...because that's an illegal addressing mode.
I double-checked handling of this code, and 387 is the only
place where this check is missing.
Fixes#22429
Change-Id: I2284fe729ea86251c6af2f04076ddf7a5e66367c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73551
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If n.Type==nil after typechecking, then we should have already
reported a more useful error somewhere else. Just return 0 in
evalunsafe without trying to do anything else that's likely to cause
problems.
Also, further split out issue7525.go into more test files, because
cmd/compile reports at most one typechecking loop per compilation
unit.
Fixes#22351.
Change-Id: I3ebf505f72c48fcbfef5ec915606224406026597
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/72251
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fine-tune skipping of tokens after missing closing parentheses in lists.
Fixes#22164.
Change-Id: I575d86e21048cd40340a2c08399e8b0deec337cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71250
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Follow CL 41477 and add two more line position tests for yyerror calls
in the typechecker which are currently not tested.
Update #19683
Change-Id: Iacd865195a3bfba87d8c22655382af267aba47a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70251
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, we were treating cross-package function calls as free for
inlining budgeting.
In theory, we should be able to recompute InlCost from the
exported/reimported function bodies. However, that process mutates the
structure of the Node AST enough that it doesn't preserve InlCost. To
avoid unexpected issues, just record and restore InlCost in the export
data.
Fixes#19261.
Change-Id: Iac2bc0d32d4f948b64524aca657051f9fc96d92d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70151
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Calls to a closure held in a local, non-escaping,
variable can be inlined, provided the closure body
can be inlined and the variable is never written to.
The current implementation has the following limitations:
- closures with captured variables are not inlined because
doing so naively triggers invariant violation in the SSA
phase
- re-assignment check is currently approximated by checking
the Addrtaken property of the variable which should be safe
but may miss optimization opportunities if the address is
not used for a write before the invocation
Updates #15561
Change-Id: I508cad5d28f027bd7e933b1f793c14dcfef8b5a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65071
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugues Bruant <hugues.bruant@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
It should be skipped on 32-bit architectures.
Change-Id: If7a64b9e90e47c3e8734dd62729bfd2944ae926c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70071
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If the stack frame is too large, abort immediately.
We used to generate code first, then abort.
In issue 22200, generating code raised a panic
so we got an ICE instead of an error message.
Change the max frame size to 1GB (from 2GB).
Stack frames between 1.1GB and 2GB didn't used to work anyway,
the pcln table generation would have failed and generated an ICE.
Fixes#22200
Change-Id: I1d918ab27ba6ebf5c87ec65d1bccf973f8c8541e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69810
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This re-enables functionality that inadvertently was disabled in the
(long) past.
Also, don't perform branch checks if we had errors in a function
to avoid spurious errors or (worst-case) crashes.
Slightly modified test/fixedbugs/issue14006.go to make sure the
test still reports invalid label errors (the surrounding function
must be syntactically correct).
Change-Id: Id5642930877d7cf3400649094ec75c753b5084b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69770
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We've supported inlining methods called as functions for a while now.
Change-Id: I53fba426e45f91d65a38f00456c2ae1527372b50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69530
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Keep left-to-right order when referring to the number of
variables and values involved.
Fixes#22159.
Change-Id: Iccca12d3222f9d5e049939a9ccec07513c393faa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68690
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
C_PPAUTO was matching offsets that is a multiple 8. But this
condition is dropped in CL 55610, causing unaligned offset
between 256 and 504 mistakenly matched to some classes, e.g.
C_UAUTO8K. This CL restores this condition, also fixes an
error that C_PPAUTO shouldn't match C_PSAUTO, because the
latter is not guaranteed to be multiple of 8. C_PPAUTO_8 is
unnecessary, removed.
Fixes#21992.
Change-Id: I75d5a0e5f5dc3dae335721fbec1bbcd4a3b862f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65730
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Historically, gc optimistically parsed the left-hand side of
assignments as expressions. Later, if it discovered a ":=" assignment,
it rewrote the parsed expressions as declarations.
This failed in the presence of dot imports though, because we lost
information about whether an imported object was named via a bare
identifier "Foo" or a normal qualified "pkg.Foo".
This CL fixes the issue by specially noding the left-hand side of ":="
assignments.
Fixes#22076.
Change-Id: I18190ecdb863112e7d009e1687e6112eec559921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66810
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use entire inlining call stack to decide whether two panic calls
can be merged. We used to merge panic calls when only the leaf
line numbers matched, but that leads to places higher up the call
stack being merged incorrectly.
Fixes#22083
Change-Id: Ia41400a80de4b6ecf3e5089abce0c42b65e9b38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/67632
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Very similar fix to the one made in golang.org/cl/65655. This time it's
for switches on interface values, as we look for duplicates in a
different manner to keep types in mind.
As before, add a small regression test.
Updates #22001.
Fixes#22063.
