In the past, we assumed that we would only run these functions on the
view's go.mod file. As we expand the concept of a view to possibly
include multiple go.mod files, we need to allow these functions to work
on multiple go.mod files.
Change-Id: If9e7d131007e0977fc48ee2264365773da7d41f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/248097
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Now that the view always looks for its module, we don't need to pass
in the module root path when creating a view. This allows us to remove
some extra logic.
Change-Id: I35ffb71ec762b2dec0b72c84195ce008f7b35872
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247897
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246419/2 fixed a problem
but introduced a new one, as go build treats -o directories differently
depending on whether or not a main package is being built.
(see https://github.com/golang/go/issues/36784)
This change explicitly constructs a temporary file for go build
to use.
Change-Id: I096748e9af5014428dab8a5aad703f062fe88d50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247899
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Some users may intentionally be opening subdirectories to avoid having
gopls load the whole module. Allow this via a configuration.
Fixesgolang/go#40567
Change-Id: I6167f62a74a1c0b7cf07c1cb247adda839ee41f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247617
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
A user need not necessarily set GOPACKAGESDRIVER in their environment,
but they may still provide it through their configuration.
Change-Id: Ic48328e6a1596ff653a048b24256b8dc44c45b8e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247817
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
gopls configuration can come in through initializeOptions or through
the workspace/configuration request. Make sure to handle error results
in both cases.
Change-Id: Iaf33d23aa33381ce86803f5e8d090deb369b7341
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/227033
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
In the previous implementation, we could not extract call expressions
to variables.
Change-Id: I80ee82d7889247a618bd80f40abaa897d15ad20b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246761
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Instead of only checking whether the selection is an AST expression in
canExtractVariable, we now also check what kind of AST expression
it is. This limits the frequency of situations where the lightbulb
appears (canExtractVariable succeeds), but nothing can be extracted
(extractVariable fails).
Change-Id: I1e63c982e482bb72df48b414bdb4e8037140afdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247408
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The GC-based cache has given us a number of problems. First, memory
leaks driven by reference cycles: the Go runtime cannot collect cycles
involving finalizers, which prevents us from writing natural code in
Bind callbacks. If we screw it up, we get a mysterious leak that takes a
long time to track down. Second, the behavior is generally mysterious;
it's hard to predict how long a value lasts, and harder to tell if a
value being live is a bug. Third, we think that it may be interacting
poorly with the GC, resulting in unnecessary memory usage.
The structure of the values we put in the cache is not actually that
complicated -- there are only 5 significant types: parse, typecheck,
analyze, parse mod, and analyze mod. Managing them manually should not
be conceptually difficult, and in fact we already do most of the work
in (*snapshot).clone.
In this CL the cache adds the concept of "generations", which function
as reference counts on cache entries. Entries are still global and
shared across generations, but will be explicitly deleted once no
generations refer to them. The idea is that each snapshot is a new
generation, and can inherit entries from the previous snapshot or leave
them behind to be deleted.
One obvious risk of this scheme is that we'll leave dangling references
to values without actually inheriting them across generations. To
prevent that, getting a value requires passing in the generation at
which it's being read, and an error will be returned if that generation
is dead.
Change-Id: I4b30891efd7be4e10f2b84f4c067b0dee43dcf9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/242838
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
In the previous implementation, we always created a default
value for each type in the struct or return statement in fillstruct
and fillreturns, respectively. Now, we try to find a variable in scope
that matches the expected type. If we find multiple matches, we choose
the variable that is named most similarly to the type. If we do not
find a variable that matches, we maintain the previous functionality.
Change-Id: I3acb7e27476afaa71aaff9ffb69445913575e2b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245130
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Kokoro build runners have an old version of the Go command. Update the
run_local.sh script that they use to build in Docker.
For golang/go#40451
Change-Id: I89fc422e6824045ffdb610fe0f9a106c6cdb875e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247681
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Progress reporting has gotten complicated, and has had a couple bugs.
