The caller of mmap expects it to return a positive errno value, but the
linux-arm64 and nacl-386 system calls returned a negative errno value.
Correct them to negate the errno value.
The caller of mincore expects it to return a negative errno value (yes,
this is inconsistent), but the linux-mips64x and linux-ppc64x system
call returned a positive errno value. Correct them to negate the errno
value.
Add a test that mmap returns errno with the correct sign. Brad added a
test for mincore's errno value in https://golang.org/cl/19457.
Fixes#14297.
Change-Id: I2b93f32e679bd1eae1c9aef9ae7bcf0ba39521b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19455
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When using a stack-allocated buffer for the result, don't
expose the uninitialized portion of it by restricting its
capacity to its length.
The other option is to zero the portion between len and cap.
That seems like more work, but might be worth it if the caller
then appends some stuff to the result. But this close to 1.6,
I'm inclined to do the simplest fix possible.
Fixes#14232
Change-Id: I21c50d3cda02fd2df4d60ba5e2cfe2efe272f333
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19231
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Currently it's possible for the scheduler to deadlock with the right
confluence of locked Gs, assists, and scheduling of background mark
workers. Broadly, this happens because handoffp is stricter than
findrunnable, and if the only work for a P is GC work, handoffp will
put the P into idle, rather than starting an M to execute that P. One
way this can happen is as follows:
0. There is only one user G, which we'll call G 1. There is more than
one P, but they're all idle except the one running G 1.
1. G 1 locks itself to an M using runtime.LockOSThread.
2. GC starts up and enters mark 1.
3. G 1 performs a GC assist, which completes mark 1 without being
fully satisfied. Completing mark 1 causes all background mark
workers to park. And since the assist isn't fully satisfied, it
parks as well, waiting for a background mark worker to satisfy its
remaining assist debt.
4. The assist park enters the scheduler. Since G 1 is locked to the M,
the scheduler releases the P and calls handoffp to hand the P to
another M.
5. handoffp checks the local and global run queues, which are empty,
and sees that there are idle Ps, so rather than start an M, it puts
the P into idle.
At this point, all of the Gs are waiting and all of the Ps are idle.
In particular, none of the GC workers are running, so no mark work
gets done and the assist on the main G is never satisfied, so the
whole process soft locks up.
Fix this by making handoffp start an M if there is GC work. This
reintroduces a key invariant: that in any situation where findrunnable
would return a G to run on a P, handoffp for that P will start an M to
run work on that P.
Fixes#13645.
Tested by running 2,689 iterations of `go tool dist test -no-rebuild
runtime:cpu124` across 10 linux-amd64-noopt VMs with no failures.
Without this change, the failure rate was somewhere around 1%.
Performance change is negligible.
name old time/op new time/op delta
XBenchGarbage-12 2.48ms ± 2% 2.48ms ± 1% -0.24% (p=0.000 n=92+93)
name old time/op new time/op delta
BinaryTree17-12 2.86s ± 2% 2.87s ± 2% ~ (p=0.667 n=19+20)
Fannkuch11-12 2.52s ± 1% 2.47s ± 1% -2.05% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
FmtFprintfEmpty-12 51.7ns ± 1% 51.5ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.931 n=16+20)
FmtFprintfString-12 170ns ± 1% 168ns ± 1% -0.65% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
FmtFprintfInt-12 160ns ± 0% 160ns ± 0% +0.18% (p=0.033 n=17+19)
FmtFprintfIntInt-12 265ns ± 1% 273ns ± 1% +2.98% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
FmtFprintfPrefixedInt-12 235ns ± 1% 239ns ± 1% +1.99% (p=0.000 n=16+19)
FmtFprintfFloat-12 315ns ± 0% 315ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.250 n=17+19)
FmtManyArgs-12 1.04µs ± 1% 1.05µs ± 0% +0.87% (p=0.000 n=17+19)
GobDecode-12 7.93ms ± 0% 7.85ms ± 1% -1.03% (p=0.000 n=16+18)
GobEncode-12 6.62ms ± 1% 6.58ms ± 1% -0.60% (p=0.000 n=18+19)
Gzip-12 322ms ± 1% 320ms ± 1% -0.46% (p=0.009 n=20+20)
Gunzip-12 42.5ms ± 1% 42.5ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.751 n=19+19)
HTTPClientServer-12 69.7µs ± 1% 70.0µs ± 2% ~ (p=0.056 n=19+19)
JSONEncode-12 16.9ms ± 1% 16.7ms ± 1% -1.13% (p=0.000 n=19+19)
JSONDecode-12 61.5ms ± 1% 61.3ms ± 1% -0.35% (p=0.001 n=20+17)
Mandelbrot200-12 3.94ms ± 0% 3.91ms ± 0% -0.67% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
GoParse-12 3.71ms ± 1% 3.70ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.244 n=17+19)
RegexpMatchEasy0_32-12 101ns ± 1% 102ns ± 2% +0.54% (p=0.037 n=19+20)
RegexpMatchEasy0_1K-12 349ns ± 0% 350ns ± 0% +0.33% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
