They could get picked up by reflect code, yielding the wrong type.
Fixes#22605
Change-Id: Ie11fb361ca7f3255e662037b3407565c8f0a2c4c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76315
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Be more pessimistic when parsing if/switch/for headers for better error
messages when things go wrong.
Fixes#22581.
Change-Id: Ibb99925291ff53f35021bc0a59a4c9a7f695a194
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76290
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Updates #21317
@mdempsky fixed issue #21317 with CL 66810,
so lock a test in to ensure we don't regress.
The test is manual for now before test/run.go
has support for matching column numbers so do
it old school and match expected output after
an exec.
Change-Id: I6c2a66ddf04248f79d17ed7033a3280d50e41562
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76150
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Updates #22389
@mdempsky's CL 70850 fixed the unnecessary
compile stack trace printing during ICE diagnostics.
This CL adds a test to lock in this behavior.
Change-Id: I9ce49923c80b78cb8c0bb5dc4af3c860a43d63ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74630
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Instead of trying to validate map key types eagerly in some
cases, delay their validation to the end of type-checking,
when we all type information is present.
Passes go build -toolexec 'toolstash -cmp' -a std .
Fixes#21273.
Fixes#21657.
Change-Id: I532369dc91c6adca1502d6aa456bb06b57e6c7ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/75310
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The test for #18902 reads the assembly stream to be sure
that the line number does not change too often (this is an
indication that debugging the code will be unpleasant and
that the compiler is probably getting line numbers "wrong").
It checks that it is getting "enough" input, but the
compiler has gotten enough better since the test was written
that it now fails for lack of enough input. The old
threshould was 200 instructions, the new one is 150 (the
minimum observed input is on arm64 with 184 instructions).
Fixes#22494.
Change-Id: Ibba7e9ff4ab6a7be369e5dd5859d150b7db94653
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74357
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
KeepAlive needs to introduce a use of the spill of the
value it is keeping alive. Without that, we don't guarantee
that the spill dominates the KeepAlive.
This bug was probably introduced with the code to move spills
down to the dominator of the restores, instead of always spilling
just after the value itself (CL 34822).
Fixes#22458.
Change-Id: I94955a21960448ffdacc4df775fe1213967b1d4c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74210
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
...because that's an illegal addressing mode.
I double-checked handling of this code, and 387 is the only
place where this check is missing.
Fixes#22429
Change-Id: I2284fe729ea86251c6af2f04076ddf7a5e66367c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73551
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If n.Type==nil after typechecking, then we should have already
reported a more useful error somewhere else. Just return 0 in
evalunsafe without trying to do anything else that's likely to cause
problems.
Also, further split out issue7525.go into more test files, because
cmd/compile reports at most one typechecking loop per compilation
unit.
Fixes#22351.
Change-Id: I3ebf505f72c48fcbfef5ec915606224406026597
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/72251
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fine-tune skipping of tokens after missing closing parentheses in lists.
Fixes#22164.
Change-Id: I575d86e21048cd40340a2c08399e8b0deec337cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71250
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, we were treating cross-package function calls as free for
inlining budgeting.
In theory, we should be able to recompute InlCost from the
exported/reimported function bodies. However, that process mutates the
structure of the Node AST enough that it doesn't preserve InlCost. To
avoid unexpected issues, just record and restore InlCost in the export
data.
Fixes#19261.
Change-Id: Iac2bc0d32d4f948b64524aca657051f9fc96d92d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70151
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
It should be skipped on 32-bit architectures.
Change-Id: If7a64b9e90e47c3e8734dd62729bfd2944ae926c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70071
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If the stack frame is too large, abort immediately.
We used to generate code first, then abort.
In issue 22200, generating code raised a panic
so we got an ICE instead of an error message.
Change the max frame size to 1GB (from 2GB).
Stack frames between 1.1GB and 2GB didn't used to work anyway,
the pcln table generation would have failed and generated an ICE.
Fixes#22200
Change-Id: I1d918ab27ba6ebf5c87ec65d1bccf973f8c8541e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69810
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This re-enables functionality that inadvertently was disabled in the
(long) past.
Also, don't perform branch checks if we had errors in a function
to avoid spurious errors or (worst-case) crashes.
Slightly modified test/fixedbugs/issue14006.go to make sure the
test still reports invalid label errors (the surrounding function
must be syntactically correct).
Change-Id: Id5642930877d7cf3400649094ec75c753b5084b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69770
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Keep left-to-right order when referring to the number of
variables and values involved.
Fixes#22159.
Change-Id: Iccca12d3222f9d5e049939a9ccec07513c393faa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68690
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
C_PPAUTO was matching offsets that is a multiple 8. But this
condition is dropped in CL 55610, causing unaligned offset
between 256 and 504 mistakenly matched to some classes, e.g.
C_UAUTO8K. This CL restores this condition, also fixes an
error that C_PPAUTO shouldn't match C_PSAUTO, because the
latter is not guaranteed to be multiple of 8. C_PPAUTO_8 is
unnecessary, removed.
