CL 36932 (speed up fastrandn) made it faster but introduced
bad interference with some properties of fastrand itself, making
fastrandn not very random in certain ways. In particular, certain
selects are demonstrably unfair.
For Go 1.10 the new faster fastrandn has induced a new fastrand,
which in turn has caused other follow-on bugs that are still being
discovered and fixed.
For Go 1.9.2, just go back to the barely slower % implementation
that we used in Go 1.8 and earlier. This should restore fairness in
select and any other problems caused by the clever fastrandn.
The test in this CL is copied from CL 62530.
Fixes#22253.
Change-Id: Ibcf948a7bce981452e05c90dbdac122043f6f813
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70991
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
If we have
y = <int16> (MOVBQSX x)
z = <int32> (MOVWQSX y)
We used to use this rewrite rule:
(MOVWQSX x:(MOVBQSX _)) -> x
But that resulted in replacing z with a value whose type
is only int16. Then if z is spilled and restored, it gets
zero extended instead of sign extended.
Instead use the rule
(MOVWQSX (MOVBQSX x)) -> (MOVBQSX x)
The result is has the correct type, so it can be spilled
and restored correctly. It might mean that a few more extension
ops might not be eliminated, but that's the price for correctness.
Fixes#21963
Change-Id: I6ec82c3d2dbe43cc1fee6fb2bd6b3a72fca3af00
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65290
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70986
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The assembler barfs on large offsets. Make sure that all the
instructions that need to have their offsets in an int32
1) check on any rule that computes offsets for such instructions
2) change their aux fields so the check builder checks it.
The assembler also silently misassembled offsets between 1<<31
and 1<<32. Add a check in the assembler to barf on those as well.
Fixes#21655
Change-Id: Iebf24bf10f9f37b3ea819ceb7d588251c0f46d7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/59630
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70981
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
After the number of lost extra events are written to the the cpuprof log,
the number of lost extra events should be set to zero, or else, the next
time time addExtra is logged, lostExtra will be overcounted. This change
resets lostExtra after its value is written to the log.
Fixes#21836
Change-Id: I8a6ac9c61e579e7a5ca7bdb0f3463f8ae8b9f864
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/63270
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70974
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The approach of https://golang.org/cl/43476 turned out incorrect.
The problem is that the sniff introduced by the CL only work for simple
expression. And when it fails it fallback to uint64, not int64, which
breaks backward compatibility.
In this CL, we use DWARF for guessing kind instead. That should be more
reliable than previous approach. And importanly, it fallbacks to int64 even
if it fails to guess kind.
Fixes#21708
Change-Id: I39a18cb2efbe4faa9becdcf53d5ac68dba180d47
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/60510
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/60810
Reviewed-by: Hiroshi Ioka <hirochachacha@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70970
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Current code uses names like "x" and "s" which can conflict with user's
code easily. Use cryptographic names.
Fixes#21668
Change-Id: Ib6d3d6327aa5b92d95c71503d42e3a79d96c8e16
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/59710
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/59730
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Hiroshi Ioka <hirochachacha@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70849
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Otherwise low-res timers cause problems at call sites that expect to
be able to use 0 as meaning "no time set" and therefore expect that
nanotime never returns 0 itself. For example, sched.lastpoll == 0
means no last poll.
Fixes#22394.
Change-Id: Iea28acfddfff6f46bc90f041ec173e0fea591285
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73410
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73491
TryBot-Result: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
More generally I'm concerned about these tests using
$GOROOT/src/cmd/go as scratch space, especially
combined wtih tg.parallel() - it's easy to believe some other
test might inadvertently also try to write x.exe about the
same time. This CL only solves the "didn't clean up x.exe"
problem and leaves for another day the "probably shouldn't
write to cmd/go at all" problem.
Fixes#22266.
Change-Id: I651534d70e2d360138e0373fb4a316081872550b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71410
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71530
After we detect errors, the AST is in a precarious state and more
likely to trip useless ICE failures. Instead let the user fix any
existing errors and see if the ICE persists. This makes Fatalf more
consistent with how panics are handled by hidePanic.
While here, also fix detection for release versions: release version
strings begin with "go" ("go1.8", "go1.9.1", etc), not "release".
Fixes#22252.
Change-Id: I1c400af62fb49dd979b96e1bf0fb295a81c8b336
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70850
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70985
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Database drivers should be called from a single goroutine to ease
driver's design. If a driver chooses to handle context
cancels internally it may do so.
The sql package violated this agreement when calling Next or
NextResultSet. It was possible for a concurrent rollback
triggered from a context cancel to call a Tx.Rollback (which
takes a driver connection lock) while a Rows.Next is in progress
(which does not tack the driver connection lock).
The current internal design of the sql package is each call takes
roughly two locks: a closemu lock which prevents an disposing of
internal resources (assigning nil or removing from lists)
and a driver connection lock that prevents calling driver code from
multiple goroutines.
