In case of amd64 the compiler issues checks if extensions are
available on a platform. With GOAMD64 microarchitecture levels
provided, some of the checks could be eliminated.
Change-Id: If15c178bcae273b2ce7d3673415cb8849292e087
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/352010
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
This updates the codegen tests in noextend.go so they are not
dependent on the ABI.
Change-Id: I8433bea9dc78830c143290a7e0cf901b2397d38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/353070
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Add rule to PPC64.rules to inline runtime.memmove in more cases, as is
done for other target architectures
Updated tests in codegen/copy.go to verify changes are done on
ppc64/ppc64le
Updates #41662
Change-Id: Id937ce21f9b4f4047b3e66dfa3c960128ee16a2a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/352054
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Instructions with immediates can be precomputed when operating on a
constant - do so for SLTI/SLTIU, SLLI/SRLI/SRAI, NEG/NEGW, ANDI, ORI
and ADDI. Additionally, optimise ANDI and ORI when the immediate is
all ones or all zeroes.
In particular, the RISCV64 logical left and right shift rules
(Lsh*x*/Rsh*Ux*) produce sequences that check if the shift amount
exceeds 64 and if so returns zero. When the shift amount is a
constant we can precompute and eliminate the filter entirely.
Likewise the arithmetic right shift rules produce sequences that
check if the shift amount exceeds 64 and if so, ensures that the
lower six bits of the shift are all ones. When the shift amount
is a constant we can precompute the shift value.
Arithmetic right shift sequences like:
117fc: 00100513 li a0,1
11800: 04053593 sltiu a1,a0,64
11804: fff58593 addi a1,a1,-1
11808: 0015e593 ori a1,a1,1
1180c: 40b45433 sra s0,s0,a1
Are now a single srai instruction:
117fc: 40145413 srai s0,s0,0x1
Likewise for logical left shift (and logical right shift):
1d560: 01100413 li s0,17
1d564: 04043413 sltiu s0,s0,64
1d568: 40800433 neg s0,s0
1d56c: 01131493 slli s1,t1,0x11
1d570: 0084f433 and s0,s1,s0
Which are now a single slli (or srli) instruction:
1d120: 01131413 slli s0,t1,0x11
This removes more than 30,000 instructions from the Go binary and
should improve performance in a variety of areas - of note
runtime.makemap_small drops from 48 to 36 instructions. Similar
gains exist in at least other parts of runtime and math/bits.
Change-Id: I33f6f3d1fd36d9ff1bda706997162bfe4bb859b6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/350689
Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Add tests for shift by constant, masked shifts and bounded shifts. While here,
sort tests by architecture and keep order of tests consistent (lsh, rshU, rsh).
Change-Id: I512d64196f34df9cb2884e8c0f6adcf9dd88b0fc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/351289
Trust: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
BMI1 includes four instructions (ANDN, BLSI, BLSMSK, BLSR) that are
easy to peephole optimize, and which GCC always seems to favor using
when available and applicable.
Updates #45453.
Change-Id: I0274184057058f5c579e5bc3ea9c414396d3cf46
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/351130
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Also, add the FABSS and FABSD pseudo instructions to the assembler.
The compiler could use FSGNJX[SD] directly but there doesn't seem
to be much advantage to doing so and the pseudo instructions are
easier to understand.
Change-Id: Ie8825b8aa8773c69cc4f07a32ef04abf4061d80d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/348989
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
In some rewrite rules for arm64 bitfield optimizations, the
bitfield lsb value and the bitfield width value are related
to datasize, some of them use datasize directly to check the
bitfield lsb value is valid, to get the bitfiled width value,
but some of them call isARM64BFMask() and arm64BFWidth()
functions. In order to be consistent, this patch changes them
all to use datasize.
Besides, this patch sorts the codegen test cases.
Run the "toolstash-check -all" command and find one inconsistent code
is as the following.
new: src/math/fma.go:104 BEQ 247
master: src/math/fma.go:104 BEQ 248
The above inconsistence is due to this patch changing the range of the
field lsb value in "UBFIZ" optimization rules from "lc+(32|16|8)<64" to
"lc<64", so that the following code is generated as "UBFIZ". The logical
of changed code is still correct.
The code of src/math/fma.go:160:
const uvinf = 0x7FF0000000000000
func FMA(a, b uint32) float64 {
ps := a+b
return Float64frombits(uint64(ps)<<63 | uvinf)
}
The new assembly code:
TEXT "".FMA(SB), LEAF|NOFRAME|ABIInternal, $0-16
MOVWU "".a(FP), R0
MOVWU "".b+4(FP), R1
ADD R1, R0, R0
UBFIZ $63, R0, $1, R0
ORR $9218868437227405312, R0, R0
MOVD R0, "".~r2+8(FP)
RET (R30)
The master assembly code:
TEXT "".FMA(SB), LEAF|NOFRAME|ABIInternal, $0-16
MOVWU "".a(FP), R0
MOVWU "".b+4(FP), R1
ADD R1, R0, R0
MOVWU R0, R0
LSL $63, R0, R0
ORR $9218868437227405312, R0, R0
MOVD R0, "".~r2+8(FP)
RET (R30)
Change-Id: I9061104adfdfd3384d0525327ae1e5c8b0df5c35
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/265038
Trust: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
Run-TryBot: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
The codegen tests are currently skipped (see #48247). The test
added in CL 346050 did not compile because it was in the main
package but did not contain a main function. Changing the package
to 'codegen' fixes the issue.
Updates #48247.
Change-Id: I0a0eaca8e6a7d7b335606d2c76a204ac0c12e6d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/348392
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
The codegen tests are currently skipped (see #48247) and the
bitfield tests do not actually compile due to a duplicate function
name (sbfiz5) added in CL 267602. Renaming the function fixes the
issue.
Updates #48247.
Change-Id: I626fd5ef13732dc358e73ace9ddcc4cbb6ae5b21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/348391
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This test is not executed by default (see #48247) and does not
actually pass. It was added in CL 346689. The code generation
changes made in that CL only change how instructions are assembled,
they do not actually affect the output of the compiler. This test
is unfortunately therefore invalid and will never pass.
Updates #48247.
Change-Id: I0c807e4a111336e5a097fe4e3af2805f9932a87f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/348390
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
The most common cases:
len(s) > 0
len(s) < 1
and they can be simplified to:
len(s) != 0
len(s) == 0
Fixes#48054
Change-Id: I16e5b0cffcfab62a4acc2a09977a6cd3543dd000
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/346050
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This patch adds some rules to rewrite "(LeftShift (SignExtend x) lc)"
expression as "SBFIZ".
Add the test cases.
Change-Id: I294c4ba09712eeb02c7a952447bb006780f1e60d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/267602
Trust: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The UBFX and SBFX already zero/sign extend the result. Further
zero/sign extensions are thus unnecessary as long as they leave
the top bits unaltered. This patch absorbs zero/sign extensions
into UBFX/SBFX.
Add the related test cases.
Change-Id: I7c4516c8b52d677f77bf3aaedab87c4a28056ec0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/265039
Trust: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
This CL simplifies riscv addition (add r, imm) to
(ADDI (ADDI r, imm/2), imm-imm/2) if imm is in specific ranges.
(-4096 <= imm <= -2049 or 2048 <= imm <= 4094)
There is little impact to the go1 benchmark, while the total
size of pkg/linux_riscv64 decreased by about 11KB.
Change-Id: I236eb8af3b83bb35ce9c0b318fc1d235e8ab9a4e
GitHub-Last-Rev: a2f56a0763
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#48110
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/346689
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Add support to the assembler for F[N]M{ADD,SUB}[SD] instructions.
Argument order is:
OP RS1, RS2, RS3, RD
Also, add support for the FMA intrinsic to the compiler. Automatic
FMA matching is left to a future CL.
Change-Id: I47166c7393b2ab6bfc2e42aa8c1a8997c3a071b3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/293030
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
For debugging.
Change-Id: I5875ccd2413b8ffd2ec97a0ace66b5cae7893b24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/324765
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
In codegen/arithmetic.go, previously there are MOVD's that match
for loads of arguments. With register ABI there are no more such
loads. Remove the MOVD matches.
Change-Id: I920ee2629c8c04d454f13a0c08e283d3528d9a64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/324251
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
This CL add runtime.memmove inlining for AMD64 and ARM64.
According to ssa dump from testcases generic rules can't inline
memmomve properly due to one of the arguments is Phi operation. But this
Phi op will be optimized out by later optimization stages. As a result
memmove can be inlined during arch-specific rules.
The commit add new optimization rules to arch-specific rules that can
inline runtime.memmove if it possible during lowering stage.
Optimization fires 5 times in Go source-code using regabi.
Fixes#41662
Change-Id: Iaffaf4c482d068b5f0683d141863892202cc8824
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/289151
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
These operations (BT{S,R,C}{Q,L}modify) are quite a bit slower than
other ways of doing the same thing.
