Make sure that when we're assigning to a map, we evaluate the
right-hand side before we attempt to insert into the map.
We used to evaluate the left-hand side to a pointer-to-slot-in-bucket
(which as a side effect does len(m)++), then evaluate the right-hand side,
then do the assignment. That clearly isn't correct when the right-hand side
might panic.
Fixes#22881
Change-Id: I42a62870ff4bf480568c9bdbf0bb18958962bdf0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81817
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The DWARF inline info generation hooks weren't properly
handling unused auto vars in certain cases, triggering an assert (now
fixed). Also with this change, introduce a new autom "flavor" to
use for autom entries that are added to insure that a specific
auto type makes it into the linker (this is a follow-on to the fix
for 22941).
Fixes#22962.
Change-Id: I7a2d8caf47f6ca897b12acb6a6de0eb25f5cac8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81557
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
The code that generates the list of DWARF variables for a function
(params and autos) will emit a "no-location" entry in the DWARF for a
user var that appears in the original pre-optimization version of the
function but is no longer around when optimization is complete. The
intent is that if a GDB user types "print foo" (where foo has been
optimized out), the response will be "<optimized out>" as opposed to
"there is no such variable 'foo'). This change fixes said code to
include vars on the autom list for the function, to insure that the
type symbol for the variable makes it to the linker.
Fixes#22941.
Change-Id: Id29f1f39d68fbb798602dfd6728603040624fc41
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81415
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
ORANGE node's Right node is the expression it is ranging over,
which is evaluated before the loop. In the escape analysis,
we should walk this node without loop depth incremented.
Fixes#21709.
Change-Id: Idc1e4c76e39afb5a344d85f6b497930a488ce5cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/80740
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
For "type T = U" we were accidentally emitting a #define for "U__size"
instead of "T__size".
Fixes#22877.
Change-Id: I5ed6757d697753ed6d944077c16150759f6e1285
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/80759
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The signature of the mapassign_fast* routines need to distinguish
the pointerness of their key argument. If the affected routines
suspend part way through, the object pointed to by the key might
get garbage collected because the key is typed as a uint{32,64}.
This is not a problem for mapaccess or mapdelete because the key
in those situations do not live beyond the call involved. If the
object referenced by the key is garbage collected prematurely, the
code still works fine. Even if that object is subsequently reallocated,
it can't be written to the map in time to affect the lookup/delete.
Fixes#22781
Change-Id: I0bbbc5e9883d5ce702faf4e655348be1191ee439
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/79018
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Improve the error message for wrong
case-field names in composite literals,
by mentioning the correct field name.
Given the program:
package main
type it struct {
ID string
}
func main() {
i1 := &it{id: "Bar"}
}
just like we do for usage of fields, we now
report wrongly cased fields as hints to give:
ts.go:8:14: unknown field 'id' in struct literal of type it (but does have ID)
instead of before:
ts.go:8:14: unknown field 'id' in struct literal of type it
Fixes#22794
Change-Id: I18cd70e75817025cb1df083503cae306e8d659fd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/78545
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This test fails on 1.9.2, but is ok on tip.
CL 77331 has both the 1.9.2 fix and this test, and is on the 1.9 release branch.
This CL is just the test, and is on HEAD. The buggy code doesn't exist on tip.
Update #22683
Change-Id: I04a24bd6c2d3068e18ca81da3347e2c1366f4447
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/77332
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Also, with this change, error locations don't print absolute positions
in [] brackets following positions relative to line directives. To get
the absolute positions as well, specify the -L flag.
Fixes#22660.
Change-Id: I9ecfa254f053defba9c802222874155fa12fee2c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/77090
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Plain blocks that contain only uninteresting instructions
(that do not have reliable Pos information themselves)
need to have their Pos left unset so that they can
inherit it from their successors. The "uninteresting"
test was not properly applied and not properly defined.
OpFwdRef does not appear in the ssa.html debugging output,
but at the time of the test these instructions did appear,
and it needs to be part of the test.
Fixes#22365.
Change-Id: I99e5b271acd8f6bcfe0f72395f905c7744ea9a02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74252
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
They could get picked up by reflect code, yielding the wrong type.
Fixes#22605
Change-Id: Ie11fb361ca7f3255e662037b3407565c8f0a2c4c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76315
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Be more pessimistic when parsing if/switch/for headers for better error
messages when things go wrong.
Fixes#22581.
Change-Id: Ibb99925291ff53f35021bc0a59a4c9a7f695a194
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76290
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Updates #21317
@mdempsky fixed issue #21317 with CL 66810,
so lock a test in to ensure we don't regress.
The test is manual for now before test/run.go
has support for matching column numbers so do
it old school and match expected output after
an exec.