Factor out progress-related behavior to a new progressTracker type, and
use this to implement some unit tests.
Also rename some methods to remove stuttering, and reorganize the code
to be more logical.
Fixesgolang/go#40527
Change-Id: I93d53a67982460e7171f892021e99f4523fe3e5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247407
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Our WorkDone reporting was generating a random token for each unit of
work, even if a token was supplied by the client. Change this to use
the client token if it is non-empty, and skip the
workDoneProgress/create request.
After this change we can no longer rely on tokens being a string.
Update our progress tracking accordingly.
For golang/go#40527
Change-Id: I702f739c466efb613b69303aaf07005addd3b5e2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247321
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Having a private field with a json tag does not necessary means the
field needs to be exposed publicly. This change ignores the warning of
such fields that contain a json tag with the field tag "-".
The lines added in the unit tests will fail without these changes with
the error:
```
a/a.go:36:2: unexpected diagnostic: struct field b has json tag but is not exported
```
Change-Id: Ife987b99c264ae3b60a702e43a1f9c778f8c2d62
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245857
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The gc annotation details code lens did build binaries during
diagnostics to the module root. When trying to enable details for a
main package in a sub directory, it failed since the output binary name
conflicted with the sub directory name.
Instead, specify output to the package directory during build to avoid
conflicts.
Change-Id: Idc11e0c6a9ba15a66645aeef89bffb5abde76928
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246419
Run-TryBot: Pontus Leitzler <leitzler@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Now we downrank candidates that have already been used in other switch
cases. For example:
switch time.Now().Weekday() {
case time.Monday:
case time.<> // downrank time.Monday
}
It wasn't quite as simple as tracking the seen types.Objects.
Consider this example:
type foo struct {
i int
}
var a, b foo
switch 123 {
case a.i:
case <>
}
At <> we don't want to downrank "b.i" even though "i" is represented
as the same types.Object for "a.i" and "b.i". To accommodate this, we
track having seen ["a", "i"] together. We will downrank "a.i", but not
"b.i".
I applied only a minor 0.9 downranking when the candidate has already
been used in another case clause. It is hard to know what the user is
planning. For instance, in the preceding example the user could intend
to write "a.i + 1", so we mustn't downrank "a.i" too much.
Change-Id: I62debc5be3d5d310deb69d11770cf5f8bd9add1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247337
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We keep track of the N highest seen scores so we can quickly skip deep
completions not in the top N. Our logic for maintaining the top N list
wasn't quite right, resulting in certain cases where we would let
non-high scoring candidates through. I don't think the bug impacted
correctness.
Change-Id: Ic105617523c82f0e71e4f95ef0ee216182a84252
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247418
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we will filter out the types already used in other case
statements:
switch ast.Node(nil).(type) {
case *ast.Ident:
case *ast.I<> // don't offer "Ident" since it has been used
}
Note that the implementation was not able to use a map to track the
seen types.Types because we build up types.Type entries dynamically
when searching for completions (e.g. types.NewPointer() to make a
pointer type). We must use types.Identical() instead of direct pointer
equality.
Change-Id: I316638bb48bfd6802e2caea671f297d640291010
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247098
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This change adds the notion of a "workspace directory", which is
basically the set of directories that contains workspace packages. These
are mainly used for replace targets right now. It's a little trickier
than expected because the set of workspace directories can technically
change on any go.mod change.
At first, I wanted DidModifyFiles to report whether there was a change,
but I don't think it's actually that expensive to check on each call
and it complicates the code a bit. I can change it back if you think
it's worth doing.
The parse mod handle changes are because I needed an unlocked way of
parsing the mod file, but I imagine they'll conflict with CL 244769
anyway.
The next CL will be to "promote" replace targets to the level of
workspace packages, meaning we will be able to find references in them.
