We used to pass -no_pie to external linker on darwin/arm, which
is incompatible with -fembed-bitcode. CL 201358 attempted to
remove the -no_pie flag, but it resulted the darwin linker to
complain about absolute addressing in TEXT segment.
On darwin/arm, we already get away from absolute addressing in
the TEXT section. The complained absolute addressing is in
RODATA, which was embedded in the TEXT segment. This CL moves
RODATA to the DATA segment, like what we already did on ARM64
and on AMD64 in c-archive/c-shared buildmodes for the same reason.
So there is no absolute addressing in the TEXT segment, which
allows us to remove -no_pie flag.
Fixes#35252.
Updates #32963.
Change-Id: Id6e3a594cb066d257d4f58fadb4a3ee4672529f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205060
Reviewed-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
POWER9 (ISA 3.0) introduced a new format of load/store instructions to
implement indexed load/store quadword, using an immediate value instead
of a register index.
This change adds support for this new instruction encoding and adds the
new load/store quadword instructions (lxv/stxv) to the assembler.
This change also adds the missing XX1-form loads/stores (halfword and byte)
included in ISA 3.0.
Change-Id: Ibcdf53c342d7a352d64a9403c2fe7b25be9c3b24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200399
Run-TryBot: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Replace
buf := [HUGE_CONST]*T)(unsafe.Pointer(p))[:]
with
buf := [HUGE_CONST]*T)(unsafe.Pointer(p))[:n:n]
Pointer p points to n of T elements. New unsafe pointer conversion
logic verifies that both first and last elements point into the
same Go variable. And this change adjusts all code to comply with
this rule.
Verified by running
go test -a -short -gcflags=all=-d=checkptr crypto/x509
The test does not fail even with original version of this code. I
suspect it is because all variables I changed live outside of Go
memory. But I am just guessing, I don't really know how pointer
checker works.
Updates golang/go#34972
Change-Id: Ibc33fdc9e2023d9b14905c9badf2f0b683999ab8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204621
Run-TryBot: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We don't async preempt assembly functions. We do that by checking
whether the function has a local pointer map, and assume it is
an assembly (or, non-Go) function if there isn't one. However,
assembly functions marked with NO_LOCAL_POINTERS still have local
pointer maps, and we wouldn't identify them. For them, check for
the special pointer map runtime.no_pointers_stackmap as well, and
treat them as not async preemptible.
Change-Id: I1301e3b4d35893c31c4c5a5147a0d775987bd6f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202337
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This adds a test of preempting a loop containing no synchronous safe
points for STW and stack scanning.
We couldn't add this test earlier because it requires scheduler, STW,
and stack scanning preemption to all be working.
For #10958, #24543.
Change-Id: I73292db78ca3d14aab11bdafd26d03986920ef0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201777
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This adds signal-based preemption to preemptone.
Since STW and forEachP ultimately use preemptone, this also makes
these work with async preemption.
This also makes freezetheworld more robust so tracebacks from fatal
panics should be far less likely to report "goroutine running on other
thread; stack unavailable".
For #10958, #24543. (This doesn't fix it yet because asynchronous
preemption only works on POSIX platforms on 386 and amd64 right now.)
Change-Id: If776181dd5a9b3026a7b89a1b5266521b95a5f61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201762
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This adds support for pausing a running G by sending a signal to its
M.
The main complication is that we want to target a G, but can only send
a signal to an M. Hence, the protocol we use is to simply mark the G
for preemption (which we already do) and send the M a "wake up and
look around" signal. The signal checks if it's running a G with a
preemption request and stops it if so in the same way that stack check
preemptions stop Gs. Since the preemption may fail (the G could be
moved or the signal could arrive at an unsafe point), we keep a count
of the number of received preemption signals. This lets stopG detect
if its request failed and should be retried without an explicit
channel back to suspendG.
For #10958, #24543.
Change-Id: I3e1538d5ea5200aeb434374abb5d5fdc56107e53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201760
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This adds support for scanning the stack when a goroutine is stopped
at an async safe point. This is not yet lit up because asyncPreempt is
not yet injected, but prepares us for that.
This works by conservatively scanning the registers dumped in the
frame of asyncPreempt and its parent frame, which was stopped at an
asynchronous safe point.
Conservative scanning works by only marking words that are pointers to
valid, allocated heap objects. One complication is pointers to stack
objects. In this case, we can't determine if the stack object is still
"allocated" or if it was freed by an earlier GC. Hence, we need to
propagate the conservative-ness of scanning stack objects: if all
pointers found to a stack object were found via conservative scanning,
then the stack object itself needs to be scanned conservatively, since
its pointers may point to dead objects.
