In particular, we can initialize globals with them at link time instead
of generating code for them in an init() function. Less code, less
startup cost.
But the real reason for this change is binary size. This change reduces
the binary size of hello world by ~4%.
The culprit is fmt.ssFree, a global variable which is a sync.Pool of
scratch scan states. It is initalized with a captureless closure as the
pool's New action. That action in turn references all the scanf code.
If you never call any of the fmt.Scanf* routines, ssFree is never used.
But before this change, ssFree is still referenced by fmt's init
function. That keeps ssFree and all the code it references in the
binary. With this change, ssFree is initialized at link time. As a
result, fmt.init never mentions ssFree. If you don't call fmt.Scanf*,
ssFree is unreferenced and it and the scanf code are not included.
This change is an easy fix for what is generally a much harder problem,
the unnecessary initializing of unused globals (and retention of code
that they reference). Ideally we should have separate init code for
each global and only include that code if the corresponding global is
live. (We'd need to make sure that the initializing code has no side
effects, except on the global being initialized.) That is a much harder
change.
Update #6853
Change-Id: I19d1e33992287882c83efea6ce113b7cfc504b67
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17398
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
There was back-and-forth on this but it has been decided to fix the original
complaint, which was easy.
Fixes#7268.
Change-Id: I6b607c49ad44579086aba2c4f4c5424b97fbed64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17710
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Fixes some failing Google tests when run under Go tip (1.6).
Updates #12986
Change-Id: I0ca4d20f6103d10ea9464e45730085401336dada
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17698
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Nodir Turakulov <nodir@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Until recently, we always permitted an empty string to NewRequest.
Keep that property, since it broke tests within in Google when trying
out Go 1.6, and probably would've broken others too.
Change-Id: Idddab1ae7b9423d5caac00af2c897fe1065b600b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17699
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a simple change to the command that should resolve problems like finding
vendored packages before their non-vendored siblings. By searching in breadth-first
order, we find the matching package lowest in the hierarchy, which is more likely
to be correct than the deeper one, such as a vendored package, that will be found
in a depth-first scan.
This may be sufficient to resolve the issue, and has the merit that it is very easy
to explain. I will leave the issue open for now in case my intuition is wrong.
Update #12423
Change-Id: Icf69e8beb1845277203fcb7d19ffb7cca9fa41f5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17691
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The current implementation including Go 1.5 through 1.5.2 misuses
Windows API and mishandles the returned values from GetAdapterAddresses
on Windows. This change fixes various issues related to network facility
information by readjusting interface and interface address parsers.
Updates #5395.
Updates #10530.
Updates #12301.
Updates #12551.
Updates #13542.
Fixes#12691.
Fixes#12811.
Fixes#13476.
Fixes#13544.
Also fixes fragile screen scraping test cases in net_windows_test.go.
Additional information for reviewers:
It seems like almost all the issues above have the same root cause and
it is misunderstanding of Windows API. If my interpretation of the
information on MSDN is correctly, current implementation contains the
following bugs:
- SIO_GET_INTERFACE_LIST should not be used for IPv6. The behavior of
SIO_GET_INTERFACE_LIST is different on kernels and probably it doesn't
work correctly for IPv6 on old kernels such as Windows XP w/ SP2.
Unfortunately MSDN doesn't describe the detail of
SIO_GET_INTERFACE_LIST, but information on the net suggests so.
- Fetching IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES structures with fixed size area may not
work when using IPv6. IPv6 generates ton of interface addresses for
various addressing scopes. We need to adjust the area appropriately.
- PhysicalAddress field of IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES structure may have extra
space. We cannot ignore PhysicalAddressLength field of
IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESS structure.
- Flags field of IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES structure doesn't represent any of
administratively and operatinal statuses. It just represents settings
for windows network adapter.
- MTU field of IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES structure may have a uint32(-1) on
64-bit platform. We need to convert the value to interger
appropriately.
- IfType field of IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES structure is not a bit field.
Bitwire operation for the field is completely wrong.
- OperStatus field of IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES structure is not a bit field.
Bitwire operation for the field is completely wrong.
