With the hybrid barrier, unless we're doing a STW GC or hit a very
rare race (~once per all.bash) that can start mark termination before
all of the work is drained, we don't need to drain the work queue at
all. Even draining an empty work queue is rather expensive since we
have to enter the getfull() barrier, so it's worth avoiding this.
Conveniently, it's quite easy to detect whether or not we actually
need the getufull() barrier: since the world is stopped when we enter
mark termination, everything must have flushed its work to the work
queue, so we can just check the queue. If the queue is empty and we
haven't queued up any jobs that may create more work (which should
always be the case with the hybrid barrier), we can simply have all GC
workers perform non-blocking drains.
Also conveniently, this solution is quite safe. If we do somehow screw
something up and there's work on the work queue, some worker will
still process it, it just may not happen in parallel.
This is not the "right" solution, but it's simple, expedient,
low-risk, and maintains compatibility with debug.gcrescanstacks. When
we remove the gcrescanstacks fallback in Go 1.9, we should also fix
the race that starts mark termination early, and then we can eliminate
work draining from mark termination.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I7b3cd5de6a248ab29d78c2b42aed8b7443641361
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32186
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Currently bulkBarrierPreWrite calls writebarrierptr_prewrite, but this
means that we check writeBarrier.needed twice and perform cgo checks
twice.
Change bulkBarrierPreWrite to call writebarrierptr_prewrite1 to skip
over these duplicate checks.
This may speed up bulkBarrierPreWrite slightly, but mostly this will
save us from running out of nosplit stack space on ppc64x in the near
future.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I1cea1a2207e884ab1a279c6a5e378dcdc048b63e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31890
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
gobuf.ctxt is set to nil from many places in assembly code and these
assignments require write barriers with the hybrid barrier.
Conveniently, in most of these places ctxt should already be nil, in
which case we don't need the barrier. This commit changes these places
to assert that ctxt is already nil.
gogo is more complicated, since ctxt may not already be nil. For gogo,
we manually perform the write barrier if ctxt is not nil.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I9d75e27c75a1b7f8b715ad112fc5d45ffa856d30
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31764
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Currently, we perform write barriers after performing pointer writes.
At the moment, it simply doesn't matter what order this happens in, as
long as they appear atomic to GC. But both the hybrid barrier and ROC
are going to require a pre-write write barrier.
For the hybrid barrier, this is important because the barrier needs to
observe both the current value of the slot and the value that will be
written to it. (Alternatively, the caller could do the write and pass
in the old value, but it seems easier and more useful to just swap the
order of the barrier and the write.)
For ROC, this is necessary because, if the pointer write is going to
make the pointer reachable to some goroutine that it currently is not
visible to, the garbage collector must take some special action before
that pointer becomes more broadly visible.
This commits swaps pointer writes around so the write barrier occurs
before the pointer write.
The main subtlety here is bulk memory writes. Currently, these copy to
the destination first and then use the pointer bitmap of the
destination to find the copied pointers and invoke the write barrier.
This is necessary because the source may not have a pointer bitmap. To
handle these, we pass both the source and the destination to the bulk
memory barrier, which uses the pointer bitmap of the destination, but
reads the pointer values from the source.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I78ecc0c5c94ee81c29019c305b3d232069294a55
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31763
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
We reject import of main packages, but we missed tests.
Reject in all tests except test of that main package.
We reject local (relative) imports from code with a
non-local import path, but again we missed tests.
Reject those too.
Fixes#14811.
Fixes#15795.
Fixes#17475.
Change-Id: I535ff26889520276a891904f54f1a85b2c40207d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31821
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
Materialize float constant 0 from integer zero register, instead
of loading from constant pool.
Also fix assembling FMOV from zero register to FP register.
Change-Id: Ie413dd342cedebdb95ba8cfc220e23ed2a39e885
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32250
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Apparently on macOS Sierra LLDB thinks /usr/lib/dyld is mapped
at address 0, even if Go code starts at 0x1000, and it looks up
addresses from dyld which shadows Go symbols. Move Go binary at
a higher address to avoid clash.
Fixes#17463. Re-enable TestLldbPython.
Change-Id: I89ca6f3ee48aa6da9862bfa0c2da91477cc93255
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32185
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
As for dropg, save is writing a nil pointer that will generate a write
barrier with the hybrid barrier. However, in this case, ctxt always
should already be nil, so replace the write with an assertion that
this is the case.
