The builtin runtime package definitions intentionally diverge from the
actual runtime package's, but this only works as long as they never
overlap.
To make it easier to expand the builtin runtime package, this CL now
loads their definitions into a logically separate "go.runtime"
package. By resetting the package's Prefix field to "runtime", any
references to builtin definitions will still resolve against the real
package runtime.
Fixes#14482.
Passes toolstash -cmp.
Change-Id: I539c0994deaed4506a331f38c5b4d6bc8c95433f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37538
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
This is the escape analysis analog of CL 37499.
Fixes#12397Fixes#16871
The only "moved to heap" decisions eliminated by this
CL in std+cmd are:
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1514: moved to heap: ac
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1515: moved to heap: bd
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1516: moved to heap: bc
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1517: moved to heap: ad
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1546: moved to heap: ac
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1547: moved to heap: bd
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1548: moved to heap: bc
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1549: moved to heap: ad
cmd/compile/internal/gc/const.go:1550: moved to heap: cc_plus
cmd/compile/internal/gc/export.go:162: moved to heap: copy
cmd/compile/internal/gc/mpfloat.go:66: moved to heap: b
cmd/compile/internal/gc/mpfloat.go:97: moved to heap: b
Change-Id: I0d420b69c84a41ba9968c394e8957910bab5edea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37508
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
New special case for booleans and byte-sized integer types
converted to interfaces needs to ensure that the operand is
not too complex, if it were to appear in a parameter list
for example.
Added test, also increased the recursive node dump depth to
a level that was actually useful for an actual bug.
Fixes#19275.
Change-Id: If36ac3115edf439e886703f32d149ee0a46eb2a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37470
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
This should help on the openbsd systems where the test mostly passes.
I don't expect it to help on s390x where the test reliably fails.
But it should give more information when it does fail.
For #19276.
Change-Id: I496c291f2b4b0c747b8dd4315477d87d03010059
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37348
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
CL 35562 substituted zerobase for the pointer for
interfaces containing zero-sized values.
However, it failed to evaluate the zero-sized value
expression for side-effects. Fix that.
The other similar interface value optimizations
are not affected, because they all actually use the
value one way or another.
Fixes#19246
Change-Id: I1168a99561477c63c29751d5cd04cf81b5ea509d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37395
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The new syntax tree introduced with 1.8 represents send statements
(ch <- x) as statements; the old syntax tree represented them as
expressions (and parsed them as such) but complained if they were
used in expression context. As a consequence, some of the errors
that in the past were of the form "ch <- x used as value" now look
like "unexpected <- ..." because a "<-" is not valid according to
Go syntax in those situations. Accept the new error message.
Also: Fine-tune handling of misformed for loop headers.
Also: Minor cleanups/better comments.
Fixes#17590.
Change-Id: Ia541dea1f2f015c1b21f5b3ae44aacdec60a8aba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37386
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The loop-A-encloses-loop-C code did not properly handle the
case where really C was already known to be enclosed by B,
and A was nearest-outer to B, not C.
Fixes#19217.
Change-Id: I755dd768e823cb707abdc5302fed39c11cdb34d4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37340
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Avoid printing a second error message when a field of an undefined
variable is accessed.
Fixes#8440.
Change-Id: I3fe0b11fa3423cec3871cb01b5951efa8ea7451a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36751
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#19012.
Fallback to return signatures without detailed types.
These error message will be of the form of issue:
* https://golang.org/issues/4215
* https://golang.org/issues/6750
So:
func f(x int, y uint) {
return x > y
}
f(10, "a" < 3)
will give errors:
too many errors to return
too many arguments in call to f
instead of:
too many errors to return
have (<T>)
want ()
too many arguments in call to f
have (number, <T>)
want (number, number)
Change-Id: I680abc7cdd8444400e234caddf3ff49c2d69f53d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36806
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Added a flag to generic and various architectures' atomic
operations that are judged to have observable side effects
and thus cannot be dead-code-eliminated.
Test requires GOMAXPROCS > 1 without preemption in loop.
Fixes#19182.
Change-Id: Id2230031abd2cca0bbb32fd68fc8a58fb912070f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37333
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The rules for folding addresses into load/stores checks sym1 is
not on stack (because the stack offset is not known at that point).
But sym1 could be nil, which invalidates the check. Check merged
sym instead.
Fixes#19137.
Change-Id: I8574da22ced1216bb5850403d8f08ec60a8d1005
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37145
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Nil check removal in the same block is disabled due to issue 18725:
because the values are not ordered, a nilcheck may influence a
value that is logically before it. This CL re-enables same-block
nilcheck removal by ordering values in store order first.