- IPv6IfIndex field of IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES structure is just a
substitute for IfIndex field. We cannot prefer IPv6IfIndex to IfIndex.
- Windows XP, 2003 server and below don't set OnLinkPrefixLength field
of IP_ADAPTER_UNICAST_ADDRESS structure. We cannot rely on the field
on old kernels. We can use FirstPrefix field of IP_ADAPTER_ADDRESSES
structure and IP_ADAPTER_PREFIX structure instead.
- Length field of IP_ADAPTER_{UNICAST,ANYCAST,MULTICAST}_ADDRESS
sturecures doesn't represent an address prefix length. It just
represents a socket address length.
Change-Id: Icabdaf7bd1d41360a981d2dad0b830b02b584528
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17412
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
This code used to be necessary because of the error messages generated
by the YACC-based parser, but they're no longer relevant under the new
recursive descent parser:
- LBRACE no longer exists, so "{ or {" can never occur.
- The parser never generates error messages about "@" or "?" now
(except in import sections, where they're actually legitimate).
- The s/LLITERAL/litbuf/ substitution is handled in p.syntax_error.
Change-Id: Id39f747e4aa492c5830d14a47b161920bd4589ad
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17690
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
When using GOEXPERIMENT=fieldtrack, we can see AUSEFIELD instructions.
We generally want to ignore them.
No tests because as far as I can tell there are no tests for
GOEXPERIMENT=fieldtrack.
Change-Id: Iee26f25592158e5db691a36cf8d77fc54d051314
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17610
Reviewed-by: David Symonds <dsymonds@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Found by github user asukakenji.
Change-Id: I4c76316b69e8a243fb6bf280283f3722e728d853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17641
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Use Windows getmac command to verify interface
MAC addresses net package returns.
The test is to be enabled once issue #12691 is fixed.
Updates #12691
Change-Id: Ic28c83303590cb4d48ee025250d4b6e30683bfd4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17632
Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
EvalSymlinks code assumes that Join has a bug
(see issue #11551 for details). But issue #11551 has
been fixed. Remove the workaround so it does not
confuses us when we read code next time.
Change-Id: I06bea20189f01f9922237c05516847353d8e4736
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17620
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use windows netsh command to verify interface
addresses and netmasks net package returns.
The test is to be enabled once issue #12811
is fixed.
Updates #12811
Change-Id: I191e350a1403e5133791d4ec59561fefa24f5c61
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17478
Reviewed-by: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Another (historic) artifact due to partially resolving symbols too early.
Fixes#13539.
Change-Id: Ie720c491cfa399599454f384b3a9735e75d4e8f1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17600
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This adapts pem.TestFuzz to sanitize the generated Block fields,
because the encoder and wireformat do not differentiate between nil
and empty slices and maps, while reflect.DeepEqual rightfully does.
In the commit mentioned below, we adapt quick.Value in
testing/quick to generate these value states, which had heretofore
been impossible with the standard library fuzz test facility.
This commit is a piecemeal extraction from ...
https://go-review.googlesource.com/#/c/16470
..., which rsc requested to be separated from the nil slice and map
generations.
Change-Id: Iec751a2b0082af6e672a09dc9b7f4b4fb309e8a8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17499
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The orders of the curves in crypto/elliptic are all very close to a
power of two. None the less, there is a tiny bias in the private key
selection.
This change makes the distribution uniform by resampling in the case
that a private key is >= to the order of the curve. (It also switches
from using BitSize to Params().N.BitLen() because, although they're the
same value here, the latter is technically the correct thing to do.)
The private key sampling and nonce sampling in crypto/ecdsa don't have
this issue.
Fixes#11082.
Change-Id: Ie2aad563209a529fa1cab522abaf5fd505c7269a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17460
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
- Only accept valid if statement syntax in go/parser.
- Check AST again in go/types since it may have been modified and the
AST doesn't preclude other statements in the else branch of an if
statement.
- Removed a test from gofmt which verified that old-style if statements
permitting any statement in the else branch were correctly reformatted.
It's been years since we switched to the current syntax; no need to
support this anymore.
