Given code such as
type T struct {
_ string
}
func f() {
var x = T{"space"}
// ...
}
the compiler rewrote the 'var x' line as
var x T
x._ = "space"
The compiler then rejected the assignment to
a blank field, thus rejecting valid code.
It also failed to catch a number of invalid assignments.
And there were insufficient checks for validity
when emitting static data, leading to ICEs.
To fix, check earlier for explicit blanks field names,
explicitly handle legit blanks in sinit,
and don't try to emit static data for nodes
for which typechecking has failed.
Fixes#19482
Change-Id: I594476171d15e6e8ecc6a1749e3859157fe2c929
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38006
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Dupok symbols may be defined in multiple packages. Its associated
package is chosen sort of arbitrarily (the first containing package
that the linker loads). Canonicalize its package to the package
with which it will be laid down in text, which is the first package
in dependency order that defines the symbol. So later passes (for
example, trampoline insertion pass) know that the dupok symbol
is laid down along with the package.
Fixes#19764.
Change-Id: I7cbc7474ff3016d5069c8b7be04af934abab8bc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/39150
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Now that we no longer generate dead code,
it is possible to follow block predecessors
into infinite loops with no variable definitions,
causing an infinite loop during phi insertion.
To fix that, check explicitly whether the predecessor
is dead in lookupVarOutgoing, and if so, bail.
The loop in lookupVarOutgoing is very hot code,
so I am wary of adding anything to it.
However, a long, CPU-only benchmarking run shows no
performance impact at all.
Fixes#19783
Change-Id: I8ef8d267e0b20a29b5cb0fecd7084f76c6f98e47
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38913
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The uintptr-typed Data field in reflect.SliceHeader and
reflect.StringHeader needs special treatment because it is
really a pointer. Add the special treatment in walk for
bug #19168 to escape analysis.
Includes extra debugging that was helpful.
Fixes#19743.
Change-Id: I6dab5002f0d436c3b2a7cdc0156e4fc48a43d6fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38738
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, an inlined call to wg.Done() in package main would have the
following incorrect symbol name:
main.(*sync.WaitGroup).Done
This change modifies methodname to return the correct symbol name:
sync.(*WaitGroup).Done
This fix was suggested by @mdempsky.
Fixes#19467.
Change-Id: I0117838679ac5353789299c618ff8c326712d94d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37866
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Gccgo crashed compiling a function that returned multiple zero-sized values.
Change-Id: I499112cc310e4a4f649962f4d2bc9fee95dee1b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38772
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This was cherry-picked to 1.8 as CL 38587, but on master issue was fixed
by CL 37661. Add still relevant part (test) and close issue, since test passes.
Fixes#19201
Change-Id: I6415792e2c465dc6d9bd6583ba1e54b107bcf5cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37376
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Prior to this CL, Type.Width != 0 was the mark
of a Type whose Width had been calculated.
As a result, dowidth always recalculated
the width of struct{}.
This, combined with the prohibition on calculating
the width of a FuncArgsStruct and the use of
struct{} as a function argument,
meant that there were circumstances in which
it was forbidden to call dowidth on a type.
This inhibits refactoring to call dowidth automatically,
rather than explicitly.
Instead add a helper method, Type.WidthCalculated,
and implement as Type.Align > 0.
Type.Width is not a good candidate for tracking
whether the width has been calculated;
0 is a value type width, and Width is subject to
too much magic value game-playing.
For good measure, add a test for #11354.
Change-Id: Ie9a9fb5d924e7a2010c1904ae5e38ed4a38eaeb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38468
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Avoid construction of incorrect syntax trees in presence of errors.
For #19663.
Change-Id: I43025a3cf0fe02cae9a57e8bb9489b5f628c3fd7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38604
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Simple phi insertion already had a heuristic to check
for dead blocks, namely having no predecessors.
When we stopped generating code for dead blocks,
we eliminated some values contained in more subtle
dead blocks, which confused phi insertion.
Compensate by beefing up the reachability check.
Fixes#19678
Change-Id: I0081e4a46f7ce2f69b131a34a0553874a0cb373e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38602
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
CL 37499 allows inlining more functions by ignoring dead code.
However, that dead code can contain non-exportable constructs.
Teach the exporter not to export dead code.
Fixes#19679
Change-Id: Idb1d3794053514544b6f1035d29262aa6683e1e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38601
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Almost never happens in practice.
The compiler will generate reasonable code anyway,
since assignments involving [0]T never do any work.
Fixes#19696Fixes#19671
Change-Id: I350d2e0c5bb326c4789c74a046ab0486b2cee49c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38599
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously, we handled recursive interfaces by deferring typechecking
of interface methods, while eagerly expanding interface embeddings.