Change-Id: I9a55d08999aeca262ad276b4649b51848a627b02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66450
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
If we have
y = <int16> (MOVBQSX x)
z = <int32> (MOVWQSX y)
We used to use this rewrite rule:
(MOVWQSX x:(MOVBQSX _)) -> x
But that resulted in replacing z with a value whose type
is only int16. Then if z is spilled and restored, it gets
zero extended instead of sign extended.
Instead use the rule
(MOVWQSX (MOVBQSX x)) -> (MOVBQSX x)
The result is has the correct type, so it can be spilled
and restored correctly. It might mean that a few more extension
ops might not be eliminated, but that's the price for correctness.
Fixes#21963
Change-Id: I6ec82c3d2dbe43cc1fee6fb2bd6b3a72fca3af00
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65290
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a regression introduced by myself in golang.org/cl/41852,
confirmed by the program that reproduces the crash that can be seen in
the added test.
Fixes#21988.
Change-Id: I18d5b2b3de63ced84db705b18490b00b16b59e02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65655
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The compiler generates wrapper methods to forward interface method
calls (which are always pointer-based) to value methods. These
wrappers appear in the call stack even though they are an
implementation detail. This leaves ugly "<autogenerated>" functions in
stack traces and can throw off skip counts for stack traces.
Fix this by considering these runtime frames in printed stack traces
so they will only be printed if runtime frames are being printed, and
by eliding them from the call stack expansion used by CallersFrames
and Caller.
This removes the test for issue 4388 since that was checking that
"<autogenerated>" appeared in the stack trace instead of something
even weirder. We replace it with various runtime package tests.
Fixes#16723.
Change-Id: Ice3f118c66f254bb71478a664d62ab3fc7125819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45412
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The existing logic tried to advance the offset for each variable's
width, but then tried to undo this logic with the array and struct
handling code. It can all be much simpler by only worrying about
computing offsets within the array and struct code.
While here, include a short-circuit for zero-width arrays to fix a
pedantic compiler failure case.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#20739.
Change-Id: I98af9bb512a33e3efe82b8bf1803199edb480640
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64471
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, after inlining a call, we made a second pass to rewrite
the AST's position information to record the inlined stack frame. The
call arguments were part of this AST, but it would be incorrect to
rewrite them too, so extra effort was made to temporarily remove them
while the position rewriting was done.
However, this extra logic was only done for regular arguments: it was
not done for receiver arguments. Consequently if m was inlined in
"f().m(g(), h())", g and h would have correct call frames, but f would
appear to be called by m.
The fix taken by this CL is to merge setpos into inlsubst and only
rewrite position information for nodes that were actually copied from
the original function AST body. As a side benefit, this eliminates an
extra AST pass and some AST walking code.
Fixes#21879.
Change-Id: I22b25c208313fc25c358d3a2eebfc9b012400084
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64470
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, we used OXFALL vs OFALL to distinguish fallthrough
statements that had been validated. Because in the Node AST we flatten
statement blocks, OXCASE and OXFALL needed to keep track of their
block scopes for this purpose.
Now that we have an AST that keeps these separate, we can just perform
the validation earlier.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#14540.
Change-Id: I8421eaba16c2b3b72c9c5483b5cf20b14261385e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/61130
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
By setting both a valid size and alignment for broken recursive types,
we can appease some more safety checks and prevent compiler crashes.
Fixes#21882.
Change-Id: Ibaa137d8aa2c2a9d521462f144d7016c4abfd6e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64430
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Refactor walkrange to treat "for _ = range a" as "for range a".
This avoids generating some later discarded nodes in the compiler.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: Ifb2e1ca3b8519cbb67e8ad5aad514af9d18f1ec4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/61017
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Currently, we handle "x op= y" by rewriting as "x = x op y", while
ensuring that any calls or receive operations in 'x' are only
evaluated once. Notably, pointer indirection, indexing operations,
etc. are left alone as it's typically safe to re-evaluate those.
However, those operations were interleaved with evaluating 'y', which
could include function calls that might cause re-evaluation to yield
different memory addresses.
As a fix, simply ensure that we order side-effecting operations in 'y'
before either evaluation of 'x'.
Fixes#21687.
Change-Id: Ib14e77760fda9c828e394e8e362dc9e5319a84b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/60091
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Do the similar thing to CL 55143 to reduce IMUL.
Change-Id: I1bd38f618058e3cd74fac181f003610ea13f2294
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/56252
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The assembler barfs on large offsets. Make sure that all the
instructions that need to have their offsets in an int32
1) check on any rule that computes offsets for such instructions
2) change their aux fields so the check builder checks it.
The assembler also silently misassembled offsets between 1<<31
and 1<<32. Add a check in the assembler to barf on those as well.
Fixes#21655
Change-Id: Iebf24bf10f9f37b3ea819ceb7d588251c0f46d7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/59630
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For code like the following (where x escapes):
x := []int{1}
We're currently generating a nil check. The line above is really 3 operations:
t := new([1]int)
t[0] = 1
x := t[:]
We remove the nil check for t[0] = 1, but not for t[:].
Our current nil check removal rule is too strict about the possible
memory arguments of the nil check. Unlike zeroing or storing to the
result of runtime.newobject, the nilness of runtime.newobject is
always false, even after other stores have happened in the meantime.