Change-Id: I6c2a66ddf04248f79d17ed7033a3280d50e41562
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76150
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Updates #22389
@mdempsky's CL 70850 fixed the unnecessary
compile stack trace printing during ICE diagnostics.
This CL adds a test to lock in this behavior.
Change-Id: I9ce49923c80b78cb8c0bb5dc4af3c860a43d63ba
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74630
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Instead of trying to validate map key types eagerly in some
cases, delay their validation to the end of type-checking,
when we all type information is present.
Passes go build -toolexec 'toolstash -cmp' -a std .
Fixes#21273.
Fixes#21657.
Change-Id: I532369dc91c6adca1502d6aa456bb06b57e6c7ff
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/75310
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
The test for #18902 reads the assembly stream to be sure
that the line number does not change too often (this is an
indication that debugging the code will be unpleasant and
that the compiler is probably getting line numbers "wrong").
It checks that it is getting "enough" input, but the
compiler has gotten enough better since the test was written
that it now fails for lack of enough input. The old
threshould was 200 instructions, the new one is 150 (the
minimum observed input is on arm64 with 184 instructions).
Fixes#22494.
Change-Id: Ibba7e9ff4ab6a7be369e5dd5859d150b7db94653
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74357
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
KeepAlive needs to introduce a use of the spill of the
value it is keeping alive. Without that, we don't guarantee
that the spill dominates the KeepAlive.
This bug was probably introduced with the code to move spills
down to the dominator of the restores, instead of always spilling
just after the value itself (CL 34822).
Fixes#22458.
Change-Id: I94955a21960448ffdacc4df775fe1213967b1d4c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/74210
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
...because that's an illegal addressing mode.
I double-checked handling of this code, and 387 is the only
place where this check is missing.
Fixes#22429
Change-Id: I2284fe729ea86251c6af2f04076ddf7a5e66367c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73551
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If n.Type==nil after typechecking, then we should have already
reported a more useful error somewhere else. Just return 0 in
evalunsafe without trying to do anything else that's likely to cause
problems.
Also, further split out issue7525.go into more test files, because
cmd/compile reports at most one typechecking loop per compilation
unit.
Fixes#22351.
Change-Id: I3ebf505f72c48fcbfef5ec915606224406026597
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/72251
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Fine-tune skipping of tokens after missing closing parentheses in lists.
Fixes#22164.
Change-Id: I575d86e21048cd40340a2c08399e8b0deec337cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71250
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Previously, we were treating cross-package function calls as free for
inlining budgeting.
In theory, we should be able to recompute InlCost from the
exported/reimported function bodies. However, that process mutates the
structure of the Node AST enough that it doesn't preserve InlCost. To
avoid unexpected issues, just record and restore InlCost in the export
data.
Fixes#19261.
Change-Id: Iac2bc0d32d4f948b64524aca657051f9fc96d92d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70151
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
It should be skipped on 32-bit architectures.
Change-Id: If7a64b9e90e47c3e8734dd62729bfd2944ae926c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/70071
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
If the stack frame is too large, abort immediately.
We used to generate code first, then abort.
In issue 22200, generating code raised a panic
so we got an ICE instead of an error message.
Change the max frame size to 1GB (from 2GB).
Stack frames between 1.1GB and 2GB didn't used to work anyway,
the pcln table generation would have failed and generated an ICE.
Fixes#22200
Change-Id: I1d918ab27ba6ebf5c87ec65d1bccf973f8c8541e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69810
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This re-enables functionality that inadvertently was disabled in the
(long) past.
Also, don't perform branch checks if we had errors in a function
to avoid spurious errors or (worst-case) crashes.
Slightly modified test/fixedbugs/issue14006.go to make sure the
test still reports invalid label errors (the surrounding function
must be syntactically correct).
Change-Id: Id5642930877d7cf3400649094ec75c753b5084b7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/69770
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Keep left-to-right order when referring to the number of
variables and values involved.
Fixes#22159.
Change-Id: Iccca12d3222f9d5e049939a9ccec07513c393faa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/68690
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
C_PPAUTO was matching offsets that is a multiple 8. But this
condition is dropped in CL 55610, causing unaligned offset
between 256 and 504 mistakenly matched to some classes, e.g.
C_UAUTO8K. This CL restores this condition, also fixes an
error that C_PPAUTO shouldn't match C_PSAUTO, because the
latter is not guaranteed to be multiple of 8. C_PPAUTO_8 is
unnecessary, removed.
Fixes#21992.
Change-Id: I75d5a0e5f5dc3dae335721fbec1bbcd4a3b862f2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65730
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Historically, gc optimistically parsed the left-hand side of
assignments as expressions. Later, if it discovered a ":=" assignment,
it rewrote the parsed expressions as declarations.
This failed in the presence of dot imports though, because we lost
information about whether an imported object was named via a bare
identifier "Foo" or a normal qualified "pkg.Foo".