Without the BTxmodify operations, there are two fallback ways the compiler
performs these operations: AND/OR/XOR operations directly on memory, or
load-BTx-write sequences. The compiler kinda chooses one arbitrarily
depending on rewrite rule application order. Currently, it uses
load-BTx-write for the Const benchmarks and AND/OR/XOR directly to memory
for the non-Const benchmarks. TBD, someone might investigate which of
the two fallback strategies is really better. For now, they are both
better than BTx ops.
name old time/op new time/op delta
BitSet-8 1.09µs ± 2% 0.64µs ± 5% -41.60% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
BitClear-8 1.15µs ± 3% 0.68µs ± 6% -41.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
BitToggle-8 1.18µs ± 4% 0.73µs ± 2% -38.36% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
BitSetConst-8 37.0ns ± 7% 25.8ns ± 2% -30.24% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
BitClearConst-8 30.7ns ± 2% 25.0ns ±12% -18.46% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
BitToggleConst-8 36.9ns ± 1% 23.8ns ± 3% -35.46% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Fixes#45790
Update #45242
Change-Id: Ie33a72dc139f261af82db15d446cd0855afb4e59
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/318149
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
Currently, if we have AX=a and BX=b, and we want to make a call
F(1, a, b), to move arguments into the desired registers it emits
MOVQ AX, CX
MOVL $1, AX // AX=1
MOVQ BX, DX
MOVQ CX, BX // BX=a
MOVQ DX, CX // CX=b
This has a few redundant moves.
This is because we process inputs in order. First, allocate 1 to
AX, which kicks out a (in AX) to CX (a free register at the
moment). Then, allocate a to BX, which kicks out b (in BX) to DX.
Finally, put b to CX.
Notice that if we start with allocating CX=b, then BX=a, AX=1,
we will not have redundant moves. This CL reduces redundant moves
by allocating them in different order: First, for inpouts that are
already in place, keep them there. Then allocate free registers.
Then everything else.
before after
cmd/compile binary size 23703888 23609680
text size 8565899 8533291
(with regabiargs enabled.)
Change-Id: I69e1bdf745f2c90bb791f6d7c45b37384af1e874
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/311371
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Fixes this failure:
go test cmd/compile/internal/ssa -run TestStmtLines -v
=== RUN TestStmtLines
stmtlines_test.go:115: Saw too many (amd64, > 1%) lines without
statement marks, total=88263, nostmt=1930
('-run TestStmtLines -v' lists failing lines)
The failure has two causes.
One is that the first-line adjuster in code generation was relocating
"first lines" to instructions that would either not have any code generated,
or would have the statment marker removed by a different believed-good heuristic.
The other was that statement boundaries were getting attached to register
values (that with the old ABI were loads from the stack, hence real instructions).
The register values disappear at code generation.
The fixes are to (1) note that certain instructions are not good choices for
"first value" and skip them, and (2) in an expandCalls post-pass, look for
register valued instructions and under appropriate conditions move their
statement marker to a compatible use.
Also updates TestStmtLines to always log the score, for easier comparison of
minor compiler changes.
Updates #40724.
Change-Id: I485573ce900e292d7c44574adb7629cdb4695c3f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/309649
Trust: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Some codegen tests were written with the assumption that
arguments and results are in memory, and with a specific stack
layout. With the register ABI, the assumption is no longer true.
Adjust the tests to work with both cases.
- For tests expecting in memory arguments/results, change to use
global variables or memory-assigned argument/results.
- Allow more registers. E.g. some tests expecting register names
contain only letters (e.g. AX), but it can also contain numbers
(e.g. R10).
- Some instruction selection changes when operate on register vs.
memory, e.g. ADDQ vs. LEAQ, MOVB vs. MOVL. Accept both.
TODO: mathbits.go and memops.go still need fix.
Change-Id: Ic5932b4b5dd3f5d30ed078d296476b641420c4c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/309335
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Under certain circumstances, the existing rules for bit operations can
produce code that writes beyond its intended bounds. For example,
consider the following code:
func repro(b []byte, addr, bit int32) {
_ = b[3]
v := uint32(b[0]) | uint32(b[1])<<8 | uint32(b[2])<<16 | uint32(b[3])<<24 | 1<<(bit&31)
b[0] = byte(v)
b[1] = byte(v >> 8)
b[2] = byte(v >> 16)
b[3] = byte(v >> 24)
}
Roughly speaking:
1. The expression `1 << (bit & 31)` is rewritten into `(SHLL 1 bit)`
2. The expression `uint32(b[0]) | uint32(b[1])<<8 | uint32(b[2])<<16 |
uint32(b[3])<<24` is rewritten into `(MOVLload &b[0])`
3. The statements `b[0] = byte(v) ... b[3] = byte(v >> 24)` are
rewritten into `(MOVLstore &b[0], v)`
4. `(ORL (SHLL 1, bit) (MOVLload &b[0]))` is rewritten into
`(BTSL (MOVLload &b[0]) bit)`. This is a valid transformation because
the destination is a register: in this case, the bit offset is masked
by the number of bits in the destination register. This is identical
to the masking performed by `SHL`.
5. `(MOVLstore &b[0] (BTSL (MOVLload &b[0]) bit))` is rewritten into
`(BTSLmodify &b[0] bit)`. This is an invalid transformation because
the destination is memory: in this case, the bit offset is not
masked, and the chosen instruction may write outside its intended
32-bit location.
These changes fix the invalid rewrite performed in step (5) by
explicitly maksing the bit offset operand to `BT(S|R|C)(L|Q)modify`. In
the example above, the adjusted rules produce
`(BTSLmodify &b[0] (ANDLconst [31] bit))` in step (5).
These changes also add several new rules to rewrite bit sets, toggles,
and clears that are rooted at `(OR|XOR|AND)(L|Q)modify` operators into
appropriate `BT(S|R|C)(L|Q)modify` operators. These rules catch cases
where `MOV(L|Q)store ((OR|XOR|AND)(L|Q) ...)` is rewritten to
`(OR|XOR|AND)(L|Q)modify` before the `(OR|XOR|AND)(L|Q) ...` can be
rewritten to `BT(S|R|C)(L|Q) ...`.
Overall, compilecmp reports small improvements in code size on
darwin/amd64 when the changes to the compiler itself are exlcuded:
file before after Δ %
runtime.s 536464 536412 -52 -0.010%
bytes.s 32629 32593 -36 -0.110%
strings.s 44565 44529 -36 -0.081%
os/signal.s 7967 7959 -8 -0.100%
cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/sys/unix.s 81686 81678 -8 -0.010%
math/big.s 188235 188253 +18 +0.010%
cmd/link/internal/loader.s 89295 89056 -239 -0.268%
cmd/link/internal/ld.s 633551 633232 -319 -0.050%
cmd/link/internal/arm.s 18934 18928 -6 -0.032%
cmd/link/internal/arm64.s 31814 31801 -13 -0.041%
cmd/link/internal/riscv64.s 7347 7345 -2 -0.027%
cmd/compile/internal/ssa.s 4029173 4033066 +3893 +0.097%
total 21298280 21301472 +3192 +0.015%
Change-Id: I2e560548b515865129e1724e150e30540e9d29ce
GitHub-Last-Rev: 9a42bd29a5
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#45242
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/304869
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Optimize some patterns into rev16/rev16w instruction.
Pattern1:
(c & 0xff00ff00)>>8 | (c & 0x00ff00ff)<<8
To:
rev16w c
Pattern2:
(c & 0xff00ff00ff00ff00)>>8 | (c & 0x00ff00ff00ff00ff)<<8
To:
rev16 c
This patch is a copy of CL 239637, contributed by Alice Xu(dianhong.xu@arm.com).
Change-Id: I96936c1db87618bc1903c04221c7e9b2779455b3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/268377
Trust: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
Run-TryBot: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
When -clobberdeadreg flag is set, the compiler inserts code that
clobbers integer registers at call sites. This may be helpful for
debugging register ABI.
Only implemented on AMD64 for now.
Change-Id: Ia203d3f891c30fd95d0103489056fe01d63a2899
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/302809
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
This CL adds rewrite rules for CSETM, CSINC, CSINV, and CSNEG. By adding
these rules, we can save one instruction.
For example,
func test(cond bool, a int) int {
if cond {
a++
}
return a
}
Before:
MOVD "".a+8(RSP), R0
ADD $1, R0, R1
MOVBU "".cond(RSP), R2
CMPW $0, R2
CSEL NE, R1, R0, R0
After:
MOVBU "".cond(RSP), R0
CMPW $0, R0
MOVD "".a+8(RSP), R0
CSINC EQ, R0, R0, R0
This patch is a copy of CL 285694. Co-authored-by: JunchenLi
<junchen.li@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ic1a79e8b8ece409b533becfcb7950f11e7b76f24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/302231
Trust: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
Run-TryBot: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL resurrects the clobberdead debugging mode (CL 23924).
When -clobberdead flag is set (TODO: make it GOEXPERIMENT?), the
compiler inserts code that clobbers all dead stack slots that
contains pointers.
Mark windows syscall functions cgo_unsafe_args, as the code
actually does that, by taking the address of one argument and
passing it to cgocall.
