This is only supported power10/linux/PPC64. This generates smaller,
faster code by merging a pli + add into paddi.
Change-Id: I1f4d522fce53aea4c072713cc119a9e0d7065acc
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531717
Run-TryBot: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In the Power10 rule to fold bit reversal into load, the MOVWZreg or
MOVHZreg (Zeroing out the upper bits of a word or halfword) becomes
redundant since byte reverse (BR) load clears the upper bits. Hence
removing for Power10. Similarly for < Power10 cases in the rule used to
fold bit reversal into load (Bswap), the above redundant operation is removed.
Change-Id: Idb027e8b6e79b6acfb81d48a9a6cc06f8e9cd2db
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531377
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jayanth Krishnamurthy <jayanth.krishnamurthy@ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The documentation of readvarintUnsafe claims itself and readvarint are
duplicated. However, two implementation are not in synced, since when
readvarint got some minor improvements in CL 43150.
Updating readvarintUnsafe to match readvarint implementation to gain a
bit of speed. While at it, also updating its documentation to clarify
the main difference.
name time/op
ReadvarintUnsafe/old-8 6.04ns ± 2%
ReadvarintUnsafe/new-8 5.31ns ± 3%
Change-Id: Ie1805d0747544f69de88f6ba9d1b3960f80f00e8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535815
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Follow up discussion in CL 535077.
Change-Id: I102c90839e39c463e878ff925872376303724e12
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535636
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
The funcdata is encoded as varint, with the upper limit set to 1e9.
However, the stack offsets could be up to 1<<30. Thus emitOpenDeferInfo
will trigger an ICE for function with large frame size.
By using binary.PutUvarint, the frame offset could be encoded correctly
for value larger than 1<<35, allow the compiler to report the error.
Further, the runtime also do validation when reading in the funcdata
value, so a bad offset won't likely cause mis-behavior.
Fixes#52697
Change-Id: I084c243c5d24c5d31cc22d5b439f0889e42b107c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535077
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
In the PPC64 ISA, the instruction to do an 'and' operation
using an immediate constant is only available in the form that
also sets CR0 (i.e. clobbers the condition register.) This means
CR0 is being clobbered unnecessarily in many cases. That
affects some decisions made during some compiler passes
that check for it.
In those cases when the constant used by the ANDCC is a right
justified consecutive set of bits, a shift instruction can
be used which has the same effect if CR0 does not need to be
set. The rule to do that has been added to the late rules file
after other rules using ANDCCconst have been processed in the
main rules file.
Some codegen tests had to be updated since ANDCC is no
longer generated for some cases. A new test case was added to
verify the ANDCC is present if the results for both the AND
and CR0 are used.
Change-Id: I304f607c039a458e2d67d25351dd00aea72ba542
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531435
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Murphy <murp@ibm.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Jayanth Krishnamurthy <jayanth.krishnamurthy@ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
CL 529219 tweaked the list_pkgconfig_error script test currently to
expect pkg-config to fail with "Package .* not found$", but on several
OSes (at least OpenBSD, AIX, and Solaris), pkg-config prints "Package
libnot-a-valid-cgo-library was not found in the pkg-config search
path". Fix the test on these OSes by dropping the "$" so the test
doesn't require the line to end with "not found".
Change-Id: I40c577521f34c360a1d62355596958f6f969eb54
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536195
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Now that we've dropped the redundant Package arguments to many
functions, we can see that the Package argument to reportCmd is always
nil. That means we can drop it and always use a.Package.
For #62067.
Change-Id: I2e11e770f495d6f770047993358c76b08204e923
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536096
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
There are several functions that take both an Action argument and a
Package argument. It takes a decent amount of work to determine that
in all cases the value of the Package argument is just Action.Package.
This makes these Package arguments both redundant and potentially
confusing because it makes these APIs look like they have more
flexibility than they actually do.
Drop these unnecessary Package arguments.
For #62067.
Change-Id: Ibd3295cf6a79d95ceb421d60671f87e023517f8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536095
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Currently, fmtcmd may have the side effect of updating
Builder.scriptDir, the logical working directory of the printed
script. If it does so, it also returns a two line command consisting
of both a "cd" into the new scriptDir and the original command.
When fmtcmd is used as part of Showcmd, that's fine, but fmtcmd is
also used in a handful of places to construct command descriptions
that are ultimately passed to Builder.reportCmd. In these cases, it's
surprising that fmtcmd has any side effects, but the bigger problem is
that reportCmd isn't expecting a two-line description and will print
it wrong in the output.
