We changed to delaying all transforms of generic functions, since there
are so many complicated situations where type params can be used. We
missed changing so that all Call expressions(not just some) are delayed
if in a generic function. This changes to delaying all transforms on
calls in generic functions. Had to convert Call() to g.callExpr() (so we
can access g.delayTransform()). By always delaying transforms on calls
in generic functions, we actually simplify the code a bit both in
g.CallExpr() and stencil.go.
Fixes#51236
Change-Id: I0342c7995254082c4baf709b0b92a06ec14425e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/386220
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The code for issue #51219 reveals bugs in the types1 and types2
importers that can occur for recursive types that are recursive through
the type constraint.
The crash in the issue is caused by the types1 bug, which leads to the
production of a type1 type which is incomplete and improperly has the
HasTParam flag set. The bug in the types1 importer is that we were not
deferring type instantiations when reading the type parameters, but we
need to do that exactly to correctly handle recursion through the type
constraint. So, the fix is to move the start of the deferrals (in the
'U' section of doDecl in typecheck/iimport.go) above the code that reads
the type params.
Once that bug is fixed, the test still crashes due to a related types2
importer issues. The problem is that t.SetConstraint(c) requires c to be
fully constructed (have its underlying type set). Since that may not be
done yet in the 'U' case in (*importReader).obj() in
importer/iimport.go, we need to defer the call to SetConstraint() in
that case, until we are done importing all the types.
I added a test case with recursion through a type constraint that causes
a problem that is fixed by the types1 importer change, though the error
is not the same as in the issue. I added more types in the test case
(which try to imitate the issue types more closely) the types2 bug, but
wasn't able to cause it yet with the smaller test case.
Fixes#51219
Change-Id: I85d860c98c09dddc37f76ce87a78a6015ec6fd20
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/386335
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Pointer comparison is lowered to the following on RISCV64
(EqPtr x y) => (SEQZ (SUB <x.Type> x y))
The difference of two pointers (the SUB) should not be pointer
type. Otherwise it can cause the GC to find a bad pointer.
Should fix#51101.
Change-Id: I7e73c2155c36ff403c032981a9aa9cccbfdf0f64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/385655
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Change-Id: Ie949f2131845f9f9292caff798f6933648779122
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/385434
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
If an invalid array length is just an identifier, mention
"array length" so that it's clear this is an invalid array
declaration and not a (invalid) generic type declaration.
Fixes#51145.
Change-Id: I8878cbb6c7b1277fc0a9a014712ec8d55499c5c7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/385255
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a pure rename of the respective Go functions/methods
with corresponding adjustments to error messages and tests.
A couple of comments were manually rephrased.
With this change, the implementation and error messages match
the latest spec.
No functionality change.
Change-Id: Iaa92a08b64756356fb2c5abdaca5c943c9105c96
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/384618
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Change run.go to apply the GO_TEST_TIMEOUT_SCALE scaling factor to
test timeouts (mentioned in "-t" clause in test header).
Also with this patch, bump up the timeout for fixedbugs/issue46234.go
from 30 to 45 seconds, to avoid flakes on very slow builders.
Updates #50973.
Change-Id: Icbafa482860e24cc1e72fee53511bcc764d06bf1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/382774
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Trust: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Refactor Checker.comparison such that its logic is easier to reason
about and so that special cases can be handled more directly.
Use the appropriate operand (of 1st or 2nd operand) for error
reporting (position and type), rather than always using the
first operand.
Use an extra parameter to indicate a switch case
comparison; in this case the error is always reported at
the position of the first operand. (The error messages are
not yet adjusted for switches; see next CL.)
Introduce a new kindString function which is used to print simplified
types in error messages (related to comparisons only): instead of
printing the details of a struct type, we just print "struct" where
the details are not relevant. This matches the 1.17 compiler behavior.
Added a "reportf" parameter to the internal comparable function so we
can report an error cause in addition to the boolean result. Rather
than passing a *string for cause, we pass a function to record the
cause so that we can use the *Checker context for printing (needed
for proper type qualification). This mechanism reports the same
details now as the 1.17 compiler.
Adjusted various tests as needed added new test files.
Fixes#50918.
