\\?\c:\ is a "root directory" that is not subject to further matching,
but the ? makes it look like a pattern, which was causing an
infinite recursion. Make sure the code understands the ? is not a pattern.
Fixes#15879.
Change-Id: I3a4310bbc398bcae764b9f8859c875317345e757
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31460
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
RFC 3986 §3.3 disallows relative URL paths in which the first segment
contains a colon, presumably to avoid confusion with scheme:foo syntax,
which is exactly what happened in #16822.
Fixes#16822.
Change-Id: Ie4449e1dd21c5e56e3b126e086c3a0b05da7ff24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31582
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
Fixed by CL 31092 already, but that change is a few steps away
from the problem observed here, so add an explicit test.
Fixes#17019.
Change-Id: If4ece1418e6596b1976961347889ce12c5969637
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31466
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
All prior versions of Go have allowed redefining empty templates
to become non-empty. Unfortunately, that has never consistently
taken effect in html/template after the first execution:
// define and execute
t := template.New("root")
t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}{{end}}<a href="{{template "T"}}">`)
t.Execute(w, nil) // <a href="">
// redefine
t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}my.url{{end}}`) // succeeds, but ignored
t.Execute(w, nil) // <a href="">
When Go 1.6 added {{block...}} to text/template, that loosened the
redefinition rules to allow redefinition at any time. The loosening was
undone a bit in html/template, although inconsistently:
// define and execute
t := template.New("root")
t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}body{{end}}`)
t.Lookup("T").Execute(ioutil.Discard, nil)
// attempt to redefine
t.Parse(`{{define "T"}}body{{end}}`) // rejected in all Go versions
t.Lookup("T").Parse("body") // OK as of Go 1.6, likely unintentionally
Like in the empty->non-empty case, whether future execution takes
notice of a redefinition basically can't be explained without going into
the details of the template escape analysis.
Address both the original inconsistencies in whether a redefinition
would have any effect and the new inconsistencies about whether a
redefinition is allowed by adopting a new rule: no parsing or modifying
any templates after the first execution of any template in the same set.
Template analysis begins at first execution, and once template analysis
has begun, we simply don't have the right logic to update the analysis
for incremental modifications (and never have).
If this new rule breaks existing uses of templates that we decide need
to be supported, we can try to invalidate all escape analysis for the
entire set after any modifications. But let's wait on that until we know
we need to and why.
Also fix documentation of text/template redefinition policy
(redefinition is always OK).
Fixes#15761.
Change-Id: I7d58d7c08a7d9df2440ee0d651a5b2ecaff3006c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31464
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
The Go resolver reports invalid domain name for '!!!.local',
but that is allowed by multicast DNS. In general we can't predict
what future relaxations might come along, and libc resolvers
do not distinguish 'no such host' from 'invalid name', so stop
making that distinction here too. Always use 'no such host'.
Fixes#12421.
Change-Id: I8f22604767ec9e270434e483da52b337833bad71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31468
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This is the documented (and now implemented) behavior.
Fixes#16841.
Change-Id: Ic75adc5ba18303ed9578e04284f32933f905d6a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31577
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
If a directory in GOPATH is unreadable, we should keep looking for other
packages. Otherwise we can give the misleading error "no buildable Go
source files".
Fixes#16240
Change-Id: I38e1037f56ec463d3c141f0508fb74211cb90f13
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31713
Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
What matters during go get -u is not whether there is an import comment
but whether we resolved the path by an HTML <meta> tag.
Fixes#16471.
Change-Id: I6b194a3f73a7962a0170b4d5cf51cfed74e02c00
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31658
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
Maybe the go generate is generating the imports,
or maybe there's some other good reason the code
is incomplete.
The help text already says:
Note that go generate does not parse the file, so lines that look
like directives in comments or multiline strings will be treated
as directives.
We'll still reject Go source files that don't begin with a package statement
or have a syntax error in the import block, but those are I think more
defensible rejections.
Fixes#16307.
Change-Id: I4f8496c02fdff993f038adfed2df4db7f067dc06
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31659
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
It's always been like this, so document it.
Fixes#14351.
Change-Id: Ic6a7c44881bac0209fa6863a487fabec5ec0214e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31663
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
Avoid crash in the specific case reported in #15201 but also
print more useful error message, avoiding slice panic.
Fixes#15201.
Fixes#16167.
Fixes#16566.
Change-Id: I66499621e9678a05bc9b12b0da77906cd7027bdd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31665
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
After resizing the scan buffer, we can immediately read into the
newly-resized buffer since we know there is now space.
Fixes#15712.
Change-Id: I56fcfaeb67045ee753a012c37883aa7c81b6e877
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31715
Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Makes windows same as others.
Change-Id: Ib4651e06d0bd37473ac345d36c91f39aa8f5e662
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31791
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently mspan.isFree technically returns whether the object was not
allocated *during this cycle*. Fix it so it actually returns whether
or not the object is allocated so the method is more generally useful
(especially for debugging).
It has one caller, which is carefully written to be insensitive to
this distinction, but this lets us simplify this caller.
Change-Id: I9d79cf784a56015e434961733093c1d8d03fc091
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30145
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
morestack writes the context pointer to gobuf.ctxt, but since
morestack is written in assembly (and has to be very careful with
state), it does *not* invoke the requisite write barrier for this
write. Instead, we patch this up later, in newstack, where we invoke
an explicit write barrier for ctxt.