For #10958, #24543.
Change-Id: I7ff84b058c37cde3de8a982da07002eaba126fd6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201761
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This adds asynchronous preemption function for amd64 and 386. These
functions spill and restore all register state that can be used by
user Go code.
For the moment we stub out the other arches.
For #10958, #24543.
Change-Id: I6f93fabe9875f4834922a5712362e79045c00aca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201759
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This adds a sigctxt.pushCall method that pushes a call at the signaled
site. We'll use this to inject asynchronous preemptions and in some
places we use it to clean up preparePanic.
For the moment this only works on 386 and amd64. We stub it out on
other platforms and will avoid calling the stubbed version.
For #10958, #24543.
Change-Id: I49e0e853f935d32dd67a70c6cafbae44ee68af8e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201758
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Currently, the compiler fails to mark any unsafe-points in the initial
instructions of a function as unsafe points. This happens because
unsafe points are encoded as a stack map index of -2 and the compiler
emits PCDATA instructions when there's a change in the stack map
index, but I had set the initial stack map index to -2. The actual
initial PCDATA value assumed by the PCDATA encoder and the runtime is
-1. Hence, if the first instructions had a stack map index of -2, no
PCDATA was emitted, which cause the runtime to assume the index was -1
instead.
This was particularly problematic in the runtime, where the compiler
was supposed to mark only calls as safe-points and everything else as
unsafe-points. Runtime leaf functions, for example, should have been
marked as entirely unsafe-points, but were instead marked entirely as
safe-points.
Fix this by making the PCDATA instruction generator assume the initial
PCDATA value is -1 instead of -2, so it will emit a PCDATA instruction
right away if the first real instruction is an unsafe-point.
This increases the size of the cmd/go binary by 0.02% since we now
emit slightly more PCDATA than before.
For #10958, #24543.
Change-Id: I92222107f799130072b36d49098d2686f1543699
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202084
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This doesn't do anything yet, but it will provide a way to disable
non-cooperative preemption.
For #10958, #24543.
Change-Id: Ifdef303f103eabd0922ced8d9bebbd5f0aa2cda4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201757
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Current implementation of httputil.DumpRequestOut
incorrectly resets the Request.Body prematurely
before Content-Length/Transfer-Encoding detection
in newTransferWriter()
This fix avoids resetting the Request.Body when
Request.ContentLength is set to '0' by the caller
and Request.Body is set to a custom reader. To allow
newTransferWriter() to treat this situation as
'Transfer-Encoding: chunked'.
Fixes#34504
Change-Id: Ieab6bf876ced28c32c084e0f4c8c4432964181f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197898
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change updates the GOARCH/GOOS discussion at the top of the
"Installing Go from source" document to better reflect the current
status. In particular:
- The GOARCH list now focuses on simply listing the supported
architectures, with no notes about their supposed "maturity", since
the same GOARCH can be mature on a GOOS and not so mature on another.
- Outdated notes about some archs being new and "not well-exercised"
have been removed in favour of a following list of which ports are
first class.
- The list of supported OS has been updated (added: AIX, Illumos),
and sorted in alphabetical order.
- A note about the runtime support being the same for all ARCHS,
"including garbage collection and efficient array slicing and" etc etc
has been removed, since it doesn't seem particularly relevant in a
"install from source" instruction page, and it's likely a leftover
from the time this doc page was the landing place for new people and
it felt the need to "sell" Go.
Updates #27689Fixes#35009
Change-Id: Ic4eca91dca3135adc7bed4fe00b4f157768f0e81
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/202197
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Even though bitwise operations may be slightly more
performant, the readability improvement of a mod
operation is worth the tradeoff.
Change-Id: I352c92ad355c6eb6ef99e3da00e1eff2d2ea5812
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204739
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On illumos systems, and at least historically on Solaris systems, it is
possible for port_getn(3C) calls to return some number of events and
then fail with error ETIME.
Generally we expect this to happen if the caller passes an nget value
larger than 1 and calls with a timeout; if less than the requested
number of events accumulate the system will still return them after
timeout failure so the caller must check the updated nget value in the
ETIME case. Note that although less likely this can still happen even
when requesting just 1 event, especially with a short timeout value or
on a busy system.