Change-Id: I1f0e7af22f09db4d31679c667c71a9038a8dc9d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381964
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
It has moved to golang.org/x/exp/constraints. Perhaps it will move
back to the standard library in a future release.
For golang/go#45458Fixesgolang/go#50792
Change-Id: I93aa251a7afe7b329a3d3faadc0c5d6388b1f0e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/382460
Trust: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
This makes the error case pointed out in the issue like the current
message in Go 1.17 or -G=0 mode. The priority is to point out the
similar but wrong method name, rather than a difference in type.
Made changes to both cmd/compile/internal/types2 and go/types.
Added in a missing tab in an error message in go/types.
At the same time, removed the extra "at info" on the have lines (and
pointer receiver lines) of error messages, as requested in #50907.
Fixes#50816Fixes#50907
Change-Id: I04f8151955bdb6192246cbcb59adc1c4b8a2c4e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381774
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
We can type-check these fine but the API implications are unclear.
Fixes#50912.
For #50937.
Change-Id: If29bbb4a257ff6a85e3bfcd4755fd8f90c80fb87
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/382116
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
- Use the correct predicate in Checker.implements: for interfaces
we cannot use the API Comparable because it always returns true
for all non-type parameter interface types: Comparable simply
answers if == and != is permitted, and it's always been permitted
for interfaces. Instead we must use Interface.IsComparable which
looks at the type set of an interface.
- When comparing interfaces for identity, we must also consider the
whether the type sets have the comparable bit set.
With this change, `any` doesn't implement `comparable` anymore. This
only matters for generic functions and types, and the API functions.
It does mean that for now (until we allow type-constrained interfaces
for general non-constraint use, at some point in the future) a type
parameter that needs to be comparable cannot be instantiated with an
interface anymore.
For #50646.
Change-Id: I7e7f711bdcf94461f330c90509211ec0c2cf3633
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381254
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
For a composite literal expression like []T{{f: 1}}, we allow T to be
a pointer to struct type, so it's consistent to allow T to also be a
type parameter whose structural type is a pointer to struct type.
Fixes#50833.
Change-Id: Ib0781ec4a4f327c875ea25b97740ff2c0c86b916
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381075
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
These can go wrong when one of the operands is the minimum integer value.
Fixes#50854.
Change-Id: I238fe284f60c7ee5aeb9dc9a18e8b1578cdb77d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381318
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Trust: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Add a missing shape check in (*Tsubster).tinter when substituting on a
generic type which is an empty interface, analogous to same check in
(*Tsubster).tstruct. Empty structs/interfaces that have rparams (i.e.
are a generic type or a shape type) need to get a new type of their
rparams - they will be different even though they don't have any
fields/methods. Without this shape check, we were not correctly
completing the Token[int] type during substitution in the example in the
issue. This issue only happens for a generic type which is an empty
interface (i.e. doesn't actually use the type param, hence quite unusual).
Added the test case already created by Keith.
Fixes#50841
Change-Id: Ia985b9f52c0e87ed0647b46373e44c51cb748ba4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381175
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This CL updates unified IR to look at the structural type of a
composite literal type, rather than merely the underlying type, to
determine if it's a structure. This fixes a number of currently
failing regress test cases.
Updates #50833.
Change-Id: I11c040c77ec86c23e8ffefcf1ce1aed548687dc5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/381074
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
For #50646.
Change-Id: I7420545556e0df2659836364a62ce2c32ad7a8b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/380654
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
We have disallowed having a typeparam on the right-hand-side of a type
declaration. So, we disabled much of the test absdiff.go. I recently
wrote a new test absdiff2.go to use a structure containing the type
param type, so I could attach a method properly and run the full test.
As a contrast, I thought I would create absdiff3.go, where the Abs
functionality is passed in as a function callback (but derived from a
generic function). This is simpler, and more inline with some of the
guidelines that Ian has been proposing (use passed-in functions rather
than requiring methods, when possible, for greater ease-of-use).
Only adds a new test absdiff3.go. (And fixes a comment in absdiff2.go.)