One option is to fix printing multi-line descriptions in reportCmd,
but we can fix the surprise side effect too by instead moving the
working directory update to Showcmd. With this CL, fmtcmd merely
consults the working directory to shorten it in the output and does
not update it.
For #62067.
Change-Id: I7808b279a430551f4ba51545417adf0bb132f931
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534857
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
This functions have been replaced with Builder.reportCmd.
For #62067.
Change-Id: Ifeccee720b3da3dc44c49fe11da1eca7b5f46551
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529220
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
The general pattern is to replace
if len(cmdOut) > 0 {
output := b.processOutput(cmdOut)
if err != nil {
err = formatOutput(b.WorkDir, dir, p.ImportPath, desc, output)
} else {
b.showOutput(a, dir, desc, output)
}
}
if err != nil {
return err
}
with
if err := b.reportCmd(a, p, desc, dir, cmdOut, err); err != nil {
return err
}
However, there is a fair amount of variation between call sites. The
most common non-trivial variation is sites where errors are an
expected outcome. In this case, often we simply pass "nil" for the
error to trigger only the printing behavior of reportCmd.
For #62067, but also a nice cleanup on its own.
Change-Id: Ie5f918017c02d8558f23ad4c38261077c0fa4ea3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529219
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Many uses of showOutput, formatOutput, and processOutput follow a very
similar (somewhat complex) pattern. Places that diverge from this
pattern are often minor bugs. Furthermore, the roles of formatOutput
and processOutput have somewhat blurred over time; e.g., formatOutput
performs directory shortening, while processOutput performs cgo
demangling.
This CL consolidates all of this logic into a single, new function:
Builder.reportCmd.
In the following CL, we'll replace all calls of the three original
functions with reportCmd.
In addition to being a nice cleanup, this puts us in a much better
position to change how build output is formatted in order to support
`go build -json`.
For #62067.
Change-Id: I733162825377d82d0015c8aae2820e56a1b32958
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529218
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Some new linker may emit warning message to standard error, causing
false positive in test result.
Fixing this by testing only stdout output.
Fixes#63588
Change-Id: I272048c41dc1c316f44af2dfc903bb03383baea3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535975
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The function WriteTabs has been renamed WritePluginTable.
Change-Id: I5f04b99b91498c41121f898cb7774334a730d7b4
GitHub-Last-Rev: c98ab3f872
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63595
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535996
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
QueryPerformanceCounter is available since Windows 2000 [1], so there
is no need to conditionally load it.
Even if the Go runtime doesn't eventually use it, it is still simpler
and faster to just tell the Windows loader to load it, instead of doing
it ourselves.
[1]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/profileapi/nf-profileapi-queryperformancecounter
Change-Id: Ied3b54a6a8fe3b8d51aefab0fe483b3a193b5522
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/532915
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
AddVectoredContinueHandler is available since Windows XP [1], there is
no need to check if it is available.
[1]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/errhandlingapi/nf-errhandlingapi-addvectoredcontinuehandler
Change-Id: I1ddc3d58b3294d9876620cd46159d9692694b475
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/532817
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Run-TryBot: Quim Muntal <quimmuntal@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
The current output for empty declarations such as var, const, import
results in "var", "const", "import" respectively. These are not valid
and the parser will promptly reject them as invalid syntax.
This CL updates this behavior by adding "()" to the output of empty
decls so the syntax becomes valid, e.g "var ()" instead of "var".
Fixes#63566
Change-Id: I571b182d9ccf71b159360c8de003ad55d0ff3443
GitHub-Last-Rev: 2720419e36
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63593
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535995
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
While at it, also using "slices" package to simplify code.
For #63489
Change-Id: I72b325f6ad379b996c108145885fa71706f6659f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/536055
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
"out" is often used for stdout or stderr. Rename it to targetPath to
clarify its meaning.
Change-Id: I95823e9119843a7026dc26c192497776ee4219e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534595
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Fixes#63525.
Change-Id: Ie9aa4dd47c025cd593e576c6e8de1774e1d1e302
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535775
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Bypass: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Robert Griesemer <gri@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
We need to track the brace depth for each individual nested expression,
since a string interpolation expression may be nested inside of an
object.
e.g. `${ {1:`${}`}}` has brace depths [1, 0] when inside of the inner
${} expression. When we exit the inner expression, we need to reset to
the previous brace depth (1) so that we know that the following } closes
the object, but not the outer expression.
Note that if you write a broken expression (i.e. `${ { }`) escaping will
clearly not work as expected (or depending on your interpretation, since
it is broken, it will work as expected). Since the JS parser doesn't
catch syntax errors, it's up to the user to write a valid template.