Change-Id: Ie09a015f4bd14ae6053cc707866e30ae509b9d6f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/301791
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
These instructions are actually 5 argument opcodes as specified
by the ISA. Prior to this patch, the MB and ME arguments were
merged into a single bitmask operand to workaround the limitations
of the ppc64 assembler backend.
This limitation no longer exists. Thus, we can pass operands for
these opcodes without having to merge the MB and ME arguments in
the assembler frontend or compiler backend.
Likewise, support for 4 operand variants is unchanged.
Change-Id: Ib086774f3581edeaadfd2190d652aaaa8a90daeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/298750
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.org>
Trust: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.org>
Add generic rule to rewrite the single-precision square root expression
with one single-precision instruction. The optimization will reduce two
times of precision converting between double-precision and single-precision.
On arm64 flatform.
previous:
FCVTSD F0, F0
FSQRTD F0, F0
FCVTDS F0, F0
optimized:
FSQRTS S0, S0
And this patch adds the test case to check the correctness.
This patch refers to CL 241877, contributed by Alice Xu
(dianhong.xu@arm.com)
Change-Id: I6de5d02281c693017ac4bd4c10963dd55989bd7e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/276873
Trust: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
Run-TryBot: fannie zhang <Fannie.Zhang@arm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The code generated when storing eight bytes loaded from memory created a
series of small writes instead of a single, large one. The specific
pattern of instructions generated stored 1 byte, then 2 bytes, then 4
bytes, and finally 1 byte.
The new rules match this specific pattern both for amd64 and for s390x,
and convert it into a single instruction to store the 8 bytes. arm64 and
ppc64le already generated the right code, but the new codegen test
covers also those architectures.
Fixes#41663
Change-Id: Ifb9b464be2d59c2ed5034acf7b9c3e473f344030
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280456
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Trust: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Trust: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Some bit test instruction generation stopped triggering after
the change to addressing modes. I suspect this was just because
ANDQload was being generated before the rewrite rules could discover
the BTQ. Fix that by decomposing the ANDQload when it is surrounded
by a TESTQ (thus re-enabling the BTQ rules).
Fixes#44228
Change-Id: I489b4a5a7eb01c65fc8db0753f8cec54097cadb2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/291749
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
In ABIInternal, reserve X15 as constant zero, and use it to zero
memory. (Maybe there can be more use of it?)
The register is zeroed when transition to ABIInternal from ABI0.
Caveat: using X15 generates longer instructions than using X0.
Maybe we want to use X0?
Change-Id: I12d5ee92a01fc0b59dad4e5ab023ac71bc2a8b7d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/288093
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Current many architectures use a rule along the lines of
// Canonicalize the order of arguments to comparisons - helps with CSE.
((CMP|CMPW) x y) && x.ID > y.ID => (InvertFlags ((CMP|CMPW) y x))
to normalize comparisons as much as possible for CSE. Replace the
ID comparison with something less variable across compiler changes.
This helps avoid spurious failures in some of the codegen-comparison
tests (though the current choice of comparison is sensitive to Op
ordering).
Two tests changed to accommodate modified instruction choice.
Change-Id: Ib35f450bd2bae9d4f9f7838ceaf7ec682bcf1e1a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/280155
Trust: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Some rules for PPC64 were checking for a case
where a shift followed by an 'and' of a mask could
be lowered, depending on the format of the mask. The
function to verify if the mask was valid for this purpose
was not checking if the mask was 0 which we don't want to
allow. This case can happen if previous optimizations
resulted in that mask value.
This fixes isPPC64ValidShiftMask to check for a mask of 0 and return
false.
This also adds a codegen testcase to verify it doesn't try to
match the rules in the future.
Fixes#42610
Change-Id: I565d94e88495f51321ab365d6388c01e791b4dbb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/270358
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.org>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes#42445
Change-Id: I9653ef094dba2a1ac2e3daaa98279d10df17a2a1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/268257
Trust: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
Trust: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Alberto Donizetti <alb.donizetti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Optimize combinations of left and right shifts by a constant value
into a 'rotate then insert selected bits [into zero]' instruction.
Use the same instruction for contiguous masks since it has some
benefits over 'and immediate' (not restricted to 32-bits, does not
overwrite source register).
To keep the complexity of this change under control I've only
implemented 64 bit operations for now.
There are a lot more optimizations that can be done with this
instruction family. However, since their function overlaps with other
instructions we need to be somewhat careful not to break existing
optimization rules by creating optimization dead ends. This is
particularly true of the load/store merging rules which contain lots
of zero extensions and shifts.
This CL does interfere with the store merging rules when an operand
is shifted left before it is stored:
binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(b, x << 1)
This is unfortunate but it's not critical and somewhat complex so
I plan to fix that in a follow up CL.
file before after Δ %
addr2line 4117446 4117282 -164 -0.004%
api 4945184 4942752 -2432 -0.049%
asm 4998079 4991891 -6188 -0.124%
buildid 2685158 2684074 -1084 -0.040%
cgo 4553732 4553394 -338 -0.007%
compile 19294446 19245070 -49376 -0.256%
cover 4897105 4891319 -5786 -0.118%
dist 3544389 3542785 -1604 -0.045%
doc 3926795 3927617 +822 +0.021%
fix 3302958 3293868 -9090 -0.275%
link 6546274 6543456 -2818 -0.043%
nm 4102021 4100825 -1196 -0.029%
objdump 4542431 4548483 +6052 +0.133%
pack 2482465 2416389 -66076 -2.662%
pprof 13366541 13363915 -2626 -0.020%
test2json 2829007 2761515 -67492 -2.386%
trace 10216164 10219684 +3520 +0.034%
vet 6773956 6773572 -384 -0.006%
total 107124151 106917891 -206260 -0.193%
Change-Id: I7591cce41e06867ba10a745daae9333513062746
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233317
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
We already remove racefuncenter and racefuncexit if they are not
needed (i.e. the function doesn't have any other race calls).
racefuncenterfp is like racefuncenter but used on LR machines.
Remove unnecessary racefuncenterfp as well.
Change-Id: I65edb00e19c6d9ab55a204cbbb93e9fb710559f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/267099
Trust: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Combine (AND m (SRWconst x)) or (SRWconst (AND m x)) when mask m is
and the shift value produce constant which can be encoded into an
RLWINM instruction.
Combine (CLRLSLDI (SRWconst x)) if the combining of the underling rotate
masks produces a constant which can be encoded into RLWINM.
Likewise for (SLDconst (SRWconst x)) and (CLRLSDI (RLWINM x)).
Combine rotate word + and operations which can be encoded as a single
RLWINM/RLWNM instruction.
The most notable performance improvements arise from the crypto
benchmarks below (GOARCH=power8 on a ppc64le/linux):
pkg:golang.org/x/crypto/blowfish goos:linux goarch:ppc64le
ExpandKeyWithSalt 52.2µs ± 0% 47.5µs ± 0% -8.88%
ExpandKey 44.4µs ± 0% 40.3µs ± 0% -9.15%
pkg:golang.org/x/crypto/ssh/internal/bcrypt_pbkdf goos:linux goarch:ppc64le
Key 57.6ms ± 0% 52.3ms ± 0% -9.13%
pkg:golang.org/x/crypto/bcrypt goos:linux goarch:ppc64le
Equal 90.9ms ± 0% 82.6ms ± 0% -9.13%
DefaultCost 91.0ms ± 0% 82.7ms ± 0% -9.12%
Change-Id: I59a0ca29face38f4ab46e37124c32906f216c4ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/260798
Run-TryBot: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@linaro.com>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Backstop support for non-sse2 chips now that 387 is gone.
RELNOTE=yes
Change-Id: Ib10e69c4a3654c15a03568f93393437e1939e013
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/260017
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
My last 387 CL. So sad ... ... ... ... not!
Fixes#40255
Change-Id: I8d4ddb744b234b8adc735db2f7c3c7b6d8bbdfa4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/258957
Trust: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
A recent change to improve shifts was generating some
invalid cases when the rule was based on an AND. The
extended mnemonics CLRLSLDI and CLRLSLWI only allow
certain values for the operands and in the mask case
those values were not being checked properly. This
adds a check to those rules to verify that the
'b' and 'n' values used when an AND was part of the rule
have correct values.
There was a bug in some diag messages in asm9. The
message expected 3 values but only provided 2. Those are
corrected here also.
The test/codegen/shift.go was updated to add a few more
cases to check for the case mentioned here.
Some of the comments that mention the order of operands
in these extended mnemonics were wrong and those have been
corrected.
Fixes#41683.
Change-Id: If5bb860acaa5051b9e0cd80784b2868b85898c31
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/258138
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This adds support for the extswsli instruction which combines
extsw followed by a shift.
New benchmark demonstrates the improvement:
name old time/op new time/op delta
ExtShift 1.34µs ± 0% 1.30µs ± 0% -3.15% (p=0.057 n=4+3)
Change-Id: I21b410676fdf15d20e0cbbaa75d7c6dcd3bbb7b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/257017
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <carlos.seo@gmail.com>
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This change adds rules to find pairs of instructions that can
be combined into a single shifts. These instruction sequences
are common in array addressing within loops. Improvements can
be seen in many crypto packages and the hash packages.