Fixes#21992.
Change-Id: I75d5a0e5f5dc3dae335721fbec1bbcd4a3b862f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65730
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Historically, gc optimistically parsed the left-hand side of
assignments as expressions. Later, if it discovered a ":=" assignment,
it rewrote the parsed expressions as declarations.
This failed in the presence of dot imports though, because we lost
information about whether an imported object was named via a bare
identifier "Foo" or a normal qualified "pkg.Foo".
This CL fixes the issue by specially noding the left-hand side of ":="
assignments.
Fixes#22076.
Change-Id: I18190ecdb863112e7d009e1687e6112eec559921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66810
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use entire inlining call stack to decide whether two panic calls
can be merged. We used to merge panic calls when only the leaf
line numbers matched, but that leads to places higher up the call
stack being merged incorrectly.
Fixes#22083
Change-Id: Ia41400a80de4b6ecf3e5089abce0c42b65e9b38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/67632
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Very similar fix to the one made in golang.org/cl/65655. This time it's
for switches on interface values, as we look for duplicates in a
different manner to keep types in mind.
As before, add a small regression test.
Updates #22001.
Fixes#22063.
Change-Id: I9a55d08999aeca262ad276b4649b51848a627b02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66450
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
If we have
y = <int16> (MOVBQSX x)
z = <int32> (MOVWQSX y)
We used to use this rewrite rule:
(MOVWQSX x:(MOVBQSX _)) -> x
But that resulted in replacing z with a value whose type
is only int16. Then if z is spilled and restored, it gets
zero extended instead of sign extended.
Instead use the rule
(MOVWQSX (MOVBQSX x)) -> (MOVBQSX x)
The result is has the correct type, so it can be spilled
and restored correctly. It might mean that a few more extension
ops might not be eliminated, but that's the price for correctness.
Fixes#21963
Change-Id: I6ec82c3d2dbe43cc1fee6fb2bd6b3a72fca3af00
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65290
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a regression introduced by myself in golang.org/cl/41852,
confirmed by the program that reproduces the crash that can be seen in
the added test.
Fixes#21988.
Change-Id: I18d5b2b3de63ced84db705b18490b00b16b59e02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65655
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The compiler generates wrapper methods to forward interface method
calls (which are always pointer-based) to value methods. These
wrappers appear in the call stack even though they are an
implementation detail. This leaves ugly "<autogenerated>" functions in
stack traces and can throw off skip counts for stack traces.
Fix this by considering these runtime frames in printed stack traces
so they will only be printed if runtime frames are being printed, and
by eliding them from the call stack expansion used by CallersFrames
and Caller.
This removes the test for issue 4388 since that was checking that
"<autogenerated>" appeared in the stack trace instead of something
even weirder. We replace it with various runtime package tests.
Fixes#16723.
Change-Id: Ice3f118c66f254bb71478a664d62ab3fc7125819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45412
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The existing logic tried to advance the offset for each variable's
width, but then tried to undo this logic with the array and struct
handling code. It can all be much simpler by only worrying about
computing offsets within the array and struct code.
While here, include a short-circuit for zero-width arrays to fix a
pedantic compiler failure case.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#20739.
Change-Id: I98af9bb512a33e3efe82b8bf1803199edb480640
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64471
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, after inlining a call, we made a second pass to rewrite
the AST's position information to record the inlined stack frame. The
call arguments were part of this AST, but it would be incorrect to
rewrite them too, so extra effort was made to temporarily remove them
while the position rewriting was done.
However, this extra logic was only done for regular arguments: it was
not done for receiver arguments. Consequently if m was inlined in
"f().m(g(), h())", g and h would have correct call frames, but f would
appear to be called by m.
The fix taken by this CL is to merge setpos into inlsubst and only
rewrite position information for nodes that were actually copied from
the original function AST body. As a side benefit, this eliminates an
extra AST pass and some AST walking code.
Fixes#21879.
Change-Id: I22b25c208313fc25c358d3a2eebfc9b012400084
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64470
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, we used OXFALL vs OFALL to distinguish fallthrough
statements that had been validated. Because in the Node AST we flatten
statement blocks, OXCASE and OXFALL needed to keep track of their
block scopes for this purpose.
Now that we have an AST that keeps these separate, we can just perform
the validation earlier.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#14540.
Change-Id: I8421eaba16c2b3b72c9c5483b5cf20b14261385e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/61130
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
By setting both a valid size and alignment for broken recursive types,
we can appease some more safety checks and prevent compiler crashes.
Fixes#21882.
Change-Id: Ibaa137d8aa2c2a9d521462f144d7016c4abfd6e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64430
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Currently, we handle "x op= y" by rewriting as "x = x op y", while
ensuring that any calls or receive operations in 'x' are only
evaluated once. Notably, pointer indirection, indexing operations,
etc. are left alone as it's typically safe to re-evaluate those.