This CL switches to eagerly evaluating interface methods, and
deferring expanding interface embeddings to dowidth. This allows us to
detect recursive interface embeddings with the same mechanism used for
detecting recursive struct embeddings.
Updates #16369.
Change-Id: If4c0320058047f8a2d9b52b9a79de47eb9887f95
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38391
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Report syntax error that was missed when moving to new parser.
Fixes#19610.
Change-Id: Ie5625f907a84089dc56fcccfd4f24df546042783
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38375
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
See https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/38313/ for background.
It turns out that only a few tests checked for this.
The new error message is shorter and very clear.
Change-Id: I8ab4ad59fb023c8b54806339adc23aefd7dc7b07
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38314
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Interface wrapper functions now get compiled eagerly in some cases.
Consequently, they may be present in multiple translation units.
Mark them as DUPOK, just like closures.
Fixes#19548Fixes#19550
Change-Id: Ibe74adb5a62dbf6447db37fde22dcbb3479969ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38156
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Move the zeroing of results earlier. In particular, they need to
come before any move-to-heap operations, as those require allocation.
Those allocations are points at which the GC can see the uninitialized
result slots.
For the function:
func f() (x, y, z *int) {
defer(){}()
escape(&y)
return
}
We used to generate code like this:
x = nil
y = nil
&y = new(int)
z = nil
Now we will generate:
x = nil
y = nil
z = nil
&y = new(int)
Since the fix for #18860, the return slots are always live if there
is a defer, so the former ordering allowed the GC to see junk
in the z slot.
Fixes#19078
Change-Id: I71554ae437549725bb79e13b2c100b2911d47ed4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/38133
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
After benchmarking with a compiler modified to have better
spill location, it became clear that this method of checking
was actually faster on (at least) two different architectures
(ppc64 and amd64) and it also provides more timely interruption
of loops.
This change adds a modified FOR loop node "FORUNTIL" that
checks after executing the loop body instead of before (i.e.,
always at least once). This ensures that a pointer past the
end of a slice or array is not made visible to the garbage
collector.
Without the rescheduling checks inserted, the restructured
loop from this change apparently provides a 1% geomean
improvement on PPC64 running the go1 benchmarks; the
improvement on AMD64 is only 0.12%.
Inserting the rescheduling check exposed some peculiar bug
with the ssa test code for s390x; this was updated based on
initial code actually generated for GOARCH=s390x to use
appropriate OpArg, OpAddr, and OpVarDef.
NaCl is disabled in testing.
Change-Id: Ieafaa9a61d2a583ad00968110ef3e7a441abca50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36206
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
When defining an int const, the compiler tries to cast the RHS
expression to int. The cast may fail for three reasons:
1. expr is an integer constant that overflows int
2. expr is a floating point constant
3. expr is a complex constant, or not a number
In the second case, in order to print a sensible error message, we
must distinguish between a floating point constant that should be
included in the error message and a floating point constant that
cannot be reasonably formatted for inclusion in an error message.
For example, in:
const a int = 1.1
const b int = 1 + 1e-100
a is in the former group, while b is in the latter, since the floating
point value resulting from the evaluation of the rhs of the assignment
(1.00...01) is too long to be fully printed in an error message, and
cannot be shortened without making the error message misleading
(rounding or truncating it would result in a "1", which looks like an
integer constant, and it makes little sense in an error message about
an invalid floating point expression).
To fix this problem, we try to format the float value using fconv
(which is used by the error reporting mechanism to format float
arguments), and then parse the resulting string back to a
big.Float. If the result is an integer, we assume that expr is a float
value that cannot be reasonably be formatted as a string, and we emit
an error message that does not include its string representation.
Also, change the error message for overflows to a more conservative
"integer too large", which does not mention overflows that are only
caused by an internal implementation restriction.
Also, change (*Mpint) SetFloat so that it returns a bool (instead of
0/-1 for success/failure).
Fixes#11371
Change-Id: Ibbc73e2ed2eaf41f07827b0649d0eb637150ecaa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35411
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This reverts commit cb6e0639fb.
The fix is incorrect as it's perfectly fine to refer to an
identifier 'init' inside a function, and 'init' may even be
a variable of function value. Misspelling 'init' in that
context would lead to an incorrect error message.
Reopened#8481.
Change-Id: I49787fdf7738213370ae6f0cab54013e9e3394a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37876
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
New special case for booleans and byte-sized integer types
converted to interfaces needs to ensure that the operand is
not too complex, if it were to appear in a parameter list
for example.
