is really only good for two cores.
Beyond that we will need to so something more sophisticated,
like have each core hand off to the next one, around a circle.
Even so, the code is a good checkpoint; for now we'll limit the
number of gc procs to at most 2.

R=dvyukov
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4641082
2011-09-30 09:40:01 -04:00
Hector Chu
9fd26872cb runtime: implement pprof support for windows
Credit to jp for proof of concept.

R=alex.brainman, jp, rsc, dvyukov
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4960057
2011-09-17 17:57:59 +10:00
Hector Chu
5c30325983 runtime: eliminate handle churn when churning channels on Windows
The Windows implementation of the net package churns through a couple of channels for every read/write operation.  This translates into a lot of time spent in the kernel creating and deleting event objects.

R=rsc, dvyukov, alex.brainman, jp
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4997044
2011-09-14 20:23:21 -04:00
Alex Brainman
7406379fff runtime: syscall to return both AX and DX for windows/386
Fixes #2181.

R=golang-dev, jp
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5000042
2011-09-14 16:19:45 +10:00
Alex Brainman
2a80882601 runtime: use cgo runtime functions to call windows syscalls
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev, jp, vcc.163
https://golang.org/cl/4926042
2011-08-27 23:17:00 +10:00
Russ Cox
33e9d24ad9 runtime: fix void warnings
Add -V flag to 6c command line to keep them fixed.

R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4930046
2011-08-23 13:13:27 -04:00
Russ Cox
03e9ea5b74 runtime: simplify stack traces
Make the stack traces more readable for new
Go programmers while preserving their utility for old hands.

- Change status number [4] to string.
- Elide frames in runtime package (internal details).
- Swap file:line and arguments.
- Drop 'created by' for main goroutine.
- Show goroutines in order of allocation:
  implies main goroutine first if nothing else.

There is no option to get the extra frames back.
Uncomment 'return 1' at the bottom of symtab.c.

$ 6.out
throw: all goroutines are asleep - deadlock!

goroutine 1 [chan send]:
main.main()
       /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:22 +0x8a

goroutine 2 [select (no cases)]:
main.sel()
       /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:11 +0x18
created by main.main
       /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:19 +0x23

goroutine 3 [chan receive]:
main.recv(0xf8400010a0, 0x0)
       /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:15 +0x2e
created by main.main
       /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:20 +0x50

goroutine 4 [chan receive (nil chan)]:
main.recv(0x0, 0x0)
       /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:15 +0x2e
created by main.main
       /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:21 +0x66
$

$ 6.out index
panic: runtime error: index out of range

goroutine 1 [running]:
main.main()
        /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:25 +0xb9
$

$ 6.out nil
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal 0xb code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x22ca]

goroutine 1 [running]:
main.main()
        /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:28 +0x211
$

$ 6.out panic
panic: panic

goroutine 1 [running]:
main.main()
        /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:30 +0x101
$

R=golang-dev, qyzhai, n13m3y3r, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4907048
2011-08-22 23:26:39 -04:00
Alex Brainman
72e83483a7 runtime: speed up cgo calls
Allocate Defer on stack during cgo calls, as suggested
by dvyukov. Also includes some comment corrections.

benchmark                   old,ns/op   new,ns/op
BenchmarkCgoCall                  669         330
(Intel Xeon CPU 1.80GHz * 4, Linux 386)

R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4910041
2011-08-18 12:17:09 -04:00
Russ Cox
3770b0e60c gc: implement nil chan support
The spec has defined nil chans this way for months.
I'm behind.

R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4897050
2011-08-17 15:54:17 -04:00
Russ Cox
65bde087ae gc: implement nil map support
The spec has defined nil maps this way for months.
I'm behind.

R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4901052
2011-08-17 14:56:27 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
a2677cf363 runtime: fix GC bitmap corruption
The corruption can occur when GOMAXPROCS
is changed from >1 to 1, since GOMAXPROCS=1
does not imply there is only 1 goroutine running,
other goroutines can still be not parked after
the change.

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4873050
2011-08-16 16:53:02 -04:00
Alex Brainman
9c774c3f26 runtime: correct seh installation during callbacks
Every time we enter callback from Windows, it is
possible that go exception handler is not at the top
of per-thread exception handlers chain. So it needs
to be installed again. At this moment this is done
by replacing top SEH frame with SEH frame as at time
of syscall for the time of callback. This is incorrect,
because, if exception strike, we won't be able to call
any exception handlers installed inside syscall,
because they are not in the chain. This changes
procedure to add new SEH frame on top of existing
chain instead.

I also removed m sehframe field, because I don't
think it is needed. We use single global exception
handler everywhere.