However, those operations were interleaved with evaluating 'y', which
could include function calls that might cause re-evaluation to yield
different memory addresses.
As a fix, simply ensure that we order side-effecting operations in 'y'
before either evaluation of 'x'.
Fixes#21687.
Change-Id: Ib14e77760fda9c828e394e8e362dc9e5319a84b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/60091
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The assembler barfs on large offsets. Make sure that all the
instructions that need to have their offsets in an int32
1) check on any rule that computes offsets for such instructions
2) change their aux fields so the check builder checks it.
The assembler also silently misassembled offsets between 1<<31
and 1<<32. Add a check in the assembler to barf on those as well.
Fixes#21655
Change-Id: Iebf24bf10f9f37b3ea819ceb7d588251c0f46d7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/59630
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
If an error was already printed during LHS conversion step, we don't reprint
the "cannot convert" error.
In particular, this prevents `_ = int("1")` (and all similar casts) from
resulting in multiple identical error messages being printed.
Fixes#20812.
Change-Id: If6e52c59eab438599d641ecf6f110ebafca740a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46912
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
It is possible to have an unexported name with a nil package,
for an embedded field whose type is a pointer to an unexported type.
We must encode that fact in the type..namedata symbol name,
to avoid incorrectly merging an unexported name with an exported name.
Fixes#21120
Change-Id: I2e3879d77fa15c05ad92e0bf8e55f74082db5111
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50710
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Load/store-merging and move optimizations can result in unaligned
memory accesses. This is fine so long as the load/store instruction
used does not take a relative offset. In the SSA rules this means we
must not merge (MOVDaddr (SB)) ops into loads/stores unless we can
guarantee the alignment of the target.
Fixes#21048.
Change-Id: I70f13a62a148d5f0a56e704e8f76e36b4a4226d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49250
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
If the LHS is unassignable, there's no point in trying to make sure
the RHS can be assigned to it or making sure they're realizable
types. This is consistent with go/types.
In particular, this prevents "1 = 2" from causing a panic when "1"
still ends up with the type "untyped int", which is not realizable.
Fixes#20813.
Change-Id: I4710bdaac2e375ef12ec29b888b8ac84fb640e56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46835
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fixes crash when printing a related error message later on.
Fixes#20789.
Change-Id: I6d2c35aafcaeda26a211fc6c8b7dfe4a095a3efe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46713
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Minimal reconstruction of reported failure case.
Manually verified that test fails with CL 45911 reverted.
Change-Id: Ia5d11500d91b46ba1eb5d841db3987edb9136c39
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45970
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Before CL 36170, we identified all function bodies that needed to be
exported before writing any export data.
With CL 36170, we started identifying additional functions while
exporting function bodies. As a consequence, we cannot use a
range-based for loop for iterating over function bodies anymore.
Fixes#18895.
Change-Id: I9cbefa8d311ca8c9898c8272b2ac365976b02396
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45817
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
These are used by DIV[U] and MOD[U] assembly instructions.
Add a test in the stdlib so we actually exercise linking
to these routines.
Update #19507
Change-Id: I0d8e19a53e3744abc0c661ea95486f94ec67585e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45703
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The existing code used Type.String() to obtain the name of a type;
specifically type reflect.Method in this case. However, Type.String()
formatting is intended for error messages and uses the format
pkgpath.name instead of pkgname.name if a package (in this case
package reflect) is imported multiple times. As a result, the
reflect.Method type detection failed under peculiar circumstances
(see the included test case).
Thanks to https://github.com/ericlagergren for tracking down
an easy way to make the bug disappear (which in turn directly
led to the underlying cause).
Fixes#19028.
Change-Id: I1b9c5dfd183260a9be74969fe916a94146fc36da
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45777
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This results in names to unexported fields like
net.(*Dialer)."".deadline instead of net.(*Dialer).deadline.
Fixes#18419.
Change-Id: I0415c68b77cc16125c2401320f56308060ac3f25
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44070
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Arguments to inlined calls are hidden from setPos as follows:
args := as.Rlist
as.Rlist.Set(nil)
// setPos...
as.Rlist.Set(args.Slice())
Previously, this code had no effect since the value of as was
overwritten by the assignment in the retvars loop.
Fixes#19799.
Change-Id: Iaf97259f82fdba8b236136337cc42b2774c7fef5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44351
Run-TryBot: David Lazar <lazard@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Apply the fix in CL 44355 to MIPS.
ARM64 has these rules but commented out for performance reason.
Fix the commented rules, in case they are enabled in the future.
Enhance the test so it triggers the failure on ARM and MIPS without
the fix.
Updates #20530.
Change-Id: I82d77448e3939a545fe519d0a29a164f8fa5417c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44430
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Replacing byteload-of-bytestore-of-x with x is incorrect
when x contains a larger-than-byte value (and so on for
16 and 32-bit load/store pairs). Replace "x" with the
appropriate zero/sign extension of x, which if unnecessary
will be repaired by other rules.
