malloc checks kindNoPointers and if it is not set and the object
is one pointer in size, it assumes it contains a pointer. So we
must set kindNoPointers correctly; it isn't just a hint.
Fixes#9425
Change-Id: Ia43da23cc3298d6e3d6dbdf66d32e9678f0aedcf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2055
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Replace with uses of //go:linkname in Go files, direct use of name in .s files.
The only one that really truly needs a jump is reflect.call; the jump is now
next to the runtime.reflectcall assembly implementations.
Change-Id: Ie7ff3020a8f60a8e4c8645fe236e7883a3f23f46
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1962
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
issue9400_linux.go did not build on 386 because it used a constant
that was larger than a 32-bit int in a ... argument. Fix this by
casting the constant to uint64 (to match how the constant is being
used).
Change-Id: Ie8cb64c3910382a41c7852be7734a62f0b2d5a21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2060
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
These signals are used by glibc to broadcast setuid/setgid to all
threads and to send pthread cancellations. Unlike other signals, the
Go runtime does not intercept these because they must invoke the libc
handlers (see issues #3871 and #6997). However, because 1) these
signals may be issued asynchronously by a thread running C code to
another thread running Go code and 2) glibc does not set SA_ONSTACK
for its handlers, glibc's signal handler may be run on a Go stack.
Signal frames range from 1.5K on amd64 to many kilobytes on ppc64, so
this may overflow the Go stack and corrupt heap (or other stack) data.
Fix this by ensuring that these signal handlers have the SA_ONSTACK
flag (but not otherwise taking over the handler).
This has been a problem since Go 1.1, but it's likely that people
haven't encountered it because it only affects setuid/setgid and
pthread_cancel.
Fixes#9600.
Change-Id: I6cf5f5c2d3aa48998d632f61f1ddc2778dcfd300
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1887
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Currently when we get a CGI or FCGI request, the remote port of the client
is hard coded to zero, despite nearly every webserver passing down the
REMOTE_PORT variable.
This was likely originally excluded because the CGI RFC (rfc3875) does not
mention anything about the remote port of the client. However every webserver
tested does pass REMOTE_PORT down. This includes Apache 2.2, Apache 2.4,
nginx and lighttpd.
Fixes#8351
Change-Id: I4c6366cb39f0ccc05e038bd31d85f93b76e8d0c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1750
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Broken by e7173dfdfd
Fix by simply disabling the relevant tests.
* bug248 and bug345 require errchk, but we can't
rely on perl being available.
* bug369 is disabled anyway.
Change-Id: Idf73ebccb066943e3fe17c2f662b37238ec74dfe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2052
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Calls to goproc/deferproc used to push & pop two extra arguments,
the argument size and the function to call. Now, we allocate space
for those arguments in the outargs section so we don't have to
modify the SP.
Defers now use the stack pointer (instead of the argument pointer)
to identify which frame they are associated with.
A followon CL might simplify funcspdelta and some of the stack
walking code.
Fixes issue #8641
Change-Id: I835ec2f42f0392c5dec7cb0fe6bba6f2aed1dad8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1601
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
OpenBSD 5.5 changed its kernel ABI and OpenBSD 5.6 enabled it.
This CL works on both 5.5 and 5.6.
Fixes#9102.
Change-Id: I4a295be9ab8acbc99e550d8cb7e8f8dacf3a03c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1932
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Gccgo creates a struct to hold the arguments for the deferred
function. In this example the struct holds a type defined in a
different package. The bug was that gccgo tried to create an equality
function for this struct, and it implemented that function by calling
the equality function for the type defined in the other package.
Since that type is not exported, the reference to the equality
function failed at link time. Normally it is impossible for a struct
to directly contain a member that is an unexported type from another
package, but in this specific case it was possible. Fixed in gccgo
with https://codereview.appspot.com/183500043 .
Change-Id: I8ec3a33631225b9ac2a4ac060cb4d10b4635e60b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1690
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Previously, this code generated bogus section indexes for dynamic
symbols. It turns out this didn't matter, since we only emit these
when generating an executable and in an executable it only matters
whether a symbol is defined or undefined, but it leads to perplexing
code full of mysterious constants.