Added test, also increased the recursive node dump depth to
a level that was actually useful for an actual bug.
Fixes#19275.
Change-Id: If36ac3115edf439e886703f32d149ee0a46eb2a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37470
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
CL 35562 substituted zerobase for the pointer for
interfaces containing zero-sized values.
However, it failed to evaluate the zero-sized value
expression for side-effects. Fix that.
The other similar interface value optimizations
are not affected, because they all actually use the
value one way or another.
Fixes#19246
Change-Id: I1168a99561477c63c29751d5cd04cf81b5ea509d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37395
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The loop-A-encloses-loop-C code did not properly handle the
case where really C was already known to be enclosed by B,
and A was nearest-outer to B, not C.
Fixes#19217.
Change-Id: I755dd768e823cb707abdc5302fed39c11cdb34d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37340
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Avoid printing a second error message when a field of an undefined
variable is accessed.
Fixes#8440.
Change-Id: I3fe0b11fa3423cec3871cb01b5951efa8ea7451a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36751
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#19012.
Fallback to return signatures without detailed types.
These error message will be of the form of issue:
* https://golang.org/issues/4215
* https://golang.org/issues/6750
So:
func f(x int, y uint) {
return x > y
}
f(10, "a" < 3)
will give errors:
too many errors to return
too many arguments in call to f
instead of:
too many errors to return
have (<T>)
want ()
too many arguments in call to f
have (number, <T>)
want (number, number)
Change-Id: I680abc7cdd8444400e234caddf3ff49c2d69f53d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36806
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Added a flag to generic and various architectures' atomic
operations that are judged to have observable side effects
and thus cannot be dead-code-eliminated.
Test requires GOMAXPROCS > 1 without preemption in loop.
Fixes#19182.
Change-Id: Id2230031abd2cca0bbb32fd68fc8a58fb912070f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37333
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The rules for folding addresses into load/stores checks sym1 is
not on stack (because the stack offset is not known at that point).
But sym1 could be nil, which invalidates the check. Check merged
sym instead.
Fixes#19137.
Change-Id: I8574da22ced1216bb5850403d8f08ec60a8d1005
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37145
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
CL 35261 introduces special handling of zero-valued STRUCTLIT for
efficient struct zeroing. But it didn't cover all use cases, for
example, CONVNOP STRUCTLIT is not handled.
On the other hand, CL 34566 handles zeroing earlier, so we don't
need the change in CL 35261 for efficient zeroing. Other uses of
zero-valued struct literals are very rare. So undo the change in
walk.go in CL 35261.
Add a test for efficient zeroing.
Fixes#19084.
Change-Id: I0807f7423fb44d47bf325b3c1ce9611a14953853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36955
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Use distinction between explicit and automatically inserted semicolons
to provide a better error message if the condition in an 'if' statement
is missing.
For #18747.
Change-Id: Iac167ae4e5ad53d2dc73f746b4dee9912434bb59
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36930
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Added missing nil-check. We will get rid of the gcCompat corrections
shortly but it's still worthwhile having the new test case added.
Fixes#19056.
Change-Id: I35bd938a4d789058da15724e34c05e5e631ecad0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36908
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The gcCompat mode was introduced to match the new parser's node position
setup exactly with the positions used by the original parser. Some of the
gcCompat adjustments were required to satisfy syntax error test cases,
and the rest were required to make toolstash cmp pass.
This change removes the former gcCompat adjustments and instead adjusts
the respective test cases as necessary. In some cases this makes the error
lines consistent with the ones reported by gccgo.
Where it has changed, the position associated with a given syntactic construct
is the position (line/col number) of the left-most token belonging to the
construct.
Change-Id: I5b60c00c5999a895c4d6d6e9b383c6405ccf725c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36695
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Starting the error message with "expecting" rather than "missing"
causes the syntax error mechanism to add additional helpful info
(it recognizes "expecting" but not "missing").
Fixes#17328.
Change-Id: I8482ca5e5a6a6b22e0ed0d831b7328e264156334
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36637
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Towards better syntax error messages: With this change, the parser knows whether
a semicolon was an actual ';' in the source, or whether it was an automatically
inserted semicolon as result of a '\n' or EOF. Using this information in error
messages makes them more understandable.
For #17328.
Change-Id: I8cd9accee8681b62569d0ecef922d38682b401eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36636
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
For code such as
if a := 10 { ...
the 1.7 compiler reported
a := 10 used as value
while the 1.8 compiler reported
invalid condition, tag, or type switch guard
Changed the error message to match the 1.7 compiler.
Fixes#18915.
Change-Id: I01308862e461922e717f9f8295a9db53d5a914eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36470
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