Fixes#21117
Change-Id: Ie340dc752a503089c27f57ffd43e191534829360
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65731
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71510
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Theophanes <kardianos@gmail.com>
CL 36799 made SetFileCompletionNotificationModes to be called for
file handles. I don't think it is correct. Revert that change.
Fixes#22024Fixes#22207
Change-Id: I26260e8a727131cffbf60958d79eca2457495554
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69871
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70990
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Current code assumes that SetFileCompletionNotificationModes
is safe to call even if we know that it is not safe to use
FILE_SKIP_COMPLETION_PORT_ON_SUCCESS flag. It appears (see issue #22149),
SetFileCompletionNotificationModes crashes when we call it without
FILE_SKIP_COMPLETION_PORT_ON_SUCCESS flag.
Do not call SetFileCompletionNotificationModes in that situation.
We are allowed to do that, because SetFileCompletionNotificationModes
is just an optimisation.
Fixes#22149
Change-Id: I0ad3aff4eabd8c27739417a62c286b1819ae166a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69870
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70989
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
This error was not used when using git because nested git is permitted.
Add test using Mercurial, so that at least we have a test, even though
the test is not run by default.
Fixes#22157Fixes#22201
Change-Id: If521f3c09b0754e00e56fa3cd0364764a57a43ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69670
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70984
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
In https://golang.org/cl/9390 I messed up and put the critical extension
test in the wrong function. Thus it only triggered for leaf certificates
and not for intermediates or roots.
In practice, this is not expected to have a security impact in the web
PKI.
Change-Id: I4f2464ef2fb71b5865389901f293062ba1327702
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69294
Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70983
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
All current darwin architectures seem to take at least 100ms to dial a closed port,
and that was making the all.bash script fail.
Fixes#22062
Change-Id: Ib79c4b7a5db2373c95ce5d993cdcbee55cc0667f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/67350
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70988
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use entire inlining call stack to decide whether two panic calls
can be merged. We used to merge panic calls when only the leaf
line numbers matched, but that leads to places higher up the call
stack being merged incorrectly.
Fixes#22083
Change-Id: Ia41400a80de4b6ecf3e5089abce0c42b65e9b38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/67632
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70980
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
On an iPhone 6 running iOS 11, the TestDialerDualStackFDLeak test
started failing with dial durations just above the limit:
FAIL: TestDialerDualStackFDLeak (0.21s)
dial_test.go:90: got 101.154ms; want <= 95ms
Bump the timeout on iOS.
For the iOS builder.
Change-Id: Id42b471e7cf7d0c84f6e83ed04b395fa1a2d449d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66491
Run-TryBot: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70987
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently, the priority of checks in (gcTrigger).test() puts the
gcpercent<0 test above gcTriggerCycle, which is used for runtime.GC().
This is an unintentional change from 1.8 and before, where
runtime.GC() triggered a GC even if GOGC=off.
Fix this by rearranging the priority so the gcTriggerCycle test
executes even if gcpercent < 0.
Fixes#22023.
Change-Id: I109328d7b643b6824eb9d79061a9e775f0149575
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65994
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70979
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
When a MOVDstorezero (8 bytes) is used the offset field
in the instruction must be a multiple of 4. This situation
had been corrected in the rules for other types of stores
but not for the zero case.
This also removes some of the special MOVDstorezero cases since
they can be handled by the general LowerZero case.
Updates made to the ssa test for lowering zero moves to
include cases where the target is not aligned to at least 4.
Fixes#21947
Change-Id: I7cceceb1be4898c77cd3b5e78b58dce0a7e28edd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64970
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70978
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
internal/poll package assumes that only net sockets use runtime
netpoller on windows. We get memory corruption if other file
handles are passed into runtime poller. Make FD.Init receive
and use useNetpoller argument, so FD.Init caller is explicit
about using runtime netpoller.
Fixes#21172
Change-Id: I60e2bfedf9dda9b341eb7a3e5221035db29f5739
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65810
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71132
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
The previous code seems to have an off-by-1 in it somewhere, the
consequence being that we didn't properly preserve all of the old
buffer contents that we intended to.
After spending a while looking at the existing window-shifting logic,
I wasn't able to understand exactly how it was supposed to work or
where the issue was, so I rewrote it to be (at least IMO) more
obviously correct.
Fixes#21938.
Change-Id: I1ed7bbc1e1751a52ab5f7cf0411ae289586dc345
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64830
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70977
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
If a function with nonzero frame but zero-sized return value is
Call'd, we may write a past-the-end pointer in preparing the
return Values. Fix by return the zero value for zero-sized
return value.
Fixes#21717.
Change-Id: I5351cd86d898467170a888b4c3fc9392f0e7aa3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/60811
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70971
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
There was unprotected access to Logger.flag in log.Output which
could lead to data race in cases when log.SetFlags called simultaneously.