R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev, hectorchu
https://golang.org/cl/4832060
2011-08-10 17:17:28 +10:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
54e9406ffb runtime: add more specialized type algorithms
The change adds specialized type algorithms
for slices and types of size 8/16/32/64/128.
It significantly accelerates chan and map operations
for most builtin types as well as user structs.

benchmark                   old,ns/op   new,ns/op
BenchmarkChanUncontended          226          94
(on Intel Xeon E5620, 2.4GHz, Linux 64 bit)

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4815087
2011-08-08 09:35:32 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
d770aadee5 runtime: faster chan creation on Linux/FreeBSD/Plan9
The change removes chan finalizer (Lock destructor)
if it is not required on the platform.

benchmark                    old ns/op    new ns/op    delta
BenchmarkChanCreation          1132.00       381.00  -66.34%
BenchmarkChanCreation-2        1215.00       243.00  -80.00%
BenchmarkChanCreation-4        1084.00       186.00  -82.84%
BenchmarkChanCreation-8        1415.00       154.00  -89.12%
BenchmarkChanCreation-16       1386.00       144.00  -89.61%
(on 2 x Intel Xeon E5620, 8 HT cores, 2.4 GHz, Linux)

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4841041
2011-08-04 08:31:03 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
a496c9eaa6 runtime: correct Note documentation
Reflect the fact that notesleep() can be called
by exactly one thread.

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4816064
2011-08-03 15:51:55 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
91f0f18100 runtime: fix data race in findfunc()
The data race can lead to reads of partially
initialized concurrently mutated symbol data.
The change also adds a simple sanity test
for Caller() and FuncForPC().

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4817058
2011-07-29 13:47:24 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
4e5086b993 runtime: improve Linux mutex
The implementation is hybrid active/passive spin/blocking mutex.
The design minimizes amount of context switches and futex calls.
The idea is that all critical sections in runtime are intentially
small, so pure blocking mutex behaves badly causing
a lot of context switches, thread parking/unparking and kernel calls.
Note that some synthetic benchmarks become somewhat slower,
that's due to increased contention on other data structures,
it should not affect programs that do any real work.

