Pending acceptance of CL 101500044
and adjustment of test/fixedbugs/bug299.go.
LGTM=adonovan
R=golang-codereviews, adonovan
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/110160043
The runtime has historically held two dedicated values g (current goroutine)
and m (current thread) in 'extern register' slots (TLS on x86, real registers
backed by TLS on ARM).
This CL removes the extern register m; code now uses g->m.
On ARM, this frees up the register that formerly held m (R9).
This is important for NaCl, because NaCl ARM code cannot use R9 at all.
The Go 1 macrobenchmarks (those with per-op times >= 10 µs) are unaffected:
BenchmarkBinaryTree17 5491374955 5471024381 -0.37%
BenchmarkFannkuch11 4357101311 4275174828 -1.88%
BenchmarkGobDecode 11029957 11364184 +3.03%
BenchmarkGobEncode 6852205 6784822 -0.98%
BenchmarkGzip 650795967 650152275 -0.10%
BenchmarkGunzip 140962363 141041670 +0.06%
BenchmarkHTTPClientServer 71581 73081 +2.10%
BenchmarkJSONEncode 31928079 31913356 -0.05%
BenchmarkJSONDecode 117470065 113689916 -3.22%
BenchmarkMandelbrot200 6008923 5998712 -0.17%
BenchmarkGoParse 6310917 6327487 +0.26%
BenchmarkRegexpMatchMedium_1K 114568 114763 +0.17%
BenchmarkRegexpMatchHard_1K 168977 169244 +0.16%
BenchmarkRevcomp 935294971 914060918 -2.27%
BenchmarkTemplate 145917123 148186096 +1.55%
Minux previous reported larger variations, but these were caused by
run-to-run noise, not repeatable slowdowns.
Actual code changes by Minux.
I only did the docs and the benchmarking.
LGTM=dvyukov, iant, minux
R=minux, josharian, iant, dave, bradfitz, dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/109050043
A single iteration of BenchmarkSaveRestore runs for 5 seconds
on my freebsd machine. 5 seconds looks like too long for a single
iteration.
This is the only benchmark that times out on freebsd-amd64-race builder.
R=golang-codereviews, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107340044
Breaks the build
««« original CL description
cmd/go: build test files containing non-runnable examples
Even if we can't run them, we should at least check that they compile.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107320046
»»»
TBR=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/110140044
Runs for 4 seconds on my mac.
Also this is the only test that times out on freebsd in -race mode.
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/110150045
This CL removes the special syntax for method receivers and
makes it just like other parameters. Instead, the crucial
receiver-specific rules (exactly one receiver, receiver type
must be of the form T or *T) are specified verbally instead
of syntactically.
This is a fully backward-compatible (and minor) syntax
relaxation. As a result, the following syntactic restrictions
(which are completely irrelevant) and which were only in place
for receivers are removed:
a) receiver types cannot be parenthesized
b) receiver parameter lists cannot have a trailing comma
The result of this CL is a simplication of the spec and the
implementation, with no impact on existing (or future) code.
Noteworthy:
- gc already permits a trailing comma at the end of a receiver
declaration:
func (recv T,) m() {}
This is technically a bug with the current spec; this CL will
legalize this notation.
- gccgo produces a misleading error when a trailing comma is used:
error: method has multiple receivers
(even though there's only one receiver)
- Compilers and type-checkers won't need to report errors anymore
if receiver types are parenthesized.
Fixes#4496.
LGTM=iant, rsc
R=r, rsc, iant, ken
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101500044
Even if we can't run them, we should at least check that they compile.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107320046
This CL re-applies the tests added in CL 101330053 and subsequently rolled back in CL 102610043.
The original author of this change was Rui Ueyama <ruiu@google.com>
LGTM=r, ruiu
R=ruiu, r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/109170043
The number of estimated iterations required to reach the benchtime is multiplied by a safety margin (to avoid falling just short) and then rounded up to a readable number. With an accurate estimate, in the worse case, the resulting number of iterations could be 3.75x more than necessary: 1.5x for safety * 2.5x to round up (e.g. from 2eX+1 to 5eX).
This CL reduces the safety margin to 1.2x. Experimentation showed a diminishing margin of return past 1.2x, although the average case continued to show improvements down to 1.05x.
This CL also reduces the maximum round-up multiplier from 2.5x (from 2eX+1 to 5eX) to 2x, by allowing the number of iterations to be of the form 3eX.
Both changes improve benchmark wall clock times, and the effects are cumulative.
