Instead of testing len(slice)+numNewElements > cap(slice) use
uint(len(slice)+numNewElements) > uint(cap(slice)) to test
if a slice needs to be grown in an append operation.
This prevents a possible overflow when len(slice) is near the maximum
int value and the addition of a constant number of new elements
makes it overflow and wrap around to a negative number which is
smaller than the capacity of the slice.
Appending a slice to a slice with append(s1, s2...) already used
a uint comparison to test slice capacity and therefore was not
vulnerable to the same overflow issue.
Fixes: #29190
Change-Id: I41733895838b4f80a44f827bf900ce931d8be5ca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/154037
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
By combining the load+op, we may force the op to happen earlier in
the store chain. That might force the SymAddr operation earlier, and
in particular earlier than its corresponding VarDef. That leads to
an invalid schedule, so avoid that.
This is kind of a hack to work around the issue presented. I think
the underlying problem, that LEAQ is not directly ordered with respect
to its vardef, is the real problem. The benefit of this CL is that
it fixes the immediate issue, is small, and obviously won't break
anything. A real fix for this issue is much more invasive.
The go binary is unchanged in size.
This situation just doesn't occur very often.
Fixes#28445
Change-Id: I13a765e13f075d5b6808a355ef3c43cdd7cd47b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153641
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
When functions are inlined, for instructions in the inlined body, does
-S print the location of the call, or the location of the body? Right
now, we do the former. I'd like to do the latter by default, it makes
much more sense when reading disassembly. With mid-stack inlining
enabled in more cases, this quandry will come up more often.
The original behavior is still available with -S=2. Some tests
use this mode (so they can find assembly generated by a particular
source line).
This helped me with understanding what the compiler was doing
while fixing #29007.
Change-Id: Id14a3a41e1b18901e7c5e460aa4caf6d940ed064
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/153241
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
IsSliceInBounds(x, y) asserts that y is not negative, but
there were cases where this is not true. Change code
generation to ensure that this is true when it's not obviously
true. Prove phase cleans a few of these out.
With this change the compiler text section is 0.06% larger,
that is, not very much. Benchmarking still TBD, may need
to wait for access to a benchmarking box (next week).
Also corrected run.go to handle '?' in -update_errors output.
Fixes#28797.
Change-Id: Ia8af90bc50a91ae6e934ef973def8d3f398fac7b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152477
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently,
for i := range a {
a[i] = nil
}
will compile to have write barriers even if a is a slice of pointers
to go:notinheap types. This happens because the optimization that
transforms this into a memclr only asks it a's element type has
pointers, and not if it specifically has heap pointers.
Fix this by changing arrayClear to use HasHeapPointer instead of
types.Haspointers. We probably shouldn't have both of these functions,
since a pointer to a notinheap type is effectively a uintptr, but
that's not going to change in this CL.
Change-Id: I284b85bdec6ae1e641f894e8f577989facdb0cf1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152723
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, when a function signature had defined a non-final variadic
parameter, the error message always referred to the type associated with that
parameter. However, if the offending parameter's name was part of an identifier
list with a variadic type, one could misinterpret the message, thinking the
problem had been with one of the other names in the identifer list.
func bar(a, b ...int) {}
clear ~~~~~~~^ ^~~~~~~~ confusing
This change updates the error message and sets the column position to that of
the offending parameter's name, if it exists.
Fixes#28450.
Change-Id: I076f560925598ed90e218c25d70f9449ffd9b3ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152417
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
For recursive functions, the parameters were iterated using
fn.Name.Defn.Func.Dcl, which does not include unnamed/blank
parameters. This results in a mismatch in formal-actual
assignments, for example,
func f(_ T, x T)
f(a, b) should result in { _=a, x=b }, but the escape analysis
currently sees only { x=a } and drops b on the floor. This may
cause b to not escape when it should (or a escape when it should
not).
Fix this by using fntype.Params().FieldSlice() instead, which
does include unnamed parameters.
Also add a sanity check that ensures all the actual parameters
are consumed.
Fixes#29000
Change-Id: Icd86f2b5d71e7ebbab76e375b7702f62efcf59ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152617
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
staticcopy of a struct or array should recursively call itself, not
staticassign.