These are based on the extended mnemonics found in the ISA
sections C.8.1 and C.8.2.
Some rules in PPC64.rules were moved because the ordering prevented
some matching.
The following results were generated on power9.
hash/crc32:
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=0 195ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -16.41%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=40/align=1 200ns ± 0% 163ns ± 0% -18.50%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=0 1.98µs ± 0% 1.67µs ± 0% -15.46%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=512/align=1 1.98µs ± 0% 1.69µs ± 0% -14.80%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=0 3.90µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -15.27%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=1kB/align=1 3.85µs ± 0% 3.31µs ± 0% -14.15%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=0 15.3µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.22%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=4kB/align=1 15.4µs ± 0% 13.1µs ± 0% -14.79%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=0 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.56%
CRC32/poly=Koopman/size=32kB/align=1 137µs ± 0% 105µs ± 0% -23.53%
crypto/rc4:
RC4_128 733ns ± 0% 650ns ± 0% -11.32% (p=1.000 n=1+1)
RC4_1K 5.80µs ± 0% 5.17µs ± 0% -10.89% (p=1.000 n=1+1)
RC4_8K 45.7µs ± 0% 40.8µs ± 0% -10.73% (p=1.000 n=1+1)
crypto/sha1:
Hash8Bytes 635ns ± 0% 613ns ± 0% -3.46% (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Hash320Bytes 2.30µs ± 0% 2.18µs ± 0% -5.38% (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Hash1K 5.88µs ± 0% 5.38µs ± 0% -8.62% (p=1.000 n=1+1)
Hash8K 42.0µs ± 0% 37.9µs ± 0% -9.75% (p=1.000 n=1+1)
There are other improvements found in golang.org/x/crypto which are all in the
range of 5-15%.
Change-Id: I193471fbcf674151ffe2edab212799d9b08dfb8c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/252097
Trust: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The order array was zero initialized by the compiler, but ends up being
overwritten by the runtime anyway.
So let the runtime takes full responsibility for initializing, save us
one instruction per select.
Fixes#40399
Change-Id: Iec1eca27ad7180d4fcb3cc9ef97348206b7fe6b8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/251517
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This merges an lis + subf into subfic, and for 32b constants
lwa + subf into oris + ori + subf.
The carry bit is no longer used in code generation, therefore
I think we can clobber it as needed. Note, lowered borrow/carry
arithmetic is self-contained and thus is not affected.
A few extra rules are added to ensure early transformations to
SUBFCconst don't trip up earlier rules, fold constant operations,
or otherwise simplify lowering. Likewise, tests are added to
ensure all rules are hit. Generic constant folding catches
trivial cases, however some lowering rules insert arithmetic
which can introduce new opportunities (e.g BitLen or Slicemask).
I couldn't find a specific benchmark to demonstrate noteworthy
improvements, but this is generating subfic in many of the default
bent test binaries, so we are at least saving a little code space.
Change-Id: Iad7c6e5767eaa9dc24dc1c989bd1c8cfe1982012
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/249461
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
With this patch, opt pass can expose more obvious constant-folding
opportunites.
Example:
func test(i int) int {return (i+8)-(i+4)}
The previous version:
MOVD "".i(FP), R0
ADD $8, R0, R1
ADD $4, R0, R0
SUB R0, R1, R0
MOVD R0, "".~r1+8(FP)
RET (R30)
The optimized version:
MOVD $4, R0
MOVD R0, "".~r1+8(FP)
RET (R30)
This patch removes some existing reassociation rules, such as "x+(z-C)",
because the current generic rewrite rules will canonicalize "x-const"
to "x+(-const)", making "x+(z-C)" equal to "x+(z+(-C))".
This patch also adds test cases.
Change-Id: I857108ba0b5fcc18a879eeab38e2551bc4277797
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/237137
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Add a new lowering rule to match and replace such instances
with the MADDLD instruction available on power9 where
possible.
Likewise, this plumbs in a new ppc64 ssa opcode to house
the newly generated MADDLD instructions.
When testing ed25519, this reduced binary size by 936B.
Similarly, MADDLD combination occcurs in a few other less
obvious cases such as division by constant.
Testing of golang.org/x/crypto/ed25519 shows non-trivial
speedup during keygeneration:
name old time/op new time/op delta
KeyGeneration 65.2µs ± 0% 63.1µs ± 0% -3.19%
Signing 64.3µs ± 0% 64.4µs ± 0% +0.16%
Verification 147µs ± 0% 147µs ± 0% +0.11%
Similarly, this test binary has shrunk by 66488B.
Change-Id: I077aeda7943119b41f07e4e62e44a648f16e4ad0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/248723
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Some of the existing optimizations aren't triggered because they
are handled by the generic rules so this CL removes them. Also
some constraints were copied without much thought from the amd64
rules and they don't make sense on s390x, so we remove those
constraints.
Finally, add a 'multiply by the sum of two powers of two'
optimization. This makes sense on s390x as shifts are low latency
and can also sometimes be optimized further (especially if we add
support for RISBG instructions).
name old time/op new time/op delta
IntMulByConst/3-8 1.70ns ±11% 1.10ns ± 5% -35.26% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
IntMulByConst/5-8 1.64ns ± 7% 1.10ns ± 4% -32.94% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
IntMulByConst/12-8 1.65ns ± 6% 1.20ns ± 4% -27.16% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
IntMulByConst/120-8 1.66ns ± 4% 1.22ns ±13% -26.43% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
IntMulByConst/-120-8 1.65ns ± 7% 1.19ns ± 4% -28.06% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
IntMulByConst/65537-8 0.86ns ± 9% 1.12ns ±12% +30.41% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
IntMulByConst/65538-8 1.65ns ± 5% 1.23ns ± 5% -25.11% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: Ib196e6bff1e97febfd266134d0a2b2a62897989f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/248937
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For an unsigned integer, it's useful to convert its order test with 0/1
to its equality test with 0. We can save a comparison instruction that
followed by a conditional branch on arm64 since it supports
compare-with-zero-and-branch instructions. For example,
if x > 0 { ... } else { ... }
the original version:
CMP $0, R0
BLS 9
the optimized version:
CBZ R0, 8
Updates #21439
Change-Id: Id1de6f865f6aa72c5d45b29f7894818857288425
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/246857
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
If the AND has other uses, we end up saving an argument to the AND
in another register, so we can use it for the TEST. No point in doing that.
Change-Id: I73444a6aeddd6f55e2328ce04d77c3e6cf4a83e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/241280
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
There are some architecture-independent rules in #21439, since an
unsigned integer >= 0 is always true and < 0 is always false. This CL
adds these optimizations to generic rules.
Updates #21439
Change-Id: Iec7e3040b761ecb1e60908f764815fdd9bc62495
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/246617
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
They were missed as part of the refactoring to use a separate
addressing modes pass.
Fixes#40426
Change-Id: Ie0418b2fac4ba1ffe720644ac918f6d728d5e420
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/244859
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Taking over Zach's CL 212277. Just cleaned up and added a test.
For a positive, signed integer, an arithmetic right shift of count
(bit-width - 1) equals zero. e.g. int64(22) >> 63 -> 0. This CL makes
prove replace these right shifts with a zero-valued constant.
These shifts may arise in source code explicitly, but can also be
created by the generic rewrite of signed division by a power of 2.
// Signed divide by power of 2.
// n / c = n >> log(c) if n >= 0
// = (n+c-1) >> log(c) if n < 0
// We conditionally add c-1 by adding n>>63>>(64-log(c))
(first shift signed, second shift unsigned).
(Div64 <t> n (Const64 [c])) && isPowerOfTwo(c) ->
(Rsh64x64
(Add64 <t> n (Rsh64Ux64 <t>
(Rsh64x64 <t> n (Const64 <typ.UInt64> [63]))
(Const64 <typ.UInt64> [64-log2(c)])))
(Const64 <typ.UInt64> [log2(c)]))
If n is known to be positive, this rewrite includes an extra Add and 2
extra Rsh. This CL will allow prove to replace one of the extra Rsh with
a 0. That replacement then allows lateopt to remove all the unneccesary
fixups from the generic rewrite.
There is a rewrite rule to handle this case directly:
(Div64 n (Const64 [c])) && isNonNegative(n) && isPowerOfTwo(c) ->
(Rsh64Ux64 n (Const64 <typ.UInt64> [log2(c)]))
But this implementation of isNonNegative really only handles constants
and a few special operations like len/cap. The division could be
handled if the factsTable version of isNonNegative were available.
Unfortunately, the first opt pass happens before prove even has a
chance to deduce the numerator is non-negative, so the generic rewrite
has already fired and created the extra Ops discussed above.
Fixes#36159
By Printf count, this zeroes 137 right shifts when building std and cmd.
Change-Id: Iab486910ac9d7cfb86ace2835456002732b384a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/232857
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
match:
m = make([]T, x); copy(m, s)
for pointer free T and x==len(s) rewrite to:
m = mallocgc(x*elemsize(T), nil, false); memmove(&m, &s, x*elemsize(T))
otherwise rewrite to:
m = makeslicecopy([]T, x, s)
This avoids memclear and shading of pointers in the newly created slice
before the copy.