Updates #61619
Change-Id: I4c33723d12aff49facdcb1134d9ca82b7a0dffc4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/532995
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Change-Id: Iba8878420c59d705066d1d9955e91a5c2eb4faf5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/507615
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: Id0a4f5716da98008eec10eee05b74fc2a155ba3c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535216
Reviewed-by: Mauri de Souza Meneguzzo <mauri870@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
We were using the size stored in the map, which is the smaller
of the real type size and 128.
As of CL 61538 we don't use these functions, but we expect to
use them again in the future after #61626 is resolved.
Change-Id: I7bfb4af5f0e3a56361d4019a8ed7c1ec59ff31fd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535215
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Change-Id: Ic1fc777b9a4e8262851e27646d53a0ec4fe55b64
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535076
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@golang.org>
Example can sometimes be more informative than additional prose.
Fixes#46829
Change-Id: Ia5a5b121ad0b891026e77420d5f7f1b2c4a407da
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/336749
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: qiulaidongfeng <2645477756@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: I2db83e3c97a154f8599b4fcbceeebf1c69ee61ae
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534762
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: Ieb43f28400e9ded3dc7e57f27f6d7514b14cc66d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535083
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Change-Id: Ic6397348108f00fc88b59b259169bd98daceba3a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/535085
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: I813aa09f8a65936796469fa637d0f23004d26098
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534757
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Id9706a783d3321e3706eeee102286522e7968efd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534775
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifc669399dde7d6229c6ccdbe29611ed1f8698fb1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534778
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Construction of Profile is getting more complex. Currently, we construct
a partial Profile and then use methods to slowly complete the structure.
This can hide dependencies and make refactoring fragile as the
requirements and outputs of the methods is not clearly specified.
Refactor construction to build the Profile only once all of the parts
are complete. The intermediate states explicitly pass input and outputs
as arguments.
Additionally, rename Profile.NodeMap to NamedEdgeMap to make its
contents more clear (edges, specified by caller/callee name rather than
IR). Remove the node flat/cumulative weight from this map; they are
unused.
Change-Id: I2079cd991daac6398d74375b04dfe120b473d908
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529558
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Today, the PGO IR graph only contains entries for ir.Func loaded into
the package. This can include functions from transitive dependencies,
but only if they happen to be referenced by something in the current
package. If they are not referenced, noder never bothers to load them.
This leads to a deficiency in PGO devirtualization: some callee methods
are available in transitive dependencies but do not devirtualize because
they happen to not get loaded from export data.
Resolve this by adding an explicit lookup from export data of callees
mentioned in the profile.
I have chosen to do this during loading of the profile for simplicity:
the PGO IR graph always contains all of the functions we might need.
That said, it isn't strictly necessary. PGO devirtualization could do
the lookup lazily if it decides it actually needs a method. This saves
work at the expense of a bit more complexity, but I've chosen the
simpler approach for now as I measured the cost of this as significantly
less than the rest of PGO loading.
For #61577.
Change-Id: Ieafb2a549510587027270ee6b4c3aefd149a901f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/497175
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Add PrefixToPath, which can be used to convert a package path in a
symbol name back to the original package path.
For #61577.
Change-Id: Ifbe8c852a7f41ff9b81ad48b92a26a0e1b046777
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/529557
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
If trampolines may be required, the current text addressing second
pass resets all assigned addresses, before assigning addresses and
laying down trampolines in a linear fashion. However, this approach
means that intra-package calls are to a symbol that has not yet
been assigned an address, when the symbol is ahead of the current
function.
In the case of RISC-V the JAL instruction is limited to +/-1MiB.
As such, if a call is to a symbol with no address currently assigned,
we have to assume that a trampoline will be required. During the
relocation phase we can fix up and avoid trampolines in some cases,
however this results in unused trampolines that are still present
in the binary (since removing them would change text addresses).
In order to significantly reduce the number of unused trampolines,
assign temporary addresses to functions within the same package,
based on the maximum number of trampolines that may be required by
a function. This allows for better decisions to be made regarding
the requirement for intra-package trampolines, as we reset the
addressing for a function, assign its final address and lay down
any resulting trampolines.
This results in ~2,300 unused trampolines being removed from the
Go binary and ~5,600 unused trampolines being removed from the
compile binary, on linux/riscv64.
This reapplies CL 349650, however does not pass big to assignAddress
when assigning temporary addresses, as this can result in side
effects such as section splitting.
Change-Id: Id7febdb65d962d6b1297a91294a8dc27c94d8696
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534760
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
IsZero does the same thing, using this rather than writing it again.
