Windows 7 is no longer supported, there is no need to complicate the
code to support inheriting console handles.
Change-Id: Ie9f5cde77a63ea4fa6032bbb7ba5bd48a0989c5b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531235
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
In CL 197062, many errors related to go.sum were changed from base.Fatal
to error returns. The malformed go.sum error was lost in the process.
Currently, when go encounters a malformed go.sum file, go will read the
well-formed part of the file and then silently ignore the rest.
The motivation behind moving away from base.Fatal was to make the errors
show up in -json output. Simply propagating the malformed go.sum error
would not achieve this:
- For an argument-less 'go mod download -json' with a go>=1.17 module,
a malformed go.sum causes an error during LoadModGraph already, before
go ever starts downloading modules and printing their JSON.
- In other cases, a malformed go.sum would be reported as Error for one
of the modules (presumably the one which gets downloaded first) but
none of the others.
- In either case, 'go mod download' manages to download enough data to
succeed on a re-run, making the error look intermittent.
Switch the error back to a Fatal one, but give 'go mod tidy' an
exception to let it fix broken go.sum files.
Fixes#62345
Change-Id: I066482b242165bcc6cbba0b2dab64901fad8619f
GitHub-Last-Rev: feae7696d6
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#62588
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/527575
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Also make 'cmd' a const for it is in fact immutable.
Change-Id: I3373daa1775e863a378355a355325a7fbdf90485
GitHub-Last-Rev: f6698174f5
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63155
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530395
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Currently, the Go bootstrap toolchain is bumped to 1.20.
Change-Id: I6467768c0640a8e9aadbfea79cfdfb14b4b80679
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7cf2d54a48
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63174
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530676
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Fixes the misuse of "a" vs "an", according to English grammatical
expectations and using https://www.a-or-an.com/
Change-Id: Ic9600dcbb3d843880349729478266c4b9bcf7316
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531335
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
For #62513
Change-Id: I295e72f71165665b8ea999e68a5586fa785b546d
GitHub-Last-Rev: 902e952d88
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63252
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531217
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
This is a follow up of CL 530120.
Change-Id: Ifa0bd1c3bb9bb1202568eaae27500bcea376f56b
GitHub-Last-Rev: b4154fa1fc
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63228
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531136
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
CL 525556 started using timeRE regexp to match time output from JSON
handler, and relaxed it to allow arbitrary (rather than fixed 3 digit)
precision.
What it missed is in JSON handler the fractional part is omitted
entirely (together with the decimal dot) when the nanoseconds field is
0.
As a result, there are occasional CI failures in js/wasm (which, I guess,
has better chances to return zero nanoseconds).
To fix the flaky test, let's use two different regular expressions,
tailored to text and JSON.
Change-Id: Ie98990fcf278bb0916ab31c9177e6b22a523062a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530675
Run-TryBot: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Pan <panjf2000@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
The ReplaceAttr function should not see groups, only leaf attributes.
Previously, we checked an Value for being a group, then resolved it,
then called ReplaceAttr. We neglected to see if it was a group
after resolving it.
Now we resolve first, then check.
Fixes#62731.
Change-Id: I2fc40758e77c445f82deb2c9de8cae7a3b0e22cf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530478
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixes#60048
Change-Id: I1553de35d5ebd9c7df9727242e888de91caca4ea
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/527095
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Tim King <taking@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim King <taking@google.com>
In CL 475375 the Go command started to generate the "preferlinkext"
token file for "strange/dangerous" compiler flags. This serves as a hint
to the Go linker whether to call the external linker or not.
Permit compiler flags used by bazel and bazelbuild/rules_go during
compilation of cgo code to not prefer external linking. This restores
the behavior of previous versions of Go.
As a side effect, it also allows these flags to appear
in #cgo directives in source code. We don't know of any cases
where that is actually useful, but it appears to be harmless
and simplifies the implementation of the internal linking change.
Fixes#60865
Change-Id: I176a6a2a2cf36293dd9aed24be928f98fa2fb6d9
GitHub-Last-Rev: 071e915b8e
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#60868
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/504335
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
When parsing patterns and matching, split the path into segments at
slashes, then unescape each segment.
This behaves as most people would expect:
- The pattern "/%61" matches the paths "/a" and "/%61".
- The pattern "/%7B" matches the path "/{". (If we did not unescape
patterns, there would be no way to write that pattern: because "/{"
is a parse error because it is an invalid wildcard.)
- The pattern "/user/{u}" matches "/user/john%2Fdoe" with u set to
"john/doe".
- The unexpected redirections of #21955 will not occur.
A later CL will restore the old behavior behind a GODEBUG setting.
Updates #61410.
Fixes#21955.
Change-Id: I99025e149021fc94bf87d351699270460db532d9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530575
Run-TryBot: Jonathan Amsterdam <jba@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
This adds some rules to recognize MOVDaddr in those cases where
it is just adding 0 to a ptr value. Instead the ptr value can just
be used.