Change-Id: I5dd58fe29415473496ca6634a94a3134923228dc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245327
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
This CL is mostly a refactoring of the logic to compute errors for
`go mod tidy` diagnostics. It had been getting a little confusing, so
hopefully this makes things easier to read.
I made a few other small changes, such as slightly changing a few error
messages and showing diagnostics in the go.mod file for all missing
modules.
Change-Id: Ia8cf580731b997248591a2d64dff133accd9c5aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244610
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
* adds gopls command line tool for call hierarchy
* adds lsp setup for call hierarchy
* adds handler for textDocument/prepareCallHierarchy to display selected
identifier and get incoming/outgoing calls for it
* setup testing
Change-Id: I0a0904abdbe11273a56162b6e5be93b97ceb9c26
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246521
Run-TryBot: Danish Dua <danishdua@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
We missed a possible case in checking for gopackagesdriver - a binary
named gopackagesdriver works the same way as setting GOPACKAGESDRIVER.
Change-Id: I676800d253950cb35d74211558bafab340310653
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247179
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
We did not adjust the range in extractFunction(). We only adjusted
the range in canExtractFunction().
Change-Id: Idc1eab775988ab61be6df8b4afd4b1a36a8bb0ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247405
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In the previous implementation, we kept the first variable in the
return statement that matched the each given return type. Now, we
keep searching for a non-"zero" value, even if we have already found
a "zero" value.
Change-Id: Icf0987bab90239781452319979e7a30502807e36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246917
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Now we prefer functions when completing "go" and "defer" statements.
Previously we had no preference for the type of object. Further, we
will now also properly invoke functions.
var f1 int
var f2 func()
go f<> // prefers "f2" and expands to "f2()"
Change-Id: I213551b74ba453c337ac89e825b5d495659e9d65
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246359
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Consider this example:
var foo, bar int
if foo == 123 && b<> {
}
Completing at "<>" previously preferred the unimported
"bytes.Contains()" function because it returns a bool. You often need
to compose a boolean expression from non-boolean candidates, so
preferring only bool candidates gives unhelpful results. Now we don't
infer any expected type for "&&" and "||", which allows the example to
prefer "bar" as the top candidate.
Fixesgolang/go#37163.
Change-Id: Ic341da11dd626439cfb265d129288c5ca6008270
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246362
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
I noticed an annoying completion ranking issue:
// ranks "HandlerFunc" over "HandleFunc"
http.HandleFunc<>
This was due to us downranking function calls to prefer fields/vars. I
tweaked the logic to only downrank methods (with a receiver).
Change-Id: Ia4040dc8a35f641be2d7d934bf555090831219ac
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246357
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In the current implementation, the return value of wasFirstChanges() is
reversed and did not record the URI of the changed file. In addition,
the snapshot was not stored in the snapshotByURI.
So I fixed when didChange() is executed, the URI of the edited file is
registered and wasFirstChanges() returns true if the URI is not
registered. Also the snapshot is now stored in snapshotByURI.
Fixesgolang/go#40531
Change-Id: I0adbf7459593d70660beb3b37900ffc88f707917
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247118
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
In the previous implementation, the extracted function would
sometimes include superfluous parameters and return values. It
might also unnecessarily initialize variables. This CL introduces
3 rules to limit this behavior. (1) a variable is not passed as a
parameter to the extracted function if its first use within the
function is its own redefinition. (2) a variable is not returned
from the extracted function if its first use after the function is its
own redefinition. (3) when possible, we redefine variables in the call
expression to the extracted function.
Change-Id: Ideb5a7eff8a1bf462c83271a2f043116ff5d8b76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/244770
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
CL 246757 resulted in an infinite loop because the value of "o" is
never updated.