RegexpMatchEasy1_32-12 84.5ns ± 2% 84.2ns ± 1% -0.43% (p=0.048 n=19+20)
RegexpMatchEasy1_1K-12 510ns ± 1% 513ns ± 2% +0.58% (p=0.002 n=18+20)
RegexpMatchMedium_32-12 132ns ± 1% 134ns ± 1% +0.95% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchMedium_1K-12 40.1µs ± 1% 39.6µs ± 1% -1.39% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
RegexpMatchHard_32-12 2.08µs ± 0% 2.06µs ± 1% -0.95% (p=0.000 n=18+18)
RegexpMatchHard_1K-12 62.2µs ± 1% 61.9µs ± 1% -0.42% (p=0.001 n=19+20)
Revcomp-12 537ms ± 0% 536ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.076 n=20+20)
Template-12 71.3ms ± 1% 69.3ms ± 1% -2.75% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
TimeParse-12 361ns ± 0% 360ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.056 n=19+19)
TimeFormat-12 353ns ± 0% 352ns ± 0% -0.23% (p=0.000 n=17+18)
[Geo mean] 62.6µs 62.5µs -0.17%
Change-Id: I0fbbbe4d7d99653ba5600ffb4394fa03558bc4e9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19107
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Tested by hand with a runtime/cgo modified to return an mmap failure
after 10 calls.
This is an interim patch. For 1.7 we should fix mmap properly to avoid
using the same value as both a pointer and an errno value.
Fixes#14149.
Change-Id: I8f2bbd47d711e283001ba73296f1c34a26c59241
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19084
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
We might be forwarding to a C signal handler. C code expects the stack
to be aligned. Should fix darwin/386 build: the testcarchive tests were
hanging as the program got an endless series of SIGSEGV signals.
Change-Id: Ia02485d3736a3c40e12259f02d25f842cf8e4d29
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19025
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
It's awkward to get a string value in cgoCheckArg, but SWIG testing
revealed that it is possible. The new handling of extra files in the
ptr.go test emulates what SWIG does with an exported function that
returns a string.
Change-Id: I453717f867b8a49499576c28550e7c93053a0cf8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19020
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This makes "CGO_ENABLED=0 go list runtime/cgo" work,
which fixes the current cmd/go test failure.
Change-Id: Ia55ce3ba1dbb09f618ae5f4c8547722670360f59
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19001
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
We set GOMAXPROCS=1 to prevent test flakiness.
There are two sources of flakiness:
1. Some tests rely on particular execution order.
If the order is different, race does not happen at all.
2. Ironically, ThreadSanitizer runtime contains a logical race condition
that can lead to false negatives if racy accesses happen literally at the same time.
Tests used to work reliably in the good old days of GOMAXPROCS=1.
So let's set it for now. A more reliable solution is to explicitly annotate tests
with required execution order by means of a special "invisible" synchronization primitive
(that's what is done for C++ ThreadSanitizer tests). This is issue #14119.
This reduces flakes on RaceAsFunc3 test from 60/3000 to 1/3000.
Fixes#14086Fixes#14079Fixes#14035
Change-Id: Ibaec6b2b21e27b62563bffbb28473a854722cf41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18968
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
CL 18964 included an extra patch (sorry, my first experience of
git-codereview) which defined the conventional breakpoint instruction
used by Plan 9 on arm, but also introduced a benign but unneeded
call to runtime.emptyfunc. This CL removes the redundant call again.
This completes the series of CLs which add support for Plan 9 on arm.
Change-Id: Id293cfd40557c9d79b4b6cb164ed7ed49295b178
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19010
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Fields in Plan 9 object headers are big-endian, on all architectures.
Change-Id: If95ad29750b776338178d660646568bf26a4abda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18964
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
It's possible for arena_start+MaxArena32 to wrap.
We do the right thing in the bounds check but not in the print.
For #13992 (to fix the print there, not the bug).
Change-Id: I4df845d0c03f0f35461b128e4f6765d3ccb71c6d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18975
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The previous CL is the real fix. This one is just insurance.
Fixes#14046 again.
Change-Id: I553349504bb1789e4b66c888dbe4034568918ad6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18977
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
It was just completely broken if you gave it the number
of records it asked for. Make it impossible for that particular
inconsistency to happen again.
Also make it exclude system goroutines, to match both
NumGoroutine and Stack.
