mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-14 15:10:54 -07:00
375092bdcb
When processing a fallthrough, the casebody function in swt.go
checks that the last statement has indeed Op == OXFALL (not-processed
fallthrough) before setting it to OFALL (processed fallthrough).
Unfortunately, sometimes the fallthrough statement won't be in the
last node. For example, in
case 0:
return func() int {return 1}()
fallthrough
the compiler generates
autotmp_0 = (func literal)(); return autotmp_0; fallthrough; <node VARKILL>
with an OVARKILL node in the last position. casebody will find that
last.Op != OXFALL, won't mark the fallthrough as processed, and the
fallthrough line will cause a "fallthrough statement out of place" error.
To fix this, we change casebody so that it searches for the fallthrough
statement backwards in the statements list, without assuming that it'll
be in the last position.
Fixes #13262
Change-Id: I366c6caa7fd7442d365bd7a08cc66a552212d9b2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22921
Run-TryBot: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Smith <quentin@golang.org>
22 lines
386 B
Go
22 lines
386 B
Go
// compile
|
|
|
|
// Copyright 2016 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
|
|
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
// Issue 13262: cmd/compile: bogus "fallthrough
|
|
// statement out of place" error
|
|
|
|
package p
|
|
|
|
func f() int {
|
|
var a int
|
|
switch a {
|
|
case 0:
|
|
return func() int { return 1 }()
|
|
fallthrough
|
|
default:
|
|
}
|
|
return 0
|
|
}
|