This already requires some subtle reasoning, and it's going to get a
lot hairier with the hybrid barrier.
Fix this by simplifying the whole mechanism. Instead of writing
gobuf.ctxt in morestack, just pass the value of the context register
to newstack and let it write it to gobuf.ctxt. This is a normal Go
pointer write, so it gets the normal Go write barrier. No subtle
reasoning required.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: Ia6bf8459bfefc6828f53682ade32c02412e4db63
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31550
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
So errnoErr can be used in other packages.
This is something I missed when I sent CL 28990.
Fixes#17539
Change-Id: I8ee3b79c4d70ca1e5b29e5b40024f7ae9a86061e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/29690
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is an alternate solution to https://golang.org/cl/31445
Instead of making NewRequest return a request with Request.Body == nil
to signal a zero byte body, add a well-known variable that means
explicitly zero.
Too many tests inside Google (and presumably the outside world)
broke.
Change-Id: I78f6ecca8e8aa1e12179c234ccfb6bcf0ee29ba8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31726
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
This makes it possible to use URLs with gob.
Ideally we'd also implement TextMarshaler and TextUnmarshaler,
but that would change the JSON encoding of a URL from something like:
{"Scheme":"https","Opaque":"","User":null,"Host":"www.google.com","Path":"/x","RawPath":"","ForceQuery":false,"RawQuery":"y=z","Fragment":""}
to something like:
"https://www.google.com/x?y=z"
That'd be nice, but it would break code expecting the old form.
Fixes#10964.
Change-Id: I83f06bc2bedd2ba8a5d8eef03ea0056d045c258f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31467
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Now that we have the Clone method on tls.Config, net/http doesn't need
any custom functions to do that any more.
Change-Id: Ib60707d37f1a7f9a7d7723045f83e59eceffd026
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31595
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
According to the GNU manual, the format is:
<<<
GNU.sparse.size=size
GNU.sparse.numblocks=numblocks
repeat numblocks times
GNU.sparse.offset=offset
GNU.sparse.numbytes=numbytes
end repeat
>>>
The logic in parsePAX converts the repeating sequence of
(offset, numbytes) pairs (which is not PAX compliant) into a single
comma-delimited list of numbers (which is now PAX compliant).
Thus, we validate the following:
* The (offset, numbytes) headers must come in the correct order.
* The ',' delimiter cannot appear in the value.
We do not validate that the value is a parsible decimal since that
will be determined later.
Change-Id: I8d6681021734eb997898227ae8603efb1e17c0c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31439
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Previously, the check to make sure we only considered constant cases
for duplicates was skipping past integer ranges, because those use
n.List instead of n.Left. Thanks to Emmanuel Odeke for investigating
and helping to identify the root cause.
Fixes#17517.
Change-Id: I46fcda8ed9c346ff3a9647d50b83f1555587b740
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31716
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Updates http2 to x/net/http2 git rev 40a0a18 for:
http2: fix Server race with concurrent Read/Close
http2: make Server reuse 64k request body buffer between requests
http2: never Read from Request.Body in Transport to determine ContentLength
Fixes#17480
Updates #17071
Change-Id: If142925764a2e148f95957f559637cfc1785ad21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31737
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The old wording over-promised.
Fixes#16957
Change-Id: Iaac04de0d24eb17a0db66beeeab9de70d0f6d391
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31735
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Bergan <tombergan@google.com>
This partially reverts commit 01bf5cc219.
For unknown reasons, this CL was causing an internal test to allocate
1.2GB when it used to allocate less than 300MB.
Change-Id: I41d767781e0ae9e43bf670e2a186ee074821eca4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31674
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
With the old code rewriting refs would rewrite the inner arguments
rather than the outer ones, leaving a reference to C.val in the outer
arguments.
Change-Id: I9b91cb4179eccd08500d14c6591bb15acf8673eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31672
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This commit fixes two bizarrely related bugs:
1. The signatures for the call* functions were wrong, indicating that
they had only two pointer arguments instead of three. We didn't notice
because the call* functions are defined by a macro expansion, which go
vet doesn't see.
2. deferArgs on a defer object with a zero-sized frame returned a
pointer just past the end of the allocated object, which is illegal in
Go (and can cause the "sweep increased allocation count" crashes).
In a fascinating twist, these two bugs canceled each other out, which
is why I'm fixing them together. The pointer returned by deferArgs is
used in only two ways: as an argument to memmove and as an argument to
reflectcall. memmove is NOSPLIT, so the argument was unobservable.
reflectcall immediately tail calls one of the call* functions, which
are not NOSPLIT, but the deferArgs pointer just happened to be the
third argument that was accidentally marked as a scalar. Hence, when
the garbage collector scanned the stack, it didn't see the bad
pointer as a pointer.
I believe this was all ultimately benign. In principle, stack growth
during the reflectcall could fail to update the args pointer, but it
never points to the stack, so it never needs to be updated. Also in
principle, the garbage collector could fail to mark the args object
because of the incorrect call* signatures, but in all calls to
reflectcall (including the ones spelled "call" in the reflect package)
the args object is kept live by the calling stack.
Change-Id: Ic932c79d5f4382be23118fdd9dba9688e9169e28
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31654
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