This fixes an issue where a struct with a slice in it is copied during
static initialization. In this case, the backing array for the slice
is duplicated, and each copy of the slice refers to a different
backing array, which is incorrect. That issue has existed since at
least Go 1.2.
I'm not sure why this was never noticed. It seems like a pretty
obvious bug if anyone modifies the resulting slice.
In any case, we started to notice when the optimization in CL 140301
landed. Here is basically what happens in issue29013b.go:
1) The error above happens, so we get two backing stores for what
should be the same slice.
2) The code for initializing those backing stores is reused.
But not duplicated: they are the same Node structure.
3) The order pass allocates temporaries for the map operations.
For the first instance, things work fine and two temporaries are
allocated and stored in the OKEY nodes. For the second instance,
the order pass decides new temporaries aren't needed, because
the OKEY nodes already have temporaries in them.
But the order pass also puts a VARKILL of the temporaries between
the two instance initializations.
4) In this state, the code is technically incorrect. But before
CL 140301 it happens to work because the temporaries are still
correctly initialized when they are used for the second time. But then...
5) The new CL 140301 sees the VARKILLs and decides to reuse the
temporary for instance 1 map 2 to initialize the instance 2 map 1
map. Because the keys aren't re-initialized, instance 2 map 1
gets the wrong key inserted into it.
Fixes#29013
Change-Id: I840ce1b297d119caa706acd90e1517a5e47e9848
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/152081
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
A Go user made a well-documented request for a slightly
lower threshold. I tested against a selection of other
people's benchmarks, and saw a tiny benefit (possibly noise)
at equally tiny cost, and no unpleasant surprises observed
in benchmarking.
I.e., might help, doesn't hurt, low risk, request was
delivered on a silver platter.
It did, however, change the behavior of one test because
now bytes.Buffer.Grow is eligible for inlining.
Updates #19348.
Change-Id: I85e3088a4911290872b8c6bda9601b5354c48695
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151977
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL adds several test cases of arithmetic operations for
386/amd64/arm/arm64.
Change-Id: I362687c06249f31091458a1d8c45fc4d006b616a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151897
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
While here, rename nonnegintconst to indexconst (because that's
what it is) and add Fatalf calls where we are not expecting the
indexconst call to fail, and fixed wrong comparison in smallintconst.
Fixes#23781.
Change-Id: I86eb13081c450943b1806dfe3ae368872f76639a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151599
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
We don't need a write barrier if:
1) The location we're writing to doesn't hold a heap pointer, and
2) The value we're writing isn't a heap pointer.
The freshly returned value from runtime.newobject satisfies (1).
Pointers to globals, and the contents of the read-only data section satisfy (2).
This is particularly helpful for code like:
p := []string{"abc", "def", "ghi"}
Where the compiler generates:
a := new([3]string)
move(a, statictmp_) // eliminates write barriers here
p := a[:]
For big slice literals, this makes the code a smaller and faster to
compile.
Update #13554. Reduces the compile time by ~10% and RSS by ~30%.
Change-Id: Icab81db7591c8777f68e5d528abd48c7e44c87eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151498
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
A little bit of compiler stress testing. Randomize the order
of the values in a block before every phase. This randomization
makes sure that we're not implicitly depending on that order.
Currently the random seed is a hash of the function name.
It provides determinism, but sacrifices some coverage.
Other arrangements are possible (env var, ...) but require
more setup.
Fixes#20178
Change-Id: Idae792a23264bd9a3507db6ba49b6d591a608e83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/33909
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
We want to issue loads as soon as possible, especially when they
are going to miss in the cache. Using a conditional move (CMOV) here:
i := ...
if cond {
i++
}
... = a[i]
means that we have to wait for cond to be computed before the load
is issued. Without a CMOV, if the branch is predicted correctly the
load can be issued in parallel with computing cond.
Even if the branch is predicted incorrectly, maybe the speculative
load is close to the real load, and we get a prefetch for free.
In the worst case, when the prediction is wrong and the address is
way off, we only lose by the time difference between the CMOV
latency (~2 cycles) and the mispredict restart latency (~15 cycles).
We only squash CMOVs that affect load addresses. Results of CMOVs
that are used for other things (store addresses, store values) we
use as before.