Made logic for arm match x86 and amd64; yields minor extra
optimization, plus I am (much) more confident it's correct,
despite inability to reproduce bug on arm.
Ppc64 lacks this optimization, hence lacks this problem.
See related https://golang.org/cl/37154/Fixes#20530.
Change-Id: I6af9cac2ad43bee99cafdcb04725ce7e55a43323
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/44355
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Cannot reproduce original problem. Compiler internals
have changed enough such that this appears to work now.
Restore original test (exported interfaces), but also
keep version of the test using non-exported interfaces.
Fixes#15596.
Change-Id: Idb32da80239963242bd5d1609343c80f19773b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43622
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
When compiling concurrently, we walk all functions before compiling
any of them. Walking functions can cause variables to switch from
being non-addrtaken to addrtaken, e.g. to prepare for a runtime call.
Typechecking propagates addrtaken-ness of closure variables to
their outer variables, so that capturevars can decide whether to
pass the variable's value or a pointer to it.
When all functions are compiled immediately, as long as the containing
function is compiled prior to the closure, this propagation has no effect.
When compilation is deferred, though, in rare cases, this results in
a change in the addrtaken-ness of a variable in the outer function,
which in turn changes the compiler's output.
(This is rare because in a great many cases, a temporary has been
introduced, insulating the outer variable from modification.)
But concurrent compilation must generate identical results.
To fix this, track whether capturevars has run.
If it has, there is no need to update outer variables
when closure variables change.
Capturevars always runs before any functions are walked or compiled.
The remainder of the changes in this CL are to support the test.
In particular, -d=compilelater forces the compiler to walk all
functions before compiling any of them, despite being non-concurrent.
This is useful because -live is fundamentally incompatible with
concurrent compilation, but we want -c=1 to have no behavior changes.
Fixes#20250
Change-Id: I89bcb54268a41e8588af1ac8cc37fbef856a90c2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42853
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Tuple ops are weird. They are essentially a pair of ops,
one which consumes a mem and one which generates a mem (the Select1).
The schedule pass didn't handle these quite right.
Fix the scheduler to include both parts of the paired op in
the store chain. That makes sure that loads are correctly ordered
with respect to the first of the pair.
Add a check for the ssacheck builder, that there is only one
live store at a time. I thought we already had such a check, but
apparently not...
Fixes#20335
Change-Id: I59eb3446a329100af38d22820b1ca2190ca46a78
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43294
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reuse block head or preceding instruction's line number for
register allocator's spill, fill, copy, rematerialization
instructionsl; and also for phi, and for no-src-pos
instructions. Assembler creates same line number tables
for copy-predecessor-line and for no-src-pos,
but copy-predecessor produces better-looking assembly
language output with -S and with GOSSAFUNC, and does not
require changes to tests of existing assembly language.
Split "copyInto" into two cases, one for register allocation,
one for otherwise. This caused the test score line change
count to increase by one, which may reflect legitimately
useful information preserved. Without any special treatment
for copyInto, the change count increases by 21 more, from
51 to 72 (i.e., quite a lot).
There is a test; using two naive "scores" for line number
churn, the old numbering is 2x or 4x worse.
Fixes#18902.
Change-Id: I0a0a69659d30ee4e5d10116a0dd2b8c5df8457b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36207
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
If there were more unused imports than
the maximum default number of errors to report,
the set of reported imports was non-deterministic.
Fix by accumulating and sorting them prior to output.
Fixes#20298
Change-Id: Ib3d5a15fd7dc40009523fcdc1b93ddc62a1b05f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42954
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
If we've already complained about a type T,
don't complain again about further expressions
involving it.
Fixes#20245 and hopefully all of its ilk.
Change-Id: Ic0abe8235d52e8a7ac40e3615aea8f3a54fd7cec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42690
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Compile:
package p
var f = func(...A)
Before this CL:
x.go:3:13: type %!v(PANIC=runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference) is not an expression
x.go:3:17: undefined: A
After this CL:
x.go:3:13: type func(...<T>) is not an expression
x.go:3:17: undefined: A
Found with go-fuzz.
Fixes#20233
Change-Id: Ibb232b3954c4091071440eba48b44c4022a8083f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42610
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Because the hint parameter is supposed to be treated
purely as a hint, if it doesn't meet the requirements
we disregard it and continue as if there was no hint
at all.
Fixes#19926
Change-Id: I86e7f99472fad6b99ba4e2fd33e4a9e55d55115e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40854
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Without this, T can sneak through to the backend
with its width unknown.
Fixes#20174
Change-Id: I9b21e0e2641f75e360cc5e45dcb4eefe8255b675
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42175
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Updates #18089.
Test for that issue; it was inadvertently fixed
by CL 34988. Ensure that we don't regress on the fix.
Change-Id: Icb85fc20dbb0a47f028f088281319b552b16759d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42173
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The code in #20162 contains an embedded interface.