On 2 x Intel E5620, 8 HT cores, 2.4GHz
benchmark                     old ns/op    new ns/op    delta
BenchmarkSelectContended         521.00       503.00   -3.45%
BenchmarkSelectContended-2       661.00       320.00  -51.59%
BenchmarkSelectContended-4      1139.00       629.00  -44.78%
BenchmarkSelectContended-8      2870.00       878.00  -69.41%
BenchmarkSelectContended-16     5276.00       818.00  -84.50%
BenchmarkChanContended           112.00       103.00   -8.04%
BenchmarkChanContended-2         631.00       174.00  -72.42%
BenchmarkChanContended-4         682.00       272.00  -60.12%
BenchmarkChanContended-8        1601.00       520.00  -67.52%
BenchmarkChanContended-16       3100.00       372.00  -88.00%
BenchmarkChanSync                253.00       239.00   -5.53%
BenchmarkChanSync-2             5030.00      4648.00   -7.59%
BenchmarkChanSync-4             4826.00      4694.00   -2.74%
BenchmarkChanSync-8             4778.00      4713.00   -1.36%
BenchmarkChanSync-16            5289.00      4710.00  -10.95%
BenchmarkChanProdCons0           273.00       254.00   -6.96%
BenchmarkChanProdCons0-2         599.00       400.00  -33.22%
BenchmarkChanProdCons0-4        1168.00       659.00  -43.58%
BenchmarkChanProdCons0-8        2831.00      1057.00  -62.66%
BenchmarkChanProdCons0-16       4197.00      1037.00  -75.29%
BenchmarkChanProdCons10          150.00       140.00   -6.67%
BenchmarkChanProdCons10-2        607.00       268.00  -55.85%
BenchmarkChanProdCons10-4       1137.00       404.00  -64.47%
BenchmarkChanProdCons10-8       2115.00       828.00  -60.85%
BenchmarkChanProdCons10-16      4283.00       855.00  -80.04%
BenchmarkChanProdCons100         117.00       110.00   -5.98%
BenchmarkChanProdCons100-2       558.00       218.00  -60.93%
BenchmarkChanProdCons100-4       722.00       287.00  -60.25%
BenchmarkChanProdCons100-8      1840.00       431.00  -76.58%
BenchmarkChanProdCons100-16     3394.00       448.00  -86.80%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork0      2014.00      1996.00   -0.89%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork0-2    1207.00      1127.00   -6.63%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork0-4    1913.00       611.00  -68.06%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork0-8    3016.00       949.00  -68.53%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork0-16   4320.00      1154.00  -73.29%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork10     1906.00      1897.00   -0.47%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork10-2   1123.00      1033.00   -8.01%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork10-4   1076.00       571.00  -46.93%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork10-8   2748.00      1096.00  -60.12%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork10-16  4600.00      1105.00  -75.98%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork100    1884.00      1852.00   -1.70%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork100-2  1235.00      1146.00   -7.21%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork100-4  1217.00       619.00  -49.14%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork100-8  1534.00       509.00  -66.82%
BenchmarkChanProdConsWork100-16 4126.00       918.00  -77.75%
BenchmarkSyscall                  34.40        33.30   -3.20%
BenchmarkSyscall-2               160.00       121.00  -24.38%
BenchmarkSyscall-4               131.00       136.00   +3.82%
BenchmarkSyscall-8               139.00       131.00   -5.76%
BenchmarkSyscall-16              161.00       168.00   +4.35%
BenchmarkSyscallWork             950.00       950.00   +0.00%
BenchmarkSyscallWork-2           481.00       480.00   -0.21%
BenchmarkSyscallWork-4           268.00       270.00   +0.75%
BenchmarkSyscallWork-8           156.00       169.00   +8.33%
BenchmarkSyscallWork-16          188.00       184.00   -2.13%
BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock         36.40        35.60   -2.20%
BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-2       81.40        45.10  -44.59%
BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-4      126.00       108.00  -14.29%
BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-8      112.00       112.00   +0.00%
BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-16     110.00       112.00   +1.82%
BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock            35.30        35.30   +0.00%
BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-2         118.00       124.00   +5.08%
BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-4         105.00       108.00   +2.86%
BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-8         101.00       111.00   +9.90%
BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-16        112.00       118.00   +5.36%
BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock        810.00       811.00   +0.12%
BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-2      476.00       414.00  -13.03%
BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-4      238.00       228.00   -4.20%
BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-8      140.00       126.00  -10.00%
BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-16     117.00       116.00   -0.85%
BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock           810.00       811.00   +0.12%
BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-2         454.00       466.00   +2.64%
BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-4         243.00       241.00   -0.82%
BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-8         145.00       137.00   -5.52%
BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-16        132.00       123.00   -6.82%
BenchmarkContendedSemaphore      123.00       102.00  -17.07%
BenchmarkContendedSemaphore-2     34.80        34.90   +0.29%
BenchmarkContendedSemaphore-4     34.70        34.80   +0.29%
BenchmarkContendedSemaphore-8     34.70        34.70   +0.00%
BenchmarkContendedSemaphore-16    34.80        34.70   -0.29%
BenchmarkMutex                    26.80        26.00   -2.99%
BenchmarkMutex-2                 108.00        45.20  -58.15%
BenchmarkMutex-4                 103.00       127.00  +23.30%
BenchmarkMutex-8                 109.00       147.00  +34.86%
BenchmarkMutex-16                102.00       152.00  +49.02%
BenchmarkMutexSlack               27.00        26.90   -0.37%
BenchmarkMutexSlack-2            149.00       165.00  +10.74%
BenchmarkMutexSlack-4            121.00       209.00  +72.73%
BenchmarkMutexSlack-8            101.00       158.00  +56.44%
BenchmarkMutexSlack-16            97.00       129.00  +32.99%
BenchmarkMutexWork               792.00       794.00   +0.25%
BenchmarkMutexWork-2             407.00       409.00   +0.49%
BenchmarkMutexWork-4             220.00       209.00   -5.00%
BenchmarkMutexWork-8             267.00       160.00  -40.07%
BenchmarkMutexWork-16            315.00       300.00   -4.76%
BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack          792.00       793.00   +0.13%
BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-2        406.00       404.00   -0.49%
BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-4        225.00       212.00   -5.78%
BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-8        268.00       136.00  -49.25%
BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-16       300.00       300.00   +0.00%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite100          27.10        27.00   -0.37%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite100-2        33.10        40.80  +23.26%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite100-4       113.00        88.10  -22.04%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite100-8       119.00        95.30  -19.92%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite100-16      148.00       109.00  -26.35%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite10           29.60        29.40   -0.68%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite10-2        111.00        61.40  -44.68%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite10-4        270.00       208.00  -22.96%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite10-8        204.00       185.00   -9.31%
BenchmarkRWMutexWrite10-16       261.00       190.00  -27.20%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite100    1040.00      1036.00   -0.38%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite100-2   593.00       580.00   -2.19%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite100-4   470.00       365.00  -22.34%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite100-8   468.00       289.00  -38.25%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite100-16  604.00       374.00  -38.08%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite10      951.00       951.00   +0.00%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite10-2   1001.00       928.00   -7.29%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite10-4   1555.00      1006.00  -35.31%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite10-8   2085.00      1171.00  -43.84%
BenchmarkRWMutexWorkWrite10-16  2082.00      1614.00  -22.48%

R=rsc, iant, msolo, fw, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4711045
2011-07-29 12:44:06 -04:00
Russ Cox
db9229def8 cgo: add GoBytes, fix gmp example
Fixes #1640.
Fixes #2007.

R=golang-dev, adg
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4815063
2011-07-28 12:39:50 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
d6ed1b70ad runtime: replace centralized ncgocall counter with a distributed one
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4809042
2011-07-21 11:29:08 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
86a659cad0 runtime: fix data race during Itab hash update/lookup
The data race is on newly published Itab nodes, which are
both unsafely published and unsafely acquired. It can
break on IA-32/Intel64 due to compiler optimizations
(most likely not an issue as of now) and on ARM due to
hardware memory access reorderings.