With this CL "s" is only be allowed to bev a variable and not a more
complex expression. This restriction could be lifted in future versions
of this optimization when it can be proven that "s" is not referencing "m".
Triggers 450 times during make.bash..
Reduces go binary size by ~8 kbyte.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Byte 71.1ns ± 1% 65.8ns ± 0% -7.49% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Int 71.2ns ± 1% 66.0ns ± 0% -7.27% (p=0.000 n=10+8)
MakeSliceCopy/mallocmove/Ptr 104ns ± 4% 99ns ± 1% -5.13% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Byte 70.3ns ± 0% 68.0ns ± 0% -3.22% (p=0.000 n=10+9)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Int 70.3ns ± 0% 68.5ns ± 1% -2.59% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
MakeSliceCopy/makecopy/Ptr 102ns ± 0% 99ns ± 1% -2.97% (p=0.000 n=9+9)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Byte 75.4ns ± 0% 74.9ns ± 2% -0.63% (p=0.015 n=9+9)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Int 75.6ns ± 0% 76.4ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.245 n=9+10)
MakeSliceCopy/nilappend/Ptr 107ns ± 0% 108ns ± 1% +0.93% (p=0.005 n=9+10)
Fixes#26252
Change-Id: Iec553dd1fef6ded16197216a472351c8799a8e71
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/146719
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We set up static symbols during walk that
we later make copies of to initialize local variables.
It is difficult to ascertain at that time exactly
when copying a symbol is profitable vs locally
initializing an autotmp.
During SSA, we are much better placed to optimize.
This change recognizes when we are copying from a
global readonly all-zero symbol and replaces it with
direct zeroing.
This often allows the all-zero symbol to be
deadcode eliminated at link time.
This is not ideal--it makes for large object files,
and longer link times--but it is the cleanest fix I could find.
This makes the final binary for the program in #38554
shrink from >500mb to ~2.2mb.
It also shrinks the standard binaries:
file before after Δ %
addr2line 4412496 4404304 -8192 -0.186%
buildid 2893816 2889720 -4096 -0.142%
cgo 4841048 4832856 -8192 -0.169%
compile 19926480 19922432 -4048 -0.020%
cover 5281816 5277720 -4096 -0.078%
link 6734648 6730552 -4096 -0.061%
nm 4366240 4358048 -8192 -0.188%
objdump 4755968 4747776 -8192 -0.172%
pprof 14653060 14612100 -40960 -0.280%
trace 11805940 11777268 -28672 -0.243%
vet 7185560 7181416 -4144 -0.058%
total 113588440 113465560 -122880 -0.108%
And not just by removing unnecessary symbols;
the program text shrinks a bit as well.
Fixes#38554
Change-Id: I8381ae6084ae145a5e0cd9410c451e52c0dc51c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229704
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Triggers a handful of times in std+cmd.
Change-Id: I9bb8ce9a5f8bae2547cb61157cd8f256e1b63e76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229602
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL optimizes code that uses a carry from a function such as
bits.Add64 as the condition in an if statement. For example:
x, c := bits.Add64(a, b, 0)
if c != 0 {
panic("overflow")
}
Rather than converting the carry into a 0 or a 1 value and using
that as an input to a comparison instruction the carry flag is now
used as the input to a conditional branch directly. This typically
removes an ADD LOGICAL WITH CARRY instruction when user code is
doing overflow detection and is closer to the code that a user
would expect to generate.
Change-Id: I950431270955ab72f1b5c6db873b6abe769be0da
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/219757
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
When generating code for unsigned equals (==) and not equals (!=)
comparisons we currently, on s390x, always use signed comparisons.
This mostly works well, however signed comparisons on s390x sign
extend their immediates and unsigned comparisons zero extend them.
For compare-and-branch instructions which can only have 8-bit
immediates this significantly changes the range of immediate values
we can represent: [-128, 127] for signed comparisons and [0, 255]
for unsigned comparisons.
When generating equals and not equals checks we don't neet to worry
about whether the comparison is signed or unsigned. This CL
therefore adds rules to allow us to switch signedness for such
comparisons if it means that it brings a constant into range for an
8-bit immediate.
For example, a signed equals with an integer in the range [128, 255]
will now be implemented using an unsigned compare-and-branch
instruction rather than separate compare and branch instructions.
As part of this change I've also added support for adding a name
to block control values using the same `x:(...)` syntax we use for
value rules.
Triggers 792 times when compiling cmd and std.
Change-Id: I77fa80a128f0a8ce51a2888d1e384bd5e9b61a77
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/228642
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This optimization works on any integer with exactly one bit set.
This is identical to being a power of two, except in the
most negative number. Use oneBit instead.
The rule now triggers in a few more places in std+cmd,
in packages encoding/asn1, crypto/elliptic, and
vendor/golang.org/x/crypto/cryptobyte.
This change obviates the need for CL 222479
by doing this optimization consistently in the compiler.
Change-Id: I983c6235290fdc634fda5e11b10f1f8ce041272f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/229124
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Benchmarking suggests that the combo instruction is notably slower,
at least in the places where we measure.
Updates #37955
Change-Id: I829f1975dd6edf38163128ba51d84604055512f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/228157
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This changes the code generated for variable length shift
counts to use isel instead of instructions that set and
read the carry flag.
This reduces the generated code for shifts like this
by 1 instruction and avoids the use of instructions to
set and read the carry flag.
This sequence can be found in strconv with these results
on power9:
Atof64Decimal 71.6ns ± 0% 68.3ns ± 0% -4.61%
Atof64Float 95.3ns ± 0% 90.9ns ± 0% -4.62%
Atof64FloatExp 153ns ± 0% 149ns ± 0% -2.61%
Atof64Big 234ns ± 0% 232ns ± 0% -0.85%
Atof64RandomBits 348ns ± 0% 369ns ± 0% +6.03%
Atof64RandomFloats 262ns ± 0% 262ns ± 0% ~
Atof32Decimal 72.0ns ± 0% 68.2ns ± 0% -5.28%
Atof32Float 92.1ns ± 0% 87.1ns ± 0% -5.43%
Atof32FloatExp 159ns ± 0% 158ns ± 0% -0.63%
Atof32Random 194ns ± 0% 191ns ± 0% -1.55%
Some tests in codegen/shift.go are enabled to verify the
expected instructions are generated.
Change-Id: I968715d10ada405a8c46132bf19b8ed9b85796d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/227337
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Extend CL 220417 (which removed the integer Greater and Geq ops) to
floating point comparisons. Greater and Geq can always be
implemented using Less and Leq.
Fixes#37316.
Change-Id: Ieaddb4877dd0ff9037a1dd11d0a9a9e45ced71e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222397
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Before using some CPU instructions, we must check for their presence.
We use global variables in the runtime package to record features.
Prior to this CL, we issued a regular memory load for these features.
The downside to this is that, because it is a regular memory load,
it cannot be hoisted out of loops or otherwise reordered with other loads.
This CL introduces a new intrinsic just for checking cpu features.
It still ends up resulting in a memory load, but that memory load can
now be floated to the entry block and rematerialized as needed.
One downside is that the regular load could be combined with the comparison
into a CMPBconstload+NE. This new intrinsic cannot; it generates MOVB+TESTB+NE.
(It is possible that MOVBQZX+TESTQ+NE would be better.)
This CL does only amd64. It is easy to extend to other architectures.
For the benchmark in #36196, on my machine, this offers a mild speedup.
name old time/op new time/op delta
FMA-8 1.39ns ± 6% 1.29ns ± 9% -7.19% (p=0.000 n=97+96)
NonFMA-8 2.03ns ±11% 2.04ns ±12% ~ (p=0.618 n=99+98)
Updates #15808
Updates #36196
Change-Id: I75e2fcfcf5a6df1bdb80657a7143bed69fca6deb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/212360
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com>
Make sure we don't use the rewrite ptr + (c + x) -> c + (ptr + x), as
that may create an ephemeral out-of-bounds pointer.
I have not seen an actual bug caused by this yet, but we've seen
them in the 386 port so I'm fixing this issue for amd64 as well.
The load-combining rules needed to be reworked somewhat to still
work without the above broken rule.
Update #37881
Change-Id: I8046d170e89e2035195f261535e34ca7d8aca68a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/226437
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Retrying CL 222782, with a fix that will hopefully stop the random crashing.
The issue with the previous CL is that it does pointer arithmetic
in a way that may briefly generate an out-of-bounds pointer. If an
interrupt happens to occur in that state, the referenced object may
be collected incorrectly.
Suppose there was code that did s[x+c]. The previous CL had a rule
to the effect of ptr + (x + c) -> c + (ptr + x). But ptr+x is not
guaranteed to point to the same object as ptr. In contrast,
ptr+(x+c) is guaranteed to point to the same object as ptr, because
we would have already checked that x+c is in bounds.
For example, strconv.trim used to have this code:
MOVZX -0x1(BX)(DX*1), BP
CMPL $0x30, AL
After CL 222782, it had this code:
LEAL 0(BX)(DX*1), BP
CMPB $0x30, -0x1(BP)
An interrupt between those last two instructions could see BP pointing
outside the backing store of the slice involved.
