Invert "useDeepCompletions" config flag to "disableDeepCompletion" and
separate out "disableFuzzyMatching" which reverts to the previous
prefix matching behavior.
I separated fuzzy matching tests out to a separate file so they aren't
entangled with deep completion tests. In coming up with representative
test cases I found a couple issues which I fixed:
- We were treating a fuzzy matcher score of 0 as no match, but the
matcher returns 0 for candidates that match but have no bonuses. I
changed the matcher interface so that a score of 0 counts as a
match. For example, this was preventing a pattern of "o" from
matching "foo".
- When we lower a candidate's score based on its depth, we were
subtracting a static multiplier which could result in the score
going negative. A negative score messes up future score weighting
because multiplying it by a value in the range [0, 1) makes it
bigger instead of smaller. Fix by scaling a candidate's score based
on its depth rather than subtracting a constant factor.
Updates golang/go#32754
Change-Id: Ie6f9111f1696b0d067d08f7eed7b0a338ad9cd67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/192137
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Make use of the existing fuzzy matcher to perform server side fuzzy
completion matching. Previously the server did exact prefix matching
for completion candidates and left fancy filtering to the
client. Having the server do fuzzy matching has two main benefits:
- Deep completions now update as you type. The completion candidates
returned to the client are marked "incomplete", causing the client
to refresh the candidates after every keystroke. This lets the
server pick the most relevant set of deep completion candidates.
- All editors get fuzzy matching for free. VSCode has fuzzy matching
out of the box, but some editors either don't provide it, or it can
be difficult to set up.
I modified the fuzzy matcher to allow matches where the input doesn't
match the final segment of the candidate. For example, previously "ab"
would not match "abc.def" because the "b" in "ab" did not match the
final segment "def". I can see how this is useful when the text
matching happens in a vacuum and candidate's final segment is the most
specific part. But, in our case, we have various other methods to
order candidates, so we don't want to exclude them just because the
final segment doesn't match. For example, if we know our candidate
needs to be type "context.Context" and "foo.ctx" is of the right type,
we want to suggest "foo.ctx" as soon as the user starts inputting
"foo", even though "foo" doesn't match "ctx" at all.
Note that fuzzy matching is behind the "useDeepCompletions" config
flag for the time being.
Change-Id: Ic7674f0cf885af770c30daef472f2e3c5ac4db78
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190099
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
When it is certain we are completing a struct field name, we don't
want deep completions. The only possible completions are the remaining
field names.
I also silenced the log spam in tests by disabling the go/packages
logger and the lsp logger.
Fixesgolang/go#33614
Change-Id: Icec8d92112b1674fa7a6a21145ab710d054919b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/190097
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change fixes documentation for completion items by using cached
package and AST information to derive the documentation. We also add
testing for documentation in completion items.
Change-Id: I911fb80f5cef88640fc06a9fe474e5da403657e3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/189237
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Cottrell <iancottrell@google.com>
Deep completion refers to searching through an object's fields and
methods for more completion candidates. For example:
func wantsInt(int) { }
var s struct { i int }
wantsInt(<>)
Will now give a candidate for "s.i" since its type matches the
expected type.
We limit to three deep completion results. In some cases there are
many useless deep completion matches. Showing too many options defeats
the purpose of "smart" completions. We also lower a completion item's
score according to its depth so that we favor shallower options. For
now we do not continue searching past function calls to limit our
search scope. In other words, we are not able to suggest results with
any chained fields/methods after the first method call.
Deep completions are behind the "useDeepCompletions" LSP config flag
for now.
Change-Id: I1b888c82e5c4b882f9718177ce07811e2bccbf22
GitHub-Last-Rev: 26522363730036e0b382a7bcd10aa1ed825f6866
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#100
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/177622
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