At this point, we're ready to disable the write barrier elision
optimizations that interfere with the hybrid barrier.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I83208e65aa33403d442401f355b2e013ab9a50e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31571
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Currently this contains no write barriers because it's writing nil
pointers, but with the hybrid barrier, even these will produce write
barriers. However, since these are *gs and *ms, they don't need write
barriers, so we can simply eliminate them.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: Ib188a60492c5cfb352814bf9b2bcb2941fb7d6c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31570
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The hybrid barrier requires allocate-black, but there's one case where
we don't currently allocate black: the tiny allocator. If we allocate
a *new* tiny alloc block during GC, it will be allocated black, but if
we allocated the current block before GC, it won't be black, and the
further allocations from it won't mark it, which means we may free a
reachable tiny block during sweeping.
Fix this by passing over all mcaches at the beginning of mark, while
the world is still stopped, and greying their tiny blocks.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I04d4df7cc2f553f8f7b1e4cb0b52e2946588111a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31456
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The hybrid barrier requires barriers on stack-to-stack copies if
either stack is grey. There are only two instances of this in the
runtime: channel sends and starting a goroutine. Channel sends already
use typedmemmove and hence have the necessary barriers. This commits
adds barriers for the stack-to-stack copy when starting a goroutine.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: Ibb55e08127ca4d021ac54be61cb96732efa5df5b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31455
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Original Change by Daria Kolistratova <daria.kolistratova@intel.com>
Added functions with suffix proto and stuff from pprof tool to translate
to protobuf. Done as the profile proto is more extensible than the legacy
pprof format and is pprof's preferred profile format. Large part was taken
from https://github.com/google/pprof tool. Tested by hand and compared the
result with translated by pprof tool, profiles are identical.
Fixes#16093
Change-Id: I2751345b09a66ee2b6aa64be76cba4cd1c326aa6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32257
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Waiting 2ms for all the kicked-off goroutines to run and block
seems a little optimistic. No harm done by waiting for 200ms instead.
Fixes#17238.
Change-Id: I827532ea2f5f1f3ed04179f8957dd2c563946ed0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32103
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Currently we initialize LR on a new stack by writing nil to it. But
this is an initializing write since the newly allocated stack is not
zeroed, so this is unsafe with the hybrid barrier. Change this is a
uintptr write to avoid a bad write barrier.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I062ac352e35df7da4644c1f2a5aaab87049d1f60
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32093
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
We reuse finalizers in finblocks, which are allocated off-heap. This
means they have to be zero-initialized before becoming visible to the
garbage collector. We actually already do this by clearing the
finalizer before returning it to the pool, but we're not careful to
enforce correct memory ordering. Fix this by manipulating the
finalizer count atomically so these writes synchronize properly with
the garbage collector.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I7797d31df3c656c9fe654bc6da287f66a9e2037d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31454
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
runfinq allocates a stack frame on the heap for constructing the
finalizer function calls and reuses it for each call. However, because
the type of this frame is constantly shifting, it tells mallocgc there
are no pointers in it and it acts essentially like uninitialized
memory between uses. But runfinq uses pointer writes with write
barriers to "initialize" this memory, which is not going to be safe
with the hybrid barrier, since the hybrid barrier may see a stale
pointer left in the "uninitialized" frame.
Fix this by zero-initializing the argument values in the frame before
writing the argument pointers.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I951c0a2be427eb9082a32d65c4410e6fdef041be
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31453
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Currently, zeroing generates an ssa.OpZero, which never has write
barriers, even if the assignment is an OASWB. The hybrid barrier
requires write barriers on zeroing, so change OASWB to generate an
ssa.OpZeroWB when assigning the zero value, which turns into a
typedmemclr.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: Ib37ac5e39f578447dbd6b36a6a54117d5624784d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31451
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
If a slice's backing store has pointers, we need to lower clears of
that slice to memclrHasPointers instead of memclrNoHeapPointers.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I20750e4bf57f7b8862f3d898bfb32d964b91d07b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31450
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The basic structure of Part.Read should be simple:
do what you can with the current buffered data,
reading more as you need it. Make it that way.
Working entirely in the bufio.Reader's buffer eliminates
the need for an additional bytes.Buffer.
This structure should be easier to extend in the future as
more special cases arise.