Fixes#26306
Change-Id: I82ca14b664bf05e1d45e58de8c4d9c775a127ca1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145717
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This commit fixes a mistake made in CL 144538.
This nilcheck can be removed because OpPPC64LoweredMove will fault if
arg0 is nil, as it's used to store. Further information can be found in
cmd/compile/internal/ssa/nilcheck.go.
Change-Id: Ifec0080c00eb1f94a8c02f8bf60b93308e71b119
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151298
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Note that the intrinsic implementation panics separately for overflow and
divide by zero, which matches the behavior of the pure go implementation.
There is a modest performance improvement after intrinsic implementation.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Div-4 53.0ns ± 1% 47.0ns ± 0% -11.28% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Div32-4 18.4ns ± 0% 18.5ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.444 n=5+5)
Div64-4 53.3ns ± 0% 47.5ns ± 4% -10.77% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Updates #28273
Change-Id: Ic1688ecc0964acace2e91bf44ef16f5fb6b6bc82
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144378
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Don't convert values that aren't Go constants, like
uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(nil)), to a literal constant. This avoids
assuming they are constants for things like indexing, array sizes,
case duplication, etc.
Also, nil is an allowed duplicate in switches. CTNILs aren't Go constants.
Fixes#28078Fixes#28079
Change-Id: I9ab8af47098651ea09ef10481787eae2ae2fb445
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151320
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When a slice composite literal is sparse, initialize it dynamically
instead of statically.
s := []int{5:5, 20:20}
To initialize the backing store for s, use 2 constant writes instead
of copying from a static array with 21 entries.
This CL also fixes pathologies in the compiler when the slice is
*very* sparse.
Fixes#23780
Change-Id: Iae95c6e6f6a0e2994675cbc750d7a4dd6436b13b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151319
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Abort evconst if its argument isn't a Go constant. The SSA backend
will do the optimizations in question later. They tend to be weird
cases, like uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(uintptr(1))).
Fix OADDSTR and OCOMPLEX cases in isGoConst.
OADDSTR has its arguments in n.List, not n.Left and n.Right.
OCOMPLEX might have a 2-result function as its arg in List[0]
(in which case it isn't a Go constant).
Fixes#24760
Change-Id: Iab312d994240d99b3f69bfb33a443607e872b01d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151338
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
In assembly free packages (aka "complete" or "pure go"), allow
bodyless functions if they are linkname'd to something else.
Presumably the thing the function is linkname'd to has a definition.
If not, the linker will complain. And linkname is unsafe, so we expect
users to know what they are doing.
Note this handles only one direction, where the linkname directive
is in the local package. If the linkname directive is in the remote
package, this CL won't help. (See os/signal/sig.s for an example.)
Fixes#23311
Change-Id: I824361b4b582ee05976d94812e5b0e8b0f7a18a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/151318
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This commit adapts compile tool to create correct nilchecks for AIX.
AIX allows to load a nil pointer. Therefore, the default nilcheck
which issues a load must be replaced by a CMP instruction followed by a
store at 0x0 if the value is nil. The store will trigger a SIGSEGV as on
others OS.
The nilcheck algorithm must be adapted to do not remove nilcheck if it's
only a read. Stores are detected with v.Type.IsMemory().
Tests related to nilptr must be adapted to the previous changements.
nilptr.go cannot be used as it's because the AIX address space starts at
1<<32.
Change-Id: I9f5aaf0b7e185d736a9b119c0ed2fe4e5bd1e7af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144538
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This commit allows the runtime to handle 64bits addresses returned by
mmap syscall on AIX.
Mmap syscall returns addresses on 59bits on AIX. But the Arena
implementation only allows addresses with less than 48 bits.
This commit increases the arena size up to 1<<60 for aix/ppc64.
Update: #25893
Change-Id: Iea72e8a944d10d4f00be915785e33ae82dd6329e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/138736
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Currently, both asm and compile have a -symabis flag, but in asm it's
a boolean flag that means to generate a symbol ABIs file and in the
compiler its a string flag giving the path of the symbol ABIs file to
consume. I'm worried about this false symmetry biting us in the
future, so rename asm's flag to -gensymabis.
Updates #27539.
Change-Id: I8b9c18a852d2838099718f8989813f19d82e7434
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149818
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The current support_XXX variables are specific for the
amd64 and 386 platforms.