Change-Id: I95fad4e3a59c27effdb37c43ea215e18f30b1e5f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/58711
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This is a crude compiler pass to eliminate stores to auto variables
that are only ever written to.
Eliminates an unnecessary store to x from the following code:
func f() int {
var x := 1
return *(&x)
}
Fixes#19765.
Change-Id: If2c63a8ae67b8c590b6e0cc98a9610939a3eeffa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38746
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Where possible generate calls to runtime makemap with int hint argument
during compile time instead of makemap with int64 hint argument.
This eliminates converting the hint argument for calls to makemap with
int64 hint argument for platforms where int64 values do not fit into
an argument of type int.
A similar optimization for makeslice was introduced in CL
golang.org/cl/27851.
386:
name old time/op new time/op delta
NewEmptyMap 53.5ns ± 5% 41.9ns ± 5% -21.56% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
NewSmallMap 182ns ± 1% 165ns ± 1% -8.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: Ibd2b4c57b36f171b173bf7a0602b3a59771e6e44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55142
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
If an error was already printed during LHS conversion step, we don't reprint
the "cannot convert" error.
In particular, this prevents `_ = int("1")` (and all similar casts) from
resulting in multiple identical error messages being printed.
Fixes#20812.
Change-Id: If6e52c59eab438599d641ecf6f110ebafca740a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46912
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
There are a few cases where this can be useful. Apart from the obvious
(and silly)
100*n + 200*n
where we generate one IMUL instead of two, consider:
15*n + 31*n
Currently, the compiler strength-reduces both imuls, generating:
0x0000 00000 MOVQ "".n+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 MOVQ AX, CX
0x0008 00008 SHLQ $4, AX
0x000c 00012 SUBQ CX, AX
0x000f 00015 MOVQ CX, DX
0x0012 00018 SHLQ $5, CX
0x0016 00022 SUBQ DX, CX
0x0019 00025 ADDQ CX, AX
0x001c 00028 MOVQ AX, "".~r1+16(SP)
0x0021 00033 RET
But combining the imuls is both faster and shorter:
0x0000 00000 MOVQ "".n+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 IMULQ $46, AX
0x0009 00009 MOVQ AX, "".~r1+16(SP)
0x000e 00014 RET
even without strength-reduction.
Moreover, consider:
5*n + 7*(n+1) + 11*(n+2)
We already have a rule that rewrites 7(n+1) into 7n+7, so the
generated code (without imuls merging) looks like this:
0x0000 00000 MOVQ "".n+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 LEAQ (AX)(AX*4), CX
0x0009 00009 MOVQ AX, DX
0x000c 00012 NEGQ AX
0x000f 00015 LEAQ (AX)(DX*8), AX
0x0013 00019 ADDQ CX, AX
0x0016 00022 LEAQ (DX)(CX*2), CX
0x001a 00026 LEAQ 29(AX)(CX*1), AX
0x001f 00031 MOVQ AX, "".~r1+16(SP)
But with imuls merging, the 5n, 7n and 11n factors get merged, and the
generated code looks like this:
0x0000 00000 MOVQ "".n+8(SP), AX
0x0005 00005 IMULQ $23, AX
0x0009 00009 ADDQ $29, AX
0x000d 00013 MOVQ AX, "".~r1+16(SP)
0x0012 00018 RET
Which is both faster and shorter; that's also the exact same code that
clang and the intel c compiler generate for the above expression.
Change-Id: Ib4d5503f05d2f2efe31a1be14e2fe6cac33730a9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55143
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The gofmt bug in question seems to be fixed (at least gofmt doesn't
complain), so reenable the commented-out ... test.
Change-Id: Icbfe0511160210557894ec8eb9b206aa6133d486
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55030
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
https://golang.org/cl/37508 added an escape analysis test for #12397 to
escape2.go but missed to add it to escape2n.go. The comment at the top
of the former states that the latter should contain all the same tests
and the tests only differ in using -N to compile. Conform to this by
adding the function issue12397 to escape2n.go as well.
Also fix a whitespace difference in escape2.go, so the two files match
exactly (except for the comment at the top).
Change-Id: I3a09cf95169bf2150a25d6b4ec9e147265d36760
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/54610
Reviewed-by: Avelino <t@avelino.xxx>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
It is possible to have an unexported name with a nil package,
for an embedded field whose type is a pointer to an unexported type.
We must encode that fact in the type..namedata symbol name,
to avoid incorrectly merging an unexported name with an exported name.
Fixes#21120
Change-Id: I2e3879d77fa15c05ad92e0bf8e55f74082db5111
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50710
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Load/store-merging and move optimizations can result in unaligned
memory accesses. This is fine so long as the load/store instruction
used does not take a relative offset. In the SSA rules this means we
must not merge (MOVDaddr (SB)) ops into loads/stores unless we can
guarantee the alignment of the target.
Fixes#21048.
Change-Id: I70f13a62a148d5f0a56e704e8f76e36b4a4226d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49250
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
