And in gomvpkg, don't stop just because some packages had errors.
This is inevitable in a large GOPATH tree.
Fixes issue golang/go#10907
Change-Id: I9a60b070228d06d44880202eeef54394e914f5d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/10715
Reviewed-by: Sameer Ajmani <sameer@golang.org>
This was not a visible bug since the only caller discards the relevant
result, so I also deleted the result.
Fixes#9999
Change-Id: I276d6523b2891d3cb9c8137448e1aed32a5fd197
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5921
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <michaelmatloob@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This avoids littering the tree, and confusing some editors (e.g. Atom)
that expect the inode number to remain constant.
Change-Id: I2faeda1ed1b01e5e4cc720744ea3c99ab29e7333
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/7664
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
...since the zero value is more useful by far.
This is a breaking API change, obviously. (One or two tests in this
CL have intentional been left using the zero value, i.e., they now
load source.)
Change-Id: I42287bfcdb1afef8ee84e5eac12534dd0a1fd5d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/5653
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Before this change, many kinds of error would cause the loader to stop.
making it brittle when analyzing large codebases, as in "godoc -analysis".
This change moves operations that used to occur during
configuration---(*build.Context).Import, loading, and parsing of
initial packages---into the Load call, and ensures that all failures
during Loading are reported at the end so that the maximum amount of
progress is made.
Also: redesign the tests and add many new cases.
Change-Id: Ia8cd99416af7c5d4a5fe133908adfa83676d401f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3626
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
In the example, we use backslashes (not single quotes) to escape
double-quotes since it works on both Windows and POSIX.
Change-Id: Id883f5457bec4d8a36d5b12c759ad385125a98a6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2862
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This change adds a command mvpkg that will move a given package and
update all its imports. It uses similar logic to gorename to update
the imports.
Change-Id: Iebbd0b4c93c2302b0a71c3b99c68f6778106012a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1973
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Previously, gorename rejected all method renamings if it would
change the assignability relation.
Now, so long as the renaming was initiated at an abstract
method, the renaming proceeds, changing concrete methods (and
possibly other abstract methods) as needed. The user
intention is clear.
The intention of a renaming initiated at a concrete method is
less clear, so we still reject it if it would change the
assignability relation. The diagnostic advises the user to
rename the abstract method if that was the intention.
Additional safety checks are required: for each
satisfy.Constraint that couples a concrete type C and an
interface type I, we must treat it just like a set of implicit
selections C.f, one per abstract method f of I, and ensure the
selections' meanings are unchanged.
The satisfy package no longer canonicalizes types, since this
substitutes one interface for another (equivalent) one, which
is sound, but makes the type names random and the error
messages confusing.
Also, fixed a bug in 'satisfy' relating to map keys.
+ Lots more tests.
LGTM=sameer
R=sameer
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/173430043
Such messages are more informative when the error occurs deep within a script.
Also: add tool name to digraph's usage messages.
LGTM=gri
R=gri
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/173380043
Rewrite performed with this command:
sed -i '' 's_code.google.com/p/go\._golang.org/x/_g' \
$(grep -lr 'code.google.com/p/go.' *)
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/170920043
See the usage message in main.go for orientation.
To the best of my knowledge, the tool implements all required
soundness checks, except:
- the dynamic behaviour of reflection is obviously undecidable.
- it rejects method renamings that change the "implements" relation.
It should probably be more aggressive.
- actually it only checks the part of the "implements" relation
needed for compilation. Understanding the dynamic behaviour
of interfaces is obviously undecidable.
- a couple of minor gaps are indicated by TODO comments.
Also:
- Emacs integration.
- tests of all safety checks and (some) successful rewrites.
LGTM=dominik.honnef, sameer
R=gri, sameer, dominik.honnef
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/139150044
