Handling of &(T{}) assumed that the parser would not introduce ()'s.
Also: Better comments around handling of OPAREN syntax tree optimization.
Fixes#13261.
Change-Id: Ifc5047a0448f5e7d74cd42f6608b87dcc9c2f2fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17040
Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
Also:
- better error messages in some cases
- factored out function to produce syntax error at given line number
Fixes#13273.
Change-Id: I0192a94731cc23444680a26bd0656ef663e6da0b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16992
Reviewed-by: Chris Manghane <cmang@golang.org>
This is a translation of the yacc-based parser with adjustements
to make the grammar work for a recursive-descent parser followed
by cleanups and simplifications.
The yacc actions were mostly literally copied for correctness
with better temporary names.
A few of the syntax tests were adjusted for slightly different
error messages (it is very difficult to match the yacc-based
error messages in all cases, and sometimes the new parser could
produce better errors).
The new parser is enabled by default.
To switch back to the yacc-based parser, set -oldparser.
To hardwire the switch back, uncomment "oldparser = 1" in lex.go.
- passes all.bash
- ~18% reduced parse time per file on average for make.bash
- ~3% reduced compile time for building cmd/compile
Change-Id: Icb5651bb9d8b9f66261762d2c94a03793050d4ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16665
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Skip fixedbugs/issue10607.go because external linking is not supported
yet.
Skip nilptr3.go because of issue #9058 (same as ppc64).
Change-Id: Ib3dfbd9a03ee4052871cf57c74b3cc5e745e1f80
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14461
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change is the same as CL #9345 which was reverted,
except for a small bug fix.
The only change is to the body of sendDirect and its callsite.
Also added a test.
The problem was during a channel send operation. The target
of the send was a sleeping goroutine waiting to receive. We
basically do:
1) Read the destination pointer out of the sudog structure
2) Copy the value we're sending to that destination pointer
Unfortunately, the previous change had a goroutine suspend
point between 1 & 2 (the call to sendDirect). At that point
the destination goroutine's stack could be copied (shrunk).
The pointer we read in step 1 is no longer valid for step 2.
Fixed by not allowing any suspension points between 1 & 2.
I suspect the old code worked correctly basically by accident.
Fixes#13169
The original 9345:
This change removes the retry mechanism we use for buffered channels.
Instead, any sender waking up a receiver or vice versa completes the
full protocol with its counterpart. This means the counterpart does
not need to relock the channel when it wakes up. (Currently
buffered channels need to relock on wakeup.)
For sends on a channel with waiting receivers, this change replaces
two copies (sender->queue, queue->receiver) with one (sender->receiver).
For receives on channels with a waiting sender, two copies are still required.
This change unifies to a large degree the algorithm for buffered
and unbuffered channels, simplifying the overall implementation.
Fixes#11506
Change-Id: I57dfa3fc219cffa4d48301ee15fe5479299efa09
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16740
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Make sure that we're moving or zeroing pointers atomically.
Anything that is a multiple of pointer size and at least
pointer aligned might have pointers in it. All the code looks
ok except for the 1-pointer-sized moves.
Fixes#13160
Update #12552
Change-Id: Ib97d9b918fa9f4cc5c56c67ed90255b7fdfb7b45
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16668
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Duffcopy now uses X0, as of 5cf281a. Teach the peephole
optimizer that duffcopy clobbers X0 so that it does not
rename registers use X0 across the duffcopy instruction.
Fixes#13171
Change-Id: I389cbf1982cb6eb2f51e6152ac96736a8589f085
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16715
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Tocar <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
sradi and sradi. hide the top bit of their immediate argument apart from the
rest of it, but the code only handled the sradi case.
I'm pretty sure this is the only instruction missing (a couple of the rotate
instructions encode their immediate the same way but their handling looks OK).
This fixes the failure of "GOARCH=amd64 ~/go/bin/go install -v runtime" as
reported in the bug.
Fixes#11987
Change-Id: I0cdefcd7a04e0e8fce45827e7054ffde9a83f589
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/16710
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Small fix: looks like a short variable declaration with a type switch
checks to make sure the variable used had valid shape (ONAME, OTYPE, or
ONONAME) and rejects everything else. Then a new variable is declared.
If the symbol contained in the declaration was a named OLITERAL (still a
valid identifier obviously) it would be rejected, even though a new
variable would have been declared.
Fix adds this case to the check.
Added a test case from issue12413.
Fixes#12413
Change-Id: I150dadafa8ee5612c867d58031027f2dca8c6ebc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15760
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Apply static bounds checking logic during type checking even to
zero-element arrays, but skip synthesized OINDEX nodes that the
compiler has asserted are within bounds (such as the ones generated
while desugaring ORANGE nodes). This matches the logic in walkexpr
that also skips static bounds checking when Bounded is true.
Passes toolstash/buildall.
Fixes#12944.
Change-Id: I14ba03d71c002bf969d69783bec8d1a8e10e7d75
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15902
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Following the C to Go translation, some useless variables
were left in the code. In fmt.go, this was harmless.
In lex.go, it broke the error message related to
non-canonical import paths.
Fix it, and remove the useless variables.
The added test case is ignored in the go/types tests, since
the behavior of the non-canonical import path check seems
to be different.
