7a992bbebd
It's totally broken (requires MLINKS which we removed long ago, relies on the old man.conf(5) format we stopped supporting long ago, Alfred Morgan reported additional bugs on bugs@, ...), it reimplements man(1) in a very poor way, and it lacks many useful features that man(1) in an xterm(1) readily provides, so fixing it would be a waste of time. matthieu@ deraadt@ krw@ agree with the direction. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
notes | ||
sets |