This is true of the existing implementations, and I think
it is an important property to guarantee.
R=golang-dev, r, borman, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5321058
This is not a language change.
Added paragraphs specifying which conversions
yield results that are constants.
R=r, rsc, iant, ken
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4515176
This is (indirectly) a language change. Per e-mail discussion
on golang-dev.
Fixes#1943.
R=rsc, iant, r, ken
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4581058
- Added some additional examples.
- 6g appears to implement this semantics already.
Fixes#658.
R=rsc, r, iant, ken
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4538119
Note: This is not a spec change.
The spec was not clear on the result type of
constant shift expressions. Made it more
explicit and added additional examples.
Also: Remove paragraph on send expressions (they
are statements, now).
Fixes#1708.
R=rsc, r, iant, r
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4517074
This CL proposes some subtle language changes
in an attempt to clarify the semantics of range
clauses and simplify uses of maps.
- nil maps behave like empty maps; but attempting
to set a value in a nil map causes a run-time panic
- nil channels are never ready for communication;
sending or reading from a nil channel blocks forever
- if there is only one index iteration variable in a
range clause and len(range expression) would be a constant,
the range expression is not evaluated.
(was discrepancy with len/cap before)
- the notion of what is a constant expression len(x)
for (pointer to) arrays x has been generalized and
simplified (can still be syntactically decided)
(before: more restrictive syntactic rule that was not
consistently implemented)
Fixes#1713.
R=r, rsc, iant, ken2, r2, bradfitz, rog
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4444050
No language change.
- added a few examples with parentheses
- added a corresponding sentence to assignments
(this explicitly permits: (_) = 0, currently allowed by 6g,
gofmt, but marked as an error by gccgo).
R=rsc, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4446071
The CL introduces inconsistencies with respect to
the use of parentheses/grouping of receive operations.
««« original CL description
spec: narrow syntax for expression and select statements
This is not a language change, it simply expresses the
accepted cases explicitly in the respective productions.
R=rsc, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4428057
»»»
R=golang-dev, rsc1
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4444080
This is not a language change, it simply expresses the
accepted cases explicitly in the respective productions.
R=rsc, r, iant
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4428057
Computer people have an agglutinating streak that I like to resist.
As a time of execution: run time.
As an adjective: run-time.
As a noun: run-time support/code/library.
Signed,
Mr. Pedant.
R=golang-dev, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4252048
- added an example to Type declarations section clarifying the
situation brought up with issue 1324
- slightly re-ordered paragraphs in Types section
- added separate heading for method set section and refer to it
from elsewhere in the spec
- no language changes
R=rsc, r, iant, ken2, r2
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4145043