Change-Id: I95188defc9701165c86bbea70d14d037a9e54853
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/527698
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
When running crypto/tls tests with GOEXPERIMENT=boringcrypto, some
tests are embedded with unreadable hexadecimal values:
=== RUN TestBoringServerSignatureAndHash/5053...3536
This corresponds to a string representation of SignatureScheme as it
implements fmt.Stringer. With this change, the above will be printed
as:
=== RUN TestBoringServerSignatureAndHash/PSSWithSHA256
Change-Id: I953c0bb35c68e77a7f01e7f1fceda203c272faf7
GitHub-Last-Rev: 19700d53a8
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63175
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530715
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Fixes#60204
Change-Id: I1234cacf0f25097d034038bcfb33f6630373a057
GitHub-Last-Rev: e9098ed8b3
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#60931
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/504883
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Change-Id: I8787458f9ccd3b5cdcdda820d8a45deb4f77eade
GitHub-Last-Rev: be865d67ef
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63165
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530120
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Change-Id: I4edf8bd6f9ab813acf1d05c603f6f562fa00cb48
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529975
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
I found the documentation for Pinner itself to contain too little information.
Rewrite it to give a summary and redirect to the relevant methods.
Also reformat the ragged comment for Pin.
Change-Id: I9c786817f43dfc9c72178127c141c35dae221104
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/528855
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The https://go.dev/security is about: "This page provides
resources for Go developers to improve security for their
projects.", https://go.dev/security/policy is about Go Security Policy.
go.dev/security links to go.dev/security/policy,
but I think it is better to link directly to go.dev/security/policy
in this case.
Change-Id: Ic6515961dc48055236bb06cc814072caa10a8f54
GitHub-Last-Rev: 37ac8ab440
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63163
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530119
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Change-Id: Ie7d495b2a53520ce89b16bc8a66b81a3955bf32f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530635
Reviewed-by: Eli Bendersky <eliben@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
When reviewing https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/522435,
Cherry Mui cherryyz@google.com noticed that the implementation of
StructOf was broken, and produced junk if an interface was embedded
into a struct. For example, StructOf messed up the calling convention
for methods of the embedded interface:
> The main problem is that the method wrappers created by reflect.MakeFunc
> expects to be called with a closure calling convention, with a closure
> context passed in the context register. But methods are called with
> a different calling convention, without setting the closure register,
> because (besides this case) all methods are top level functions.
> So there is no way to pass that makefunc closure context.
It is curious that StructOf did not break in go 1.17 which introduced
the regabi. I've tried to run the following example program, and it
fails even in 1.7 which introduced StructOf.
As the embedding of interfaces has been broken since forever,
let us not perpetuate the complexity that this feature brings,
and just remove the support for embedding altogether.
The test program:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
)
type I interface {
F()
}
type T int
func (t T) F() { println(t) }
func main() {
var i I
t := reflect.StructOf([]reflect.StructField{
{
Anonymous: true,
Name: "I",
Type: reflect.TypeOf(&i).Elem(),
},
})
v := reflect.New(t).Elem()
v.Field(0).Set(reflect.ValueOf(T(42)))
fmt.Println(v)
v.Interface().(interface{ F() }).F() // fatal error
}
Change-Id: I7b2115c22d66ea4ed746f0f9d22b2c94f604e185
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/526075
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
This is a follow up of CL 528696.
Change-Id: I5b71eabedb12567c4b1b36f7182a3d2b0ed662a5
GitHub-Last-Rev: acaf3ac11c
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#62713
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529197
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Verify functional stubs are inserted between TOC and NOTOC functions.
The implementation of the stub varies depending on -buildmode and
GOPPC64. Today, the type of stub generated by the internal linker
is roughly determined by the following
{GOPPC64 < 10, GOPPC64 >= 10} x {-buildmode=pie, -buildmode=default}
Change-Id: Ib9b3eef252bfcd357a476134d3503cb996bc285b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/496916
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This sequence can show up in the lowering pass on PPC64. If it
makes it to the latelower pass, it will cause an error because
it looks like it can be turned into RLDICL, but -1 isn't an
accepted mask.
Also, print more debug info if panic is called from
encodePPC64RotateMask.
Fixes#62698
Change-Id: I0f3322e2205357abe7fc28f96e05e3f7ad65567c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529195
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
go get golang.org/x/tools@f9b8da7 # CL 529915
go mod tidy
go mod vendor
Change-Id: Ib0824e66ab8889bfab438e79bf3f7bb4b4f45879
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/530175
Run-TryBot: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Tim King <taking@google.com>
After CL 528817, *sigctxt.fault of all arches return uintptr, so
there is no need to convert 'c.fault()' to uintptr anymore.
Change-Id: I062283b578adaaee69d8f439b109a573eeb15110
GitHub-Last-Rev: 3ce3a75a66
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63133
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529995
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Windows APIs are normally not arch-specific, so it's better to
implement them in Go instead of assembly.
It was previously implemented in assembly because it was the only way
to support calls without a valid g. This CL defines a new function,
stdcall_no_g, that can be used in such cases.