Change-Id: I83cb24a755a1767c4c037f9ece6716460c3ecd01
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32092
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Since barrier-less memclr is only safe in very narrow circumstances,
this commit renames memclr to avoid accidentally calling memclr on
typed memory. This can cause subtle, non-deterministic bugs, so it's
worth some effort to prevent. In the near term, this will also prevent
bugs creeping in from any concurrent CLs that add calls to memclr; if
this happens, whichever patch hits master second will fail to compile.
This also adds the other new memclr variants to the compiler's
builtin.go to minimize the churn on that binary blob. We'll use these
in future commits.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I00eead049f5bd35ca107ea525966831f3d1ed9ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31369
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Currently fixalloc does not zero memory it reuses. This is dangerous
with the hybrid barrier if the type may contain heap pointers, since
it may cause us to observe a dead heap pointer on reuse. It's also
error-prone since it's the only allocator that doesn't zero on
allocation (mallocgc of course zeroes, but so do persistentalloc and
sysAlloc). It's also largely pointless: for mcache, the caller
immediately memclrs the allocation; and the two specials types are
tiny so there's no real cost to zeroing them.
Change fixalloc to zero allocations by default.
The only type we don't zero by default is mspan. This actually
requires that the spsn's sweepgen survive across freeing and
reallocating a span. If we were to zero it, the following race would
be possible:
1. The current sweepgen is 2. Span s is on the unswept list.
2. Direct sweeping sweeps span s, finds it's all free, and releases s
to the fixalloc.
3. Thread 1 allocates s from fixalloc. Suppose this zeros s, including
s.sweepgen.
4. Thread 1 calls s.init, which sets s.state to _MSpanDead.
5. On thread 2, background sweeping comes across span s in allspans
and cas's s.sweepgen from 0 (sg-2) to 1 (sg-1). Now it thinks it
owns it for sweeping. 6. Thread 1 continues initializing s.
Everything breaks.
I would like to fix this because it's obviously confusing, but it's a
subtle enough problem that I'm leaving it alone for now. The solution
may be to skip sweepgen 0, but then we have to think about wrap-around
much more carefully.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: Ie08691feed3abbb06a31381b94beb0a2e36a0613
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31368
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Currently the zero value of an mspan is in the "in use" state. This
seems like a bad idea in general. But it's going to wreak havoc when
we make fixalloc zero allocations: even "freed" mspan objects are
still on the allspans list and still get looked at by the garbage
collector. Hence, if we leave the mspan states the way they are,
allocating a span that reuses old memory will temporarily pass that
span (which is visible to GC!) through the "in use" state, which can
cause "unswept span" panics.
Fix all of this by making the zero state "dead".
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I77c7ac06e297af4b9e6258bc091c37abe102acc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31367
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
The hybrid barrier requires distinguishing typed and untyped memory
even when zeroing because the *current* contents of the memory matters
even when overwriting.
This commit introduces runtime.typedmemclr and runtime.memclrHasPointers
as a typed memory clearing functions parallel to runtime.typedmemmove.
Currently these simply call memclr, but with the hybrid barrier we'll
need to shade any pointers we're overwriting. These will provide us
with the necessary hooks to do so.
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: I74478619f8907825898092aaa204d6e4690f27e6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31366
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Currently all mcaches are flushed in a single STW root job. This takes
about 5 µs per P, but since it's done sequentially it adds about
5*GOMAXPROCS µs to the STW.
Fix this by parallelizing the job. Since there are exactly GOMAXPROCS
mcaches to flush, this parallelizes quite nicely and brings the STW
latency cost down to a constant 5 µs (assuming GOMAXPROCS actually
reflects the number of CPUs).
Updates #17503.
Change-Id: Ibefeb1c2229975d5137c6e67fac3b6c92103742d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32033
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Added functions with suffix proto and stuff from pprof tool to translate
to protobuf. Done as the profile proto is more extensible than the legacy
pprof format and is pprof's preferred profile format. Large part was taken
from https://github.com/google/pprof tool. Tested by hand and compared the
result with translated by pprof tool, profiles are identical.
Fixes#16093
Change-Id: I5acdb2809cab0d16ed4694fdaa7b8ddfd68df11e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30556
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
The current logic in gcDrain conflates non-blocking with preemptible
draining for root jobs. As a result, if you do a non-blocking (but
*not* preemptible) drain, like dedicated workers do, the root job
drain will stop if preempted and fall through to heap marking jobs,
which won't stop until it fails to get a heap marking job.
This commit fixes the condition on root marking jobs so they only stop
when preempted if the drain is preemptible.
