mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-26 21:21:34 -07:00
399a36a634
R=dsymonds CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/7094058
266 lines
12 KiB
HTML
266 lines
12 KiB
HTML
<!--{
|
||
"title": "About the go command"
|
||
}-->
|
||
|
||
<p>The Go distribution includes a command, named
|
||
"<code><a href="/cmd/go/">go</a></code>", that
|
||
automates the downloading, building, installation, and testing of Go packages
|
||
and commands. This document talks about why we wrote a new command, what it
|
||
is, what it's not, and how to use it.</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>Motivation</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>You might have seen early Go talks in which Rob Pike jokes that the idea
|
||
for Go arose while waiting for a large Google server to compile. That
|
||
really was the motivation for Go: to build a language that worked well
|
||
for building the large software that Google writes and runs. It was
|
||
clear from the start that such a language must provide a way to
|
||
express dependencies between code libraries clearly, hence the package
|
||
grouping and the explicit import blocks. It was also clear from the
|
||
start that you might want arbitrary syntax for describing the code
|
||
being imported; this is why import paths are string literals.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>An explicit goal for Go from the beginning was to be able to build Go
|
||
code using only the information found in the source itself, not
|
||
needing to write a makefile or one of the many modern replacements for
|
||
makefiles. If Go needed a configuration file to explain how to build
|
||
your program, then Go would have failed.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>At first, there was no Go compiler, and the initial development
|
||
focused on building one and then building libraries for it. For
|
||
expedience, we postponed the automation of building Go code by using
|
||
make and writing makefiles. When compiling a single package involved
|
||
multiple invocations of the Go compiler, we even used a program to
|
||
write the makefiles for us. You can find it if you dig through the
|
||
repository history.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>The purpose of the new go command is our return to this ideal, that Go
|
||
programs should compile without configuration or additional effort on
|
||
the part of the developer beyond writing the necessary import
|
||
statements.</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>Configuration versus convention</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>The way to achieve the simplicity of a configuration-free system is to
|
||
establish conventions. The system works only to the extent that those conventions
|
||
are followed. When we first launched Go, many people published packages that
|
||
had to be installed in certain places, under certain names, using certain build
|
||
tools, in order to be used. That's understandable: that's the way it works in
|
||
most other languages. Over the last few years we consistently reminded people
|
||
about the <code>goinstall</code> command
|
||
(now replaced by <a href="/cmd/go/#hdr-Download_and_install_packages_and_dependencies"><code>go get</code></a>)
|
||
and its conventions: first, that the import path is derived in a known way from
|
||
the URL of the source code; second, that the place to store the sources in
|
||
the local file system is derived in a known way from the import path; third,
|
||
that each directory in a source tree corresponds to a single package; and
|
||
fourth, that the package is built using only information in the source code.
|
||
Today, the vast majority of packages follow these conventions.
|
||
The Go ecosystem is simpler and more powerful as a result.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>We received many requests to allow a makefile in a package directory to
|
||
provide just a little extra configuration beyond what's in the source code.
|
||
But that would have introduced new rules. Because we did not accede to such
|
||
requests, we were able to write the go command and eliminate our use of make
|
||
or any other build system.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>It is important to understand that the go command is not a general
|
||
build tool. It cannot be configured and it does not attempt to build
|
||
anything but Go packages. These are important simplifying
|
||
assumptions: they simplify not only the implementation but also, more
|
||
important, the use of the tool itself.</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>Go's conventions</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>The <code>go</code> command requires that code adheres to a few key,
|
||
well-established conventions.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>First, the import path is derived in an known way from the URL of the
|
||
source code. For Bitbucket, GitHub, Google Code, and Launchpad, the
|
||
root directory of the repository is identified by the repository's
|
||
main URL, without the <code>http://</code> prefix. Subdirectories are named by
|
||
adding to that path. For example, the supplemental networking
|
||
libraries for Go are obtained by running</p>
|
||
|
||
<pre>
|
||
hg clone http://code.google.com/p/go.net
|
||
</pre>
|
||
|
||
<p>and thus the import path for the root directory of that repository is
|
||
"<code>code.google.com/p/go.net</code>". The websocket package is stored in a
|
||
subdirectory, so its import path is
|
||
"<code>code.google.com/p/go.net/websocket</code>".</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>These paths are on the long side, but in exchange we get an
|
||
automatically managed name space for import paths and the ability for
|
||
a tool like the go command to look at an unfamiliar import path and
|
||
deduce where to obtain the source code.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Second, the place to store sources in the local file system is derived
|
||
in a known way from the import path. Specifically, the first choice
|
||
is <code>$GOPATH/src/<import-path></code>. If <code>$GOPATH</code> is
|
||
unset, the go command will fall back to storing source code alongside the
|
||
standard Go packages, in <code>$GOROOT/src/pkg/<import-path></code>.