Change-Id: I6dd185b50a3baeec31f689a892319963468a7201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/380774
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Added a new absdiff2.go test case, which works fully without using a
typeparam on the right-hand-side of a type declaration (which is
disallowed). Fixed an issue that the test revealed, which is that we
need to set g.curDecl properly for the "later" functions which are
deferred until after all declarations are initially processed. Also,
g.curDecl may be non-nil in typeDecl for local type declaration. So, we
adjust the associate assertion, and save/restore g.curDecl
appropriately.
Fixes#50790
Change-Id: Ieed76a7ad0a83bccb99cbad4bf98a7bfafbcbbd3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/380594
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
By processing non-alias type declarations before alias type declaration,
and those before everything else we can avoid some of the remaining
errors which are due to alias types not being available.
For #25838.
For #50259.
For #50276.
For #50729.
Change-Id: I233da2899a6d4954c239638624dfa8c08662e6b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/380056
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The type checker doesn't have a general mechanism to "use" the type
of a type alias whose type depends on a recursive type declaration
which is not yet completely type-checked. In some cases, the type of
a type alias is needed before it is determined; the type is incorrect
(invalid) in that case but no error is reported. The type-checker is
happy with this (incorrect type), but the compiler may crash under
some circumstances.
A correct fix will likely require some form of forwarding type which
is a fairly pervasive change and may also affect the type checker API.
This CL introduces a simple side table, a map of broken type aliases,
which is consulted before the type associated with a type alias is
used. If the type alias is broken, an error is reported.
This is a stop-gap solution that prevents the compiler from crashing.
The reported error refers to the corresponding issue which suggests
a work-around that may be applicable in some cases.
Also fix a minor error related to type cycles: If we have a cycle
that doesn't start with a type, don't use a compiler error message
that explicitly mentions "type".
Fixes#50259.
Fixes#50276.
Fixes#50779.
For #50729.
Change-Id: Ie8e38f49ef724e742e8e78625e6d4f3d4014a52c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379916
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
In validType, when we see an instantiated type, proceed as with
non-generic types but provide an environment in which to look up
the values (the corresponding type arguments) of type parameters
of the instantiated type. For each type parameter for which there
is a type argument, proceed with validating that type argument.
This corresponds to applying validType to the instantiated type
without actually instantiating the type (and running into infinite
instantiations in case of invalid recursive types).
Also, when creating a type instance, use the correct source position
for the instance (the start of the qualified identifier if we have an
imported type).
Fixes#48962.
Change-Id: I196c78bf066e4a56284d53368b2eb71bd8d8a780
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379414
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Given we have support for field access to type params with a single
structural type, we need to distinguish between methods calls and field
access when we have an OXDOT node on an expression which is a typeparam
(or correspondingly a shape). We were missing checks in getInstInfo,
which figures out the dictionary format, which then caused problems when
we generate the dictionaries. We don't need/want dictionary entries for
field access, only for bound method calls. Added a new function
isBoundMethod() to distinguish OXDOT nodes which are bound calls vs.
field accesses on a shape.
Removed isShapeDeref() - we can't have field access or method call on a
pointer to variable of type param type.
Fixes#50690
Change-Id: Id692f65e6f427f28cd2cfe474dd30e53c71877a7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379674
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In a method declaration "func (f *Foo[_, _]) String() string { ... }",
the two blank typeparams have the same name, but our current design with
types1 needs unique names for type params. Similarly, for export/import,
we need unique names to keep the type params straight in generic types
and connect the proper type param with the proper constraint. We make
blank type params unique by changing them to $1, $2, etc in noder.typ0()
via typecheck.TparamExportName(). We then revert $<num> back to _ during
type2 import via typecheck.TparamName(). We similarly revert
during gcimporter import. We don't need/want to revert in the types1
importer, since we want unique names for type params.
Rob Findley has made a similar change to x/tools (and we tried to make
the source code changes similar for the gcimporter and types2 importer
changes).
Fixes#50419
Change-Id: I855cc3d90d06bcf59541ed0c879e9a0e4ede45bb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379194
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Most CONVIFACEs are created in the transform phase (or old typechecker,
in -G=0 mode). But if the main result of a multi-value assignment (map,
channel, or dot-type) must be converted to an interface during the
assignment, that CONVIFACE is not created until (*orderState).as2ok in
the order phase (because the AS2* ops and their sub-ops are so tightly
intertwined). But we need to create the CONVIFACE during the
stenciling/transform phase to enable dictionary lookups. So, in
transformAssign(), if we are doing a special multi-value assignment
involving a type-param-derived type, assign the results first to temps,
so that we can manifest the CONVIFACE during the transform in assigning
the first temp to lhs[0].
