The go:nosplit change wasn't the problem, reinstating.
««« original CL description
undo CL 93380044 / 7f0999348917
Partial undo, just of go:nosplit annotation. Somehow it
is breaking the windows builders.
TBR=bradfitz
««« original CL description
runtime: implement string ops in Go
Also implement go:nosplit annotation. Not really needed
for now, but we'll definitely need it for other conversions.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkRuneIterate 534 474 -11.24%
BenchmarkRuneIterate2 535 470 -12.15%
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, dave, bradfitz, minux
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/93380044
»»»
TBR=bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/105260044
»»»
TBR=bradfitz
R=bradfitz, golang-codereviews
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/103490043
Partial undo, just of go:nosplit annotation. Somehow it
is breaking the windows builders.
TBR=bradfitz
««« original CL description
runtime: implement string ops in Go
Also implement go:nosplit annotation. Not really needed
for now, but we'll definitely need it for other conversions.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkRuneIterate 534 474 -11.24%
BenchmarkRuneIterate2 535 470 -12.15%
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, dave, bradfitz, minux
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/93380044
»»»
TBR=bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/105260044
Also implement go:nosplit annotation. Not really needed
for now, but we'll definitely need it for other conversions.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkRuneIterate 534 474 -11.24%
BenchmarkRuneIterate2 535 470 -12.15%
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, dave, bradfitz, minux
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/93380044
We don't need to shift array elements to shuffle them.
We just have to swap a selected element with 0th element.
LGTM=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/91750044
Printf("%x", "abc") was "0x610x620x63"; is now "0x616263", which
is surely better.
Printf("% #x", "abc") is still "0x61 0x62 0x63".
Fixes#8080.
LGTM=bradfitz, gri
R=golang-codereviews, bradfitz, gri
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/106990043
Also added a test to verify os.Getppid() works across all platforms
LGTM=alex.brainman
R=golang-codereviews, alex.brainman, shreveal, iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/102320044
Reportedly in the Linux 3.16 kernel the VDSO will not have
section headers or a normal symbol table.
Too late for 1.3 but perhaps for 1.3.1, if there is one.
Fixes#8197.
LGTM=rsc
R=golang-codereviews, mattn.jp, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101260044
bufio.Scanner.Scan returns whether the scan succeeded, not whether it
is done, so the test was mistakenly breaking early.
LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/93670045
makes windows-amd64-race benchmarks slower
««« original CL description
testing: make benchmarking faster
Allow the number of benchmark iterations to grow faster for fast benchmarks, and don't round up twice.
Using the default benchtime, this CL reduces wall clock time to run benchmarks:
net/http 49s -> 37s (-24%)
runtime 8m31s -> 5m55s (-30%)
bytes 2m37s -> 1m29s (-43%)
encoding/json 29s -> 21s (-27%)
strings 1m16s -> 53s (-30%)
LGTM=crawshaw
R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101970047
»»»
TBR=josharian
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/105950044
It appears that something about Go on Windows
cannot handle the fault cause by a jump to address 0.
The way Go represents and calls functions, this
never happened at all, until CL 105140044.
This CL changes the code added in CL 105140044
to make jump to 0 impossible once again.
Fixes#8047. (again, on Windows)
TBR=bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, dave
CC=adg, golang-codereviews, iant, r
https://golang.org/cl/105120044
Rob asked for this change to make maintaining go1.4.txt easier.
If you are not sure of a change, it is still okay to send for review.
LGTM=r
R=r
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/109880044
jmpdefer modifies PC, SP, and LR, and not atomically,
so walking past jmpdefer will often end up in a state
where the three are not a consistent execution snapshot.
This was causing warning messages a few frames later
when the traceback realized it was confused, but given
the right memory it could easily crash instead.
Update #8153
LGTM=minux, iant
R=golang-codereviews, minux, iant
CC=golang-codereviews, r
https://golang.org/cl/107970043
The test requires that timerproc runs, but busy loops and starves
the scheduler so that, with high probability, timerproc doesn't run.
Avoid the issue by expecting the test to succeed; if not, a major
outside timeout will kill it and let us know.
As you can see from the diffs, there have been several attempts to
fix this with chicanery, but none has worked. Don't bother trying
any more.
Fixes#8136.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc, josharian
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/105140043
Allow the number of benchmark iterations to grow faster for fast benchmarks, and don't round up twice.
Using the default benchtime, this CL reduces wall clock time to run benchmarks:
net/http 49s -> 37s (-24%)
runtime 8m31s -> 5m55s (-30%)
bytes 2m37s -> 1m29s (-43%)
encoding/json 29s -> 21s (-27%)
strings 1m16s -> 53s (-30%)
LGTM=crawshaw
R=golang-codereviews, crawshaw
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101970047
Call copy with as large buffer as possible to reduce the
number of function calls.
benchmark old ns/op new ns/op delta
BenchmarkBytesRepeat 540 162 -70.00%
BenchmarkStringsRepeat 563 177 -68.56%
LGTM=josharian
R=golang-codereviews, josharian, dave, dvyukov
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/90550043
Previously, an input string was stripped of newline
characters at the beginning of DecodeString and then passed
to Decode. Decode again tried to strip newline characters.
That's waste of time.
benchmark old MB/s new MB/s speedup
BenchmarkDecodeString 38.37 65.20 1.70x
LGTM=dave, bradfitz
R=golang-codereviews, dave, bradfitz
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/91770051
There is a hierarchy of location defined by loop depth:
-1 = the heap
0 = function results
1 = local variables (and parameters)
2 = local variable declared inside a loop
3 = local variable declared inside a loop inside a loop
etc
In general if an address from loopdepth n is assigned to
something in loop depth m < n, that indicates an extended
lifetime of some form that requires a heap allocation.
Function results can be local variables too, though, and so
they don't actually fit into the hierarchy very well.
Treat the address of a function result as level 1 so that
if it is written back into a result, the address is treated
as escaping.
Fixes#8185.
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/108870044
Provide Nextafter64 as alias to Nextafter.
For submission after the 1.3 release.
Fixes#8117.
LGTM=adonovan
R=adonovan
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/101750048
The analysis for &x was using the loop depth on x set
during x's declaration. A type switch creates a list of
implicit declarations that were not getting initialized
with loop depths.
Fixes#8176.
LGTM=iant
R=iant
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/108860043
The putpclcdelta function set the DWARF line number PC to
s->value + pcline->pc, which is correct, but the code then set
the local variable pc to epc, which can be a different value.
This caused the next delta in the DWARF table to be wrong.
Fixes#8098.
LGTM=rsc
R=rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/104950045