Coincidentally, this also fixes a nil pointer dereference if we call
gcDrain with gcDrainNoBlock and without a user G, since it tries to
get the preempt flag from the nil user G. This combination never
happens right now, but will in the future.
Change-Id: Ia910ec20a9b46237f7926969144a33b1b4a7b2f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32291
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This adds support to the runtime/trace test for saving traces
collected by its tests to disk and a script in internal/trace that
uses this to collect canned traces for the trace test suite. This can
be used to add to the test suite when we introduce a new trace format
version.
Change-Id: Id9ac1ff312235bf02f982fdfff8a827f54035758
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32290
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
In a large codebase within Google, there are thousands of uses of:
ContainsAny|IndexAny|LastIndexAny|Trim|TrimLeft|TrimRight
An analysis of their usage shows that over 97% of them only use character
sets consisting of only ASCII symbols.
Uses of ContainsAny|IndexAny|LastIndexAny:
6% are 1 character (e.g., "\n" or " ")
58% are 2-4 characters (e.g., "<>" or "\r\n\t ")
24% are 5-9 characters (e.g., "()[]*^$")
10% are 10+ characters (e.g., "+-=&|><!(){}[]^\"~*?:\\/ ")
We optimize for ASCII sets, which are commonly used to search for
"control" characters in some string. We don't optimize for the
single character scenario since IndexRune or IndexByte could be used.
Uses of Trim|TrimLeft|TrimRight:
71% are 1 character (e.g., "\n" or " ")
14% are 2 characters (e.g., "\r\n")
10% are 3-4 characters (e.g., " \t\r\n")
5% are 10+ characters (e.g., "0123456789abcdefABCDEF")
We optimize for the single character case with a simple closured function
that only checks for that character's value. We optimize for the medium
and larger sets using a 16-byte bit-map representing a set of ASCII characters.
The benchmarks below have the following suffix name "%d:%d" where the first
number is the length of the input and the second number is the length
of the charset.
== bytes package ==
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:1-4 5.09 5.23 +2.75%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:2-4 5.81 5.85 +0.69%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:4-4 7.22 7.50 +3.88%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:8-4 11.0 11.1 +0.91%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:16-4 17.5 17.8 +1.71%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:1-4 36.0 34.0 -5.56%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:2-4 46.6 36.5 -21.67%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:4-4 78.0 40.4 -48.21%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:8-4 136 47.4 -65.15%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:16-4 254 61.5 -75.79%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:1-4 542 388 -28.41%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:2-4 705 382 -45.82%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:4-4 1089 386 -64.55%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:8-4 1994 394 -80.24%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:16-4 3843 411 -89.31%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:1-4 8522 5873 -31.08%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:2-4 11253 5861 -47.92%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:4-4 17824 5883 -66.99%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:8-4 32053 5871 -81.68%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:16-4 60512 5888 -90.27%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:1-4 79.5 70.8 -10.94%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:2-4 79.0 105 +32.91%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:4-4 79.6 109 +36.93%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:8-4 78.8 118 +49.75%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:16-4 80.2 132 +64.59%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:1-4 243 116 -52.26%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:2-4 243 171 -29.63%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:4-4 243 176 -27.57%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:8-4 241 184 -23.65%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:16-4 238 199 -16.39%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:1-4 2580 840 -67.44%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:2-4 2603 1175 -54.86%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:4-4 2572 1188 -53.81%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:8-4 2550 1191 -53.29%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:16-4 2585 1208 -53.27%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:1-4 39773 12181 -69.37%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:2-4 39946 17231 -56.86%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:4-4 39641 17179 -56.66%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:8-4 39835 17175 -56.88%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:16-4 40229 17215 -57.21%
== strings package ==
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:1-4 5.94 4.97 -16.33%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:2-4 5.94 5.55 -6.57%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:4-4 7.45 7.21 -3.22%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:8-4 10.8 10.6 -1.85%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/1:16-4 17.4 17.2 -1.15%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:1-4 36.4 32.2 -11.54%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:2-4 49.6 34.6 -30.24%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:4-4 77.5 37.9 -51.10%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:8-4 138 45.5 -67.03%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/16:16-4 241 59.1 -75.48%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:1-4 509 378 -25.74%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:2-4 720 381 -47.08%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:4-4 1142 384 -66.37%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:8-4 1999 391 -80.44%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/256:16-4 3735 403 -89.21%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:1-4 7973 5824 -26.95%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:2-4 11432 5809 -49.19%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:4-4 18327 5819 -68.25%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:8-4 33059 5828 -82.37%
BenchmarkIndexAnyASCII/4096:16-4 59703 5817 -90.26%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:1-4 71.9 71.8 -0.14%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:2-4 73.3 103 +40.52%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:4-4 71.8 106 +47.63%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:8-4 71.2 113 +58.71%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/1:16-4 71.6 128 +78.77%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:1-4 152 116 -23.68%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:2-4 160 168 +5.00%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:4-4 172 170 -1.16%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:8-4 200 177 -11.50%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/16:16-4 254 193 -24.02%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:1-4 1438 864 -39.92%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:2-4 1551 1195 -22.95%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:4-4 1770 1200 -32.20%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:8-4 2195 1216 -44.60%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/256:16-4 3054 1224 -59.92%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:1-4 21726 12557 -42.20%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:2-4 23586 17508 -25.77%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:4-4 26898 17510 -34.90%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:8-4 33714 17595 -47.81%
BenchmarkTrimASCII/4096:16-4 47429 17700 -62.68%
The benchmarks added test the worst case. For IndexAny, that is when the
charset matches none of the input. For Trim, it is when the charset matches
all of the input.