Fixes#14046.
Change-Id: Ic238c6b89934ba7b47cccd3440dd347ed11e4c3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18976
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Currently p.gcBgMarkWorker is a *g. Change it to a guintptr. This
eliminates a write barrier during the subtle mark worker parking dance
(which isn't known to be causing problems, but may).
Change-Id: Ibf12c05ac910820448059e69a68e5b882c993ed8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18970
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
traceEvent records system call events after a G has already entered
_Gsyscall, which means the garbage collector could be installing stack
barriers in the G's stack during the traceEvent. If traceEvent
attempts to capture the user stack during this, it may observe a
inconsistent stack barriers and panic. Fix this by acquiring the stack
lock around the stack walk in traceEvent.
Fixes#14101.
Change-Id: I15f0ab0c70c04c6e182221f65a6f761c5a896459
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18973
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Currently mark workers attach to their designated Ps before parking,
either during initialization or after performing a phase transition.
However, in both of these cases, it's possible that the mark worker is
running on a different P than the one it attaches to. This is a
problem, because as soon as the worker attaches to a P, that P's
scheduler can execute the worker. If the worker hasn't yet parked on
the P it's actually running on, this means the worker G will be
running in two places at once. The most visible consequence of this is
that once the first instance of the worker does park, it will clear
g.m and the second instance will crash shortly when it tries to use
g.m.
Fix this by moving the attach to the gopark callback. At this point,
the G is genuinely stopped and the callback is running on the system
stack, so it's safe for another P's scheduler to pick up the worker G.
Fixes#13363. Fixes#13978.
Change-Id: If2f7c4a4174f9511f6227e14a27c56fb842d1cc8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18761
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Currently we run profiling tests for around 200ms in short mode.
However, even on platforms with good profiling, these tests are
inherently flaky, especially on loaded systems like the builders.
To mitigate this, modify the profiling test harness so that if a test
fails in a way that could indicate there just weren't enough samples,
it retries with a longer duration.
This requires some adjustment to the profile checker to distinguish
"fatal" and "retryable" errors. In particular, we no longer consider
it a fatal error to get a profile with zero samples (which we
previously treated as a parse error). We replace this with a retryable
check that the total number of samples is reasonable.
Fixes#13943. Fixes#13871. Fixes#13223.
Change-Id: I9a08664a7e1734c5334b1f3792a56184fe314c4d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18683
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use of the alternate signal stack on darwin/{arm,arm64} is reportedly
buggy, and the runtime function sigaltstack does nothing. So don't
check the sigaltstack result to decide how to handle the signal stack.
Fixes#14070.
Change-Id: Ie97ede8895fad721e3acc79225f2cafcbe1f3a81
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18940
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
When using c-archive/c-shared, the signal handler for SIGPROF will not
be installed, which means that runtime/pprof.StartCPUProfile won't work.
There is no really good solution here, as the main program may want to
do its own profiling. For now, just document that runtime/pprof doesn't
work as expected, but that it will work if you use Notify to install the
Go signal handler.
Fixes#14043.
Change-Id: I7ff7a01df6ef7f63a7f050aac3674d640a246fb4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18911
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
On NetBSD and DragonFly a newly created thread inherits the signal stack
of the creating thread. That means that in a cgo program a C thread
created using pthread_create will get the signal stack of the creating
thread, most likely a Go thread. This will then lead to chaos if two
signals occur simultaneously.
We can't fix the general case. But we can fix the case of a C thread
that calls a Go function, by installing a new signal stack and then
dropping it when we return to C. That will break the case of a C thread
that calls sigaltstack and then calls Go, because we will drop the C
thread's alternate signal stack as we return from Go. Still, this is
the 1.5 behavior. And what else can we do?
Fixes#14051.
Fixes#14052.
Fixes#14067.
Change-Id: Iee286ca50b50ec712a4d929c7121c35e2383a7b9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18835
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Use the standard names, for discoverability.
Use the standard register arguments, for correctness.
Implement all possible arguments, for completeness.
Enable the corresponding tests now that everything is standard.
Update the uses in package runtime.
Fixes#14068.
Change-Id: I8e1af9a41e7d02d98c2a82af3d4cdb3e9204824f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18852
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
It doesn't work and I don't know why.
Update #14063.
Change-Id: I42735012cf6247eca5336f29fcf713e08c8477f8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18817
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
On NetBSD a signal handler returns to the kernel by calling the
setcontext system call with the context passed to the signal handler.
The implementation of runtime·sigreturn_tramp for amd64, copied from the
NetBSD libc, expects that context address to be in r15. That works in
the NetBSD libc because r15 is preserved across the call to the signal
handler. It fails in the Go library because r15 is not preserved.