This CL fixes the issue by specially noding the left-hand side of ":="
assignments.
Fixes#22076.
Change-Id: I18190ecdb863112e7d009e1687e6112eec559921
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66810
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Use entire inlining call stack to decide whether two panic calls
can be merged. We used to merge panic calls when only the leaf
line numbers matched, but that leads to places higher up the call
stack being merged incorrectly.
Fixes#22083
Change-Id: Ia41400a80de4b6ecf3e5089abce0c42b65e9b38a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/67632
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Very similar fix to the one made in golang.org/cl/65655. This time it's
for switches on interface values, as we look for duplicates in a
different manner to keep types in mind.
As before, add a small regression test.
Updates #22001.
Fixes#22063.
Change-Id: I9a55d08999aeca262ad276b4649b51848a627b02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/66450
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
If we have
y = <int16> (MOVBQSX x)
z = <int32> (MOVWQSX y)
We used to use this rewrite rule:
(MOVWQSX x:(MOVBQSX _)) -> x
But that resulted in replacing z with a value whose type
is only int16. Then if z is spilled and restored, it gets
zero extended instead of sign extended.
Instead use the rule
(MOVWQSX (MOVBQSX x)) -> (MOVBQSX x)
The result is has the correct type, so it can be spilled
and restored correctly. It might mean that a few more extension
ops might not be eliminated, but that's the price for correctness.
Fixes#21963
Change-Id: I6ec82c3d2dbe43cc1fee6fb2bd6b3a72fca3af00
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65290
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a regression introduced by myself in golang.org/cl/41852,
confirmed by the program that reproduces the crash that can be seen in
the added test.
Fixes#21988.
Change-Id: I18d5b2b3de63ced84db705b18490b00b16b59e02
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/65655
Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The compiler generates wrapper methods to forward interface method
calls (which are always pointer-based) to value methods. These
wrappers appear in the call stack even though they are an
implementation detail. This leaves ugly "<autogenerated>" functions in
stack traces and can throw off skip counts for stack traces.
Fix this by considering these runtime frames in printed stack traces
so they will only be printed if runtime frames are being printed, and
by eliding them from the call stack expansion used by CallersFrames
and Caller.
This removes the test for issue 4388 since that was checking that
"<autogenerated>" appeared in the stack trace instead of something
even weirder. We replace it with various runtime package tests.
Fixes#16723.
Change-Id: Ice3f118c66f254bb71478a664d62ab3fc7125819
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45412
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The existing logic tried to advance the offset for each variable's
width, but then tried to undo this logic with the array and struct
handling code. It can all be much simpler by only worrying about
computing offsets within the array and struct code.
While here, include a short-circuit for zero-width arrays to fix a
pedantic compiler failure case.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#20739.
Change-Id: I98af9bb512a33e3efe82b8bf1803199edb480640
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64471
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, after inlining a call, we made a second pass to rewrite
the AST's position information to record the inlined stack frame. The
call arguments were part of this AST, but it would be incorrect to
rewrite them too, so extra effort was made to temporarily remove them
while the position rewriting was done.
However, this extra logic was only done for regular arguments: it was
not done for receiver arguments. Consequently if m was inlined in
"f().m(g(), h())", g and h would have correct call frames, but f would
appear to be called by m.
The fix taken by this CL is to merge setpos into inlsubst and only
rewrite position information for nodes that were actually copied from
the original function AST body. As a side benefit, this eliminates an
extra AST pass and some AST walking code.
Fixes#21879.
Change-Id: I22b25c208313fc25c358d3a2eebfc9b012400084
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64470
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Previously, we used OXFALL vs OFALL to distinguish fallthrough
statements that had been validated. Because in the Node AST we flatten
statement blocks, OXCASE and OXFALL needed to keep track of their
block scopes for this purpose.
Now that we have an AST that keeps these separate, we can just perform
the validation earlier.
Passes toolstash-check.
Fixes#14540.
Change-Id: I8421eaba16c2b3b72c9c5483b5cf20b14261385e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/61130
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
By setting both a valid size and alignment for broken recursive types,
we can appease some more safety checks and prevent compiler crashes.
Fixes#21882.
Change-Id: Ibaa137d8aa2c2a9d521462f144d7016c4abfd6e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/64430
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
Currently, we handle "x op= y" by rewriting as "x = x op y", while
ensuring that any calls or receive operations in 'x' are only
evaluated once. Notably, pointer indirection, indexing operations,
etc. are left alone as it's typically safe to re-evaluate those.
However, those operations were interleaved with evaluating 'y', which
could include function calls that might cause re-evaluation to yield
different memory addresses.
As a fix, simply ensure that we order side-effecting operations in 'y'
before either evaluation of 'x'.
Fixes#21687.
Change-Id: Ib14e77760fda9c828e394e8e362dc9e5319a84b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/60091
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