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4673055
2011-07-13 11:22:41 -07:00
Quan Yong Zhai
fe9991e8b2 runtime: replace runtime.mcpy with runtime.memmove
faster string operations, and more

tested on linux/386

runtime_test.BenchmarkSliceToString                    642          532  -17.13%
runtime_test.BenchmarkStringToSlice                    636          528  -16.98%
runtime_test.BenchmarkConcatString                    1109          897  -19.12%

R=r, iant, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4674042
2011-07-12 17:30:40 -07:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
c9152a8568 runtime: eliminate contention during stack allocation
Standard-sized stack frames use plain malloc/free
instead of centralized lock-protected FixAlloc.
Benchmark results on HP Z600 (2 x Xeon E5620, 8 HT cores, 2.40GHz)
are as follows:
benchmark                                        old ns/op    new ns/op    delta
BenchmarkStackGrowth                               1045.00       949.00   -9.19%
BenchmarkStackGrowth-2                             3450.00       800.00  -76.81%
BenchmarkStackGrowth-4                             5076.00       513.00  -89.89%
BenchmarkStackGrowth-8                             7805.00       471.00  -93.97%
BenchmarkStackGrowth-16                           11751.00       321.00  -97.27%

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4657091
2011-07-12 09:24:32 -07:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
013ad89c9b runtime: eliminate false sharing on runtime.goidgen
runtime.goidgen can be quite frequently modified and
shares cache line with the following variables,
it leads to false sharing.
50c6b0 b nfname
50c6b4 b nfunc
50c6b8 b nfunc$17
50c6bc b nhist$17
50c6c0 B runtime.checking
50c6c4 B runtime.gcwaiting
50c6c8 B runtime.goidgen
50c6cc B runtime.gomaxprocs
50c6d0 B runtime.panicking
50c6d4 B strconv.IntSize
50c6d8 B src/pkg/runtime/_xtest_.ss
50c6e0 B src/pkg/runtime/_xtest_.stop
50c6e8 b addrfree
50c6f0 b addrmem
50c6f8 b argv

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4673054
2011-07-12 01:25:14 -04:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
909f31872a runtime: eliminate false sharing on random number generators
Use machine-local random number generator instead of
racy global ones.

R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4674049
2011-07-12 01:23:58 -04:00
Wei Guangjing
f83609f642 runtime: windows/amd64 port
R=rsc, alex.brainman, hectorchu, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3759042
2011-06-29 17:37:56 +10:00
Dmitriy Vyukov
997c00f991 runtime: replace Semacquire/Semrelease implementation
1. The implementation uses distributed hash table of waitlists instead of a centralized one.
  It significantly improves scalability for uncontended semaphores.
2. The implementation provides wait-free fast-path for signalers.
3. The implementation uses less locks (1 lock/unlock instead of 5 for Semacquire).
4. runtime·ready() call is moved out of critical section.
5. Semacquire() does not call semwake().
Benchmark results on HP Z600 (2 x Xeon E5620, 8 HT cores, 2.40GHz)
are as follows:
benchmark                                        old ns/op    new ns/op    delta
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaUncontended                58.20        36.30  -37.63%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaUncontended-2             199.00        18.30  -90.80%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaUncontended-4             327.00         9.20  -97.19%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaUncontended-8             491.00         5.32  -98.92%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaUncontended-16            946.00         4.18  -99.56%

runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock               59.00        36.80  -37.63%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-2            167.00       138.00  -17.37%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-4            333.00       129.00  -61.26%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-8            464.00       130.00  -71.98%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntNonblock-16          1015.00       136.00  -86.60%

runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock                  58.80        36.70  -37.59%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-2               294.00       149.00  -49.32%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-4               333.00       177.00  -46.85%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-8               471.00       221.00  -53.08%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaSyntBlock-16              990.00       227.00  -77.07%

runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock              829.00       832.00   +0.36%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-2            425.00       419.00   -1.41%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-4            308.00       220.00  -28.57%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-8            394.00       147.00  -62.69%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkNonblock-16          1510.00       149.00  -90.13%

runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock                 828.00       813.00   -1.81%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-2               428.00       436.00   +1.87%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-4               232.00       219.00   -5.60%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-8               392.00       251.00  -35.97%
runtime_test.BenchmarkSemaWorkBlock-16             1524.00       298.00  -80.45%

sync_test.BenchmarkMutexUncontended                  24.10        24.00   -0.41%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexUncontended-2                12.00        12.00   +0.00%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexUncontended-4                 6.25         6.17   -1.28%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexUncontended-8                 3.43         3.34   -2.62%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexUncontended-16                2.34         2.32   -0.85%

sync_test.BenchmarkMutex                             24.70        24.70   +0.00%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutex-2                          208.00        99.50  -52.16%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutex-4                         2744.00       256.00  -90.67%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutex-8                         5137.00       556.00  -89.18%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutex-16                        5368.00      1284.00  -76.08%

