It causes every test to fail as the log file is on the local file system,
not the NaCl file system.
Updates #22593
Change-Id: Iee3d8307317bd792c9c701baa962ebbbfa34c147
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83256
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Instead of requiring that cmd/api/run.go be edited upon each
release to include the next Go version number, look in $GOROOT/api
for files with the prefix go1* and use those instead to perform
API checks.
Change-Id: I5d9407f2bd368ff5e62f487cccdd245641ca9c9b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83355
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Use “substantial”, which is believed to be the correct word.
Additionally, this change strips trailing whitespace from the file.
Change-Id: I5b6b718fc09e4b8b911b95e8be0733abd58e165d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83356
Reviewed-by: Andrew Gerrand <adg@golang.org>
The Builder's ReadFrom method allows the underlying unsafe slice to
escape, and for callers to subsequently modify memory that had been
unsafely converted into an immutable string.
In the original proposal for Builder (#18990), I'd noted there should
be no Read methods:
> There would be no Reset or Bytes or Truncate or Read methods.
> Nothing that could mutate the []byte once it was unsafely converted
> to a string.
And in my prototype (https://golang.org/cl/37767), I handled ReadFrom
properly, but when https://golang.org/cl/74931 arrived, I missed that
it had a ReadFrom method and approved it.
Because we're so close to the Go 1.10 release, just remove the
ReadFrom method rather than think about possible fixes. It has
marginal utility in a Builder anyway.
Also, fix a separate bug that also allowed mutation of a slice's
backing array after it had been converted into a slice by disallowing
copies of the Builder by value.
Updates #18990Fixes#23083Fixes#23084
Change-Id: Id1f860f8a4f5f88b32213cf85108ebc609acb95f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83255
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
When we write a cached test result, we now also write a log of the
environment variables and files inspected by the test run,
along with a hash of their content. Before reusing a cached test result,
we recompute the hash of the content specified by the log, and only
use the result if that content has not changed.
This makes test caching behave correctly for tests that consult
environment variables or stat or read files or directories.
Fixes#22593.
Change-Id: I8608798e73c90e0c1911a38bf7e03e1232d784dc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81895
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Currently, wbBufFlush does nothing if the goroutine is dying on the
assumption that the system is crashing anyway and running the write
barrier may crash it even more. However, it fails to reset the
buffer's "next" pointer. As a result, if there are later write
barriers on the same P, the write barrier will overflow the write
barrier buffer and start corrupting other fields in the P or other
heap objects. Often, this corrupts fields in the next allocated P
since they tend to be together in the heap.
Fix this by always resetting the buffer's "next" pointer, even if
we're not doing anything with the pointers in the buffer.
Updates #22987 and #22988. (May fix; it's hard to say.)
Change-Id: I82c11ea2d399e1658531c3e8065445a66b7282b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83016
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
heapBits.bits is used during bulkBarrierPreWrite via
heapBits.isPointer, which means it must not be preempted. If it is
preempted, several bad things can happen:
1. This could allow a GC phase change, and the resulting shear between
the barriers and the memory writes could result in a lost pointer.
2. Since bulkBarrierPreWrite uses the P's local write barrier buffer,
if it also migrates to a different P, it could try to append to the
write barrier buffer concurrently with another write barrier. This can
result in the buffer's next pointer skipping over its end pointer,
which results in a buffer overflow that can corrupt arbitrary other
fields in the Ps (or anything in the heap, really, but it'll probably
crash from the corrupted P quickly).
Fix this by marking heapBits.bits go:nosplit. This would be the
perfect use for a recursive no-preempt annotation (#21314).
This doesn't actually affect any binaries because this function was
always inlined anyway. (I discovered it when I was modifying heapBits
and make h.bits() no longer inline, which led to rampant crashes from
problem 2 above.)
Updates #22987 and #22988 (but doesn't fix because it doesn't actually
change the generated code).
Change-Id: I60ebb928b1233b0613361ac3d0558d7b1cb65610
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83015
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Parts of TestUDPConnSpecificMethods and TestWriteToUDP fail, because
UDPConn.WriteMsgUDP is broken on Windows XP. UDPConn.WriteMsgUDP uses
Windows WSASendMsg API, but that call is not implemented on Windows XP (see
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms741692(v=vs.85).aspx
for details)
Update #23072
Change-Id: I4e8f149bc62bd87cd7c199e6832b9ce479af0a3e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83077
Run-TryBot: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On DragonFly mmap with MAP_STACK returns the top of the region, not
the bottom. Rather than try to cope, just don't use the flag anywhere.
Fixes#23061
Change-Id: Ib5df4dd7c934b3efecfc4bc87f8989b4c37555d7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/83035
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
The package unsafe docs say it's safe to convert an unsafe.Pointer to
uintptr in the argument list to an assembly function, but it was
erroneously only detecting normal pointers converted to unsafe.Pointer
and then to intptr.
Fixes#23051.
Change-Id: Id1be19f6d8f26f2d17ba815191717d2f4f899732
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82817
Run-TryBot: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This essentially applies https://golang.org/cl/81636 to the net package.
The full truth seems too complicated to write in this method's doc, so
I'm going with a simple half truth.