It didn't get dowidth'd by the frontend,
and during DWARF generation, ngotype asked
for a string description of it,
which triggered a request for the number of fields
in the interface, which triggered a dowidth,
which is disallowed in the backend.
The other changes in this CL are to support the test.
Fixes#20162
Change-Id: I4d0be5bd949c361d4cdc89a8ed28b10977e40cf9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/42131
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
dowidth is fundamentally unsafe to call from the back end;
it will cause data races.
Replace all calls to dowidth in the backend with
assertions that the width has been calculated.
Then fix all the cases in which that was not so,
including the cases from #20145.
Fixes#20145.
Change-Id: Idba3d19d75638851a30ec2ebcdb703c19da3e92b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41970
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
At VARKILLs, zero a variable if it is ambiguously live.
After the VARKILL anything this variable references
might be collected. If it were to become live again later,
the GC will see references to already-collected objects.
We don't know a variable is ambiguously live until very
late in compilation (after lowering, register allocation, ...),
so it is hard to generate the code in an arch-independent way.
We also have to be careful not to clobber any registers.
Fortunately, this almost never happens so performance is ~irrelevant.
There are only 2 instances where this triggers in the stdlib.
Fixes#20029
Change-Id: Ia9585a91d7b823fad4a9d141d954464cc7af31f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/41076
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Instead of a separate check control flow pass (checkcfg.go)
operating on nodes, perform this check at parse time on the
new syntax tree. Permits this check to be done concurrently,
and doesn't depend on the specifics of the symbol's dclstack
implementation anymore. The remaining dclstack uses will be
removed in a follow-up change.
- added CheckBranches Mode flag (so we can turn off the check
if we only care about syntactic correctness, e.g. for tests)
- adjusted test/goto.go error messages: the new branches
checker only reports if a goto jumps into a block, but not
which block (we may want to improve this again, eventually)
- also, the new branches checker reports one variable that
is being jumped over by a goto, but it may not be the first
one declared (this is fine either way)
- the new branches checker reports additional errors for
fixedbugs/issue14006.go (not crucial to avoid those errors)
- the new branches checker now correctly reports only
variable declarations being jumped over, rather than
all declarations (issue 8042). Added respective tests.
Fixes#8042.
Change-Id: I53b6e1bda189748e1e1fb5b765a8a64337c27d40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39998
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The fixedbugs/issue12536.go file was erroneously deleted just before
committing the patch that fixed the issue (CL 14400).
That's an easy test and there's a small reproducer in the issue, add
it back.
Updates #12536
Change-Id: Ib7b0cd245588299e9a5469e1d75805fd0261ce1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40712
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Also adjust truncfltlit to make it more similar to trunccmplxlit, and
make it report an error for bad Etypes.
Fixes#19947
Change-Id: I6684523e989c2293b8a8e85bd2bfb9c399c5ea36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40453
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
When casting an ideal to complex{64,128}, for example during the
evaluation of
var a = complex64(0) / 1e-50
we want the compiler to report a division-by-zero error if a divisor
would be zero after the cast.
We already do this for floats; for example
var b = float32(0) / 1e-50
generates a 'division by zero' error at compile time (because
float32(1e-50) is zero, and the cast is done before performing the
division).
There's no such check in the path for complex{64,128} expressions, and
no cast is performed before the division in the evaluation of
var a = complex64(0) / 1e-50
which compiles just fine.
This patch changes the convlit1 function so that complex ideals
components (real and imag) are correctly truncated to float{32,64}
when doing an ideal -> complex{64, 128} cast.
Fixes#11674
Change-Id: Ic5f8ee3c8cfe4c3bb0621481792c96511723d151
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37891
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This avoids false positives
like those found in #19880.
Fixes#19880
Change-Id: I583c16cc3c71e7462a72500db9ea2547c468f8c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/40255
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Given code such as
type T struct {
_ string
}
func f() {
var x = T{"space"}
// ...
}
the compiler rewrote the 'var x' line as
var x T
x._ = "space"
The compiler then rejected the assignment to
a blank field, thus rejecting valid code.
It also failed to catch a number of invalid assignments.
And there were insufficient checks for validity
when emitting static data, leading to ICEs.
To fix, check earlier for explicit blanks field names,
explicitly handle legit blanks in sinit,
and don't try to emit static data for nodes
for which typechecking has failed.
Fixes#19482
Change-Id: I594476171d15e6e8ecc6a1749e3859157fe2c929
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38006
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Dupok symbols may be defined in multiple packages. Its associated
package is chosen sort of arbitrarily (the first containing package
that the linker loads). Canonicalize its package to the package
with which it will be laid down in text, which is the first package
in dependency order that defines the symbol. So later passes (for
example, trampoline insertion pass) know that the dupok symbol
is laid down along with the package.
Fixes#19764.
Change-Id: I7cbc7474ff3016d5069c8b7be04af934abab8bc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39150
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Now that we no longer generate dead code,
it is possible to follow block predecessors
into infinite loops with no variable definitions,
causing an infinite loop during phi insertion.