Fixes#11362
Change-Id: Ic9129139ede90357dc79ebf167af638cf44536fa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15580
Reviewed-by: Marvin Stenger <marvin.stenger94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Minux Ma <minux@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This lets us re-enable duffzero.
Fixes#12108
Change-Id: Iefd24d26eaa56067caa2c29ff99cd20a42d8714a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14937
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Turns out the summary information for the ... args was
already correctly computed, all that lacked was to make
use of it and correct tests that documented our prior
deficiencies.
Fixes#12006
Change-Id: Ie8adfab7547f179391d470679598f0904aabf9f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15200
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Internal error arose from calling methodfunc on a invalid interface
field during the implements check. int obviously isn't a function,
and errors on getinarg...
for im := iface.Type; im != nil; im = im.Down {
imtype = methodfunc(im.Type, nil)
// ...
}
Fix handles the internal compiler error, but does not throw an
additional error, i.e. the following code will error on the I
interface, but type A will pass the implements check since
'Read(string) string' is implemented and 'int' is skipped
type I interface {
Read(string) string
int
}
type A struct {
}
func (a *A) Read(s string) string {
return s
}
func New() I {
return new(A)
}
Fixes#10975
Change-Id: I4b54013afb2814db3f315515f0c742d8631ca500
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13747
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The existing test did not take into account the implicit
dereference of &fixedArray and thus heap-escaped when it
was not necessary.
Also added a detailed test for this and related cases.
Fixes#12588
Change-Id: I951e9684a093082ccdca47710f69f4366bd6b3cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15130
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
As detailed in #11910, the current implementation attempts to execute an area
of memory with unknown content. If the memory is executable, the result is
unpredictable - instead, make the test deterministic by attempting to execute
an instruction that is known to trigger a trap on the given architecture.
The new implementation is written by iant@ and provided via #11910.
Update issue #11910
Change-Id: Ia698c36e0dd98a9d9d16a701f60f6748c6faf896
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15058
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <jsing@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The issue 12226 has been caused by the allocation of the same register
for the equality check of two byte values. The code in cgen.go freed the
register for the second operand before the allocation of the register
for the first operand.
Fixes#12226
Change-Id: Ie4dc33a488bd48a17f8ae9b497fd63c1ae390555
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13771
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The reg[] array in .../gc is where truth lies. The copy in .../ARCH
is incorrect as it is mostly not updated to reflect regalloc decisions.
This bug was introduced in the rewrite
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/7853/. The new reg[] array was
introduced in .../gc but not all of the uses were removed in the
.../ARCH directories.
Fixes#12133
Change-Id: I6364fc403cdab92d802d17f2913ba1607734037c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13630
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Instead of pushing the denominator argument on the stack,
the denominator is now passed in m.
This fixes a variety of bugs related to trying to take stack traces
backwards from the middle of the software div/mod routines.
Some of those bugs have been kludged around in the past,
but others have not. Instead of trying to patch up after breaking
the stack, this CL stops breaking the stack.
This is an update of https://golang.org/cl/19810043,
which was rolled back in https://golang.org/cl/20350043.
The problem in the original CL was that there were divisions
at bad times, when m was not available. These were divisions
by constant denominators, either in C code or in assembly.
The Go compiler knows how to generate division by multiplication
for constant denominators, but the C compiler did not.
There is no longer any C code, so that's taken care of.
There was one problematic DIV in runtime.usleep (assembly)
but https://golang.org/cl/12898 took care of that one.
So now this approach is safe.
Reject DIV/MOD in NOSPLIT functions to keep them from
coming back.
Fixes#6681.
Fixes#6699.
Fixes#10486.
Change-Id: I09a13c76ad08ba75b3bd5d46a3eb78e66a84ab38
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12899
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Russ Cox fixed this issue for other systems
in CL 12026, but the Plan 9 part was forgotten.
Fixes#11656.
Change-Id: I91c033687987ba43d13ad8f42e3fe4c7a78e6075
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12762
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
This is a reprise of https://golang.org/cl/12623. In that a CL I made
a suggestion which forgot that the +build constraints in the test
directory are not the same as those supported by the go tool: in the
test directory, if a single +build line fails, the test is skipped.
(In my defense, the code I was commenting on was also wrong.)
Change-Id: I8f29392a80b1983027f9a33043c803578409d678
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12776
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Old code appended, did not play well with a closure
with a ... param.
Fixes#11075.
Change-Id: Ib7c8590c5c4e576e798837e7499e00f3494efb4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12580
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
There was already special code to recognize "?" in hidden_structdcl,
which is used for inlined types and variables. This recognizes "?" in
structdcl as well, a case that arises when a struct type appears
within an inlined function body.
Fixes#10219.
Change-Id: Ic5257ae54f817e0d4a189c2294dcd633c9f2101a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12241
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The one in misc/makerelease/makerelease.go is particularly bad and
probably warrants rotating our keys.
I didn't update old weekly notes, and reverted some changes involving
test code for now, since we're late in the Go 1.5 freeze. Otherwise,
the rest are all auto-generated changes, and all manually reviewed.
Change-Id: Ia2753576ab5d64826a167d259f48a2f50508792d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12048
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
We can't address more than this on amd64 anyway.
Fixes#9862.
Change-Id: Ifb1abae558e2e1ee2dc953a76995f3f08c60b1df
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11715
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