While here, I've also replaced the use of the deprecated syscall
NtWaitForSingleObject with WaitForSingleObject. The former may
give the illusion of being more accurate, as it takes a higher
resolution timeout, but it's not. Windows time resolution is 15.6ms,
and can be as high as 1ms when using a high resolution timer, which
WaitForSingleObject supports.
Change-Id: I903400220ade4d4ccc15685c8da47182430f8686
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/526477
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
Also explicitly look up user "nobody" (or "gopher" on the Go builders)
if running as root, instead of hard-coding UID/GID 99.
Fixes#62719.
Change-Id: I9fa8955f2c239804fa775f2478a5274af9330822
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529795
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
No test case because the problem can only happen for invalid data. Let
the fuzzer find cases like this.
Fixes#62649
Change-Id: Ia40b4d415e3bbffaffd143ee280949ba41346579
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/528655
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Id63e1e5ae7e225e4a6a721673bf2d43b6c398c25
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/527701
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
1. Remove the use of fmt.Sprintf from t.Fatal.
2. Check for errors from initFromJSON.
3. Move 'overlay=0' to a separate cleanup function, for clarity.
Change-Id: I4d0daad248e8f26b6f159b4cc7e77fd60dc1ed98
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/527700
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
The existing documentation for `go help build` does not match the current behavior of `go build`. This commit fixes inconsistency between documentation and behavior as suggested in #60836 ticket.
Fixes#60836
Change-Id: I22f24f84815f50fecfa8c51b7f1c24e8e0cd8bc8
GitHub-Last-Rev: 7613930a3d
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#61438
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/511015
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Currently, *sigctxt.fault of freebsd-arm64 and openbsd-arm64 return
uint64 which is different from other arches (return uintptr). Change
the method signature for consistency.
Change-Id: I81185123c1ea40e456075fd86b931aa860c38a42
GitHub-Last-Rev: 82934ecd3d
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#62672
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/528817
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: Id2079f7012392dea8dfe2386bb9fb1ea3f487a4a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/526015
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Windows APIs are normally not arch-specific, so it's better to
implement them in Go instead of assembly.
It was previously implemented in assembly because it was the only way
to support calls without a valid g. This CL defines a new function,
stdcall_no_g, that can be used in such cases.
Change-Id: I26a223b918c6c462b06ac256bdacf9ddb78752bc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/526476
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
This permits using the same mechanism not just for *Named types but
also future Alias types.
Change-Id: Ia8dee413d8dff7b08ab073ce03a4779603c4f396
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/524897
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
In case of a handshake timeout, the goroutine running addTLS
closes the underlying connection, which should unblock the call
to tlsConn.HandshakeContext. However, it didn't then wait for
HandshakeContext to actually return.
I thought this might have something to do with #57602, but as
far as I can tell it does not. Still, it seems best to avoid the leak:
if tracing is enabled we emit a TLSHandshakeDone event, and it seems
misleading to produce that event when the handshake is still in
progress.
For #57602.
Change-Id: Ibfc0cf4ef8df2ccf11d8897f23d7d79ee482d5fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529755
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Add compiler support for range over functions.
See the large comment at the top of
cmd/compile/internal/rangefunc/rewrite.go for details.
This is only reachable if GOEXPERIMENT=range is set,
because otherwise type checking will fail.
For proposal #61405 (but behind a GOEXPERIMENT).
For #61717.
Change-Id: I05717f94e63089c503acc49b28b47edeb4e011b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/510541
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Add compiler implementation of range over integers.
This is only reachable if GOEXPERIMENT=range is set,
because otherwise type checking will fail.
For proposal #61405 (but behind a GOEXPERIMENT).
For #61717.
Change-Id: I4e35a73c5df1ac57f61ffb54033a433967e5be51
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/510538
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Add type-checking logic for range over integers and functions,
behind GOEXPERIMENT=range.
For proposal #61405 (but behind a GOEXPERIMENT).
For #61717.
Change-Id: Ibf78cf381798b450dbe05eb922df82af2b009403
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/510537
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
Currently, for the shared build mode, we don't generate the module
inittasks. Instead, we rely on the main executable to do the
initialization, for both the executable and the shared library.
But, with the model as of CL 478916, the main executable only
has relocations to packages that are directly imported. It won't
see the dependency edges between packages within a shared library.
Therefore indirect dependencies are not included, and thus not
initialized. E.g. main imports a, which imports b, but main
doesn't directly import b. a and b are in a shared object. When
linking main, it sees main depends on a, so it generates main's
inittasks to run a's init before main's, but it doesn't know b,
so b's init doesn't run.
This CL makes it initialize all packages in a shared library when
the library is loaded, as any of them could potentially be
imported, directly or indirectly.
Also, in the runtime, when running the init functions, make sure
to go through the DSOs in dependency order. Otherwise packages
can be initialized in the wrong order.
Fixes#61973.
Change-Id: I2a090336fe9fa0d6c7e43912f3ab233c9c47e247
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/520375
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