The full truth is that File returns the descriptor in blocking mode,
because that is historically how it worked, and existing programs
would be surprised if the descriptor is suddenly non-blocking. On Unix
systems whether a socket is non-blocking or not is a property of the
underlying file description, not of a particular file descriptor, so
changing the returned descriptor to blocking mode also changes the
existing socket to blocking mode. Blocking mode works fine, althoug I/O
operations now take up a thread. SetDeadline and friends rely on the
runtime poller, and the runtime poller only works if the descriptor is
non-blocking. So it's correct that calling File disables SetDeadline.
The other half of the truth is that if the program is willing to work
with a non-blocking descriptor, it could call
syscall.SetNonblock(f.Fd(), true) to change the descriptor, and
the original socket, to non-blocking mode. At that point SetDeadline
would start working again. I tried to write that in a way that is
short and comprehensible but failed. Since we now have the RawConn
approach to frobbing the descriptor, and hopefully most people can use
that rather than calling File, I decided to punt.
Updates #22934Fixes#21862
Change-Id: If269da762f6f5a88c334e7b6d6f3998f7e10b11e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82915
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This test has been getting occasional timeouts on the race builder.
The point of the test is whether a file descriptor leaks, not whether
the connection occurs in a certain amount of time. So use a very large
timeout. The connection is normally fast and the timeout doesn't matter.
Updates #13324
Change-Id: Ie1051c4a0be1fca4e63b1277101770be0cdae512
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82916
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
The jobject type is declared as a pointer, but some JVMs
(Dalvik, ART) store non-pointer values in them. In Go, we must
use uintptr instead of a real pointer for these types.
This is similar to the CoreFoundation types on Darwin which
were "fixed" in CL 66332.
Update #22906
Update #21897
RELNOTE=yes
Change-Id: I0d4c664501d89a696c2fb037c995503caabf8911
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81876
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This error message should reference t2, not t1.
Change-Id: I2e42b8335ca9367a1fb7f76c38a1bcf8f32a2bf3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82816
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Aszalos <gabriel.aszalos@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Gabriel Aszalos <gabriel.aszalos@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This was originally done in https://golang.org/cl/31359 but partially
undone (apparently unintentionally) in https://golang.org/cl/34310
Fix it, and update tests to ensure the error is unrecoverable.
Fixes#23039
Change-Id: I923ebd613a05e67d8acce77f4a68c64c8574faa6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82656
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
The DNS code can start goroutines and not wait for them to complete.
This does no harm, but in tests this can cause a race condition with
the test hooks that are installed and unintalled around the tests.
Add a WaitGroup that tests of DNS can use to avoid the race.
Fixes#21090
Change-Id: I6c1443a9c2378e8b89d0ab1d6390c0e3e726b0ce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82795
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If (*Template).New replaces an existing template, reset the
existing template that is going to be replaced so that any
later attempt to execute this orphaned template will fail.
Fixes#22780
Change-Id: I0e058f42c1542c86d19dc5f6c4e1e859e670a4a2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/78542
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Pointer arithemetic is done mod 2^32 on 386, so we can just
drop the high bits of any large constant offsets.
The bounds check will make sure wraparounds are never observed.
Fixes#21655
Change-Id: I68ae5bbea9f02c73968ea2b21ca017e5ecb89223
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82675
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
I can reproduce with a very short timeout (fractions of a millisecond)
combined with -race.
But given that this is inherently sensitive to actual time, add a
testing mechanism to retry with increasingly large times to compensate
for busy buidlers. This also means the test is usually faster now,
too, since we can start with smaller durations.
Fixes#19608
Change-Id: I3a222464720195849da768e9801eb7b43baa4aeb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82595
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
It's 32-bit binaries that fail for reasons unknown on 64-bit kernels.
Change-Id: Ib410af0491160e3ed8d32118966142516123db2c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82655
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
The DWARF inline info generation code was using file/line/column (from
src.Pos) as a means of matching up pre- and post-optimization variable
nodes. This turns out to be problematic since it looks as though
distinct formals on the same line can be assigned the same column
number. Work around this issue by adding variable names to the
disambiguation code. Added a testpoint to the linker DWARF test that
checks to make sure each abstract origin offset of distinct within a
given DWARF DW_AT_inlined_routine body.
Fixes#23020.
Change-Id: Ie09bbe01dc60822d84d4085547b138e644036fb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82396
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
This CL reverts CL 76851 and takes a different approach to #21357.
The changes in encode.go and encode_test.go are reverts that
rolls back the changed behavior in CL 76851 where
embedded pointers to unexported struct types were
unilaterally ignored in both marshal and unmarshal.
Instead, these fields are handled as before with the exception that
it returns an error when Unmarshal is unable to set an unexported field.
The behavior of Marshal is now unchanged with regards to #21357.
This policy maintains the greatest degree of backwards compatibility
and avoids silently discarding data the user may have expected to be present.
Fixes#21357
Change-Id: I7dc753280c99f786ac51acf7e6c0246618c8b2b1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/82135
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fixed by CL 76025 yesterday, without realizing it:
the testshared and testplugin builds of separate iface_i
packages were colliding incorrectly in the cache.
Including the build directory fixes that.
Fixes#22571.
Change-Id: Id8193781c67c3150823dc1f48eae781dfe3702fb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/76371
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@golang.org>
