This fixes issue 2444.
A big cleanup of all 31/32bit size boundaries i'll leave for another cl though. (see also issue 1700).
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5484058
Refactors the benchmarks and test code.
Now benchmarks can call Errorf, Fail, etc.,
and the runner will act accordingly.
Because functionality has been folded into an
embedded type, a number of methods' docs
no longer appear in godoc output. A fix is
underway; if it doesn't happen fast enough,
I'll add wrapper methods to restore the
documentation.
R=bradfitz, adg, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5492060
I have included a few important microbenchmarks,
but the overall intent is to have mostly end-to-end
benchmarks timing real world operations.
The jsondata.go file is a summary of agl's
activity in various open source repositories.
It gets used as test data for many of the benchmarks.
Everything links into one binary (even the test data)
so that it is easy to run the benchmarks on many
computers: there is just one file to copy around.
R=golang-dev, r, bradfitz, adg, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5484071
This avoids degraded performance caused by extra labels
emitted by inlining (breaking strconv ftoa alloc count unittest) and is better in any case.
R=rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5483071
To allow these types as map keys, we must fill in
equal and hash functions in their algorithm tables.
Structs or arrays that are "just memory", like [2]int,
can and do continue to use the AMEM algorithm.
Structs or arrays that contain special values like
strings or interface values use generated functions
for both equal and hash.
The runtime helper func runtime.equal(t, x, y) bool handles
the general equality case for x == y and calls out to
the equal implementation in the algorithm table.
For short values (<= 4 struct fields or array elements),
the sequence of elementwise comparisons is inlined
instead of calling runtime.equal.
R=ken, mpimenov
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5451105
All but 3 cases (in gcimporter.go and hixie.go)
are automatic conversions using gofix.
No attempt is made to use the new Append functions
even though there are definitely opportunities.
R=golang-dev, gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5447069
This is the result of running `gofix -r hashsum` over the tree, changing
the hash function implementations by hand and then fixing a couple of
instances where gofix didn't catch something.
The changed implementations are as simple as possible while still
working: I'm not trying to optimise in this CL.
R=rsc, cw, rogpeppe
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5448065
The wrong value made Nconv() show "1" for node "-1", and "2" from
node "2+3".
Fixes#2452.
R=gri, lvd, rsc
CC=golang-dev, remy
https://golang.org/cl/5435064
The allowed conversions before and after are:
type Tstring string
type Tbyte []byte
type Trune []rune
string <-> string // ok
string <-> []byte // ok
string <-> []rune // ok
string <-> Tstring // ok
string <-> Tbyte // was illegal, now ok
string <-> Trune // was illegal, now ok
Tstring <-> string // ok
Tstring <-> []byte // ok
Tstring <-> []rune // ok
Tstring <-> Tstring // ok
Tstring <-> Tbyte // was illegal, now ok
Tstring <-> Trune // was illegal, now ok
Update spec, compiler, tests. Use in a few packages.
We agreed on this a few months ago but never implemented it.
Fixes#1707.
R=golang-dev, gri, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5421057
An experiment: allow structs to be copied even if they
contain unexported fields. This gives packages the
ability to return opaque values in their APIs, like reflect
does for reflect.Value but without the kludgy hacks reflect
resorts to.
In general, we trust programmers not to do silly things
like *x = *y on a package's struct pointers, just as we trust
programmers not to do unicode.Letter = unicode.Digit,
but packages that want a harder guarantee can introduce
an extra level of indirection, like in the changes to os.File
in this CL or by using an interface type.
All in one CL so that it can be rolled back more easily if
we decide this is a bad idea.
Originally discussed in March 2011.
https://groups.google.com/group/golang-dev/t/3f5d30938c7c45ef
R=golang-dev, adg, dvyukov, r, bradfitz, jan.mercl, gri
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5372095
