'no' is the answer to the comment question: cc->name can't be NULL at

this point due to client_setname()'s work; remove this check.

ok oga@
This commit is contained in:
okan 2009-05-30 00:30:27 +00:00
parent 9e51da2d59
commit f18194f34c

View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*
* $Id: conf.c,v 1.62 2009/05/17 23:54:17 okan Exp $
* $Id: conf.c,v 1.63 2009/05/30 00:30:27 okan Exp $
*/
#include "headers.h"
@ -269,17 +269,12 @@ conf_client(struct client_ctx *cc)
char *wname = cc->name;
int ignore = 0;
/* Can wname be NULL? */
if (wname != NULL) {
TAILQ_FOREACH(wm, &Conf.ignoreq, entry) {
if (strncasecmp(wm->title, wname, strlen(wm->title))
== 0) {
ignore = 1;
break;
}
TAILQ_FOREACH(wm, &Conf.ignoreq, entry) {
if (strncasecmp(wm->title, wname, strlen(wm->title)) == 0) {
ignore = 1;
break;
}
} else
ignore = 1;
}
cc->bwidth = ignore ? 0 : Conf.bwidth;
cc->flags |= ignore ? CLIENT_IGNORE : 0;