1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-10-04 18:31:22 -06:00
go/src/cmd/6g
Russ Cox 84f291b1bd 8g: compute register liveness during regopt
Input code like

0000 (x.go:2) TEXT    main+0(SB),$36-0
0001 (x.go:3) MOVL    $5,i+-8(SP)
0002 (x.go:3) MOVL    $0,i+-4(SP)
0003 (x.go:4) MOVL    $1,BX
0004 (x.go:4) MOVL    i+-8(SP),AX
0005 (x.go:4) MOVL    i+-4(SP),DX
0006 (x.go:4) MOVL    AX,autotmp_0000+-20(SP)
0007 (x.go:4) MOVL    DX,autotmp_0000+-16(SP)
0008 (x.go:4) MOVL    autotmp_0000+-20(SP),CX
0009 (x.go:4) CMPL    autotmp_0000+-16(SP),$0
0010 (x.go:4) JNE     ,13
0011 (x.go:4) CMPL    CX,$32
0012 (x.go:4) JCS     ,14
0013 (x.go:4) MOVL    $0,BX
0014 (x.go:4) SHLL    CX,BX
0015 (x.go:4) MOVL    BX,x+-12(SP)
0016 (x.go:5) MOVL    x+-12(SP),AX
0017 (x.go:5) CDQ     ,
0018 (x.go:5) MOVL    AX,autotmp_0001+-28(SP)
0019 (x.go:5) MOVL    DX,autotmp_0001+-24(SP)
0020 (x.go:5) MOVL    autotmp_0001+-28(SP),AX
0021 (x.go:5) MOVL    autotmp_0001+-24(SP),DX
0022 (x.go:5) MOVL    AX,(SP)
0023 (x.go:5) MOVL    DX,4(SP)
0024 (x.go:5) CALL    ,runtime.printint+0(SB)
0025 (x.go:5) CALL    ,runtime.printnl+0(SB)
0026 (x.go:6) RET     ,

is problematic because the liveness range for
autotmp_0000 (0006-0009) is nested completely
inside a span where BX holds a live value (0003-0015).
Because the register allocator only looks at 0006-0009
to see which registers are used, it misses the fact that
BX is unavailable and uses it anyway.

The n->pun = anyregalloc() check in tempname is
a workaround for this bug, but I hit it again because
I did the tempname call before allocating BX, even
though I then used the temporary after storing in BX.
This should fix the real bug, and then we can remove
the workaround in tempname.

The code creates pseudo-variables for each register
and includes that information in the liveness propagation.
Then the regu fields can be populated using that more
complete information.  With that approach, BX is marked
as in use on every line in the whole span 0003-0015,
so that the decision about autotmp_0000
(using only 0006-0009) still has all the information
it needs.

This is not specific to the 386, but it only happens in
generated code of the form

        load R1
        ...
        load var into R2
        ...
        store R2 back into var
        ...
        use R1

and for the most part the other compilers generate
the loads for a given compiled line before any of
the stores.  Even so, this may not be the case everywhere,
so the change is worth making in all three.

R=ken2, ken, ken
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/4529106
2011-06-03 14:10:39 -04:00
..
cgen.c gc: inline append when len<cap 2011-05-11 16:35:11 +02:00
doc.go tweak documentation of commands 2009-11-09 11:45:15 -08:00
galign.c gc: delete float, complex 2011-01-19 23:08:11 -05:00
gg.h 6g: avoid too-large immediate constants 2010-10-20 00:40:06 -04:00
ggen.c gc: typecheck the whole tree before walking. preparation for some escape-analysis related changes. 2011-06-02 18:48:17 +02:00
gobj.c ld: 25% faster 2011-04-09 09:44:20 -04:00
gsubr.c gc: inline append when len<cap 2011-05-11 16:35:11 +02:00
list.c various: avoid %ld etc 2010-10-13 16:20:22 -04:00
Makefile gc: typecheck the whole tree before walking. preparation for some escape-analysis related changes. 2011-06-02 18:48:17 +02:00
opt.h sped up optimization by not optimizing 2009-08-29 20:33:21 -07:00
peep.c 1. integer division by a constant done. 2009-08-09 15:16:06 -07:00
reg.c 8g: compute register liveness during regopt 2011-06-03 14:10:39 -04:00