Unfortunately, this happens too early to put in real section indexes,
so just use section index 1 to distinguish the symbol from an
undefined symbol.
Change-Id: I0e514604bf31f21683598ebd3e020b66acf767ef
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1720
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This will be used by ppc64 to add call stubs to the .text section.
ARM needs a similar pass to generate veneers for arm->thumb
transitions.
Change-Id: Iaee74036e60643a56fab15b564718f359c5910eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2004
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Disabled by default, but invaluable when you need it.
Change-Id: If4a75d11d14f70b6840d339aaec4b940dc406493
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/2012
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
* bug248, bug345, bug369, and bug429 were ported from bash commands to run scripts. bug369 remains disabled.
* bug395 is a test for issue 1909, which is still open. It is marked as skip now and will be usable with compile with run.go when issue 1909 is fixed.
Fixes#4139
Updates #1909
Change-Id: Ibb5fbfb5cf72ddc285829245318eeacd3fb5a636
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1774
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
For arm and powerpc, as well as x86 without aes instructions.
Contains a mixture of ideas from cityhash and xxhash.
Compared to our old fallback on ARM, it's ~no slower on
small objects and up to ~50% faster on large objects. More
importantly, it is a much better hash function and thus has
less chance of bad behavior.
Fixes#8737
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkHash5 173 181 +4.62%
BenchmarkHash16 252 212 -15.87%
BenchmarkHash64 575 419 -27.13%
BenchmarkHash1024 7173 3995 -44.31%
BenchmarkHash65536 516940 313173 -39.42%
BenchmarkHashStringSpeed 300 279 -7.00%
BenchmarkHashBytesSpeed 478 424 -11.30%
BenchmarkHashInt32Speed 217 207 -4.61%
BenchmarkHashInt64Speed 262 231 -11.83%
BenchmarkHashStringArraySpeed 609 631 +3.61%
Change-Id: I0a9335028f32b10ad484966e3019987973afd3eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1360
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Pointers to zero-sized values may end up pointing to the next
object in memory, and possibly off the end of a span. This
can cause memory leaks and/or confuse the garbage collector.
By putting the overflow pointer at the end of the bucket, we
make sure that pointers to any zero-sized keys or values don't
accidentally point to the next object in memory.
fixes#9384
Change-Id: I5d434df176984cb0210b4d0195dd106d6eb28f73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1869
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Handles the case where the parent is pid 1 (common in docker
containers).
Attempted and failed to write a test for this.
Fixes#9263.
Change-Id: I5c6036446c99e66259a4fab1660b6a594f875020
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1372
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Move the symMerge recursion stopping condition
from the beginning of symMerge to the callers.
This halves the number of calls to symMerge
while running 'go test sort'.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkStable1e6 8358117060 7954143849 -4.83%
BenchmarkStable1e4 40116117 38583285 -3.82%
BenchmarkStableInt1K 119150 115182 -3.33%
BenchmarkStableInt64K 9799845 9515475 -2.90%
BenchmarkStableString1K 388901 393516 +1.19%
BenchmarkStable1e2 124917 123618 -1.04%
Change-Id: I7ba2ca277f213b076fe6830e1139edb47ac53800
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1820
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
intDataSize ignores unsigned integers, forcing reads/writes to miss the fast path.
Fixes#8956
Change-Id: Ie79b565b037db3c469aa1dc6d0a8a5a9252d5f0a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1777
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This was a copy-paste error from 9l. Besides incorrectly referring to
cnames9, 6l doesn't even use a->class, so simply remove this.
Fixes#9320
Change-Id: I0e3440c9dae1c3408eb795b3645f9f1dd8f50aed
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1516
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Some applications use unpadded base64 format, omitting the trailing
'=' padding characters from the standard base64 format, either to
minimize size or (more justifiably) to avoid use of the '=' character.
Unpadded flavors are standard and documented in section 3.2 of RFC 4648.
To support these unpadded flavors, this change adds two predefined
encoding variables, RawStdEncoding and RawURLEncoding, for unpadded
encodings using the standard and URL character set, respectively.
The change also adds a function WithPadding() to customize the padding
character or disable padding in a custom Encoding.
Finally, I noticed that the existing base64 test-suite was only
exercising the StdEncoding, and not referencing URLEncoding at all.