It's really hard to actually demonstrate a bug. First, you need to
have an interrupt occur at exactly the right time. Then, there must
be no other pointers to the object in question. Since the interrupted
frame will be scanned conservatively, there can't even be a dead
pointer in another register or on the stack. (In the example above,
a bug can't happen because BX still holds the original pointer.)
Then, the object in question needs to be collected (or at least
scanned?) before the interrupted code continues.
This CL needs to handle load combining somewhat differently than CL 222782
because of the new restriction on arithmetic. That's the only real
difference (other than removing the bad rules) from that old CL.
This bug is also present in the amd64 rewrite rules, and we haven't
seen any crashing as a result. I will fix up that code similarly to
this one in a separate CL.
Update #37881
Change-Id: I5f0d584d9bef4696bfe89a61ef0a27c8d507329f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/225798
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The load and test instructions compare the given value
against zero and will produce a condition code indicating
one of the following scenarios:
0: Result is zero
1: Result is less than zero
2: Result is greater than zero
3: Result is not a number (NaN)
The instruction can be used to simplify floating point comparisons
against zero, which can enable further optimizations.
This CL also reduces the size of .text section of math.test binary by around
0.7 KB (in hexadecimal, from 1358f0 to 135620).
Change-Id: I33cb714f0c6feebac7a1c46dfcc735e7daceff9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209159
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This reverts commit CL 222782.
Reason for revert: Reverting to see if 386 errors go away
Update #37881
Change-Id: I74f287404c52414db1b6ff1649effa4ed9e5cc0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/225218
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Rolling back portions of CL 222782 to see if that helps
issue #37881 any.
Update #37881
Change-Id: I9cc3ff8c469fa5e4b22daec715d04148033f46f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/224837
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
This commit extends the -spectre flag to cmd/asm and adds
a new Spectre mitigation mode "ret", which enables the use
of retpolines.
Retpolines prevent speculation about the target of an indirect
jump or call and are described in more detail here:
https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
Change-Id: I4f2cb982fa94e44d91e49bd98974fd125619c93a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222661
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This commit adds a new cmd/compile flag -spectre,
which accepts a comma-separated list of possible
Spectre mitigations to apply, or the empty string (none),
or "all". The only known mitigation right now is "index",
which uses conditional moves to ensure that x86-64 CPUs
do not speculate past index bounds checks.
Speculating past index bounds checks may be problematic
on systems running privileged servers that accept requests
from untrusted users who can execute their own programs
on the same machine. (And some more constraints that
make it even more unlikely in practice.)
The cases this protects against are analogous to the ones
Microsoft explains in the "Array out of bounds load/store feeding ..."
sections here:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/security/developer-guidance-speculative-execution?view=vs-2019#array-out-of-bounds-load-feeding-an-indirect-branch
Change-Id: Ib7532d7e12466b17e04c4e2075c2a456dc98f610
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/222660
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Use a separate compiler pass to introduce complicated x86 addressing
modes. Loads in the normal architecture rules (for x86 and all other
platforms) can have constant offsets (AuxInt values) and symbols (Aux
values), but no more.
The complex addressing modes (x+y, x+2*y, etc.) are introduced in a
separate pass that combines loads with LEAQx ops.
Organizing rewrites this way simplifies the number of rewrites
required, as there are lots of different rule orderings that have to
be specified to ensure these complex addressing modes are always found
if they are possible.
Update #36468
Change-Id: I5b4bf7b03a1e731d6dfeb9ef19b376175f3b4b44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/217097
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
There are still two places in src/runtime/string.go that use
staticbytes, so we cannot delete it just yet.
There is a new codegen test to verify that the index calculation
is constant-folded, at least on amd64. ppc64, mips[64] and s390x
cannot currently do that.
There is also a new runtime benchmark to ensure that this does not
slow down performance (tested against parent commit):
name old time/op new time/op delta
ConvT2EByteSized/bool-4 1.07ns ± 1% 1.07ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.060 n=14+15)
ConvT2EByteSized/uint8-4 1.06ns ± 1% 1.07ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.095 n=14+15)
Updates #37612
Change-Id: I5ec30738edaa48cda78dfab4a78e24a32fa7fd6a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221957
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Trying this CL again, with a fixed test that allows platforms
to disagree on the exact behavior of converting NaNs.
We store 32-bit floating point constants in a 64-bit field, by
converting that 32-bit float to 64-bit float to store it, and convert
it back to use it.
That works for *almost* all floating-point constants. The exception is
signaling NaNs. The round trip described above means we can't represent
a 32-bit signaling NaN, because conversions strip the signaling bit.
To fix this issue, just forbid NaNs as floating-point constants in SSA
form. This shouldn't affect any real-world code, as people seldom
constant-propagate NaNs (except in test code).
Additionally, NaNs are somewhat underspecified (which of the many NaNs
do you get when dividing 0/0?), so when cross-compiling there's a
danger of using the compiler machine's NaN regime for some math, and
the target machine's NaN regime for other math. Better to use the
target machine's NaN regime always.
Update #36400
Change-Id: Idf203b688a15abceabbd66ba290d4e9f63619ecb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/221790
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Ensure that any comparison between two values has the same argument
order. This helps ensure that they can be eliminated during the
lowered CSE pass which will be particularly important if we eliminate
the Greater and Geq ops (see #37316).
Example:
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R1, R0 // different order, cannot eliminate
BEQ L2
CMP R0, R1
BLT L1
CMP R0, R1 // same order, can eliminate
BEQ L2
This does have some drawbacks. Notably comparisons might 'flip'
direction in the assembly output after even small changes to the
code or compiler. It should help make optimizations more reliable
however.
compilecmp master -> HEAD
master (218f4572f5): text/template: make reflect.Value indirections more robust
HEAD (f1661fef3e): cmd/compile: canonicalize comparison argument order
platform: linux/amd64
file before after Δ %
api 6063927 6068023 +4096 +0.068%
asm 5191757 5183565 -8192 -0.158%
cgo 4893518 4901710 +8192 +0.167%
cover 5330345 5326249 -4096 -0.077%
fix 3417778 3421874 +4096 +0.120%
pprof 14889456 14885360 -4096 -0.028%
test2json 2848138 2844042 -4096 -0.144%
trace 11746239 11733951 -12288 -0.105%
total 132739173 132722789 -16384 -0.012%
Change-Id: I11736b3fe2a4553f6fc65018f475e88217fa22f9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220425
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This reverts CL 213477.
Reason for revert: tests are failing on linux-mips*-rtrk builders.
Change-Id: I8168f7450890233f1bd7e53930b73693c26d4dc0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/220897
Run-TryBot: Bryan C. Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We store 32-bit floating point constants in a 64-bit field, by
converting that 32-bit float to 64-bit float to store it, and convert
it back to use it.
That works for *almost* all floating-point constants. The exception is
signaling NaNs. The round trip described above means we can't represent
a 32-bit signaling NaN, because conversions strip the signaling bit.
To fix this issue, just forbid NaNs as floating-point constants in SSA
form. This shouldn't affect any real-world code, as people seldom
constant-propagate NaNs (except in test code).
Additionally, NaNs are somewhat underspecified (which of the many NaNs
do you get when dividing 0/0?), so when cross-compiling there's a
danger of using the compiler machine's NaN regime for some math, and
the target machine's NaN regime for other math. Better to use the
target machine's NaN regime always.
This has been a bug since 1.10, and there's an easy workaround
(declare a global varaible containing the signaling NaN pattern, and
use that as the argument to math.Float32frombits) so we'll fix it in
1.15.
Fixes#36400
Update #36399
Change-Id: Icf155e743281560eda2eed953d19a829552ccfda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/213477
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The address calculations in the example end up doing x << 4 + y + 0.
Before this CL we use a SHLQ+LEAQ. Since the constant offset is 0,
we can use SHLQ+ADDQ instead.
Change-Id: Ia048c4fdbb3a42121c7e1ab707961062e8247fca
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/209959
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This API was added for #25819, where it was discussed as math.FMA.
The commit adding it used math.Fma, presumably for consistency
with the rest of the unusual names in package math
(Sincos, Acosh, Erfcinv, Float32bits, etc).
I believe that using an idiomatic Go name is more important here
than consistency with these other names, most of which are historical
baggage from C's standard library.
Early additions like Float32frombits happened before "uppercase for export"
(so they were originally like "float32frombits") and they were not properly
reconsidered when we uppercased the symbols to export them.
That's a mistake we live with.
The names of functions we have added since then, and even a few
that were legacy, are more properly Go-cased, such as IsNaN, IsInf,
and RoundToEven, rather than Isnan, Isinf, and Roundtoeven.
And also constants like MaxFloat32.
For new API, we should keep using proper Go-cased symbols
instead of minimally-upper-cased-C symbols.
So math.FMA, not math.Fma.
This API has not yet been released, so this change does not break
the compatibility promise.
This CL also modifies cmd/compile, since the compiler knows
the name of the function. I could have stopped at changing the
string constants, but it seemed to make more sense to use a
consistent casing everywhere.