Change-Id: I970874d101a96b33528fc99b165379abe58cf6ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31593
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de>
The report in #17414 points out that if you have many many templates,
then this is an overwhelming list and just hurts the signal-to-noise ratio of the error.
Even the test of the old behavior also supports the idea that this is noise:
template: empty: "empty" is an incomplete or empty template; defined templates are: "secondary"
The chance that someone mistyped "secondary" as "empty" is slim at best.
Similarly, the compiler does not augment an error like 'unknown variable x'
by dumping the full list of all the known variables.
For all these reasons, drop the list.
Fixes#17414.
Change-Id: I78f92d2c591df7218385fe723a4abc497913acf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32116
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Following RFC 6265 Section 5.1.1.5, ensure that the minimum
year for which an Expires value is valid and can be included in
the cookie's string, is 1601 instead of the Epoch year 1970.
A detailed specification for parsing the Expiry field is at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-5.2.1
I stumbled across this bug due to this StackOverflow answer
that recommends setting the Expiry to the Epoch:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/5285982Fixes#17632
Change-Id: I3c1bdf821d369320334a5dc1e4bf22783cbfe9fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32142
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This lets quotedprintable handle some inputs found in the wild,
most notably generated by "Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000",
and it also matches how Python's quopri package handles these inputs.
Fixes#13219.
Change-Id: I69d400659d01b6ea0f707b7053d61803a85b4799
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32174
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
We thought it would at the time, but then Beta 4 changed the ABI
again, so it wasn't true in practice.
Fixes#17643
Change-Id: I36b747bd69a56adc7291fa30d6bffdf67ab8741b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/32238
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently when a goroutine blocks on a GC assist, it emits a generic
EvGoBlock event. Since assist blocking events and, in particular, the
length of the blocked assist queue, are important for diagnosing GC
behavior, this commit adds a new EvGoBlockGC event for blocking on a
GC assist. The trace viewer uses this event to report a "waiting on
GC" count in the "Goroutines" row. This makes sense because, unlike
other blocked goroutines, these goroutines do have work to do, so
being blocked on a GC assist is quite similar to being in the
"runnable" state, which we also report in the trace viewer.
Change-Id: Ic21a326992606b121ea3d3d00110d8d1fdc7a5ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30704
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Currently the trace tool tracks an overall counts of goroutine states,
but not the states of any individual goroutine. We're about to add
more sophisticated blocked-state tracking, so add this tracking and
base the state counts off the tracked goroutine states.
Change-Id: I943ed61782436cf9540f4ee26c5561715c5b4a1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30703
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Currently mark workers are shown in the trace as regular goroutines
labeled "runtime.gcBgMarkWorker". That's somewhat unhelpful to an end
user because of the opaque label and particularly unhelpful to runtime
developers because it doesn't distinguish the different types of mark
workers.
Fix this by introducing a variant of the GoStart event called
GoStartLabel that lets the runtime indicate a label for a goroutine
execution span and using this to label mark worker executions as "GC
(<mode>)" in the trace viewer.
Since this bumps the trace version to 1.8, we also add test data for
1.7 traces.
Change-Id: Id7b9c0536508430c661ffb9e40e436f3901ca121
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/30702
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