sync_test.BenchmarkMutexSlack                        24.70        25.00   +1.21%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexSlack-2                    1094.00       186.00  -83.00%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexSlack-4                    3430.00       402.00  -88.28%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexSlack-8                    5051.00      1066.00  -78.90%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexSlack-16                   6806.00      1363.00  -79.97%

sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWork                        793.00       792.00   -0.13%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWork-2                      398.00       398.00   +0.00%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWork-4                     1441.00       308.00  -78.63%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWork-8                     8532.00       847.00  -90.07%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWork-16                    8225.00      2760.00  -66.44%

sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack                   793.00       793.00   +0.00%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-2                 418.00       414.00   -0.96%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-4                4481.00       480.00  -89.29%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-8                6317.00      1598.00  -74.70%
sync_test.BenchmarkMutexWorkSlack-16               9111.00      3038.00  -66.66%

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4631059
2011-06-28 15:09:53 -04:00
Jonathan Mark
ddde52ae56 runtime: SysMap uses MAP_FIXED if needed on 64-bit Linux
This change was adapted from gccgo's libgo/runtime/mem.c at
Ian Taylor's suggestion.  It fixes all.bash failing with
"address space conflict: map() =" on amd64 Linux with kernel
version 2.6.32.8-grsec-2.1.14-modsign-xeon-64.
With this change, SysMap will use MAP_FIXED to allocate its desired
address space, after first calling mincore to check that there is
nothing else mapped there.

R=iant, dave, n13m3y3r, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4438091
2011-06-07 21:50:10 -07:00
Robert Hencke
3fbd478a8a pkg: spelling tweaks, I-Z
also, a few miscellaneous fixes to files outside pkg

R=golang-dev, dsymonds, mikioh.mikioh, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4517116
2011-05-30 18:02:59 +10:00
Alexey Borzenkov
b701cf3332 runtime: make StackSystem part of StackGuard
Fixes #1779

R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4543052
2011-05-16 16:57:49 -04:00
Russ Cox
370276a3e5 runtime: stack split + garbage collection bug
The g->sched.sp saved stack pointer and the
g->stackbase and g->stackguard stack bounds
can change even while "the world is stopped",
because a goroutine has to call functions (and
therefore might split its stack) when exiting a
system call to check whether the world is stopped
(and if so, wait until the world continues).

That means the garbage collector cannot access
those values safely (without a race) for goroutines
executing system calls.  Instead, save a consistent
triple in g->gcsp, g->gcstack, g->gcguard during
entersyscall and have the garbage collector refer
to those.

The old code was occasionally seeing (because of
the race) an sp and stk that did not correspond to
each other, so that stk - sp was not the number of
stack bytes following sp.  In that case, if sp < stk
then the call scanblock(sp, stk - sp) scanned too
many bytes (anything between the two pointers,
which pointed into different allocation blocks).
If sp > stk then stk - sp wrapped around.
On 32-bit, stk - sp is a uintptr (uint32) converted
to int64 in the call to scanblock, so a large (~4G)
but positive number.  Scanblock would try to scan
that many bytes and eventually fault accessing
unmapped memory.  On 64-bit, stk - sp is a uintptr (uint64)
promoted to int64 in the call to scanblock, so a negative
number.  Scanblock would not scan anything, possibly
causing in-use blocks to be freed.

In short, 32-bit platforms would have seen either
ineffective garbage collection or crashes during garbage
collection, while 64-bit platforms would have seen
either ineffective or incorrect garbage collection.
You can see the invalid arguments to scanblock in the
stack traces in issue 1620.

Fixes #1620.
Fixes #1746.

R=iant, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4437075
2011-04-27 23:21:12 -04:00
Russ Cox
40fccbce6b reflect: more efficient; cannot Set result of NewValue anymore
* Reduces malloc counts during gob encoder/decoder test from 6/6 to 3/5.

The current reflect uses Set to mean two subtly different things.

(1) If you have a reflect.Value v, it might just represent
itself (as in v = reflect.NewValue(42)), in which case calling
v.Set only changed v, not any other data in the program.

(2) If you have a reflect Value v derived from a pointer
or a slice (as in x := []int{42}; v = reflect.NewValue(x).Index(0)),
v represents the value held there.  Changing x[0] affects the
value returned by v.Int(), and calling v.Set affects x[0].

This was not really by design; it just happened that way.

The motivation for the new reflect implementation was
to remove mallocs.  The use case (1) has an implicit malloc
inside it.  If you can do:

       v := reflect.NewValue(0)
       v.Set(42)
       i := v.Int()  // i = 42

then that implies that v is referring to some underlying
chunk of memory in order to remember the 42; that is,
NewValue must have allocated some memory.

Almost all the time you are using reflect the goal is to
inspect or to change other data, not to manipulate data
stored solely inside a reflect.Value.