Change-Id: I0f6f3407f41e99bfa8239467345c33945088896e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205317
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This change introduces an arm intrinsic that generates the FMULAD
instruction for the fused-multiply-add operation on systems that
support it. System support is detected via cpu.ARM.HasVFPv4. A rewrite
rule translates the generic intrinsic to FMULAD.
Updates #25819.
Change-Id: I8459e5dd1cdbdca35f88a78dbeb7d387f1e20efa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/142117
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
To permit ssa-level optimization, this change introduces an amd64 intrinsic
that generates the VFMADD231SD instruction for the fused-multiply-add
operation on systems that support it. System support is detected via
cpu.X86.HasFMA. A rewrite rule can then translate the generic ssa intrinsic
("Fma") to VFMADD231SD.
The benchmark compares the software implementation (old) with the intrinsic
(new).
name old time/op new time/op delta
Fma-4 27.2ns ± 1% 1.0ns ± 9% -96.48% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
Updates #25819.
Change-Id: I966655e5f96817a5d06dff5942418a3915b09584
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/137156
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In order to make math.FMA a compiler intrinsic for ISAs like ARM64,
PPC64[le], and S390X, a generic 3-argument opcode "Fma" is provided and
rewritten as
ARM64: (Fma x y z) -> (FMADDD z x y)
PPC64: (Fma x y z) -> (FMADD x y z)
S390X: (Fma x y z) -> (FMADD z x y)
Updates #25819.
Change-Id: Ie5bc628311e6feeb28ddf9adaa6e702c8c291efa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/131959
Run-TryBot: Akhil Indurti <aindurti@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
When a subsequent load/store of a ptr makes the nil check of that pointer
unnecessary, if their lines differ, change the line of the load/store
to that of the nilcheck, and attempt to rehome the load/store position
instead.
This fix makes profiling less accurate in order to make panics more
informative.
Fixes#33724
Change-Id: Ib9afaac12fe0d0320aea1bf493617facc34034b3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/200197
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For commuting ops, check whether the second argument is dead before
checking if the first argument is rematerializeable. Reusing the register
holding a dead value is always best.
Fixes#33580
Change-Id: I7372cfc03d514e6774d2d9cc727a3e6bf6ce2657
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/199559
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Add a bunch of extra tests and benchmarks for defer, in preparation for new
low-cost (open-coded) implementation of defers (see #34481),
- New file defer_test.go that tests a bunch more unusual defer scenarios,
including things that might have problems for open-coded defers.
- Additions to callers_test.go actually verifying what the stack trace looks like
for various panic or panic-recover scenarios.
- Additions to crash_test.go testing several more crash scenarios involving
recursive panics.
- New benchmark in runtime_test.go measuring speed of panic-recover
- New CGo benchmark in cgo_test.go calling from Go to C back to Go that
shows defer overhead
Updates #34481
Change-Id: I423523f3e05fc0229d4277dd00073289a5526188
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197017
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
On modern 64bit CPUs a SHR, SHL or AND instruction take 1 cycle to execute.
A pair of shifts that operate on the same register will take 2 cycles
and needs to wait for the input register value to be available.
Large constants used to mask the high bits of a register with an AND
instruction can not be encoded as an immediate in the AND instruction
on amd64 and therefore need to be loaded into a register with a MOV
instruction.
However that MOV instruction is not dependent on the output register and
on many CPUs does not compete with the AND or shift instructions for
execution ports.
Using a pair of shifts to mask high bits instead of an AND to mask high
bits of a register has a shorter encoding and uses one less general
purpose register but is slower due to taking one clock cycle longer
if there is no register pressure that would make the AND variant need to
generate a spill.
For example the instructions emitted for (x & 1 << 63) before this CL are:
48c1ea3f SHRQ $0x3f, DX
48c1e23f SHLQ $0x3f, DX
after this CL the instructions are the same as GCC and LLVM use:
48b80000000000000080 MOVQ $0x8000000000000000, AX
4821d0 ANDQ DX, AX
Some platforms such as arm64 already have SSA optimization rules to fuse
two shift instructions back into an AND.
Removing the general rule to rewrite AND to SHR+SHL speeds up this benchmark:
var GlobalU uint
func BenchmarkAndHighBits(b *testing.B) {
x := uint(0)
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
x &= 1 << 63
}
GlobalU = x
}
amd64/darwin on Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AndHighBits-4 0.61ns ± 6% 0.42ns ± 6% -31.42% (p=0.000 n=25+25):
'go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen' passes with following adjustments:
ARM64: The BFXIL pattern ((x << lc) >> rc | y & ac) needed adjustment
since ORshiftRL generation fusing '>> rc' and '|' interferes
with matching ((x << lc) >> rc) to generate UBFX. Previously
ORshiftLL was created first using the shifts generated for (y & ac).
S390X: Add rules for abs and copysign to match use of AND instead of SHIFTs.
Updates #33826
Updates #32781
Change-Id: I5a59f6239660d53c029cd22dfb44ddf39f93a56c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196810
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On modern 64bit CPUs a SHR, SHL or AND instruction take 1 cycle to execute.
A pair of shifts that operate on the same register will take 2 cycles
and needs to wait for the input register value to be available.
Large constants used to mask the high bits of a register with an AND
instruction can not be encoded as an immediate in the AND instruction
on amd64 and therefore need to be loaded into a register with a MOV
instruction.
However that MOV instruction is not dependent on the output register and
on many CPUs does not compete with the AND or shift instructions for
execution ports.
Using a pair of shifts to mask high bits instead of an AND to mask high
bits of a register has a shorter encoding and uses one less general
purpose register but is slower due to taking one clock cycle longer
if there is no register pressure that would make the AND variant need to
generate a spill.
For example the instructions emitted for (x & 1 << 63) before this CL are:
48c1ea3f SHRQ $0x3f, DX
48c1e23f SHLQ $0x3f, DX
after this CL the instructions are the same as GCC and LLVM use:
48b80000000000000080 MOVQ $0x8000000000000000, AX
4821d0 ANDQ DX, AX
Some platforms such as arm64 already have SSA optimization rules to fuse
two shift instructions back into an AND.
Removing the general rule to rewrite AND to SHR+SHL speeds up this benchmark:
var GlobalU uint
func BenchmarkAndHighBits(b *testing.B) {
x := uint(0)
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
x &= 1 << 63
}
GlobalU = x
}
amd64/darwin on Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AndHighBits-4 0.61ns ± 6% 0.42ns ± 6% -31.42% (p=0.000 n=25+25):
'go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen' passes with following adjustments:
ARM64: The BFXIL pattern ((x << lc) >> rc | y & ac) needed adjustment
since ORshiftRL generation fusing '>> rc' and '|' interferes
with matching ((x << lc) >> rc) to generate UBFX. Previously
ORshiftLL was created first using the shifts generated for (y & ac).
S390X: Add rules for abs and copysign to match use of AND instead of SHIFTs.
Updates #33826
Updates #32781
Change-Id: I43227da76b625de03fbc51117162b23b9c678cdb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/194297
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <martisch@uos.de>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
i32.eqz instructions don't appear unless needed in if conditions anymore
after CL 195204. I forgot to run the codegen tests while submitting the CL.
Thanks to @martisch for catching it.
Fixes#34442
Change-Id: I177b064b389be48e39d564849714d7a8839be13e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196580
Run-TryBot: Agniva De Sarker <agniva.quicksilver@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
When compiling expression switches, we try to optimize runs of
constants into binary searches. The ordering used isn't visible to the
application, so it's unimportant as long as we're consistent between
sorting and searching.
For strings, it's much cheaper to compare string lengths than strings
themselves, so instead of ordering strings by "si <= sj", we currently
order them by "len(si) < len(sj) || len(si) == len(sj) && si <= sj"
(i.e., the lexicographical ordering on the 2-tuple (len(s), s)).
However, it's also somewhat cheaper to compare strings for equality
(i.e., ==) than for ordering (i.e., <=). And if there were two or
three string constants of the same length in a switch statement, we
might unnecessarily emit ordering comparisons.
For example, given:
switch s {
case "", "1", "2", "3": // ordered by length then content
goto L
}
we currently compile this as:
if len(s) < 1 || len(s) == 1 && s <= "1" {
if s == "" { goto L }
else if s == "1" { goto L }
} else {
if s == "2" { goto L }
else if s == "3" { goto L }
}
This CL switches to using a 2-level binary search---first on len(s),
then on s itself---so that string ordering comparisons are only needed
when there are 4 or more strings of the same length. (4 being the
cut-off for when using binary search is actually worthwhile.)
So the above switch instead now compiles to:
if len(s) == 0 {
if s == "" { goto L }
} else if len(s) == 1 {
if s == "1" { goto L }
else if s == "2" { goto L }
else if s == "3" { goto L }
}
which is better optimized by walk and SSA. (Notably, because there are
only two distinct lengths and no more than three strings of any
particular length, this example ends up falling back to simply using
linear search.)
Test case by khr@ from CL 195138.
Fixes#33934.
Change-Id: I8eeebcaf7e26343223be5f443d6a97a0daf84f07
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195340
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
golang.org/cl/109517 optimized the compiler to avoid the allocation for make in
append(x, make([]T, y)...). This was only implemented for the case that y has type int.