This change adds test-suite functionality to exercise all four encodings
(the two existing ones and the two new unpadded flavors),
although it still doesn't run *every* test on all four encodings.
Naming: I used the "Raw" prefix because it's more concise than "Unpadded"
and seemed just as expressive, but I have no strong preferences here.
Another short alternative prefix would be "Min" ("minimal" encoding).
Change-Id: Ic0423e02589b39a6b2bb7d0763bd073fd244f469
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1511
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Couldn't handle a hex string terminated by anything
other than spaces. Easy to fix.
Fixes#9124.
Change-Id: I18f89a0bd99a105c9110e1ede641873bf9daf3af
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1538
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Check for Set error when a boolean flag isn't explicitly given a value.
Fixes#9345
Change-Id: I97a1289f8cf27567d1a726ebe5ef167c800f357c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1897
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Make golint a bit happier
Change-Id: I8a14342f3e492e92bf5efa611f9ef91176624031
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1891
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Given a file of size N, a request for "Range: bytes=N-*" should
return a 416 [1]. Currently, it returns a 206 and a body of 0
bytes, with the illegal Content-Range of "bytes N-(N-1)/N" [2].
[1]: RFC 7233, sec 2.1: "If a valid byte-range-set includes at least one
byte-range-spec with a first-byte-pos that is less than the current
length of the representation, [...]". sec 3.1: "If all of the
preconditions are true, the server supports the Range header field for
the target resource, and the specified range(s) are invalid or
unsatisfiable, the server SHOULD send a 416 (Range Not Satisfiable)
response."
[2]: RFC 7233, sec 4.2: "A Content-Range field value is invalid if it
contains a byte-range-resp that has a last-byte-pos value less than its
first-byte-pos value, [...]"
Fixes#8988
Change-Id: If3e1134e7815f5d361efea01873b29aafe3de817
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1862
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
with uintptr, the check for < 0 will never succeed in mem_plan9.go's
sbrk() because the brk_ syscall returns -1 on failure. fixes the plan9/amd64 build.
this failed on plan9/amd64 because of the attempt to allocate 136GB in mallocinit(),
which failed. it was just by chance that on plan9/386 allocations never failed.
Change-Id: Ia3059cf5eb752e20d9e60c9619e591b80e8fb03c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1590
Reviewed-by: Anthony Martin <ality@pbrane.org>
Reviewed-by: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aram Hăvărneanu <aram@mgk.ro>
Co-hacking with Dave Cheney.
Fixes#9405
Change-Id: I14fc3b6a47dcdb5e514e93d062b804bb24e89f47
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1875
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
Gccgo can only get a backtrace for the currently running thread, which
means that it can only get a backtrace for goroutines currently running
Go code. When a goroutine is running C code, gccgo has no way to stop
it and get the backtrace. This test is all about getting a backtrace
of goroutines running C code, so it can't work for gccgo.
Change-Id: I2dff4403841fb544da7396562ab1193875fc14c3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1904
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Instead of relying on the asm names declared in the gccgo version of
cgo_export.h, just emit a dummy symbol with the right asm name. This
is enough to let the _cgo_main link succeed, which is all that matters
here.
Fixes#9294.
Change-Id: I803990705b6b226ed0adf17dc57b58a9f501b213
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1901
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
This was brought to my attention because a user thought that because
the file was named "example.go" it served as an example of good coding
practice. It's not an example, of course, but may as well use a more
idiomatic style anyhow.
Change-Id: I7aa720f603f09f7d597fb7536dbf46ef09144e28
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1902
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
"x*41" computes the same value as "x*31 + x*7 + x*3" and (when
compiled by gc) requires just one multiply instruction instead of
three.
Alternatively, the expression could be written as "(x<<2+x)<<3 + x" to
use shifts instead of multiplies (which is how GCC optimizes "x*41").
But gc currently emits suboptimal instructions for this expression
anyway (e.g., separate SHL+ADD instructions rather than LEA on
386/amd64). Also, if such an optimization was worthwhile, it would
seem better to implement it as part of gc's strength reduction logic.
Change-Id: I7156b793229d723bbc9a52aa9ed6111291335277
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/1830
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