This CL removes use case (1), so that an assignable
reflect.Value must always refer to some other piece of data
in the program.  Put another way, removing this case would
make

       v := reflect.NewValue(0)
       v.Set(42)

as illegal as

       0 = 42.

It would also make this illegal:

       x := 0
       v := reflect.NewValue(x)
       v.Set(42)

for the same reason.  (Note that right now, v.Set(42) "succeeds"
but does not change the value of x.)

If you really wanted to make v refer to x, you'd start with &x
and dereference it:

       x := 0
       v := reflect.NewValue(&x).Elem()  // v = *&x
       v.Set(42)

It's pretty rare, except in tests, to want to use NewValue and then
call Set to change the Value itself instead of some other piece of
data in the program.  I haven't seen it happen once yet while
making the tree build with this change.

For the same reasons, reflect.Zero (formerly reflect.MakeZero)
would also return an unassignable, unaddressable value.
This invalidates the (awkward) idiom:

       pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
       v := reflect.Zero(pv.Type().Elem())
       pv.PointTo(v)

which, when the API changed, turned into:

       pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
       v := reflect.Zero(pv.Type().Elem())
       pv.Set(v.Addr())

In both, it is far from clear what the code is trying to do.  Now that
it is possible, this CL adds reflect.New(Type) Value that does the
obvious thing (same as Go's new), so this code would be replaced by:

       pv := ... some Ptr Value we have ...
       pv.Set(reflect.New(pv.Type().Elem()))

The changes just described can be confusing to think about,
but I believe it is because the old API was confusing - it was
conflating two different kinds of Values - and that the new API
by itself is pretty simple: you can only Set (or call Addr on)
a Value if it actually addresses some real piece of data; that is,
only if it is the result of dereferencing a Ptr or indexing a Slice.

If you really want the old behavior, you'd get it by translating:

       v := reflect.NewValue(x)

into

       v := reflect.New(reflect.Typeof(x)).Elem()
       v.Set(reflect.NewValue(x))

Gofix will not be able to help with this, because whether
and how to change the code depends on whether the original
code meant use (1) or use (2), so the developer has to read
and think about the code.

You can see the effect on packages in the tree in
https://golang.org/cl/4423043/.

R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4435042
2011-04-18 14:35:33 -04:00
Russ Cox
c19b373c8a runtime: cpu profiling support
R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4306043
2011-03-23 11:43:37 -04:00
Russ Cox
8bf34e3356 gc, runtime: replace closed(c) with x, ok := <-c
R=ken2, ken3
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4259064
2011-03-11 14:47:26 -05:00
Russ Cox
f9ca3b5d5b runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization
* Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack).
* Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack.
* Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule).

Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that
exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack
(Grecovery, Gstackalloc).

The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and
starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the
way cgo uses the m->g0 stack.  Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled)
C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go,
it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that
other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames.
Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at
this point would end up running scheduler with the lower
sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for
a call to scheduler.  If scheduler then wrote any function call
arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack
frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack.
I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with
calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback.
This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe
it is a real bug nonetheless.  Switching to runtime.mcall, which
only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into
functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug.

* Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c.
* Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences.
* Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names.
* Add test suite as misc/cgo/test.

Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall,
and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg.

The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves
most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running
on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and
only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls
to exitsyscall and entersyscall).

The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's
approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector
were running, it would still barge in and start doing things
like call malloc.  Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of
entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads
when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560.

Fixes #1560.

R=iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 10:37:42 -05:00
Russ Cox
324cc3d040 runtime: record goroutine creation pc and display in traceback
package main

func main() {
        go func() { *(*int)(nil) = 0 }()
        select{}
}

panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference

[signal 0xb code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1c96]

runtime.panic+0xac /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1083
        runtime.panic(0x11bf0, 0xf8400011f0)
runtime.panicstring+0xa3 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/runtime.c:116
        runtime.panicstring(0x29a57, 0x0)
runtime.sigpanic+0x144 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/darwin/thread.c:470
        runtime.sigpanic()
main._func_001+0x16 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:188
        main._func_001()
runtime.goexit /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:150
        runtime.goexit()
----- goroutine created by -----
main.main+0x3d /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:4

goroutine 1 [4]:
runtime.gosched+0x77 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:598
        runtime.gosched()
runtime.block+0x27 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:680
        runtime.block()
main.main+0x44 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/x.go:5
        main.main()
runtime.mainstart+0xf /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/amd64/asm.s:77
        runtime.mainstart()
runtime.goexit /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:150
        runtime.goexit()
----- goroutine created by -----
_rt0_amd64+0x8e /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/amd64/asm.s:64

Fixes #1563.

R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4243046
2011-03-02 13:42:02 -05:00
Russ Cox
582fd17e11 runtime: idle goroutine
This functionality might be used in environments
where programs are limited to a single thread,
to simulate a select-driven network server.  It is
not exposed via the standard runtime API.