To fix that, check explicitly whether the predecessor
is dead in lookupVarOutgoing, and if so, bail.
The loop in lookupVarOutgoing is very hot code,
so I am wary of adding anything to it.
However, a long, CPU-only benchmarking run shows no
performance impact at all.
Fixes#19783
Change-Id: I8ef8d267e0b20a29b5cb0fecd7084f76c6f98e47
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38913
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The uintptr-typed Data field in reflect.SliceHeader and
reflect.StringHeader needs special treatment because it is
really a pointer. Add the special treatment in walk for
bug #19168 to escape analysis.
Includes extra debugging that was helpful.
Fixes#19743.
Change-Id: I6dab5002f0d436c3b2a7cdc0156e4fc48a43d6fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38738
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, an inlined call to wg.Done() in package main would have the
following incorrect symbol name:
main.(*sync.WaitGroup).Done
This change modifies methodname to return the correct symbol name:
sync.(*WaitGroup).Done
This fix was suggested by @mdempsky.
Fixes#19467.
Change-Id: I0117838679ac5353789299c618ff8c326712d94d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37866
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Gccgo crashed compiling a function that returned multiple zero-sized values.
Change-Id: I499112cc310e4a4f649962f4d2bc9fee95dee1b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38772
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This was cherry-picked to 1.8 as CL 38587, but on master issue was fixed
by CL 37661. Add still relevant part (test) and close issue, since test passes.
Fixes#19201
Change-Id: I6415792e2c465dc6d9bd6583ba1e54b107bcf5cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37376
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Prior to this CL, Type.Width != 0 was the mark
of a Type whose Width had been calculated.
As a result, dowidth always recalculated
the width of struct{}.
This, combined with the prohibition on calculating
the width of a FuncArgsStruct and the use of
struct{} as a function argument,
meant that there were circumstances in which
it was forbidden to call dowidth on a type.
This inhibits refactoring to call dowidth automatically,
rather than explicitly.
Instead add a helper method, Type.WidthCalculated,
and implement as Type.Align > 0.
Type.Width is not a good candidate for tracking
whether the width has been calculated;
0 is a value type width, and Width is subject to
too much magic value game-playing.
For good measure, add a test for #11354.
Change-Id: Ie9a9fb5d924e7a2010c1904ae5e38ed4a38eaeb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38468
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Avoid construction of incorrect syntax trees in presence of errors.
For #19663.
Change-Id: I43025a3cf0fe02cae9a57e8bb9489b5f628c3fd7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38604
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Simple phi insertion already had a heuristic to check
for dead blocks, namely having no predecessors.
When we stopped generating code for dead blocks,
we eliminated some values contained in more subtle
dead blocks, which confused phi insertion.
Compensate by beefing up the reachability check.
Fixes#19678
Change-Id: I0081e4a46f7ce2f69b131a34a0553874a0cb373e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38602
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
CL 37499 allows inlining more functions by ignoring dead code.
However, that dead code can contain non-exportable constructs.
Teach the exporter not to export dead code.
Fixes#19679
Change-Id: Idb1d3794053514544b6f1035d29262aa6683e1e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38601
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Almost never happens in practice.
The compiler will generate reasonable code anyway,
since assignments involving [0]T never do any work.
Fixes#19696Fixes#19671
Change-Id: I350d2e0c5bb326c4789c74a046ab0486b2cee49c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38599
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously, we handled recursive interfaces by deferring typechecking
of interface methods, while eagerly expanding interface embeddings.
This CL switches to eagerly evaluating interface methods, and
deferring expanding interface embeddings to dowidth. This allows us to
detect recursive interface embeddings with the same mechanism used for
detecting recursive struct embeddings.
Updates #16369.
Change-Id: If4c0320058047f8a2d9b52b9a79de47eb9887f95
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38391
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Report syntax error that was missed when moving to new parser.
Fixes#19610.
Change-Id: Ie5625f907a84089dc56fcccfd4f24df546042783
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38375
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
See https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/38313/ for background.
It turns out that only a few tests checked for this.
The new error message is shorter and very clear.
Change-Id: I8ab4ad59fb023c8b54806339adc23aefd7dc7b07
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38314
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Interface wrapper functions now get compiled eagerly in some cases.
Consequently, they may be present in multiple translation units.
Mark them as DUPOK, just like closures.
Fixes#19548Fixes#19550
Change-Id: Ibe74adb5a62dbf6447db37fde22dcbb3479969ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38156
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Move the zeroing of results earlier. In particular, they need to
come before any move-to-heap operations, as those require allocation.
Those allocations are points at which the GC can see the uninitialized
result slots.
For the function:
func f() (x, y, z *int) {
defer(){}()
escape(&y)
return
}
We used to generate code like this:
x = nil
y = nil
&y = new(int)
z = nil
Now we will generate:
x = nil
y = nil
z = nil
&y = new(int)
Since the fix for #18860, the return slots are always live if there
is a defer, so the former ordering allowed the GC to see junk
in the z slot.