This change extends the optimization to trigger for all integer types where the value
is known at compile time to fit into an int.
name old time/op new time/op delta
ExtendInt-12 106ns ± 4% 106ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.351 n=10+6)
ExtendUint64-12 1.03µs ± 5% 0.10µs ± 4% -90.01% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
ExtendInt-12 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12 13.6kB ± 0% 0.0kB -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
ExtendInt-12 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
ExtendUint64-12 1.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Updates #29785
Change-Id: Ief7760097c285abd591712da98c5b02bc3961fcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182559
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This reverts CL 192101.
Reason for revert: The same paragraph was added 2 weeks ago
(look a few lines above)
Change-Id: I05efb2631d7b4966f66493f178f2a649c715a3cc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/195637
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
It is useful to know about the -all_codegen option for running
codegen tests for all platforms. I was puzzling that some codegen
test was not failing on my local machine or on trybot, until I
found this option.
Change-Id: I062cf4d73f6a6c9ebc2258195779d2dab21bc36d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192101
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change adds an intrinsic for Mul64 on s390x. To achieve that,
a new assembly instruction, MLGR, is introduced in s390x/asmz.go. This assembly
instruction directly uses an existing instruction on Z and supports multiplication
of two 64 bit unsigned integer and stores the result in two separate registers.
In this case, we require the multiplcand to be stored in register R3 and
the output result (the high and low 64 bit of the product) to be stored in
R2 and R3 respectively.
A test case is also added.
Benchmark:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Mul-18 11.1ns ± 0% 1.4ns ± 0% -87.39% (p=0.002 n=8+10)
Mul32-18 2.07ns ± 0% 2.07ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Mul64-18 11.1ns ± 1% 1.4ns ± 0% -87.42% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Change-Id: Ieca6ad1f61fff9a48a31d50bbd3f3c6d9e6675c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/194572
Reviewed-by: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This CL gets rid of the MOVDreg and MOVDnop SSA operations on
s390x. They were originally inserted to help avoid situations
where a sign/zero extension was elided but a spill invalidated
the optimization. It's not really clear we need to do this though
(amd64 doesn't have these ops for example) so long as we are
careful when removing sign/zero extensions. Also, the MOVDreg
technique doesn't work if the register is spilled before the
MOVDreg op (I haven't seen that in practice).
Removing these ops reduces the complexity of the rules and also
allows us to unblock optimizations. For example, the compiler can
now merge the loads in binary.{Big,Little}Endian.PutUint16 which
it wasn't able to do before. This CL reduces the size of the .text
section in the go tool by about 4.7KB (0.09%).
Change-Id: Icaddae7f2e4f9b2debb6fabae845adb3f73b41db
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173897
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
On modern 64bit CPUs a SHR, SHL or AND instruction take 1 cycle to execute.
A pair of shifts that operate on the same register will take 2 cycles
and needs to wait for the input register value to be available.
Large constants used to mask the high bits of a register with an AND
instruction can not be encoded as an immediate in the AND instruction
on amd64 and therefore need to be loaded into a register with a MOV
instruction.
However that MOV instruction is not dependent on the output register and
on many CPUs does not compete with the AND or shift instructions for
execution ports.
Using a pair of shifts to mask high bits instead of an AND to mask high
bits of a register has a shorter encoding and uses one less general
purpose register but is slower due to taking one clock cycle longer
if there is no register pressure that would make the AND variant need to
generate a spill.
For example the instructions emitted for (x & 1 << 63) before this CL are:
48c1ea3f SHRQ $0x3f, DX
48c1e23f SHLQ $0x3f, DX
after this CL the instructions are the same as GCC and LLVM use:
48b80000000000000080 MOVQ $0x8000000000000000, AX
4821d0 ANDQ DX, AX
Some platforms such as arm64 already have SSA optimization rules to fuse
two shift instructions back into an AND.
Removing the general rule to rewrite AND to SHR+SHL speeds up this benchmark:
var GlobalU uint
func BenchmarkAndHighBits(b *testing.B) {
x := uint(0)
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
x &= 1 << 63
}
GlobalU = x
}
amd64/darwin on Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AndHighBits-4 0.61ns ± 6% 0.42ns ± 6% -31.42% (p=0.000 n=25+25):
Updates #33826
Updates #32781
Change-Id: I862d3587446410c447b9a7265196b57f85358633
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191780
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
For performance reasons (avoiding costly cross-compilations) CL 177577
changed the codegen test harness to only run the tests for the
machine's GOARCH by default.
This change updates the codegen README accordingly, explaining what
all.bash does run by default and how to perform the tests for all
architectures.
Fixes#33924
Change-Id: I43328d878c3e449ebfda46f7e69963a44a511d40
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192619
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
This CL eliminates unnecessary pairs of I32WrapI64 and
I64ExtendI32U generated by the WASM backend for IF
statements. And it makes the total size of pkg/js_wasm/
decreases about 490KB.
Change-Id: I16b0abb686c4e30d5624323166ec2d0ec57dbe2d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/191758
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
This CL reverts CL 192097 and fixes the issue in CL 189277.
Change-Id: Icd271262e1f5019a8e01c91f91c12c1261eeb02b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192519
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The syntax of a shifted operation does not have a "$" sign for
the shift amount. Remove it.
Change-Id: I50782fe942b640076f48c2fafea4d3175be8ff99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/192100
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Extend the optimization introduced in CL 141118 to the wasm architecture.
And for reference, the rules trigger 212 times while building std and cmd
$GOOS=js GOARCH=wasm gotip build std cmd
$grep -E "Wasm.rules:44(1|2|3|4)" rulelog | wc -l
212
Updates #26498
Change-Id: I153684a2b98589ae812b42268da08b65679e09d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/185477
Run-TryBot: Agniva De Sarker <agniva.quicksilver@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
Use the shiftIsBounded function to generate more efficient
Shift instructions.
Updates #25167
Change-Id: Id350f8462dc3a7ed3bfed0bcbea2860b8f40048a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/182558
Run-TryBot: Agniva De Sarker <agniva.quicksilver@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
This CL optimizes math.bits.TrailingZeros16 on 386 with
a pair of BSFL and ORL instrcutions.
The case TrailingZeros16-4 of the benchmark test in
math/bits shows big improvement.
name old time/op new time/op delta
TrailingZeros16-4 1.55ns ± 1% 0.87ns ± 1% -43.87% (p=0.000 n=50+49)
Change-Id: Ia899975b0e46f45dcd20223b713ed632bc32740b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/189277
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL performs the branchelim optimization on WASM with its
select instruction. And the total size of pkg/js_wasm decreased
about 80KB by this optimization.
Change-Id: I868eb146120a1cac5c4609c8e9ddb07e4da8a1d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/190957
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Musiol <neelance@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The assembly output for x & c == c, where c is power of 2:
MOVQ "".set+8(SP), AX
ANDQ $8, AX
CMPQ AX, $8
SETEQ "".~r2+24(SP)
With optimization using bitset:
MOVQ "".set+8(SP), AX
BTL $3, AX
SETCS "".~r2+24(SP)
output less than 1 instruction.
However, there is no speed improvement:
name old time/op new time/op delta
AllBitSet-8 0.35ns ± 0% 0.35ns ± 0% ~ (all equal)
Fixes#31904
Change-Id: I5dca4e410bf45716ed2145e3473979ec997e35d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/175957
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This reverts CL 180761
Reason for revert: Reinstate the stack-allocated defer CL.
There was nothing wrong with the CL proper, but stack allocation of defers exposed two other issues.
Issue #32477: Fix has been submitted as CL 181258.
Issue #32498: Possible fix is CL 181377 (not submitted yet).
Change-Id: I32b3365d5026600069291b068bbba6cb15295eb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/181378
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This reverts commit fff4f599fe.
Reason for revert: Seems to still have issues around GC.
Fixes#32452
Change-Id: Ibe7af629f9ad6a3d5312acd7b066123f484da7f0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/180761
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
When a defer is executed at most once in a function body,
we can allocate the defer record for it on the stack instead
of on the heap.
This should make defers like this (which are very common) faster.
This optimization applies to 363 out of the 370 static defer sites
in the cmd/go binary.
name old time/op new time/op delta
Defer-4 52.2ns ± 5% 36.2ns ± 3% -30.70% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Fixes#6980
Update #14939
Change-Id: I697109dd7aeef9e97a9eeba2ef65ff53d3ee1004
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/171758
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The CL 164718 mistyped the comparison flags. The rules for floating
point comparison should be GreaterThanF and GreaterEqualF. Fortunately,
the wrong optimizations were overwritten by other integer rules, so the
issue won't cause failure but just some performance impact.
The fixed CL optimizes the floating point test as follows.
source code: func foo(f float64) bool { return f > 4 || f < -4}
previous version: "FCMPD", "CSET\tGT", "CBZ"
fixed version: "FCMPD", BLE"
Add the test case.
Change-Id: Iea954fdbb8272b2d642dae0f816dc77286e6e1fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/177121
Reviewed-by: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Ben Shi <powerman1st@163.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