For example, "hot" switching on/off debug-mode for Logger by log.SetFlags
while application still writing logs.
Fixes#21935
Change-Id: I36be25f23cad44cde62ed1af28a30d276400e1b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64710
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70976
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The compiler replaces any path of the form /path/to/goroot/src/net/port.go
with GOROOT/src/net/port.go so that the same object file is
produced if the GOROOT is moved. It was skipping this transformation
for any absolute path into the GOROOT that came from //line directives,
such as those generated by cmd/cgo.
Fixes#21373Fixes#21720Fixes#21825
Change-Id: I2784c701b4391cfb92e23efbcb091a84957d61dd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/63693
Run-TryBot: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70975
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If the Go packages with enough source files,it will cause EMFILE/ENFILE error,
Fix this by limiting the number of simultaneously opened files.
Fixes#21621
Change-Id: I8555d79242d2f90771e37e073b7540fc7194a64a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/57751
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/63752
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Saying that they return t unchanged is misleading, because they return
a modified t, stripped of any monotonic clock reading, as of Go 1.9.
Fixes#21485.
Change-Id: Icddf8813aed3d687fcefcd2fe542829438be6a0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/56690
Reviewed-by: Avelino <t@avelino.xxx>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70846
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
CL 36428 changed the way nanotime works so on Darwin and Windows it
now depends on runtime.startNano, which is computed at runtime.init
time. Unfortunately, the `runtimeInitTime = nanotime()` initialization
happened *before* runtime.init, so on these platforms runtimeInitTime
is set incorrectly. The one (and only) consequence of this is that the
start time printed in gctrace lines is bogus:
gc 1 18446653480.186s 0%: 0.092+0.47+0.038 ms clock, 0.37+0.15/0.81/1.8+0.15 ms cpu, 4->4->1 MB, 5 MB goal, 8 P
To fix this, this commit moves the runtimeInitTime initialization to
shortly after runtime.init, at which point nanotime is safe to use.
This also requires changing the condition in newproc1 that currently
uses runtimeInitTime != 0 simply to detect whether or not the main M
has started. Since runtimeInitTime could genuinely be 0 now, this
introduces a separate flag to newproc1.
Fixes#21554.
Change-Id: Id874a4b912d3fa3d22f58d01b31ffb3548266d3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/58690
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70848
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
golang.org/cl/36941 enabled loading of all trusted certs on darwin
for the non-cgo execSecurityRoots.
The corresponding cgo version golang.org/cl/36942 for systemRootsPool
has not been merged yet.
This tests fails reliably on some darwin systems:
--- FAIL: TestSystemRoots (1.28s)
root_darwin_test.go:31: cgo sys roots: 353.552363ms
root_darwin_test.go:32: non-cgo sys roots: 921.85297ms
root_darwin_test.go:44: got 169 roots
root_darwin_test.go:44: got 455 roots
root_darwin_test.go:73: insufficient overlap between cgo and non-cgo roots; want at least 227, have 168
FAIL
FAIL crypto/x509 2.445s
Updates #16532
Updates #21416
Change-Id: I52c2c847651fb3621fdb6ab858ebe8e28894c201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/57830
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70847
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
I also wanted to test net sockets, but I do not know how to
access their file handles. So I did not implement socket tests.
Updates #21172
Change-Id: I5062c0e65a817571d755397d60762c175f9791ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/53530
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71131
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
PlainAuth originally refused to send passwords to non-TLS servers
and was documented as such.
In 2013, issue #5184 was filed objecting to the TLS requirement,
despite the fact that it is spelled out clearly in RFC 4954.
The only possibly legitimate use case raised was using PLAIN auth
for connections to localhost, and the suggested fix was to let the
server decide: if it advertises that PLAIN auth is OK, believe it.
That approach was adopted in CL 8279043 and released in Go 1.1.
Unfortunately, this is exactly wrong. The whole point of the TLS
requirement is to make sure not to send the password to the wrong
server or to a man-in-the-middle. Instead of implementing this rule,
CL 8279043 blindly trusts the server, so that if a man-in-the-middle
says "it's OK, you can send me your password," PlainAuth does.
And the documentation was not updated to reflect any of this.
This CL restores the original TLS check, as required by RFC 4954
and as promised in the documentation for PlainAuth.
It then carves out a documented exception for connections made
to localhost (defined as "localhost", "127.0.0.1", or "::1").
Cherry-pick of CL 68170.
Change-Id: I1d3729bbd33aa2f11a03f4c000e6bb473164957b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68210
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
It was only waiting 0.1 seconds for the two GCs it wanted.
Let it wait 1 second.
Change-Id: Ib3cdc8127cbf95694a9f173643c02529a85063af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68118
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Chris Broadfoot <cbro@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