Added a test for both AS2RECV (channel receives) and AS2MAPR (maps). I
don't think we can have a type assertion on a type-param-derived type.
Fixes#50642
Change-Id: I4d079fc46c93d8494d7db4ea8234d91522edb02a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379054
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Slightly better for cases such as string(1 << s).
Leaves type-checker tests alone for now because
there are multiple dozens.
For #45117.
Change-Id: I47b314c713fabe424c2158674bf965416a8a6f5c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379274
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
For an extension operation like MOWWreg, if the operand is already
extended, we optimize the second extension out. Usually a LoadReg
of a proper type would come already extended, as a MOVW/MOVWU etc.
instruction does. But for a LoadReg to a floating point register,
the instruction does not do the extension. So we cannot elide the
extension.
Fixes#50671.
Change-Id: Id8991df78d5acdecd3fd6138c558428cbd5f6ba3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379236
Trust: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Currently the code handles the case of returning values from
a function with no result parameters as a special case.
Consider this input:
package p
func f0_2() { return 1, 2 }
func f0_1() { return 1 }
func f1_0() int { return }
func f1_2() int { return 1, 2 }
func f2_0() (int, int) { return }
func f2_1() (int, int) { return 1 }
The errors are:
x.go:3:33: no result values expected <<<
x.go:4:33: no result values expected <<<
x.go:5:26: not enough return values
have ()
want (int)
x.go:6:36: too many return values
have (number, number)
want (int)
x.go:7:26: not enough return values
have ()
want (int, int)
x.go:8:33: not enough return values
have (number)
want (int, int)
There are two problems with the current special case emitting the
errors on the marked line:
1. It calls them 'result values' instead of 'return values'.
2. It doesn't show the type being returned, which can be useful to programmers.
Using the general case solves both these problems,
so this CL removes the special case and calls the general case instead.
Now those two errors read:
x.go:3:33: too many return values
have (number, number)
want ()
x.go:4:33: too many return values
have (number)
want ()
Fixes#50653.
Change-Id: If6b47dcece14ed4febb3a2d3d78270d5be1cb24d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/379116
Trust: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
In the compiler, we need to distinguish field and method access on a
type param. For field access, we avoid the dictionary access (to create
an interface bound) and just do the normal transformDot() (which will
create the field access on the shape type).
This field access works fine for non-pointer types, since the shape type
preserves the underlying type of all types in the shape. But we
generally merge all pointer types into a single shape, which means the
field will not be accessible via the shape type. So, we need to change
Shapify() so that a type which is a pointer type is mapped to its
underlying type, rather than being merged with other pointers.
Because we don't want to change the export format at this point in the
release, we need to compute StructuralType() directly in types1, rather
than relying on types2. That implementation is in types/type.go, along
with the helper specificTypes().
I enabled the compiler-related tests in issue50417.go, added an extra
test for unnamed pointer types, and added a bunch more tests for
interesting cases involving StructuralType(). I added a test
issue50417b.go similar to the original example, but also tests access to
an embedded field.
I also added a unit test in
cmd/compile/internal/types/structuraltype_test.go that tests a bunch of
unusual cases directly (some of which have no structural type).
Updates #50417
Change-Id: I77c55cbad98a2b95efbd4a02a026c07dfbb46caa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/376194
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
When we export a shape instantiation, because a particular
fully-instantiated type is needed by an inlineable function, we possibly
export the body of the instantiation, if it is inlineable. In this case,
we should have been calling ImportedBody() to make sure that the
function body had already been read in (if it is actually imported from
another package).
Fixes#50598
Change-Id: I512d2bcc745faa6ff3a97e25bc8f46e2c2643d23
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/378494
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
In order to make sure we export the dictionaries/shape methods for all
fully-instantiated types in inlineable functions, we need to descend
fully into types. For example, we may have a map type (e.g.
map[transactionID]Promise[*ByteBuffer]), where the key or value is a new
fully-instantiated type. So, I add a new checkFullyInst() traversal
function, which traverses all encountered types, but maintains a map, so
it only traverse it type once. We need to descend fully into interfaces,
structs, and methods, since a fully-instantiated type make occur in any
fields or arguments/results of methods, etc.