Change-Id: I79cf265349838de19089c4468128c565a9a3cda3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/247182
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
In the example:
append([]T{}, <>)
We used to track the "objType" as "[]T", and "variadicType" separately
as "T". However, most things are more interested in "T" vs "[]T", so
they had to fiddle around with swapping types. Now instead we track
objType as T, and add a "variadic=true" flag indicating that "[]T" is
also an acceptable type.
Change-Id: I8ee3ef840917378c8406368cb5c660a377498dfd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246698
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Fix a minor completion ranking issue:
foo := func(int, int) {}
foo(123, <>)
Previously we were preferring "foo()" at "<>" even though it can't be
used. We mistakenly thought we were completing the first param because
the *ast.CallExpr appears to only have a single param.
Change-Id: Iedbbb1870a4b9eb5d5be4ed266b8bb3e313b496b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246697
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
The gc_details command, which shows the gc compiler's decisions, can
produce thousands of diagnostics for a package. New gopls options
'noBounds', 'noEscape', 'noInline', 'noNilcheck' will suppress diagnostics
of less interest to the user. These are in a new 'annotations' section
parallel to 'codelens' or 'analyses'.
Change-Id: Ica75de25b14f38b67ddfa9f997f581674f45221d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246477
Run-TryBot: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
snapshot.View().Session().Cache().FileSet() has been driving me crazy
for a while. Add it to snapshot. Along the way, discover that the Cache
interface is now totally unused and delete it.
I also changed a bunch of View arguments to Snapshot while I was in the
area.
Change-Id: I1064d0020b1567c2ed28d2d55e0f4649eb94c060
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245324
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Only add files in errors if either the error's import stack is empty,
or the import stack's top package is the same as the package itself,
so we have more confidence that the error applies to the package.
This is bound to be flaky, but shouldn't be worse than the current
state. (And it unblocks a cl from going into the RC...).
Updates golang/go#40544
Change-Id: Ie21a8abec7150800d3d34b94a7ec90fd40d93fe9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246758
Run-TryBot: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Ran into this while debugging another issue.
Change-Id: I154493418c7676a24457a4e11431ad4f0311c07a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246757
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
In the previous implementation, fillreturns only altered return
statements that contained too few values. Now, fillreturns also examines
return statements with too many return values. In these situations,
we remove any value that is a "zero value" and does not match a type
in the return signature.
Change-Id: I7548307234ff4b16534b72a8aead95a322eb535a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246520
Run-TryBot: Josh Baum <joshbaum@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
This CL addresses completion prefix not being overwritten for completion
in comments for exported variables/functions/types etc. Instead of
setting the surrounding range as cursor position, we expand out from
cursor instead to replace the word we're currently on.
Fixesgolang/go#39262
Change-Id: I90c28562e3ef285ce6848598f8d7bd7545d5c957
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246237
Run-TryBot: Danish Dua <danishdua@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Previously, the suggested fix tests did not properly handle the case
in which one fix contained at least two edits. We also prevent
the server from panicing when we cannot extract the selection.
Change-Id: I38f7b6d871b2f2741349a3fd94fd95b396f5fd33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246458
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In the previous implementation, a test would pass if the given
command could not be applied to the given range.
Change-Id: I2e63972472cbd146cb5f27a3e27c878387222cb6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246517
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We were returning the AST node for the identifier that the rename was
called from, not the actual declaration, so the doc comments weren't
getting updated.
Fixesgolang/go#40463
Change-Id: Id8ba0b0aeb8f42d2aaa561e7a964edcca5202916
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245817
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
People reading this doc may not know, how versions in "go get" work
or how Git tags map to Go module versions. So, add an example
of getting a specific version of gopls.
Change-Id: Id75cc8829bbbf710c3c021eab7d956433ba4110e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/246418
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
parseGoHandles have lifetimes separate from the packages they belong to.
For example, a package may be invalidated by a change to one of its
files, but we still want to retain the parse results for all the rest.
Track them explicitly.
Change-Id: I03a4ffe283bf2b252d2d838bdb2cf332cd981075
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/245059
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
