1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-10-05 02:21:22 -06:00
go/src/pkg/runtime/cgocall.c

295 lines
8.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
#include "runtime.h"
#include "arch_GOARCH.h"
ld: detect stack overflow due to NOSPLIT Fix problems found. On amd64, various library routines had bigger stack frames than expected, because large function calls had been added. runtime.assertI2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertI2T 8 after runtime.assertI2T uses 112 0 on entry to runtime.newTypeAssertionError -8 on entry to runtime.morestack01 runtime.assertE2E: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2E 16 after runtime.assertE2E uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.assertE2T: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.assertE2T 16 after runtime.assertE2T uses 104 8 on entry to runtime.panic 0 on entry to runtime.morestack16 -8 after runtime.morestack16 uses 8 runtime.newselect: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.newselect 56 after runtime.newselect uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectdefault: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectdefault 56 after runtime.selectdefault uses 64 48 on entry to runtime.printf 8 after runtime.printf uses 40 0 on entry to vprintf -8 on entry to runtime.morestack16 runtime.selectgo: nosplit stack overflow 120 assumed on entry to runtime.selectgo 0 after runtime.selectgo uses 120 -8 on entry to runtime.gosched On arm, 5c was tagging functions NOSPLIT that should not have been, like the recursive function printpanics: printpanics: nosplit stack overflow 124 assumed on entry to printpanics 112 after printpanics uses 12 108 on entry to printpanics 96 after printpanics uses 12 92 on entry to printpanics 80 after printpanics uses 12 76 on entry to printpanics 64 after printpanics uses 12 60 on entry to printpanics 48 after printpanics uses 12 44 on entry to printpanics 32 after printpanics uses 12 28 on entry to printpanics 16 after printpanics uses 12 12 on entry to printpanics 0 after printpanics uses 12 -4 on entry to printpanics R=r, r2 CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4188061
2011-02-22 15:40:40 -07:00
#include "stack.h"
#include "cgocall.h"
#include "race.h"
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// Cgo call and callback support.
//
// To call into the C function f from Go, the cgo-generated code calls
// runtime.cgocall(_cgo_Cfunc_f, frame), where _cgo_Cfunc_f is a
// gcc-compiled function written by cgo.
//
// runtime.cgocall (below) locks g to m, calls entersyscall
// so as not to block other goroutines or the garbage collector,
// and then calls runtime.asmcgocall(_cgo_Cfunc_f, frame).
//
// runtime.asmcgocall (in asm_$GOARCH.s) switches to the m->g0 stack
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// (assumed to be an operating system-allocated stack, so safe to run
// gcc-compiled code on) and calls _cgo_Cfunc_f(frame).
//
// _cgo_Cfunc_f invokes the actual C function f with arguments
// taken from the frame structure, records the results in the frame,
// and returns to runtime.asmcgocall.
//
// After it regains control, runtime.asmcgocall switches back to the
// original g (m->curg)'s stack and returns to runtime.cgocall.
//
// After it regains control, runtime.cgocall calls exitsyscall, which blocks
// until this m can run Go code without violating the $GOMAXPROCS limit,
// and then unlocks g from m.
//
// The above description skipped over the possibility of the gcc-compiled
// function f calling back into Go. If that happens, we continue down
// the rabbit hole during the execution of f.
//
// To make it possible for gcc-compiled C code to call a Go function p.GoF,
// cgo writes a gcc-compiled function named GoF (not p.GoF, since gcc doesn't
// know about packages). The gcc-compiled C function f calls GoF.
//
// GoF calls crosscall2(_cgoexp_GoF, frame, framesize). Crosscall2
// (in cgo/gcc_$GOARCH.S, a gcc-compiled assembly file) is a two-argument
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// adapter from the gcc function call ABI to the 6c function call ABI.
// It is called from gcc to call 6c functions. In this case it calls
// _cgoexp_GoF(frame, framesize), still running on m->g0's stack
// and outside the $GOMAXPROCS limit. Thus, this code cannot yet
// call arbitrary Go code directly and must be careful not to allocate
// memory or use up m->g0's stack.
//
// _cgoexp_GoF calls runtime.cgocallback(p.GoF, frame, framesize).
// (The reason for having _cgoexp_GoF instead of writing a crosscall3
// to make this call directly is that _cgoexp_GoF, because it is compiled
// with 6c instead of gcc, can refer to dotted names like
// runtime.cgocallback and p.GoF.)