- Added a comment to go/printer.
Fixes#13475.
Change-Id: Id2c8fbcc68b719cd511027d0412a37266cceed6b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17408
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Use import paths of packages to build a shared lib name.
Use arguments for meta-packages 'std', 'cmd', and 'all'.
Fixes#12236
Change-Id: If274d63301686ef34e198287eb012f9062541ea0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13921
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The documentation was inconsistent. It said zero values were not sent, but
that zero-valued elements of arrays and arrays were sent. But which rule
applies if the array is all zero elements, and is therefore itself a zero value?
The answer is: the array is transmitted. In principle the other choice could
be made, but there would be considerable expense and complexity required
to implement this behavior now, not to mention worries about changes of
behavior.
Therefore we just document the situation: Arrays, slices, and maps are
always encoded. It would perhaps be nice to have sorted this out earlier,
but it was a missed opportunity.
Fixes#13378
Change-Id: I8fae345edfa707fcfa7a3e0160d87ff1ac5cc5a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17394
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Following an empty import, a declaration involving a ? symbol
generates an internal compiler error when the name of the
symbol (in newname function).
package a
import""
var?
go.go:2: import path is empty
go.go:3: internal compiler error: newname nil
Make sure dclname is not called when the symbol is nil.
The error message is now:
go.go:2: import path is empty
go.go:3: invalid declaration
go.go:4: syntax error: unexpected EOF
This CL was initially meant to be applied to the old parser,
and has been updated to apply to the new parser.
Fixes#11610
Change-Id: I75e07622fb3af1d104e3a38c89d9e128e3b94522
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/15268
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
If reports like #13062 are really concurrent misuse of maps,
we can detect that, at least some of the time, with a cheap check.
There is an extra pair of memory writes for writing to a map,
but to the same cache line as h.count, which is often being modified anyway,
and there is an extra memory read for reading from a map,
but to the same cache line as h.count, which is always being read anyway.
So the check should be basically invisible and may help reduce the
number of "mysterious runtime crash due to map misuse" reports.
Change-Id: I0e71b0d92eaa3b7bef48bf41b0f5ab790092487e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17501
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The following code:
func n() {(interface{int})}
generates:
3: interface contains embedded non-interface int
3: type %!v(PANIC=runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference) is not an expression
It is because the corresponding symbol (Sym field in Type object)
is nil, resulting in a panic in typefmt.
Just skip the symbol if it is nil, so that the error message becomes:
3: interface contains embedded non-interface int
3: type interface { int } is not an expression
Fixes#11614
Change-Id: I219ae7eb01edca264fad1d4a1bd261d026294b00
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/14015
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
algtype already controls the behavior of the normal map access code
paths, so it makes sense to base the decision on which optimized paths
are applicable on it too.
Enables use of optimized paths for key types like [8]byte and struct{s
string}.
Fixes#13271.
Change-Id: I48c52d97abaa7259ad5aba9641ea996a967cd359
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17464
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Prior behavior would show empty string when unset. In go1.5 this
would result in "off". In go1.6 this will result in "on". This
change will make empty or "0" off and "1" on for go1.5 and go1.6.
Vendor tools can then rely on this value.
Discussion:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/golang-dev/oZzcXrlRrkA
Change-Id: I7e145a32e813dfde02dc262a9186c7af28db7b92
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17487
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This change modifies comments to use the more gramatically correct "more than"
instead of "more then".
Change-Id: Ie3bddcf25eb6b243a21da934f2f3c76a750c083a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17488
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This is CL 11882 brought back to life.
Fixes#11551
Change-Id: I29810183957745442d1e9937f56a66fc9c6cc82a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17470
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
The build tags are necessary to keep "go build" in that directory
building only stdio.go, but we have to arrange for test/run.go to
treat them as satisfied.
Fixes#12625.
Change-Id: Iec0cb2fdc2c9b24a4e0530be25e940aa0cc9552e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17454
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
(sig is unsigned, so sig-1 >= 0 is always true.)
Fixes#11281.
Change-Id: I4b9d784da6e3cc80816f2d2f7228d5d8a237e2d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17457
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