From 1.5x to 1.2x safety margin:
package old s new s delta
bytes 163 125 -23%
encoding/json 27 21 -22%
net/http 42 36 -14%
runtime 463 418 -10%
strings 82 65 -21%
Allowing 3eX iterations:
package old s new s delta
bytes 163 134 -18%
encoding/json 27 23 -15%
net/http 42 36 -14%
runtime 463 422 -9%
strings 82 72 -12%
Combined:
package old s new s delta
bytes 163 112 -31%
encoding/json 27 20 -26%
net/http 42 30 -29%
runtime 463 346 -25%
strings 82 60 -27%
LGTM=crawshaw, r, rsc
R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw, r, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/105990045
The previous call to parseRange already checks whether
all the ranges start before the end of file.
LGTM=robert.hencke, bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, robert.hencke, gobot, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/91880044
Update #1435
This proposal disables Setuid and Setgid on all linux platforms.
Issue 1435 has been open for a long time, and it is unlikely to be addressed soon so an argument was made by a commenter
https://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=1435#c45
That these functions should made to fail rather than succeed in their broken state.
LGTM=ruiu, iant
R=iant, ruiu
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/106170043
MOV with SSE registers seems faster than REP MOVSQ if the
size being copied is less than about 2K. Previously we
didn't use MOV if the memory region is larger than 256
byte. This patch improves the performance of 257 ~ 2048
byte non-overlapping copy by using MOV.
Here is the benchmark result on Intel Xeon 3.5GHz (Nehalem).
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkMemmove16 4 4 +0.42%
BenchmarkMemmove32 5 5 -0.20%
BenchmarkMemmove64 6 6 -0.81%
BenchmarkMemmove128 7 7 -0.82%
BenchmarkMemmove256 10 10 +1.92%
BenchmarkMemmove512 29 16 -44.90%
BenchmarkMemmove1024 37 25 -31.55%
BenchmarkMemmove2048 55 44 -19.46%
BenchmarkMemmove4096 92 91 -0.76%
benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup
BenchmarkMemmove16 3370.61 3356.88 1.00x
BenchmarkMemmove32 6368.68 6386.99 1.00x
BenchmarkMemmove64 10367.37 10462.62 1.01x
BenchmarkMemmove128 17551.16 17713.48 1.01x
BenchmarkMemmove256 24692.81 24142.99 0.98x
BenchmarkMemmove512 17428.70 31687.72 1.82x
BenchmarkMemmove1024 27401.82 40009.45 1.46x
BenchmarkMemmove2048 36884.86 45766.98 1.24x
BenchmarkMemmove4096 44295.91 44627.86 1.01x
LGTM=khr
R=golang-codereviews, gobot, khr
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/90500043
sync.Pool is not supposed to be used everywhere, but is
a last resort.
««« original CL description
strings: use sync.Pool to cache buffer
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkByteReplacerWriteString 3596 3094 -13.96%
benchmark old allocs new allocs delta
BenchmarkByteReplacerWriteString 1 0 -100.00%
LGTM=dvyukov
R=bradfitz, dave, dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101330053
»»»
LGTM=dave
R=r, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/102610043
Fixes#8074.
The issue was not reproduceable by revision
go version devel +e0ad7e329637 Thu Jun 19 22:19:56 2014 -0700 linux/arm
But include the original test case in case the issue reopens itself.
LGTM=dvyukov
R=golang-codereviews, dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107290043
This requires minimal changes to the runtime hooks. In particular,
synchronization events must be done only on valid addresses now,
so I've added the additional checks to race.c.
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101000046
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkByteReplacerWriteString 7359 3661 -50.25%
LGTM=dave
R=golang-codereviews, dave
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/102550043
Afterprologue check was required when did not know
about return arguments of functions and/or they were not zeroed.
Now 100% precision is required for stacks due to stack copying,
so it must work w/o afterprologue one way or another.
I can limit this change for 1.3 to merely adding a TODO,
but this check is super confusing so I don't want this knowledge to get lost.
LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, gobot, rsc, khr
CC=golang-codereviews, khr, rsc
https://golang.org/cl/96580045
Use WriteString instead of allocating a byte slice as a
buffer. This was a TODO.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkWriteString 40139 19991 -50.20%
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/107190044
requires a decoder to do its own byte buffering instead of using
bufio.Reader, due to byte stuffing.
benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup
BenchmarkDecodeBaseline 33.40 50.65 1.52x
BenchmarkDecodeProgressive 24.34 31.92 1.31x
On 6g, unsafe.Sizeof(huffman{}) falls from 4872 to 964 bytes, and
the decoder struct contains 8 of those.
LGTM=r
R=r, nightlyone
CC=bradfitz, couchmoney, golang-codereviews, raph
https://golang.org/cl/109050045
This is a clone of 101370043, which I accidentally applied to the
release branch first.
No big deal, it needed to be applied there anyway.
LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/108090043