//
// runtime.cgocallback (in asm_$GOARCH.s) switches from m->g0's
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// stack to the original g (m->curg)'s stack, on which it calls
// runtime.cgocallbackg(p.GoF, frame, framesize).
// As part of the stack switch, runtime.cgocallback saves the current
// SP as m->g0->sched.sp, so that any use of m->g0's stack during the
// execution of the callback will be done below the existing stack frames.
// Before overwriting m->g0->sched.sp, it pushes the old value on the
// m->g0 stack, so that it can be restored later.
//
// runtime.cgocallbackg (below) is now running on a real goroutine
// stack (not an m->g0 stack). First it calls runtime.exitsyscall, which will
// block until the $GOMAXPROCS limit allows running this goroutine.
// Once exitsyscall has returned, it is safe to do things like call the memory
// allocator or invoke the Go callback function p.GoF. runtime.cgocallbackg
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// first defers a function to unwind m->g0.sched.sp, so that if p.GoF
// panics, m->g0.sched.sp will be restored to its old value: the m->g0 stack
// and the m->curg stack will be unwound in lock step.
// Then it calls p.GoF. Finally it pops but does not execute the deferred
// function, calls runtime.entersyscall, and returns to runtime.cgocallback.
//
// After it regains control, runtime.cgocallback switches back to
// m->g0's stack (the pointer is still in m->g0.sched.sp), restores the old
// m->g0.sched.sp value from the stack, and returns to _cgoexp_GoF.
//
// _cgoexp_GoF immediately returns to crosscall2, which restores the
// callee-save registers for gcc and returns to GoF, which returns to f.
void *_cgo_init; /* filled in by dynamic linker when Cgo is available */
static int64 cgosync; /* represents possible synchronization in C code */
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// These two are only used by the architecture where TLS based storage isn't
// the default for g and m (e.g., ARM)
void *_cgo_load_gm; /* filled in by dynamic linker when Cgo is available */
void *_cgo_save_gm; /* filled in by dynamic linker when Cgo is available */
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
static void unwindm(void);
// Call from Go to C.
static void endcgo(void);
static FuncVal endcgoV = { endcgo };
void
runtime·cgocall(void (*fn)(void*), void *arg)
{
Defer d;
if(m->racecall) {
runtime·asmcgocall(fn, arg);
return;
}
if(!runtime·iscgo && !Windows)
runtime·throw("cgocall unavailable");
if(fn == 0)
runtime·throw("cgocall nil");
if(raceenabled)
runtime·racereleasemerge(&cgosync);
m->ncgocall++;
/*
* Lock g to m to ensure we stay on the same stack if we do a
* cgo callback. Add entry to defer stack in case of panic.
*/
runtime·lockOSThread();
d.fn = &endcgoV;
d.siz = 0;
d.link = g->defer;
d.argp = (void*)-1; // unused because unlockm never recovers
d.special = true;
d.free = false;
g->defer = &d;
m->ncgo++;
/*
* Announce we are entering a system call
* so that the scheduler knows to create another
* M to run goroutines while we are in the
* foreign code.
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
*
* The call to asmcgocall is guaranteed not to
* split the stack and does not allocate memory,
* so it is safe to call while "in a system call", outside
* the $GOMAXPROCS accounting.
*/
runtime·entersyscall();
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
runtime·asmcgocall(fn, arg);
runtime·exitsyscall();
if(g->defer != &d || d.fn != &endcgoV)
runtime·throw("runtime: bad defer entry in cgocallback");
g->defer = d.link;
endcgo();
}
static void
endcgo(void)
{
runtime·unlockOSThread();
m->ncgo--;
if(m->ncgo == 0) {
// We are going back to Go and are not in a recursive
// call. Let the GC collect any memory allocated via
// _cgo_allocate that is no longer referenced.
m->cgomal = nil;
}
if(raceenabled)
runtime·raceacquire(&cgosync);
}
void
runtime·NumCgoCall(int64 ret)
{
M *mp;
ret = 0;
for(mp=runtime·atomicloadp(&runtime·allm); mp; mp=mp->alllink)
ret += mp->ncgocall;
FLUSH(&ret);
}
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// Helper functions for cgo code.
void (*_cgo_malloc)(void*);
void (*_cgo_free)(void*);
void*
runtime·cmalloc(uintptr n)
{
struct {
uint64 n;
void *ret;
} a;
a.n = n;
a.ret = nil;
runtime·cgocall(_cgo_malloc, &a);
return a.ret;
}
void
runtime·cfree(void *p)
{
runtime·cgocall(_cgo_free, p);
}
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// Call from C back to Go.