Fixes#50561
Change-Id: I88681a30384168539ed7229eed709f4e73ff0666
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/378154
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Using type aliases, it's possible to create structs with embedded
fields that have no corresponding type literal notation. However, we
still need to generate a unique name for these types to use for linker
symbols. This CL introduces a new "struct{ Name = Type }" syntax for
use in LinkString formatting to represent these types.
Reattempt at CL 372914, which was rolled back due to race-y
LocalPkg.Lookup call that isn't safe for concurrency.
Fixes#50190.
Change-Id: I0b7fd81e1b0b3199a6afcffde96ade42495ad8d1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/378434
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
With this change, we shall now see:
*myS does not implement S (wrong type for DoSomething method)
have DoSomething() (string, error) at ./main.go:9:14
want DoSomething() (int, error)
instead of previously:
*myS does not implement S (wrong type for DoSomething method)
have DoSomething() (string, error)
want DoSomething() (int, error)
Fixes#42841Fixes#45813
Change-Id: I66990929e39b0d36f2e91da0d92f60586a9b84e5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/373634
Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Trust: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The names given to methods of types created during type substitution
were possible incorrect when the type parameters themselves were nested
types.
Fixes#50485
Change-Id: I7e0043ed22c26406a5f9d8d51d9e928770a678f6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/377494
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
The loading of the base type in typ0() may cause s.Def to be defined for
the instantiated type, so load the base type before checking s.Def.
Fixes#50486
Change-Id: Ic039bc8f774dda534f4ccd1f920220b7a10dede6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/377094
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Issue #50552 is due to a problem with my recent improvement in the
interaction between generics and inlining. In markInlBody(), we now mark
dictionaries and shape methods for export, so they will be available for
any package that inlines the current inlineable function. But we need to
make sure that the dictionary and method symbols have actually been
resolved into Nodes (looked up in the import data), if they are not
already defined, so we can then mark them for export.
Improved header comment on Resolve().
Fixes#50552
Change-Id: I89e52d39d3b9894591d2ad6eb3a8ed3bb5f1e0a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/377714
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
For some reason, aix sometimes executes the bogus function body. This
should never happen as it lives in a no-execute section. It might be
a transient permission blip as the heap grows.
Add a small function to cleanup and synchronize the icache before
jumping to the bogus function to ensure it causes a panic, not SIGILL.
Fixes#44583
Change-Id: Iadca62d82bfb70fc62088705dac42a880a1208fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/377314
Trust: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
I made the default be that, where there are differences between types2
and -G=0 error messages, we want errorcheck tests to pass types2.
Typically, we can get errorcheck to pass on types2 and -G=0 if they give
the same number of error messages on the same lines, just different
wording. If they give a different number of error messages, then I made
types2 pass. I added an exception list for -G=0 to cover those cases
where -G=0 and types give different numbers of error messages.
Because types2 does not run if there are syntax errors, for several
tests, I had to split the tests into two parts in order to get all the
indicated errors to be reported in types2 (bug228.go, bug388.go,
issue11610.go, issue14520.go)
I tried to preserve the GCCGO labeling correctly (but may have gotten
some wrong). When types2 now matches where a GCCGO error previously
occurred, I transformed GCCGO_ERROR -> ERROR. When types2 no longer
reports an error in a certain place, I transformed ERROR -> GCCGO_ERROR.
When types2 reports an error in a new place, I used GC_ERROR.
The remaining entries in types2Failures are things that I think we
probably still need to fix - either actually missing errors in types2,
or cases where types2 gives worse errors than -G=0.
Change-Id: I7f01e82b322b16094096b67d7ed2bb39b410c34f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372854
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
- detect *interface case and report specific error
- replaced switch with sequence of if's for more clarity
- fixed isInterfacePtr: it applies to all interfaces, incl.
type parameters
- reviewed/fixed all uses of isInterfacePtr
- adjusted error messages to be consistently of the format
"type %s is pointer to interface, not interface"
Fixes#48312.