R=r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4254041
2011-02-27 23:32:42 -05:00
Russ Cox
b5dfac45ba runtime: always run stackalloc on scheduler stack
Avoids deadlocks like the one below, in which a stack split happened
in order to call lock(&stacks), but then the stack unsplit cannot run
because stacks is now locked.

The only code calling stackalloc that wasn't on a scheduler
stack already was malg, which creates a new goroutine.

runtime.futex+0x23 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/linux/amd64/sys.s:139
       runtime.futex()
futexsleep+0x50 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/linux/thread.c:51
       futexsleep(0x5b0188, 0x300000003, 0x100020000, 0x4159e2)
futexlock+0x85 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/linux/thread.c:119
       futexlock(0x5b0188, 0x5b0188)
runtime.lock+0x56 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/linux/thread.c:158
       runtime.lock(0x5b0188, 0x7f0d27b4a000)
runtime.stackfree+0x4d /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/malloc.goc:336
       runtime.stackfree(0x7f0d27b4a000, 0x1000, 0x8, 0x7fff37e1e218)
runtime.oldstack+0xa6 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:705
       runtime.oldstack()
runtime.lessstack+0x22 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/amd64/asm.s:224
       runtime.lessstack()
----- lessstack called from goroutine 2 -----
runtime.lock+0x56 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/linux/thread.c:158
       runtime.lock(0x5b0188, 0x40a5e2)
runtime.stackalloc+0x55 /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/malloc.c:316
       runtime.stackalloc(0x1000, 0x4055b0)
runtime.malg+0x3d /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:803
       runtime.malg(0x1000, 0x40add9)
runtime.newproc1+0x12b /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:854
       runtime.newproc1(0xf840027440, 0x7f0d27b49230, 0x0, 0x49f238, 0x40, ...)
runtime.newproc+0x2f /home/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:831
       runtime.newproc(0x0, 0xf840027440, 0xf800000010, 0x44b059)
...

R=r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4216045
2011-02-23 15:51:20 -05:00
Russ Cox
d9fd11443c ld: detect stack overflow due to NOSPLIT
Fix problems found.

On amd64, various library routines had bigger
stack frames than expected, because large function
calls had been added.

runtime.assertI2T: nosplit stack overflow
        120	assumed on entry to runtime.assertI2T
        8	after runtime.assertI2T uses 112
        0	on entry to runtime.newTypeAssertionError
        -8	on entry to runtime.morestack01

runtime.assertE2E: nosplit stack overflow
        120	assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2E
        16	after runtime.assertE2E uses 104
        8	on entry to runtime.panic
        0	on entry to runtime.morestack16
        -8	after runtime.morestack16 uses 8

runtime.assertE2T: nosplit stack overflow
        120	assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2T
        16	after runtime.assertE2T uses 104
        8	on entry to runtime.panic
        0	on entry to runtime.morestack16
        -8	after runtime.morestack16 uses 8

runtime.newselect: nosplit stack overflow
        120	assumed on entry to runtime.newselect
        56	after runtime.newselect uses 64
        48	on entry to runtime.printf
        8	after runtime.printf uses 40
        0	on entry to vprintf
        -8	on entry to runtime.morestack16

runtime.selectdefault: nosplit stack overflow
        120	assumed on entry to runtime.selectdefault
        56	after runtime.selectdefault uses 64
        48	on entry to runtime.printf
        8	after runtime.printf uses 40
        0	on entry to vprintf
        -8	on entry to runtime.morestack16

runtime.selectgo: nosplit stack overflow
        120	assumed on entry to runtime.selectgo
        0	after runtime.selectgo uses 120
        -8	on entry to runtime.gosched

On arm, 5c was tagging functions NOSPLIT that should
not have been, like the recursive function printpanics:

printpanics: nosplit stack overflow
        124	assumed on entry to printpanics
        112	after printpanics uses 12
        108	on entry to printpanics
        96	after printpanics uses 12
        92	on entry to printpanics
        80	after printpanics uses 12
        76	on entry to printpanics
        64	after printpanics uses 12
        60	on entry to printpanics
        48	after printpanics uses 12
        44	on entry to printpanics
        32	after printpanics uses 12
        28	on entry to printpanics
        16	after printpanics uses 12
        12	on entry to printpanics
        0	after printpanics uses 12
        -4	on entry to printpanics

R=r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4188061
2011-02-22 17:40:40 -05:00
Russ Cox
6779350349 runtime: minor cleanup
implement runtime.casp on amd64.
keep simultaneous panic messages separate.

R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4188053
2011-02-16 13:21:13 -05:00
Hector Chu
239ef63bf2 runtime: take the callback return value from the stack
R=brainman, lxn, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4126056
2011-02-10 23:02:27 +11:00
Russ Cox
b287d7cbe1 runtime: more detailed panic traces, line number work
Follow morestack, so that crashes during a stack split
give complete traces.  Also mark stack segment boundaries
as an aid to debugging.