Prefix processor capability variables by architecture to have a
consistent naming scheme and avoid reuse of the existing
variables for new platforms.
This also aligns naming of runtime variables closer with internal/cpu
processor capability variable names.
Change-Id: I3eabb29a03874678851376185d3a62e73c1aff1d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/91435
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
When using soft-float, OMUL might be rewritten to function call
so we should ensure it was evaluated first.
Fixes#28688
Change-Id: I30b87501782fff62d35151f394a1c22b0d490c6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/148837
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Move the empty header file created by "builddir", "buildrundir"
directives to t.tempDir. The file was accidentally placed in the
same directory as the source code and this was a vestige of CL 146999.
Fixes#28781
Change-Id: I3d2ada5f9e8bf4ce4f015b9bd379b311592fe3ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149458
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Because run.go doesn't pass the package being compiled to the compiler
via the -p flag, it can't match up the main·f symbol from the
assembler with the "func f" stub in Go, so it doesn't produce the
correct assembly stub.
Fix this by removing the package prefix from the assembly definition.
Alternatively, we could make run.go pass -p to the compiler, but it's
nicer to remove these package prefixes anyway.
Should fix the linux-arm builder, which was broken by the introduction
of function ABIs in CL 147160.
Updates #27539.
Change-Id: Id62b7701e1108a21a5ad48ffdb5dad4356c273a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149483
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
When we set an explicit argmap, we may want only a prefix of that
argmap. Argmap is set when the function is reflect.makeFuncStub or
reflect.methodValueCall. In this case, arglen specifies how much of
the args section is actually live. (It could be either all the args +
results, or just the args.)
Fixes#28750
Change-Id: Idf060607f15a298ac591016994e58e22f7f92d83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/149217
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This is a little clearer, and we're about to need the .s file list in
one more place, so this will cut down on duplication.
Change-Id: I4da8bf03a0469fb97565b0841c40d505657b574e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146998
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We have an existing optimization that recognizes
memory moves of the form A -> B -> C and converts
them into A -> C, in the hopes that the store to
B will be end up being dead and thus eliminated.
However, when A, B, and C are large types,
the front end sometimes emits VarDef ops for the moves.
This change adds an optimization to match that pattern.
This required changing an old compiler test.
The test assumed that a temporary was required
to deal with a large return value.
With this optimization in place, that temporary
ended up being eliminated.
Triggers 649 times during 'go build -a std cmd'.
Cuts 16k off cmd/go.
name old object-bytes new object-bytes delta
Template 507kB ± 0% 507kB ± 0% -0.15% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Unicode 225kB ± 0% 225kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
GoTypes 1.85MB ± 0% 1.85MB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Flate 328kB ± 0% 328kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
GoParser 402kB ± 0% 402kB ± 0% -0.00% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Reflect 1.41MB ± 0% 1.41MB ± 0% -0.20% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Tar 458kB ± 0% 458kB ± 0% ~ (all equal)
XML 601kB ± 0% 599kB ± 0% -0.21% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Change-Id: I9b5f25c8663a0b772ad1ee51fa61f74b74d26dd3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143479
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
This change makes use of the cc versions of the AND, OR, XOR
instructions, omitting the need for a CMP instruction.
In many test programs and in the go binary, this reduces the
size of 20-30 functions by at least 1 instruction, many in
runtime.
Testcase added to test/codegen/comparisons.go
Change-Id: I6cc1ca8b80b065d7390749c625bc9784b0039adb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/143059
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a simple tweak to allow a bit more mid-stack inlining.
In cases like this:
func f() {
g()
}
We'd really like to inline f into its callers. It can't hurt.
We implement this optimization by making calls a bit cheaper, enough
to afford a single call in the function body, but not 2.
The remaining budget allows for some argument modification, or perhaps
a wrapping conditional:
func f(x int) {
g(x, 0)
}
func f(x int) {
if x > 0 {
g()
}
}
Update #19348
Change-Id: Ifb1ea0dd1db216c3fd5c453c31c3355561fe406f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147361
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Dead-code eliminating labels is tricky because there might
be gotos that can still reach them.