Change-Id: Ic3c8cfcf93ad57ecdb60f6a727cce9e1aa4afb5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/376914
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Added a test to make sure that the private methods of a local generic
type are properly exported, if there is a global variable with that
type.
Added comments in crawler.go, to give more detail and to give more about
the overall purpose.
Fixed one place where t.isFullyInstantiated() should be replaced by
isPtrFullyInstantiated(t), so that we catch pointers to generic types
that may be used as a method receiver.
Change-Id: I9c42d14eb6ebe14d249df7c8fa39e889f7cd3f22
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/374754
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Using type aliases, it's possible to create structs with embedded
fields that have no corresponding type literal notation. However, we
still need to generate a unique name for these types to use for linker
symbols. This CL introduces a new "struct{ Name = Type }" syntax for
use in LinkString formatting to represent these types.
Fixes#50190.
Change-Id: I025ceb09a86e00b7583d3b9885d612f5d6cb44fe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/372914
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Trust: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Finally figured out how to deal with the interaction between generics
and inlining. The problem has been: what to do if you inline a function
that uses a new instantiated type that hasn't been seen in the current
package? This might mean that you need to do another round of
function/method instantiatiations after inlining, which might lead to
more inlining, etc. (which is what we currently do, but it's not clear
when you can stop the inlining/instantiation loop).
We had thought that one solution was to export instantiated types (even
if not marked as exportable) if they are referenced in exported
inlineable functions. But that was quite complex and required changing
the export format. But I realized that we really only need to make sure
the relevant dictionaries and shape instantiations for the instantiated
types are exported, not the instantiated type itself and its wrappers.
The instantiated type is naturally created as needed, and the wrappers
are generated automatically while writing out run-time type (making use
of the exported dictionaries and shape instantiations).
So, we just have to make sure that those dictionaries and shape
instantiations are exported, and then they will be available without any
extra round of instantiations after inlining. We now do this in
crawler.go. This is especially needed when the instantiated type is only
put in an interface, so relevant dictionaries/shape instantiations are
not directly referenced and therefore exported, but are still needed for
the itab.
This fix avoids the phase ordering problem where we might have to keep
creating new type instantiations and instantiated methods after each
round of inlining we do.
Removed the extra round of instantiation/inlining that were added in the
previous fix. The existing tests
test/typeparam{geninline.go,structinit.go} already test this situation
of inlining a function referencing a new instantiated type.
Added the original example from issue 50121 as test (has 5 packages),
since it found a problem with this code that the current simpler test
for 50121 did not find.
Change-Id: Iac5d0dddf4be19376f6de36ee20a83f0d8f213b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/375494
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Similarly to what we do for the built-in function `copy`,
where we allow a string as 2nd argument to append, also
permit a type parameter constrained by string|[]byte.
While at it, change date in the manual.go2 test files so
that we don't need to constantly correct it when copying
a test case from that file into a proper test file.
Fixes#50281.
Change-Id: I23fed66736aa07bb3c481fe97313e828425ac448
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/376214
Trust: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
types2 allows the conversion of a slice of a user-defined byte type B
(not builtin uint8 or byte) to string. But runtime.slicebytetostring
requires a []byte argument, so add in a CONVNOP from []B to []byte if
needed. Same for the conversion of a slice of user-defined rune types to
string.
I made the same change in the transformations of the old typechecker, so
as to keep tcConv() and transformConv() in sync. That fixes the bug for
-G=0 mode as well.
Fixes#23536
Change-Id: Ic79364427f27489187f3f8015bdfbf0769a70d69
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/376056
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 352870 added extra phase for instantiation after inlining, to take
care of the new fully-instantiated types. However, when fetching inlined
body of these types's methods, we need to allow OADDR operations on
untyped expressions, the same as what main inlining phase does.
The problem does not show up, until CL 371554, which made the compiler
do not re-typecheck while importing, thus leaving a OXDOT node to be
marked as address taken when it's not safe to do that.
Fixes#50437
Change-Id: I20076b872182c520075a4f8b84230f5bcb05b341
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/375574
Trust: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Trust: Dan Scales <danscales@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