Correct various line number bugs with yet another attempt
at interpreting the pc/ln table.  This one has a chance at
being correct, because I based it on reading src/cmd/ld/lib.c
instead of on reading the documentation.

Fixes #1138.
Fixes #1430.
Fixes #1461.

throw: runtime: split stack overflow

runtime.throw+0x3e /home/rsc/g/go2/src/pkg/runtime/runtime.c:78
        runtime.throw(0x81880af, 0xf75c8b18)
runtime.newstack+0xad /home/rsc/g/go2/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:728
        runtime.newstack()
runtime.morestack+0x4f /home/rsc/g/go2/src/pkg/runtime/386/asm.s:184
        runtime.morestack()
----- morestack called from stack: -----
runtime.new+0x1a /home/rsc/g/go2/src/pkg/runtime/malloc.c:288
        runtime.new(0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
gongo.makeBoard+0x33 /tmp/Gongo/gongo_robot_test.go:344
        gongo.makeBoard(0x809d238, 0x1, 0xf76092c8, 0x1)
----- stack segment boundary -----
gongo.checkEasyScore+0xcc /tmp/Gongo/gongo_robot_test.go:287
        gongo.checkEasyScore(0xf764b710, 0x0, 0x809d238, 0x1)
gongo.TestEasyScore+0x8c /tmp/Gongo/gongo_robot_test.go:255
        gongo.TestEasyScore(0xf764b710, 0x818a990)
testing.tRunner+0x2f /home/rsc/g/go2/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:132
        testing.tRunner(0xf764b710, 0xf763b5dc, 0x0)
runtime.goexit /home/rsc/g/go2/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:149
        runtime.goexit()

R=ken2, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4000053
2011-02-02 16:44:20 -05:00
Hector Chu
62afa225af windows: multiple improvements and cleanups
The callback mechanism has been made more flexible.
Eliminated one round of argument copying in Syscall.
Faster Get/SetLastError implemented.
Added gettime for gc perf profiling.

R=rsc, brainman, mattn, rog
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4058046
2011-02-01 11:49:24 -05:00
Luuk van Dijk
7400be87d8 runtime: generate Go defs for C types.
R=rsc, mattn
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4047047
2011-01-31 12:27:28 +01:00
Russ Cox
4608feb18b runtime: simpler heap map, memory allocation
The old heap maps used a multilevel table, but that
was overkill: there are only 1M entries on a 32-bit
machine and we can arrange to use a dense address
range on a 64-bit machine.

The heap map is in bss.  The assumption is that if
we don't touch the pages they won't be mapped in.

Also moved some duplicated memory allocation
code out of the OS-specific files.

R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4118042
2011-01-28 15:03:26 -05:00
Russ Cox
afc6928ad9 runtime: prefer fixed stack allocator over general memory allocator
* move stack constants from proc.c to runtime.h
  * make memclr take uintptr length

R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3985046
2011-01-25 16:35:36 -05:00
Russ Cox
b0543ddd8a gc, runtime: make range on channel safe for multiple goroutines
Fixes #397.

R=ken2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3994043
2011-01-18 15:59:19 -05:00
Russ Cox
12307008e9 runtime: print signal information during panic
$ 6.out
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference

[signal 11 code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x1c16]

runtime.panic+0xa7 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:1089
	runtime.panic(0xf6c8, 0x25c010)
runtime.panicstring+0x69 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/runtime.c:88
	runtime.panicstring(0x24814, 0x0)
runtime.sigpanic+0x144 /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/darwin/thread.c:465
	runtime.sigpanic()
main.f+0x16 /Users/rsc/x.go:5
	main.f()
main.main+0x1c /Users/rsc/x.go:9
	main.main()
runtime.mainstart+0xf /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/amd64/asm.s:77
	runtime.mainstart()
runtime.goexit /Users/rsc/g/go/src/pkg/runtime/proc.c:149
	runtime.goexit()

R=r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4036042
2011-01-18 14:15:11 -05:00
Russ Cox
141a4a1759 runtime: fix arm reflect.call boundary case
The fault was lucky: when it wasn't faulting it was silently
copying a word from some other block and later putting
that same word back.  If some other goroutine had changed
that word of memory in the interim, too bad.

The ARM code was inconsistent about whether the
"argument frame" included the saved LR.  Including it made
some things more regular but mostly just caused confusion
in the places where the regularity broke.  Now the rule
reflects reality: argp is always a pointer to arguments,
never a saved link register.

Renamed struct fields to make meaning clearer.

Running ARM in QEMU, package time's gotest:
  * before: 27/58 failed
  * after: 0/50

R=r, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3993041
2011-01-14 14:05:20 -05:00
Alex Brainman
a41d85498e runtime: revert 6974:1f3c3696babb
I missed that environment is used during runtime setup,
well before go init() functions run. Implemented os-dependent
runtime.goenvs functions to allow for different unix, plan9 and
windows versions of environment discovery.

R=rsc, paulzhol
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3787046
2011-01-12 11:48:15 +11:00