Updates #18725.
Change-Id: I287a38525230c14c5412cbcdbc422547dabd54f6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35496
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Until now, the parser set the position for each Node to the position of
the first token belonging to that node. For compatibility with the now
defunct gc parser, in many places that position information was modified
when the gcCompat flag was set (which it was, by default). Furthermore,
in some places, position information was not set at all.
This change removes the gcCompat flag and all associated code, and sets
position information for all nodes in a more principled way, as proposed
by mdempsky (see #16943 for details). Specifically, the position of a
node may not be at the very beginning of the respective production. For
instance for an Operation `a + b`, the position associated with the node
is the position of the `+`. Thus, for `a + b + c` we now get different
positions for the two additions.
This change does not pass toolstash -cmp because position information
recorded in export data and pcline tables is different. There are no
other functional changes.
Added test suite testing the position of all nodes.
Fixes#16943.
Change-Id: I3fc02bf096bc3b3d7d2fa655dfd4714a1a0eb90c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37017
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
CL 35261 introduces special handling of zero-valued STRUCTLIT for
efficient struct zeroing. But it didn't cover all use cases, for
example, CONVNOP STRUCTLIT is not handled.
On the other hand, CL 34566 handles zeroing earlier, so we don't
need the change in CL 35261 for efficient zeroing. Other uses of
zero-valued struct literals are very rare. So undo the change in
walk.go in CL 35261.
Add a test for efficient zeroing.
Fixes#19084.
Change-Id: I0807f7423fb44d47bf325b3c1ce9611a14953853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36955
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Use distinction between explicit and automatically inserted semicolons
to provide a better error message if the condition in an 'if' statement
is missing.
For #18747.
Change-Id: Iac167ae4e5ad53d2dc73f746b4dee9912434bb59
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36930
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Added missing nil-check. We will get rid of the gcCompat corrections
shortly but it's still worthwhile having the new test case added.
Fixes#19056.
Change-Id: I35bd938a4d789058da15724e34c05e5e631ecad0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36908
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Add temporaries to reorder the assignment for OAS2XXX nodes.
This makes orderstmt(), rewrite
a, b, c = ...
as
tmp1, tmp2, tmp3 = ...
a, b, c = tmp1, tmp2, tmp3
and
a, ok = ...
as
t1, t2 = ...
a = t1
ok = t2
Fixes#13433.
Change-Id: Id0f5956e3a254d0a6f4b89b5f7b0e055b1f0e21f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34713
Run-TryBot: Dhananjay Nakrani <dhananjayn@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The gcCompat mode was introduced to match the new parser's node position
setup exactly with the positions used by the original parser. Some of the
gcCompat adjustments were required to satisfy syntax error test cases,
and the rest were required to make toolstash cmp pass.
This change removes the former gcCompat adjustments and instead adjusts
the respective test cases as necessary. In some cases this makes the error
lines consistent with the ones reported by gccgo.
Where it has changed, the position associated with a given syntactic construct
is the position (line/col number) of the left-most token belonging to the
construct.
Change-Id: I5b60c00c5999a895c4d6d6e9b383c6405ccf725c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36695
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Starting the error message with "expecting" rather than "missing"
causes the syntax error mechanism to add additional helpful info
(it recognizes "expecting" but not "missing").
Fixes#17328.
Change-Id: I8482ca5e5a6a6b22e0ed0d831b7328e264156334
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36637
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Towards better syntax error messages: With this change, the parser knows whether
a semicolon was an actual ';' in the source, or whether it was an automatically
inserted semicolon as result of a '\n' or EOF. Using this information in error
messages makes them more understandable.
For #17328.
Change-Id: I8cd9accee8681b62569d0ecef922d38682b401eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36636
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The compiler did not emit write barrier for assigning global with
struct literal, like global = T{} where T contains pointer.
The relevant code path is:
walkexpr OAS var_ OSTRUCTLIT
oaslit
anylit OSTRUCTLIT
walkexpr OAS var_ nil
return without adding write barrier
return true
break (without adding write barrier)
This CL makes oaslit not apply to globals. See also CL
https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/36355/ for an alternative
fix.
The downside of this is that it generates static data for zeroing
struct now. Also this only covers global. If there is any lurking
bug with implicit zeroing other than globals, this doesn't fix.
Fixes#18956.