|
||
If <code>$GOPATH</code> is set to a list of paths, the go command tries
|
||
<code><dir>/src/<import-path></code> for each of the directories in
|
||
that list.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Each of those trees contains, by convention, a top-level directory named
|
||
"<code>bin</code>", for holding compiled executables, and a top-level directory
|
||
named "<code>pkg</code>", for holding compiled packages that can be imported,
|
||
and the "<code>src</code>" directory, for holding package source files.
|
||
Imposing this structure lets us keep each of these directory trees
|
||
self-contained: the compiled form and the sources are always near each
|
||
other.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>These naming conventions also let us work in the reverse direction,
|
||
from a directory name to its import path. This mapping is important
|
||
for many of the go command's subcommands, as we'll see below.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Third, each directory in a source tree corresponds to a single
|
||
package. By restricting a directory to a single package, we don't have
|
||
to create hybrid import paths that specify first the directory and
|
||
then the package within that directory. Also, most file management
|
||
tools and UIs work on directories as fundamental units. Tying the
|
||
fundamental Go unit—the package—to file system structure means
|
||
that file system tools become Go package tools. Copying, moving, or
|
||
deleting a package corresponds to copying, moving, or deleting a
|
||
directory.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Fourth, each package is built using only the information present in
|
||
the source files. This makes it much more likely that the tool will
|
||
be able to adapt to changing build environments and conditions. For
|
||
example, if we allowed extra configuration such as compiler flags or
|
||
command line recipes, then that configuration would need to be updated
|
||
each time the build tools changed; it would also be inherently tied
|
||
to the use of a specific tool chain.</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>Getting started with the go command</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>Finally, a quick tour of how to use the go command, to supplement
|
||
the information in <a href="/doc/code.html">How to Write Go Code</a>,
|
||
which you might want to read first. Assuming you want
|
||
to keep your source code separate from the Go distribution source
|
||
tree, the first step is to set <code>$GOPATH</code>, the one piece of global
|
||
configuration that the go command needs. The <code>$GOPATH</code> can be a
|
||
list of directories, but by far the most common usage should be to set it to a
|
||
single directory. In particular, you do not need a separate entry in
|
||
<code>$GOPATH</code> for each of your projects. One <code>$GOPATH</code> can
|
||
support many projects.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Here’s an example. Let’s say we decide to keep our Go code in the directory
|
||
<code>$HOME/mygo</code>. We need to create that directory and set
|
||
<code>$GOPATH</code> accordingly.</p>
|
||
|
||
<pre>
|
||
$ mkdir $HOME/mygo
|
||
$ export GOPATH=$HOME/mygo
|
||
$
|
||
</pre>
|
||
|
||
<p>Into this directory, we now add some source code. Suppose we want to use
|
||
the indexing library from the codesearch project along with a left-leaning
|
||
red-black tree. We can install both with the "<code>go get</code>"
|
||
subcommand:</p>
|
||
|
||
<pre>
|
||
$ go get code.google.com/p/codesearch/index
|
||
$ go get github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb
|
||
$
|
||
</pre>
|
||
|
||
<p>Both of these projects are now downloaded and installed into our
|
||
<code>$GOPATH</code> directory. The one tree now contains the two directories
|
||
<code>src/code.google.com/p/codesearch/index/</code> and
|
||
<code>src/github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb/</code>, along with the compiled
|
||
packages (in <code>pkg/</code>) for those libraries and their dependencies.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Because we used version control systems (Mercurial and Git) to check
|
||
out the sources, the source tree also contains the other files in the
|
||
corresponding repositories, such as related packages. The "<code>go list</code>"
|
||
subcommand lists the import paths corresponding to its arguments, and
|
||
the pattern "<code>./...</code>" means start in the current directory
|
||
("<code>./</code>") and find all packages below that directory
|
||
("<code>...</code>"):</p>
|
||
|
||
<pre>
|
||
$ go list ./...