Change-Id: I62810ac2d1a6e189feac03b022c8931fb6993e19
GitHub-Last-Rev: 1d5fd10d96
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#63519
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534935
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
The system stack often starts with a stack transition function
like "systemstack" or "mcall", which is marked as SPWRITE. When
unwinding a system stack for printing, we want the traceback stop
at the stack switching frame, but not print the "unexpected
SPWRITE" message.
Previously before CL 525835, we don't print the "unexpected
SPWRITE" message if unwindPrintErrors is set, i.e. printing a
stack trace. This CL restores this behavior.
Another possibility is not printing the message only on the system
stack. We don't expect a stack transition function to appear in a
user G.
Change-Id: I173e89ead2cd4fbf1f0f8cca225f28718b5baebe
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/531815
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
When computing function cost, hairyVisitor.doNode has two primary cases
for determining the cost of a call inside the function:
* Normal calls are simply cost 57.
* Calls that can be inlined have the cost of the inlined function body,
since that body will end up in this function.
Determining which "calls can be inlined" is where this breaks down.
doNode simply assumes that any function with `fn.Inl != nil` will get
inlined. However, this are more complex in mkinlcall, which has a
variety of cases where it may not inline.
For standard builds, most of these reasons are fairly rare (recursive
calls, calls to runtime functions in instrumented builds, etc), so this
simplification isn't too build.
However, for PGO builds, any function involved in at least one inlinable
hot callsite will have `fn.Inl != nil`, even though mkinlcall will only
inline at the hot callsites. As a result, cold functions calling hot
functions will use the (potentially very large) hot function inline body
cost in their call budget. This could make these functions too expensive
to inline even though they won't actually inline the hot function.
Handle this case plus the other inlinability cases (recursive calls,
etc) by consolidating mkinlcall's inlinability logic into
canInlineCallExpr, which is shared by doNode.
mkinlcall and doNode now have identical logic, except for one case: we
check for recursive cycles via inlined functions by looking at the
inline tree. Since we haven't actually done any inlining yet when in
doNode, we will miss those cases.
This CL doesn't change any inlining decisions in a standard build of the
compiler.
In the new inliner, the inlining decision is also based on the call
site, so this synchronization is also helpful.
Fixes#59484
Change-Id: I6ace66e37d50526535972215497ef75cd71f8b9d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/483196
Reviewed-by: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
var p *[2]uint32 = ...
p[0] = 0
p[1] = 0
When we combine these two 32-bit stores into a single 64-bit store,
use the line number of the first store, not the second one.
This differs from the default behavior because usually with the combining
that the compiler does, we use the line number of the last instruction
in the combo (e.g. load+add, we use the line number of the add).
This is the same behavior that gcc does in C (picking the line
number of the first of a set of combined stores).
Change-Id: Ie70bf6151755322d33ecd50e4d9caf62f7881784
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/521678
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia6e88aec59cb294e8b303a00fcd69f4cbf0dc09a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534759
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I886a8869ba885286ac8219bc7e245c9237ad4c99
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534777
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Change-Id: Id32bae57c9fcc2074f82089ba9c69be9a601f128
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534758
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
Run-TryBot: shuang cui <imcusg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
In CL 163624 we added an atomic store in noteclear on AIX only.
In the discussion on issue #63384 we think we figured out that the
real problem was in the implementation of compare-and-swap on ppc64.
That is fixed by CL 533118, so the atomic store is no longer required.
For #30189
For #63384
Change-Id: I60f4f2fac75106f2bee51a8d9663259dcde2029c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534517
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Sing <joel@sing.id.au>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
The immediate-data interface shortcuts also apply to pointer-shaped
things like maps, channels, and functions.
Fixes#63505.
Change-Id: I43982441bf523f53e9e5d183e95aea7c6655dd6b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534657
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cuong Manh Le <cuong.manhle.vn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Currently, set_crosscall2 takes the address of crosscall2 without
using the GOT, which, on some architectures, results in a
PC-relative relocation (e.g. R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 on ARM64)
to the crosscall2 symbol. But crosscall2 is dynamically exported,
so the C linker thinks it may bind to a symbol from a different
DSO. Some C linker may not like a PC-relative relocation to such a
symbol. Using a local trampoline to avoid taking the address of a
dynamically exported symbol.
It may be possible to not dynamically export crosscall2. But this
CL is safer for backport. Later we may remove the trampolines
after unexport crosscall2, if they are not needed.
Fixes#62556.
Change-Id: Id28457f65ef121d3f87d8189803abc65ed453283
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/533535
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
For #61666
Change-Id: I7a0a849fba0abebe28804bdd6d364b154456e399
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/534516
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