Change-Id: Ibcd27e4fae3aa38390ffa94a32a9dd7a802e4b37
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36410
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For code such as
if a := 10 { ...
the 1.7 compiler reported
a := 10 used as value
while the 1.8 compiler reported
invalid condition, tag, or type switch guard
Changed the error message to match the 1.7 compiler.
Fixes#18915.
Change-Id: I01308862e461922e717f9f8295a9db53d5a914eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36470
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
We shouldn't use CONVNOP for conversions between two different
nonempty interface types, because we want to update the itab
in those situations.
Fixes#18595
After this CL, we are guaranteed that itabs are unique, that is
there is only one itab per compile-time-type/concrete type pair.
See also the tests in CL 35115 and 35116 which make sure this
invariant holds even for shared libraries and plugins.
Unique itabs are required for CL 34810 (faster type switch code).
R=go1.9
Change-Id: Id27d2e01ded706680965e4cb69d7c7a24ac2161b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35119
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This CL fixes two issues:
1. Load ops were initially always lowered to unsigned loads, even
for signed types. This was fine by itself however LoadReg ops
(used to re-load spilled values) were lowered to signed loads
for signed types. This meant that spills could invalidate
optimizations that assumed the original unsigned load.
2. Types were not always being maintained correctly through rules
designed to eliminate unnecessary zero and sign extensions.
Fixes#18906.
Change-Id: I95785dcadba03f7e3e94524677e7d8d3d3b9b737
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36256
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <munday@ca.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
If there is a defer, and that defer recovers, then the caller
can see all of the output parameters. That means that we must
mark all the output parameters live at any point which might panic.
If there is no defer then this is not necessary. This is implemented.
We could also detect whether there is a recover in any of the defers.
If not, we would need to mark only output params that the defer
actually references (and the closure mechanism already does that).
This is not implemented.
Fixes#18860.
Change-Id: If984fe6686eddce9408bf25e725dd17fc16b8578
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36030
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
When we discover a relation x <= len(s), also discover the relation
x <= cap(s). That way, in situations like:
a := s[x:] // tests 0 <= x <= len(s)
b := s[:x] // tests 0 <= x <= cap(s)
the second check can be eliminated.
Fixes#16813
Change-Id: Ifc037920b6955e43bac1a1eaf6bac63a89cfbd44
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33633
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Moșoi <alexandru@mosoi.ro>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
CSE opportunities were being missed for commutative ops. We used to
order the args of commutative ops (by arg ID) once at the start of CSE.
But that may not be enough.
i1 = (Load ptr mem)
i2 = (Load ptr mem)
x1 = (Add i1 j)
x2 = (Add i2 j)
Equivalent commutative ops x1 and x2 may not get their args ordered in
the same way because because at the start of CSE, we don't know that
the i values will be CSEd. If x1 and x2 get opposite orders we won't
CSE them.
Instead, (re)order the args of commutative operations by their
equivalence class IDs each time we partition an equivalence class.
Change-Id: Ic609fa83b85299782a5e85bf93dc6023fccf4b0c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33632
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Neal <todd@tneal.org>
Fixes#10561.
Provides a better diagnostic message for failed type switch
satisfaction in the case that a value receiver is being used
in place of the pointer receiver that implements and satisfies
the interface.
Change-Id: If8c13ba13f2a8d81bf44bac7c3a66c12921ba921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35235
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#8481.
Inform the user that init functions cannot be directly invoked
in user code, as mandated by the spec at:
http://golang.org/ref/spec#Program_initialization_and_execution.
Change-Id: Ib12c0c08718ffd48b76b6f9b13c76bb6612d2e7b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34790
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#15055.
Updates exprfmt printing using fmt verb "%v" to check that n.Left
is non-nil before attempting to print it, otherwise we'll print
the nodes in the list using verb "%.v".
Credit to @mdempsky for this approach and for finding
the root cause of the issue.
Change-Id: I20a6464e916dc70d5565e145164bb9553e5d3865
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/25361
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Make sure that the lack of an lvalue doesn't
cause extra side-effects.
Updates #18661
Updates #18739
Change-Id: I52eb4b4a5c6f8ff5cddd2115455f853c18112c19
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36126
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
When switching to the new parser, I changed cmd/compile to handle iota
per an intuitive interpretation of how nested constant declarations
should work (which also matches go/types).
Note: if we end up deciding that the current spec wording is
intentional (i.e., confirming gccgo's current behavior), the test will
need to be updated to expect 4 instead of 1.
Updates #15550.
Change-Id: I441f5f13209f172b73ef75031f2a9daa5e985277
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36122
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