Fixes#35261
Change-Id: I0d83251b69a2fadc64c4e8e280aa596e2e1548ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204801
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If multiple goroutines call time.(*Timer).Reset then the timer will go
from timerWaiting to timerDeleted to timerModifying to timerModifiedLater.
The timer can be on a different P, meaning that simultaneously cleantimers
could change it from timerDeleted to timerRemoving to timerRemoved.
If Reset sees timerRemoved, it was doing an atomic.Store of timerWaiting,
meaning that it did not necessarily see the other values set in the timer,
so the timer could appear to be in an inconsistent state. Use atomic.Cas
to avoid that possibility.
Updates #6239
Updates #27707Fixes#35272
Change-Id: I1d59a13dc4f2ff4af110fc6e032c8c9d59cfc270
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204717
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
In CL 204617, I intend to make "bound" parameter to have special meaning
in typecheckarraylit, so we can distinguish between type-checks array
literal and slice literal. But we end up with other solution. The CL was
submitted without reverting the "bound" parameter in case of slice
literal.
Technically, it's not harmful, but causes the code harder to read and maintain.
Change-Id: Ia522ccc9a6b8e25d7eaad4aa4957cb4fa18edc60
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204618
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
User's program was mutating time.Local variable and crashing
itself as a consequence. Instead of documenting that time.Local
variable should not be mutated, recommended way of setting the
system's time zone has been documented.
Fixes#34814
Change-Id: I7781189855c3bf2ea979dfa07f86c283eed27091
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200457
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
I was doing some testing with GODEBUG=schedtrace=1,scheddetail=1 and I
noticed that the program hung after a throw with "all goroutines are
asleep". This is because when doing a throw or fatal panic with schedtrace
the panic code does a final schedtrace, which needs to acquire the
scheduler lock. The checkdead function is always called with the scheduler
lock held. So checkdead would throw with the scheduler lock held, then
the panic code would call schedtrace, which would block trying to acquire
the scheduler lock.
This problem will only happen for people debugging the runtime, but
it's easy to avoid by having checkdead unlock the scheduler lock before
it throws. I only did this for the throws that can happen for a normal
program, not for throws that indicate some corruption in the scheduler data.
Change-Id: Ic62277b3ca6bee6f0fca8d5eb516c59cb67855cb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204778
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change turns off the scavenger if there's less than one physical
page of work to do. If there's less than one phyiscal page of work
today, then the computed time for the work to be done will be zero,
resulting in a floating point division by zero.
This is bad on two accounts. On the one hand it could cause a fault on
some systems. On the other hand, it could cause the pacing computations
done by the scavenger to be nonsense. While this is generally harmless
in the case where there's a very small amount of work to do anyway (the
scavenger might just back off expontentially forever, or do some work
and immediately sleep, because there's not much of it to do), it causes
problems for the deadlock checker. On platforms with a larger physical
page size, such as 64 KiB, we might hit this path in a deadlock
scenario, in which case the deadlock checker will never fire and we'll
just hang.
Specifically, this happens on ppc64 trybot tests, which is where the
issue was discovered.
Fixes#34575.
Change-Id: I8677db539447b2f0e75b8cfcbe33932244e1508c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203517
Run-TryBot: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
For debugging. (The "go1.4" can be misleading since it might actually
be go1.4.3 or go1.11 or go1.12 or master)
Change-Id: I27520b931a2be018de577a299592d082260aa467
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204757
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Suppress “finding” messages unless they are unusually slow, and
“extracting” messages always (they almost always occur conjunction
with “downloading”, which is already logged).
Log “found” messages for module dependencies added to satisfy missing
import paths.
Log top-level version changes in 'go get' when the selected version
is not identical to the version requested on the command line.
Updates #26152
Updates #33284
Change-Id: I4d0de60fab58d7cc7df8a2aff05c8b5b2220e626
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204777
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jay Conrod <jayconrod@google.com>
A majority of work is spent in dataSize when en/decoding the same
struct over and over again. This wastes a lot of work, since
the result doesn't change for a given reflect.Value.
Cache the result of the function for structs, so that subsequent
calls to dataSize can avoid doing work.
name old time/op new time/op delta
ReadStruct 1.00µs ± 1% 0.37µs ± 1% -62.99% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
WriteStruct 1.00µs ± 3% 0.37µs ± 1% -62.69% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
name old speed new speed delta
ReadStruct 75.1MB/s ± 1% 202.9MB/s ± 1% +170.16% (p=0.029 n=4+4)
WriteStruct 74.8MB/s ± 3% 200.4MB/s ± 1% +167.96% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Fixes#34471
Change-Id: Ic5d987ca95f1197415ef93643a0af6fc1224fdf0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/199539
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Based on the riscv-go port and the linux/riscv64 files in x/sys/unix.
