Add missing function prototypes.
Fix function prototypes.
Use FP references instead of SP references.
Fix variable names.
Update comments.
Clean up whitespace. (Not for vet.)
All fairly minor fixes to make vet happy.
Updates #11041
Change-Id: Ifab2cdf235ff61cdc226ab1d84b8467b5ac9446c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27713
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The Source provided by math/rand relies on an array of cooked
pseudo-random 63bit integers for seeding. The origin of these
numbers is undocumented.
Add a standalone program in math/rand folder that generates
the 63bit integer array as well as a 64bit version supporting
extension of the Source to 64bit pseudo-random number
generation while maintaining the current sequence in the
lower 63bit.
The code is largely based on the initial implementation of the
random number generator in the go repository by Ken Thompson
(revision 399).
Change-Id: Ib4192aea8127595027116a0f5a7be53f11dc110b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22230
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
There are no synchronization points protecting the readVal and readPos
variables. This leads to a race when Read is called concurrently.
Fix this by adding methods to lockedSource, which is the case where
a race matters.
Fixes#16308.
Change-Id: Ic028909955700906b2d71e5c37c02da21b0f4ad9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24852
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Do not throw away the rest of Int63 value used for
generation random bytes. Save it in Rand struct and
re-use during the next Read call.
Fixes#16124
Change-Id: Ic70bd80c3c3a6590e60ac615e8b3c2324589bea3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24251
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#15788
Change-Id: I5a1fd1e5992f1c16cf8d8437d742bf02e1653b9c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23461
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Previously, a 0 mantissa was special-cased during big.Float
parsing, but not during big.Rat parsing. This meant that a value
like 0e9999999999 would parse successfully in big.Float.SetString,
but would hang in big.Rat.SetString. This discrepancy became an
issue in https://golang.org/src/go/constant/value.go?#L250,
where the big.Float would report an exponent of 0, so
big.Rat.SetString would be used and would subsequently hang.
A Go Playground example of this is https://play.golang.org/p/3fy28eUJuF
The solution is to special-case a zero mantissa during big.Rat
parsing as well, so that neither big.Rat nor big.Float will hang when
parsing a value with 0 mantissa but a large exponent.
This was discovered using go-fuzz on CockroachDB:
https://github.com/cockroachdb/go-fuzz/blob/master/examples/parser/main.goFixes#16176
Change-Id: I775558a8682adbeba1cc9d20ba10f8ed26259c56
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24430
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
shortens code and gives an example of the use of Run.
Change-Id: I75ffaf762218a589274b4b62e19022e31e805d1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23424
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Document the fact that the default Source uses only
the bottom 31 bits of the given seed.
Fixes#15788
Change-Id: If20d1ec44a55c793a4a0a388f84b9392c2102bd1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23352
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Follow-up to https://golang.org/cl/21755.
This turned out to be a bit more than just a few nits
as originally expected in that CL.
1) The actual mantissa may be shorter than required for the
given precision (because of trailing 0's): no need to
allocate space for it (and transmit 0's). This can save
a lot of space when the precision is high: E.g., for
prec == 1000, 16 words or 128 bytes are required at the
most, but if the actual number is short, it may be much
less (for the test cases present, it's significantly less).
2) The actual mantissa may be longer than the number of
words required for the given precision: make sure to
not overflow when encoding in bytes.
3) Add more documentation.
4) Add more tests.
Change-Id: I9f40c408cfdd9183a8e81076d2f7d6c75e7a00e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22324
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Added GobEncode/Decode and a test for them.
Fixes#14593
Change-Id: Ic8d3efd24d0313a1a66f01da293c4c1fd39764a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21755
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
cmd and runtime were handled separately, and I'm intentionally skipped
syscall. This is the rest of the standard library.
CL generated mechanically with github.com/mdempsky/unconvert.
Change-Id: I9e0eff886974dedc37adb93f602064b83e469122
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22104
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Converting a big.Float value x to a float32/64 value did not correctly
round x up to the smallest denormal float32/64 if x was smaller than the
smallest denormal float32/64, but larger than 0.5 of a smallest denormal
float32/64.
Handle this case explicitly and simplify some code in the turn.
For #14651.
Change-Id: I025e24bf8f0e671581a7de0abf7c1cd7e6403a6c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20816
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
'b' is a standard verb for floating point values. The runes like '+'
and '#' are called "flags" by package fmt's documentation. The flag
'-' controls left/right justification, not anything related to signs.
Change-Id: Ia9cf81b002df373f274ce635fe09b5bd0066aa1c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20930
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing implementation uses code written in Go to
implement Sqrt; this adds the assembler to use the sqrt
instruction for Power and makes the necessary changes to
allow it to be inlined.
