Number represents the actual JSON text,
preserving the precision and
formatting of the original input.
R=rsc, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6202068
go/build section "Build Constraints", first paragraph said:
"... they must be appear near the top of the file ..."
fixed to:
"... they must appear near the top of the file ..."
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6329060
Removes an incorrect code comment and some superfluous variables.
The comment I removed says that struct fields which implement
Unmarshaler must be pointers, even if they're in an addressable
struct. That's not the case, and there's already a test in decode_test.go
that demonstrates as much.
Encoding/json has quite a few assignments of reflect.Values to extra
variables – things like "iv := v" when there's no need to make a copy. I
think these are left over from a previous version of the reflect API. If they
aren't wanted, I wouldn't mind going through the package and getting
rid of the rest of them.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6318047
- receiving from a closed channel returns immediately
- in the ,ok form, the 2nd result is of type bool, not
just boolean (gc and ggcgo agree).
Per dsymonds' suggestion.
R=r, rsc, ken, iant, dsymonds
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6333057
This is a new, not yet committed API.
- Changed NewCommentMap to be independent of
*File nodes and more symmetric with the
Filter and Comments methods.
- Implemented Update method for use in
AST modifications.
- Implemented String method for debugging
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6303086
A few performance improvements, but without the stack sorting
change to avoid allocating, which is instead waiting on better
escape analysis.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6265047
The issue seems to not be triggered right now,
but I've seen the deadlock after some other legal
modifications to runtime.
So I think we are safer this way.
R=rsc, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6339051
This can only happen if the hash function we're using is getting
far more than it's fair share of collisions, but that has happened
to us repeatedly as we've expanded the allowed use cases for
hash tables (issue 1544, issue 2609, issue 2630, issue 2883, issue 3695).
Maybe this will help the next time we try something new.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6306083
pkg/math/all_test.go tests Atan (and therefore Asin and Acos) to a
relative accuracy of 4e-16, but the test vector misses values where
the old algorithm was in error by more than that. For example:
x newError oldError
0.414215746 1.41e-16 -4.24e-16
0.414216076 1.41e-16 -4.24e-16
0.414217632 1.41e-16 -4.24e-16
0.414218770 1.41e-16 -4.24e-16
0.414225466 0 -5.65e-16
0.414226244 1.41e-16 -4.24e-16
0.414228756 0 -5.65e-16
0.414235089 0 -5.65e-16
0.414237070 0 -5.65e-16
R=rsc, golang-dev
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6302093
Several of my students were confused by trying to use both the error
return and a reply return, so I figured it was worth explicitly clarifying
that returning an error overrides the reply.
R=golang-dev, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6327051
Use code to be used in lisp programs as suggested in the doc strings for
replace-{string|regexp}. Bonus: This code works for XEmacs.
R=golang-dev, sameer, jmeurin
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6296073
Flame motivated me to get around to adding extended key usage support
so that code signing certificates can't be used for TLS server
authentication and vice versa.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6304065
if we were to use sizeof(sa.sa_mask) instead of 8 as the last argument
to rt_sigaction, we would have already fixed this bug, so also updated
Linux/386 and Linux/amd64 files to use that; also test the return value
of rt_sigaction.
R=dave, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6297087
If the server replies with an HTTP response before we're done
writing our body (for instance "401 Unauthorized" response), we
were previously ignoring that, since we returned our write
error ("broken pipe", etc) before ever reading the response.
Now we read and write at the same time.
Fixes#3595
R=rsc, adg
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/6238043