Fixes#19078
Change-Id: I71554ae437549725bb79e13b2c100b2911d47ed4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38133
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
After benchmarking with a compiler modified to have better
spill location, it became clear that this method of checking
was actually faster on (at least) two different architectures
(ppc64 and amd64) and it also provides more timely interruption
of loops.
This change adds a modified FOR loop node "FORUNTIL" that
checks after executing the loop body instead of before (i.e.,
always at least once). This ensures that a pointer past the
end of a slice or array is not made visible to the garbage
collector.
Without the rescheduling checks inserted, the restructured
loop from this change apparently provides a 1% geomean
improvement on PPC64 running the go1 benchmarks; the
improvement on AMD64 is only 0.12%.
Inserting the rescheduling check exposed some peculiar bug
with the ssa test code for s390x; this was updated based on
initial code actually generated for GOARCH=s390x to use
appropriate OpArg, OpAddr, and OpVarDef.
NaCl is disabled in testing.
Change-Id: Ieafaa9a61d2a583ad00968110ef3e7a441abca50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36206
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
When defining an int const, the compiler tries to cast the RHS
expression to int. The cast may fail for three reasons:
1. expr is an integer constant that overflows int
2. expr is a floating point constant
3. expr is a complex constant, or not a number
In the second case, in order to print a sensible error message, we
must distinguish between a floating point constant that should be
included in the error message and a floating point constant that
cannot be reasonably formatted for inclusion in an error message.
For example, in:
const a int = 1.1
const b int = 1 + 1e-100
a is in the former group, while b is in the latter, since the floating
point value resulting from the evaluation of the rhs of the assignment
(1.00...01) is too long to be fully printed in an error message, and
cannot be shortened without making the error message misleading
(rounding or truncating it would result in a "1", which looks like an
integer constant, and it makes little sense in an error message about
an invalid floating point expression).
To fix this problem, we try to format the float value using fconv
(which is used by the error reporting mechanism to format float
arguments), and then parse the resulting string back to a
big.Float. If the result is an integer, we assume that expr is a float
value that cannot be reasonably be formatted as a string, and we emit
an error message that does not include its string representation.
Also, change the error message for overflows to a more conservative
"integer too large", which does not mention overflows that are only
caused by an internal implementation restriction.
Also, change (*Mpint) SetFloat so that it returns a bool (instead of
0/-1 for success/failure).
Fixes#11371
Change-Id: Ibbc73e2ed2eaf41f07827b0649d0eb637150ecaa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35411
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This reverts commit cb6e0639fb.
The fix is incorrect as it's perfectly fine to refer to an
identifier 'init' inside a function, and 'init' may even be
a variable of function value. Misspelling 'init' in that
context would lead to an incorrect error message.
Reopened#8481.
Change-Id: I49787fdf7738213370ae6f0cab54013e9e3394a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37876
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
New special case for booleans and byte-sized integer types
converted to interfaces needs to ensure that the operand is
not too complex, if it were to appear in a parameter list
for example.
Added test, also increased the recursive node dump depth to
a level that was actually useful for an actual bug.
Fixes#19275.
Change-Id: If36ac3115edf439e886703f32d149ee0a46eb2a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37470
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
CL 35562 substituted zerobase for the pointer for
interfaces containing zero-sized values.
However, it failed to evaluate the zero-sized value
expression for side-effects. Fix that.
The other similar interface value optimizations
are not affected, because they all actually use the
value one way or another.
Fixes#19246
Change-Id: I1168a99561477c63c29751d5cd04cf81b5ea509d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37395
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The loop-A-encloses-loop-C code did not properly handle the
case where really C was already known to be enclosed by B,
and A was nearest-outer to B, not C.
Fixes#19217.
Change-Id: I755dd768e823cb707abdc5302fed39c11cdb34d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37340
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Avoid printing a second error message when a field of an undefined
variable is accessed.
Fixes#8440.
Change-Id: I3fe0b11fa3423cec3871cb01b5951efa8ea7451a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36751
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#19012.
Fallback to return signatures without detailed types.
These error message will be of the form of issue:
* https://golang.org/issues/4215
* https://golang.org/issues/6750
So:
func f(x int, y uint) {
return x > y
}
f(10, "a" < 3)
will give errors:
too many errors to return
too many arguments in call to f
instead of:
too many errors to return
have (<T>)
want ()
too many arguments in call to f
have (number, <T>)
want (number, number)
Change-Id: I680abc7cdd8444400e234caddf3ff49c2d69f53d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36806
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Added a flag to generic and various architectures' atomic
operations that are judged to have observable side effects
and thus cannot be dead-code-eliminated.
Test requires GOMAXPROCS > 1 without preemption in loop.
Fixes#19182.
Change-Id: Id2230031abd2cca0bbb32fd68fc8a58fb912070f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37333
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The rules for folding addresses into load/stores checks sym1 is
not on stack (because the stack offset is not known at that point).