The following tests showed this relative improvement:
benchmark delta
BenchmarkSqrt -97.91%
BenchmarkSqrtIndirect -96.65%
BenchmarkSqrtGo -35.93%
BenchmarkSqrtPrime -96.94%
Fixes#14349
Change-Id: I8074f4dc63486e756587564ceb320aca300bf5fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19515
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Adds a type of output to Examples that allows tests to have unordered
output. This is intended to help clarify when the output of a command
will produce a fixed return, but that return might not be in an constant
order.
Examples where this is useful would be documenting the rand.Perm()
call, or perhaps the (os.File).Readdir(), both of which can not guarantee
order, but can guarantee the elements of the output.
Fixes#10149
Change-Id: Iaf0cf1580b686afebd79718ed67ea744f5ed9fc5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19280
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
When a big.Float is converted to a denormal float32/64, the rounding
precision depends on the size of the denormal. Rounding may round up
and thus change the size (exponent) of the denormal. Recompute the
correct precision again for correct placement of the mantissa.
Fixes#14553.
Change-Id: Iedab5810a2d2a405cc5da28c6de7be34cb035b86
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20198
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
It appears to be a trivial dreg. Unreferenced. Gone.
Change-Id: I4a5ceed48e84254bc8a07fdb04487a18a0edf965
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20122
Run-TryBot: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Cheney <dave@cheney.net>
The tree's pretty inconsistent about single space vs double space
after a period in documentation. Make it consistently a single space,
per earlier decisions. This means contributors won't be confused by
misleading precedence.
This CL doesn't use go/doc to parse. It only addresses // comments.
It was generated with:
$ perl -i -npe 's,^(\s*// .+[a-z]\.) +([A-Z]),$1 $2,' $(git grep -l -E '^\s*//(.+\.) +([A-Z])')
$ go test go/doc -update
Change-Id: Iccdb99c37c797ef1f804a94b22ba5ee4b500c4f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20022
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Day <djd@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a subset of https://golang.org/cl/20022 with only the copyright
header lines, so the next CL will be smaller and more reviewable.
Go policy has been single space after periods in comments for some time.
The copyright header template at:
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#copyright
also uses a single space.
Make them all consistent.
Change-Id: Icc26c6b8495c3820da6b171ca96a74701b4a01b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20111
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Takes 3% off my all.bash run time.
For #10571.
Change-Id: I8f00f523d6919e87182d35722a669b0b96b8218b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18087
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also fix bug reported in CL 17510.
Found during fix of #13515 in CL 17672, but separate from the fix.
Change-Id: I4b1024569a98f5cfd2ebb442ec3d64356164d284
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17673
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Replaced code that substituted 0 for rounded-up 1 with
code to try again. This has minimal effect on the existing
stream of random numbers, but restores uniformity.
Fixes#12290.
Change-Id: Ib68f0b0a4a173339bcd0274cc16509f7b0977de8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17670
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
ˆ (U+02C6) is a circumflex accent, not an exponentiation operator.
In the rest of the source code for this package, exponentation is
written as **, so do the same here.
Change-Id: I107b85be242ab79d152eb8a6fcf3ca2b197d7658
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17671
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Found by github user asukakenji.
Change-Id: I4c76316b69e8a243fb6bf280283f3722e728d853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17641
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Noticed by cmd/vet.
Expected values array produced by Python instead of Keisan because:
1) Keisan's website calculator is painfully difficult to copy/paste
values into and out of, and
2) after tediously computing e^(vf[i] * 10) - 1 via Keisan I
discovered that Keisan computing vf[i]*10 in a higher precision was
giving substantially different output values.
Also, testing uses "close" instead of "veryclose" because 386's
assembly implementation produces values for some of the test cases
that fail "veryclose". Curiously, Expm1(vf[i]*10) is identical to
Exp(vf[i]*10)-1 on 386, whereas with the portable implementation
they're only "veryclose".
Investigating these questions is left to someone else. I just wanted
to fix the cmd/vet warning.
Fixes#13101.
Change-Id: Ica8f6c267d01aa4cc31f53593e95812746942fbc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16505
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Klaus Post <klauspost@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
The bug number was a typo, and I forgot to switch the implementation
back to if statements after the change from Float64bits in the first
patchset back to branching.
if statements can currently be inlined, but switch cannot (#13071)
Change-Id: I81d0cf64bda69186c3d747a07047f6a694f8fa70
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16446
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The compiler can do a fine job, and can also inline it.
From Jeremy Jackins's observation and rsc's recommendation in thread:
"Pure Go math.Abs outperforms assembly version"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-dev/nP5mWvwAXZo
Updates #13095
Change-Id: I3066f8eaa327bb403173b29791cc8661d7c0532c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16444
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