|
||
code.google.com/p/codesearch/cmd/cgrep
|
||
code.google.com/p/codesearch/cmd/cindex
|
||
code.google.com/p/codesearch/cmd/csearch
|
||
code.google.com/p/codesearch/index
|
||
code.google.com/p/codesearch/regexp
|
||
code.google.com/p/codesearch/sparse
|
||
github.com/petar/GoLLRB/example
|
||
github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb
|
||
$
|
||
</pre>
|
||
|
||
<p>We can also test those packages:</p>
|
||
|
||
<pre>
|
||
$ go test ./...
|
||
? code.google.com/p/codesearch/cmd/cgrep [no test files]
|
||
? code.google.com/p/codesearch/cmd/cindex [no test files]
|
||
? code.google.com/p/codesearch/cmd/csearch [no test files]
|
||
ok code.google.com/p/codesearch/index 0.239s
|
||
ok code.google.com/p/codesearch/regexp 0.021s
|
||
? code.google.com/p/codesearch/sparse [no test files]
|
||
? github.com/petar/GoLLRB/example [no test files]
|
||
ok github.com/petar/GoLLRB/llrb 0.231s
|
||
$
|
||
</pre>
|
||
|
||
<p>If a go subcommand is invoked with no paths listed, it operates on the
|
||
current directory:</p>
|
||
|
||
<pre>
|
||
$ cd $GOPATH/src/code.google.com/p/codesearch/regexp
|
||
$ go list
|
||
code.google.com/p/codesearch/regexp
|
||
$ go test -v
|
||
=== RUN TestNstateEnc
|
||
--- PASS: TestNstateEnc (0.00 seconds)
|
||
=== RUN TestMatch
|
||
--- PASS: TestMatch (0.01 seconds)
|
||
=== RUN TestGrep
|
||
--- PASS: TestGrep (0.00 seconds)
|
||
PASS
|
||
ok code.google.com/p/codesearch/regexp 0.021s
|
||
$ go install
|
||
$
|
||
</pre>
|
||
|
||
<p>That "<code>go install</code>" subcommand installs the latest copy of the
|
||
package into the pkg directory. Because the go command can analyze the
|
||
dependency graph, "<code>go install</code>" also installs any packages that
|
||
this package imports but that are out of date, recursively.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>Notice that "<code>go install</code>" was able to determine the name of the
|
||
import path for the package in the current directory, because of the convention
|
||
for directory naming. It would be a little more convenient if we could pick
|
||
the name of the directory where we kept source code, and we probably wouldn't
|
||
pick such a long name, but that ability would require additional configuration
|
||
and complexity in the tool. Typing an extra directory name or two is a small
|
||
price to pay for the increased simplicity and power.</p>
|
||
|
||
<p>As the example shows, it’s fine to work with packages from many different
|
||
projects at once within a single <code>$GOPATH</code> root directory.</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>Limitations</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>As mentioned above, the go command is not a general-purpose build
|
||
tool. In particular, it does not have any facility for generating Go
|
||
source files during a build. Instead, if you want to use a tool like
|
||
yacc or the protocol buffer compiler, you will need to write a
|
||
makefile (or a configuration file for the build tool of your choice)
|
||
to generate the Go files and then check those generated source files
|
||
into your repository. This is more work for you, the package author,
|
||
but it is significantly less work for your users, who can use
|
||
"<code>go get</code>" without needing to obtain and build
|
||
any additional tools.</p>
|
||
|
||
<h2>More information</h2>
|
||
|
||
<p>For more information, read <a href="/doc/code.html">How to Write Go Code</a>
|
||
and see the <a href="/cmd/go/">go command documentation</a>.</p>
|