But sym1 could be nil, which invalidates the check. Check merged
sym instead.
Fixes#19137.
Change-Id: I8574da22ced1216bb5850403d8f08ec60a8d1005
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37145
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
CL 35261 introduces special handling of zero-valued STRUCTLIT for
efficient struct zeroing. But it didn't cover all use cases, for
example, CONVNOP STRUCTLIT is not handled.
On the other hand, CL 34566 handles zeroing earlier, so we don't
need the change in CL 35261 for efficient zeroing. Other uses of
zero-valued struct literals are very rare. So undo the change in
walk.go in CL 35261.
Add a test for efficient zeroing.
Fixes#19084.
Change-Id: I0807f7423fb44d47bf325b3c1ce9611a14953853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36955
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Use distinction between explicit and automatically inserted semicolons
to provide a better error message if the condition in an 'if' statement
is missing.
For #18747.
Change-Id: Iac167ae4e5ad53d2dc73f746b4dee9912434bb59
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36930
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Added missing nil-check. We will get rid of the gcCompat corrections
shortly but it's still worthwhile having the new test case added.
Fixes#19056.
Change-Id: I35bd938a4d789058da15724e34c05e5e631ecad0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36908
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The gcCompat mode was introduced to match the new parser's node position
setup exactly with the positions used by the original parser. Some of the
gcCompat adjustments were required to satisfy syntax error test cases,
and the rest were required to make toolstash cmp pass.
This change removes the former gcCompat adjustments and instead adjusts
the respective test cases as necessary. In some cases this makes the error
lines consistent with the ones reported by gccgo.
Where it has changed, the position associated with a given syntactic construct
is the position (line/col number) of the left-most token belonging to the
construct.
Change-Id: I5b60c00c5999a895c4d6d6e9b383c6405ccf725c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36695
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Starting the error message with "expecting" rather than "missing"
causes the syntax error mechanism to add additional helpful info
(it recognizes "expecting" but not "missing").
Fixes#17328.
Change-Id: I8482ca5e5a6a6b22e0ed0d831b7328e264156334
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36637
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Towards better syntax error messages: With this change, the parser knows whether
a semicolon was an actual ';' in the source, or whether it was an automatically
inserted semicolon as result of a '\n' or EOF. Using this information in error
messages makes them more understandable.
For #17328.
Change-Id: I8cd9accee8681b62569d0ecef922d38682b401eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36636
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For code such as
if a := 10 { ...
the 1.7 compiler reported
a := 10 used as value
while the 1.8 compiler reported
invalid condition, tag, or type switch guard
Changed the error message to match the 1.7 compiler.
Fixes#18915.
Change-Id: I01308862e461922e717f9f8295a9db53d5a914eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36470
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We shouldn't use CONVNOP for conversions between two different
nonempty interface types, because we want to update the itab
in those situations.
Fixes#18595
After this CL, we are guaranteed that itabs are unique, that is
there is only one itab per compile-time-type/concrete type pair.
See also the tests in CL 35115 and 35116 which make sure this
invariant holds even for shared libraries and plugins.
Unique itabs are required for CL 34810 (faster type switch code).
R=go1.9
Change-Id: Id27d2e01ded706680965e4cb69d7c7a24ac2161b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35119
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This CL fixes two issues:
1. Load ops were initially always lowered to unsigned loads, even
for signed types. This was fine by itself however LoadReg ops
(used to re-load spilled values) were lowered to signed loads
for signed types. This meant that spills could invalidate
optimizations that assumed the original unsigned load.
2. Types were not always being maintained correctly through rules
designed to eliminate unnecessary zero and sign extensions.
Fixes#18906.
Change-Id: I95785dcadba03f7e3e94524677e7d8d3d3b9b737
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36256
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Fixes#8481.
Inform the user that init functions cannot be directly invoked
in user code, as mandated by the spec at:
http://golang.org/ref/spec#Program_initialization_and_execution.
Change-Id: Ib12c0c08718ffd48b76b6f9b13c76bb6612d2e7b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34790
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#15055.
Updates exprfmt printing using fmt verb "%v" to check that n.Left
is non-nil before attempting to print it, otherwise we'll print
the nodes in the list using verb "%.v".
Credit to @mdempsky for this approach and for finding
the root cause of the issue.
Change-Id: I20a6464e916dc70d5565e145164bb9553e5d3865
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/25361
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Make sure that the lack of an lvalue doesn't
cause extra side-effects.
Updates #18661
Updates #18739
Change-Id: I52eb4b4a5c6f8ff5cddd2115455f853c18112c19
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36126
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When switching to the new parser, I changed cmd/compile to handle iota
per an intuitive interpretation of how nested constant declarations
should work (which also matches go/types).
Note: if we end up deciding that the current spec wording is
intentional (i.e., confirming gccgo's current behavior), the test will
need to be updated to expect 4 instead of 1.
Updates #15550.
Change-Id: I441f5f13209f172b73ef75031f2a9daa5e985277
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36122
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