Bug probably introduced with CL 91056
Fixes#28616
Change-Id: I6680465134e3486dcb658896f5172606cc51b104
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147817
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Iskander Sharipov <iskander.sharipov@intel.com>
This change re-introduces (temporarily) a work-around for recursive
alias type declarations, originally in https://golang.org/cl/35831/
(intended as fix for #18640). The work-around was removed later
for a more comprehensive cycle detection check. That check
contained a subtle error which made the code appear to work,
while in fact creating incorrect types internally. See #25838
for details.
By re-introducing the original work-around, we eliminate problems
with many simple recursive type declarations involving aliases;
specifically cases such as #27232 and #27267. However, the more
general problem remains.
This CL also fixes the subtle error (incorrect variable use when
analyzing a type cycle) mentioned above and now issues a fatal
error with a reference to the relevant issue (rather than crashing
later during the compilation). While not great, this is better
than the current status. The long-term solution will need to
address these cycles (see #25838).
As a consequence, several old test cases are not accepted anymore
by the compiler since they happened to work accidentally only.
This CL disables parts or all code of those test cases. The issues
are: #18640, #23823, and #24939.
One of the new test cases (fixedbugs/issue27232.go) exposed a
go/types issue. The test case is excluded from the go/types test
suite and an issue was filed (#28576).
Updates #18640.
Updates #23823.
Updates #24939.
Updates #25838.
Updates #28576.
Fixes#27232.
Fixes#27267.
Change-Id: I6c2d10da98bfc6f4f445c755fcaab17fc7b214c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/147286
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Unlikely to happen in practice, but easy enough to prevent and might
as well do so for completeness.
Fixes#28243.
Change-Id: I848c3af49cb923f088e9490c6a79373e182fad08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/142719
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This commit skips tests which aren't yet supported on AIX.
nosplit.go is disabled because stackGuardMultiplier is increased for
syscalls.
Change-Id: Ib5ff9a4539c7646bcb6caee159f105ff8a160ad7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146939
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
For moves >8,<16 bytes, do a move using non-overlapping loads/stores
if it would require no more instructions.
This helps a bit with the case when the move is from a static
constant, because then the code to materialize the value being moved
is smaller.
Change-Id: Ie47a5a7c654afeb4973142b0a9922faea13c9b54
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/146019
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This CL fixes several typos and adds two more cases
to arithmetic test.
Change-Id: I086560162ea351e2166866e444e2317da36c1729
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145210
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This reverts commit 9ce87a63b9.
The fix addresses the specific test case, but not the general
problem.
Updates #24755.
Change-Id: I0ba8463b41b099b1ebf49759f88a423b40f70d58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145617
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This way, once the constant declarations are typechecked, all named
types are fully typechecked and have all of their methods added.
Usually this isn't important, as methods and interfaces cannot be used
in constant declarations. However, it can lead to confusing and
incorrect errors, such as:
$ cat f.go
package p
type I interface{ F() }
type T struct{}
const _ = I(T{})
func (T) F() {}
$ go build f.go
./f.go:6:12: cannot convert T literal (type T) to type I:
T does not implement I (missing F method)
The error is clearly wrong, as T does have an F method. If we ensure
that all funcs are typechecked before all constant declarations, we get
the correct error:
$ go build f2.go
# command-line-arguments
./f.go:6:7: const initializer I(T literal) is not a constant
Fixes#24755.
Change-Id: I182b60397b9cac521d9a9ffadb11b42fd42e42fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/115096
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
CL 114797 reworked how arguments get written to the stack.
Some type conversions got lost in the process. Restore them.
Fixes#28390
Updates #28430
Change-Id: Ia0d37428d7d615c865500bbd1a7a4167554ee34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144598
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Unlike normal load+op opcodes, the load+compare opcode does
not clobber its non-load argument. Allow the load+compare merge
to happen even if the non-load argument is used elsewhere.
Noticed when investigating issue #28417.
Change-Id: Ibc48d1f2e06ae76034c59f453815d263e8ec7288
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/145097
Reviewed-by: Ainar Garipov <gugl.zadolbal@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
If a field and method have the same name, mark the respective struct field
so that we don't report follow-on errors when the field/method is accessed.
Per suggestion of @mdempsky.
Fixes#28268.
Change-Id: Ia1ca4cdfe9bacd3739d1fd7ca5e014ca094245ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/144259
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