static FuncVal unwindmf = {unwindm};
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
void
runtime·cgocallbackg(FuncVal *fn, void *arg, uintptr argsize)
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
{
Defer d;
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
if(m->racecall) {
reflect·call(fn, arg, argsize);
return;
}
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
if(g != m->curg)
runtime·throw("runtime: bad g in cgocallback");
runtime·exitsyscall(); // coming out of cgo call
if(m->needextram) {
m->needextram = 0;
runtime·newextram();
}
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// Add entry to defer stack in case of panic.
d.fn = &unwindmf;
d.siz = 0;
d.link = g->defer;
d.argp = (void*)-1; // unused because unwindm never recovers
d.special = true;
d.free = false;
g->defer = &d;
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
if(raceenabled)
runtime·raceacquire(&cgosync);
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// Invoke callback.
reflect·call(fn, arg, argsize);
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
if(raceenabled)
runtime·racereleasemerge(&cgosync);
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
// Pop defer.
// Do not unwind m->g0->sched.sp.
// Our caller, cgocallback, will do that.
if(g->defer != &d || d.fn != &unwindmf)
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
runtime·throw("runtime: bad defer entry in cgocallback");
g->defer = d.link;
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
runtime·entersyscall(); // going back to cgo call
}
static void
unwindm(void)
{
// Restore sp saved by cgocallback during
// unwind of g's stack (see comment at top of file).
switch(thechar){
default:
runtime·throw("runtime: unwindm not implemented");
case '8':
case '6':
case '5':
m->g0->sched.sp = *(uintptr*)m->g0->sched.sp;
runtime: scheduler, cgo reorganization * Change use of m->g0 stack (aka scheduler stack). * Provide runtime.mcall(f) to invoke f() on m->g0 stack. * Replace scheduler loop entry with runtime.mcall(schedule). Runtime.mcall eliminates the need for fake scheduler states that exist just to run a bit of code on the m->g0 stack (Grecovery, Gstackalloc). The elimination of the scheduler as a loop that stops and starts using gosave and gogo fixes a bad interaction with the way cgo uses the m->g0 stack. Cgo runs external (gcc-compiled) C functions on that stack, and then when calling back into Go, it sets m->g0->sched.sp below the added call frames, so that other uses of m->g0's stack will not interfere with those frames. Unfortunately, gogo (longjmp) back to the scheduler loop at this point would end up running scheduler with the lower sp, which no longer points at a valid stack frame for a call to scheduler. If scheduler then wrote any function call arguments or local variables to where it expected the stack frame to be, it would overwrite other data on the stack. I realized this possibility while debugging a problem with calling complex Go code in a Go -> C -> Go cgo callback. This wasn't the bug I was looking for, it turns out, but I believe it is a real bug nonetheless. Switching to runtime.mcall, which only adds new frames to the stack and never jumps into functions running in existing ones, fixes this bug. * Move cgo-related code out of proc.c into cgocall.c. * Add very large comment describing cgo call sequences. * Simpilify, regularize cgo function implementations and names. * Add test suite as misc/cgo/test. Now the Go -> C path calls cgocall, which calls asmcgocall, and the C -> Go path calls cgocallback, which calls cgocallbackg. The shuffling, which affects mainly the callback case, moves most of the callback implementation to cgocallback running on the m->curg stack (not the m->g0 scheduler stack) and only while accounted for with $GOMAXPROCS (between calls to exitsyscall and entersyscall). The previous callback code did not block in startcgocallback's approximation to exitsyscall, so if, say, the garbage collector were running, it would still barge in and start doing things like call malloc. Similarly endcgocallback's approximation of entersyscall did not call matchmg to kick off new OS threads when necessary, which caused the bug in issue 1560. Fixes #1560. R=iant CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/4253054
2011-03-07 08:37:42 -07:00
break;
}
}
void
runtime·badcgocallback(void) // called from assembly
{
runtime·throw("runtime: misaligned stack in cgocallback");
}
void
runtime·cgounimpl(void) // called from (incomplete) assembly
{
runtime·throw("runtime: cgo not implemented");
}
// For cgo-using programs with external linking,
// export "main" (defined in assembly) so that libc can handle basic
// C runtime startup and call the Go program as if it were
// the C main function.
#pragma cgo_export_static main