Updates #27532
Change-Id: Ib33a59a61f6b2721b12292c18f1fc9f9d0509cd3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204659
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The current implementation performs a plain map lookup,
but other header methods canonicalize header keys before
using them.
Fixes#34918
Change-Id: Id4120488b8b39ecee97fa7a6ad8a34158687ffcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/201357
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Based on the riscv-go port.
Updates #27532
Change-Id: I3a4d86783fbd625e3ade16d08f87d66e4502f3f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204660
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If a previous Write returned an error, any subsequent Write or ReadFrom
must return that error before any operations.
However, only Write behaved correctly and this change fixes that problem
by making sure that ReadFrom firstly checks for the underlying error.
Fixes#35194
Change-Id: I31356a9e8bd945bc0168b2e3be470f3ae69d4813
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204000
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When everything is working correctly, any pointer the garbage
collector encounters can only point into a fully initialized heap
span, since the span must have been initialized before that pointer
could escape the heap allocator and become visible to the GC.
However, in various cases, we try to be defensive against bad
pointers. In findObject, this is just a sanity check: we never expect
to find a bad pointer, but programming errors can lead to them. In
spanOfHeap, we don't necessarily trust the pointer and we're trying to
check if it really does point to the heap, though it should always
point to something. Conservative scanning takes this to a new level,
since it can only guess that a word may be a pointer and verify this.
In all of these cases, we have a problem that the span lookup and
check can race with span initialization, since the span becomes
visible to lookups before it's fully initialized.
Furthermore, we're about to start initializing the span without the
heap lock held, which is going to introduce races where accesses were
previously protected by the heap lock.
To address this, this CL makes accesses to mspan.state atomic, and
ensures that the span is fully initialized before setting the state to
mSpanInUse. All loads are now atomic, and in any case where we don't
trust the pointer, it first atomically loads the span state and checks
that it's mSpanInUse, after which it will have synchronized with span
initialization and can safely check the other span fields.
For #10958, #24543, but a good fix in general.
Change-Id: I518b7c63555b02064b98aa5f802c92b758fef853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203286
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Currently, several important fields of a heap span are set by
heapBits.initSpan, which happens after the span has already been
published and returned from the locked region of alloc_m. In
particular, allocBits is set very late, which makes mspan.isFree
unsafe even if you were to lock the heap because it tries to access
allocBits.
This CL fixes this by populating these fields in alloc_m. The next CL
builds on this to only publish the span once it is fully initialized.
Together, they'll make it safe to check allocBits even if there is a
race with alloc_m.
For #10958, #24543, but a good fix in general.
Change-Id: I7fde90023af0f497e826b637efa4d19c32840c08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/203285
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Follow the recommandation from RFC 8422, section 5.1.2 of sending back the
ec_points_format extension when requested by the client. This is to fix
some clients declining the handshake if omitted.
Fixes#31943
Change-Id: I7b04dbac6f9af75cda094073defe081e1e9a295d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/176418
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Poitrey <rs@rhapsodyk.net>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a re-submission of CL 151157, since it was reverted in CL 190909
due to an introduced crash found by a fuzzer. The revert CL included
regression tests, while this CL includes a fixed version of the original
change.
In particular, what we forgot in the original optimization was that we
still need the length and trailing quote checks at the beginning of
unquoteBytes. Without those, we could end up in a crash later on.
We can work out how many bytes can be unquoted trivially in
rescanLiteral, which already iterates over a string's bytes.
Removing the extra loop in unquoteBytes simplifies the function and
speeds it up, especially when decoding simple strings, which are common.
While at it, we can remove the check that s[0]=='"', since all call
sites already meet that condition.
name old time/op new time/op delta
CodeDecoder-8 10.6ms ± 2% 10.5ms ± 1% -1.01% (p=0.004 n=20+10)
name old speed new speed delta
CodeDecoder-8 183MB/s ± 2% 185MB/s ± 1% +1.02% (p=0.003 n=20+10)
Updates #28923.
Change-Id: I8c6b13302bcd86a364bc998d72451332c0809cde
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190659
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
Add some simple unit tests for these atomic operations. These can't
catch all the bugs that are possible with these operations but at
least they provide some coverage.
Change-Id: I94b9f451fcc9fecdb2a1448c5357b019563ad275
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/204317
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
