1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-14 19:50:21 -07:00

image/jpeg: ignore garbage bytes before a RST marker

Well-formed JPEG images will not have garbage bytes. However, for
corrupted JPEG images, the RST (restart) mechanism is specifically
designed so that a decoder can re-synchronize to an upcoming restartable
MCU (Minimum Coded Unit, e.g. 16x16 block of pixels) boundary and resume
decoding. Even if the resultant image isn't perfect, a 98%-good image is
better than a fatal error.

Every JPEG marker is encoded in two bytes, the first of which is 0xFF.
There are 8 possible RST markers, cycling as "0xFF 0xD0", "0xFF 0xD1",
..., "0xFF 0xD7". Suppose that, our decoder is expecting "0xFF 0xD1".

Before this commit, Go's image/jpeg package would accept only two
possible inputs: a well-formed "0xFF 0xD1" or one very specific pattern
of spec non-compliance, "0xFF 0x00 0xFF 0xD1".

After this commit, it is more lenient, similar to libjpeg's jdmarker.c's
next_marker function.
2dfe6c0fe9/jdmarker.c (L892-L935)

The new testdata file was created by:

$ convert video-001.png a.ppm
$ cjpeg -restart 2 a.ppm > video-001.restart2.jpeg
$ rm a.ppm

Fixes #40130

Change-Id: Ic598a5f489f110d6bd63e0735200fb6acac3aca3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/580755
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Joedian Reid <joedian@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nigel Tao 2024-04-22 23:36:32 +10:00
parent 799968dfc3
commit e7aeeae0c8
3 changed files with 91 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@ -504,6 +504,48 @@ func TestIssue56724(t *testing.T) {
}
}
func TestBadRestartMarker(t *testing.T) {
b, err := os.ReadFile("../testdata/video-001.restart2.jpeg")
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
} else if len(b) != 4855 {
t.Fatal("test image had unexpected length")
} else if (b[2816] != 0xff) || (b[2817] != 0xd1) {
t.Fatal("test image did not have FF D1 restart marker at expected offset")
}
prefix, suffix := b[:2816], b[2816:]
testCases := []string{
"PASS:",
"PASS:\x00",
"PASS:\x61",
"PASS:\x61\x62\x63\xff\x00\x64",
"PASS:\xff",
"PASS:\xff\x00",
"PASS:\xff\xff\xff\x00\xff\x00\x00\xff\xff\xff",
"FAIL:\xff\x03",
"FAIL:\xff\xd5",
"FAIL:\xff\xff\xd5",
}
for _, tc := range testCases {
want := tc[:5] == "PASS:"
infix := tc[5:]
data := []byte(nil)
data = append(data, prefix...)
data = append(data, infix...)
data = append(data, suffix...)
_, err := Decode(bytes.NewReader(data))
got := err == nil
if got != want {
t.Errorf("%q: got %v, want %v", tc, got, want)
}
}
}
func benchmarkDecode(b *testing.B, filename string) {
data, err := os.ReadFile(filename)
if err != nil {

View File

@ -305,33 +305,16 @@ func (d *decoder) processSOS(n int) error {
} // for i
mcu++
if d.ri > 0 && mcu%d.ri == 0 && mcu < mxx*myy {
// A more sophisticated decoder could use RST[0-7] markers to resynchronize from corrupt input,
// but this one assumes well-formed input, and hence the restart marker follows immediately.
// For well-formed input, the RST[0-7] restart marker follows
// immediately. For corrupt input, call findRST to try to
// resynchronize.
if err := d.readFull(d.tmp[:2]); err != nil {
return err
}
// Section F.1.2.3 says that "Byte alignment of markers is
// achieved by padding incomplete bytes with 1-bits. If padding
// with 1-bits creates a XFF value, a zero byte is stuffed
// before adding the marker."
//
// Seeing "\xff\x00" here is not spec compliant, as we are not
// expecting an *incomplete* byte (that needed padding). Still,
// some real world encoders (see golang.org/issue/28717) insert
// it, so we accept it and re-try the 2 byte read.
//
// libjpeg issues a warning (but not an error) for this:
// https://github.com/LuaDist/libjpeg/blob/6c0fcb8ddee365e7abc4d332662b06900612e923/jdmarker.c#L1041-L1046
if d.tmp[0] == 0xff && d.tmp[1] == 0x00 {
if err := d.readFull(d.tmp[:2]); err != nil {
} else if d.tmp[0] != 0xff || d.tmp[1] != expectedRST {
if err := d.findRST(expectedRST); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if d.tmp[0] != 0xff || d.tmp[1] != expectedRST {
return FormatError("bad RST marker")
}
expectedRST++
if expectedRST == rst7Marker+1 {
expectedRST = rst0Marker
@ -521,3 +504,47 @@ func (d *decoder) reconstructBlock(b *block, bx, by, compIndex int) error {
}
return nil
}
// findRST advances past the next RST restart marker that matches expectedRST.
// Other than I/O errors, it is also an error if we encounter an {0xFF, M}
// two-byte marker sequence where M is not 0x00, 0xFF or the expectedRST.
//
// This is similar to libjpeg's jdmarker.c's next_marker function.
// https://github.com/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo/blob/2dfe6c0fe9e18671105e94f7cbf044d4a1d157e6/jdmarker.c#L892-L935
//
// Precondition: d.tmp[:2] holds the next two bytes of JPEG-encoded input
// (input in the d.readFull sense).
func (d *decoder) findRST(expectedRST uint8) error {
for {
// i is the index such that, at the bottom of the loop, we read 2-i
// bytes into d.tmp[i:2], maintaining the invariant that d.tmp[:2]
// holds the next two bytes of JPEG-encoded input. It is either 0 or 1,
// so that each iteration advances by 1 or 2 bytes (or returns).
i := 0
if d.tmp[0] == 0xff {
if d.tmp[1] == expectedRST {
return nil
} else if d.tmp[1] == 0xff {
i = 1
} else if d.tmp[1] != 0x00 {
// libjpeg's jdmarker.c's jpeg_resync_to_restart does something
// fancy here, treating RST markers within two (modulo 8) of
// expectedRST differently from RST markers that are 'more
// distant'. Until we see evidence that recovering from such
// cases is frequent enough to be worth the complexity, we take
// a simpler approach for now. Any marker that's not 0x00, 0xff
// or expectedRST is a fatal FormatError.
return FormatError("bad RST marker")
}
} else if d.tmp[1] == 0xff {
d.tmp[0] = 0xff
i = 1
}
if err := d.readFull(d.tmp[i:2]); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 4.7 KiB