There are various ways to fix this; this one uses the simple approach,
essentially identical to the one in the NetBSD libc, of preserving r15
across the signal handler proper.
Looking at the code for 386 and arm suggests that they are OK. However,
I have not actually tested them.
Update #14052.
Change-Id: I2b516b1d05fe5d3b8911e65ca761d621dc37fa1b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18815
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
On NetBSD and DragonFly a newly created thread inherits the signal stack
of the creating thread. This breaks horribly if both threads get a
signal at the same time. Fix this by dropping the signal stack in the
newly created thread. The right signal stack will then get installed
later.
Note that cgo code that calls pthread_create will have the wrong,
duplicated, signal stack in the newly created thread. I don't see any
way to fix that in Go. People using cgo to call pthread_create will
have to be aware of the problem.
Fixes#13945.
Fixes#13947.
Change-Id: I0c7bd2cdf9ada575d57182ca5e9523060de34931
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18814
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
I'm not sure what the convert function was intended to be.
Fixes#14011
Change-Id: I29d905bc1827936b9433b20b13b7a0b0ac5f502e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18712
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is testing code in asm_GOARCH.s, so it's not necessary to run the
test on systems where it doesn't build.
Fixes#13991.
Change-Id: Ia7a2d3a34b32e6987dc67428c1e09e63baf0518a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18707
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
GC assists check gcBlackenEnabled under the assist queue lock to avoid
going to sleep after gcWakeAllAssists has already woken all assists.
However, currently we clear gcBlackenEnabled shortly *after* waking
all assists, which opens a window where this exact race can happen.
Fix this by clearing gcBlackenEnabled before waking blocked assists.
However, it's unlikely this actually matters because the world is
stopped between waking assists and clearing gcBlackenEnabled and there
aren't any obvious allocations during this window, so I don't think an
assist could actually slip in to this race window.
Updates #13645.
Change-Id: I7571f059530481dc781d8fd96a1a40aadebecb0d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18682
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Also adds missing nosplit to unminit.
Fixes#13964.
Change-Id: I07d93a8c872a255a89f91f808b66c889f0a6a69c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18658
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
While the default behavior of eliding runtime frames from tracebacks
usually makes sense, this is not the case when you're trying to test
the runtime itself. Fix this by forcing the traceback level to at
least "system" in the runtime tests.
This will specifically help with debugging issue #13645, which has
proven remarkably resistant to reproduction outside of the build
dashboard itself.
Change-Id: I2a8356ba6c3c5badba8bb3330fc527357ec0d296
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18648
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
This doesn't fix a bug, but may improve performance in programs that
have many concurrent calls from C to Go. The old code made several
system calls between lockextra and unlockextra. That could be happening
while another thread is spinning acquiring lockextra. This changes the
code to not make any system calls while holding the lock.
Change-Id: I50576478e478670c3d6429ad4e1b7d80f98a19d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18548
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TestFutexsleep is supposed to clean up before returning by waking up
the goroutines it started and left blocked in futex sleeps. However,
it currently fails at this in several ways:
1. Both the sleep and wakeup are done on the address of tt.mtx, but in
both cases tt is a *local copy* of the futexsleepTest created by a
loop, so the sleep and wakeup happen on completely different
addresses. Fix this by making them both use the address of the
global tt.mtx.
2. If the sleep happens after the wakeup (not likely, but not
impossible), it won't wake up. Fix this by using the futex protocol
properly: sleep if the mutex's value is 0, and set the mutex's
value to non-zero before doing the wakeup.
3. If TestFutexsleep runs more than once, channels and mutex values
left over from the first run will interfere with later runs. Fix
this by clearing the mutex value and creating a new channel for
each test and waiting for goroutines to finish before returning
(lest they send their completion to the channel for the next run).
As an added bonus, this test now actually tests that futex
sleep/wakeup work. Previously this test would have been satisfied if
futexsleep was an infinite loop and futexwakeup was a no-op.
Change-Id: I1cbc6871cc9dcb8f4601b3621913bec2b79b0fc3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18617
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
CMOVs were not introduced until P6. We need 386 to run on
Pentium MMX.
Fixes#13923
Change-Id: Iee9572cd83e64c3a1336bc1e6b300b048fbcc996
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18621
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Add several instructions that were used via BYTE and use them.
Instructions added: PEXTRB, PEXTRD, PEXTRQ, PINSRB, XGETBV, POPCNT.
Change-Id: I5a80cd390dc01f3555dbbe856a475f74b5e6df65
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18593
Run-TryBot: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
A bit cleanuppy for 1.6 maybe, but something I happened to notice.
Change-Id: I70f3b48445f4f527d67f7b202b6171195440b09f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18550
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
