1
0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go synced 2024-11-19 05:54:44 -07:00
go/test/codegen
Martin Möhrmann f41451e7eb compile: prefer an AND instead of SHR+SHL instructions
On modern 64bit CPUs a SHR, SHL or AND instruction take 1 cycle to execute.
A pair of shifts that operate on the same register will take 2 cycles
and needs to wait for the input register value to be available.

Large constants used to mask the high bits of a register with an AND
instruction can not be encoded as an immediate in the AND instruction
on amd64 and therefore need to be loaded into a register with a MOV
instruction.

However that MOV instruction is not dependent on the output register and
on many CPUs does not compete with the AND or shift instructions for
execution ports.

Using a pair of shifts to mask high bits instead of an AND to mask high
bits of a register has a shorter encoding and uses one less general
purpose register but is slower due to taking one clock cycle longer
if there is no register pressure that would make the AND variant need to
generate a spill.

For example the instructions emitted for (x & 1 << 63) before this CL are:
48c1ea3f                SHRQ $0x3f, DX
48c1e23f                SHLQ $0x3f, DX

after this CL the instructions are the same as GCC and LLVM use:
48b80000000000000080    MOVQ $0x8000000000000000, AX
4821d0                  ANDQ DX, AX

Some platforms such as arm64 already have SSA optimization rules to fuse
two shift instructions back into an AND.

Removing the general rule to rewrite AND to SHR+SHL speeds up this benchmark:

    var GlobalU uint

    func BenchmarkAndHighBits(b *testing.B) {
        x := uint(0)
        for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
                x &= 1 << 63
        }
        GlobalU = x
    }

amd64/darwin on Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz:
name           old time/op  new time/op  delta
AndHighBits-4  0.61ns ± 6%  0.42ns ± 6%  -31.42%  (p=0.000 n=25+25):

'go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen' passes  with following adjustments:

ARM64: The BFXIL pattern ((x << lc) >> rc | y & ac) needed adjustment
       since ORshiftRL generation fusing '>> rc' and '|' interferes
       with matching ((x << lc) >> rc) to generate UBFX. Previously
       ORshiftLL was created first using the shifts generated for (y & ac).

S390X: Add rules for abs and copysign to match use of AND instead of SHIFTs.

Updates #33826
Updates #32781

Change-Id: I5a59f6239660d53c029cd22dfb44ddf39f93a56c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/196810
Run-TryBot: Martin Möhrmann <moehrmann@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
2019-09-24 20:30:59 +00:00
..
alloc.go cmd/compile: don't generate newobject call for 0-sized types 2019-02-26 23:08:15 +00:00
arithmetic.go cmd/compile: add signed divisibility rules 2019-04-30 22:02:07 +00:00
bitfield.go
bits.go cmd/compile: optimize bitset tests 2019-08-27 18:01:16 +00:00
comparisons.go test/codegen: fix wasm codegen breakage 2019-09-21 16:31:44 +00:00
condmove.go cmd/compile: generate Select on WASM 2019-08-28 02:29:25 +00:00
copy.go test/codegen: enable more tests for ppc64/ppc64le 2018-10-16 19:00:53 +00:00
floats.go cmd/compile: fix the error of absorbing boolean tests into block(FGE, FGT) 2019-05-16 13:46:25 +00:00
issue22703.go
issue25378.go
issue31618.go cmd/compile: always mark atColumn1 results as statements 2019-04-23 17:39:11 +00:00
mapaccess.go
maps.go cmd/compile: avoid string allocations when map key is struct or array literal 2018-10-15 19:22:07 +00:00
math.go compile: prefer an AND instead of SHR+SHL instructions 2019-09-24 20:30:59 +00:00
mathbits.go cmd/compile: add math/bits.Mul64 intrinsic on s390x 2019-09-13 09:04:48 +00:00
memcombine.go cmd/compile: improve s390x sign/zero extension removal 2019-09-10 13:17:24 +00:00
memops.go cmd/compile: fix rule for combining loads with compares 2018-10-27 00:59:54 +00:00
noextend.go test/codegen: gofmt 2019-03-13 21:44:45 +00:00
race.go cmd/compile: handle new panicindex/slice names in optimizations 2019-04-03 21:24:17 +00:00
README Revert "test/codegen: document -all_codegen option in README" 2019-09-16 17:31:37 +00:00
rotate.go test/codegen: enable more tests for ppc64/ppc64le 2018-10-16 19:00:53 +00:00
shift.go cmd/compile: optimize bounded shifts on wasm 2019-08-28 04:44:21 +00:00
slices.go cmd/compile: support more length types for slice extension optimization 2019-09-17 17:18:17 +00:00
stack.go Revert "Revert "cmd/compile,runtime: allocate defer records on the stack"" 2019-06-10 16:19:39 +00:00
strings.go cmd/compile: apply optimization for readonly globals on wasm 2019-08-28 05:55:52 +00:00
structs.go
switch.go cmd/compile: optimize switch on strings 2019-09-18 05:33:05 +00:00
zerosize.go cmd/compile: pad zero-sized stack variables 2018-12-22 01:16:00 +00:00

// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

The codegen directory contains code generation tests for the gc
compiler.


- Introduction

The test harness compiles Go code inside files in this directory and
matches the generated assembly (the output of `go tool compile -S`)
against a set of regexps to be specified in comments that follow a
special syntax (described below). The test driver is implemented as a
step of the top-level test/run.go suite, called "asmcheck".

The codegen harness is part of the all.bash test suite, but for
performance reasons only the codegen tests for the host machine's
GOARCH are enabled by default. To perform comprehensive tests for all
the supported architectures, one can run the following command

  $ ../bin/go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen

in the top-level test directory. This is recommended after any change
that affect the compiler's code.

The test harness compiles the tests with the same go toolchain that is
used to run run.go. After writing tests for a newly added codegen
transformation, it can be useful to first run the test harness with a
toolchain from a released Go version (and verify that the new tests
fail), and then re-runnig the tests using the devel toolchain.


- Regexps comments syntax

Instructions to match are specified inside plain comments that start
with an architecture tag, followed by a colon and a quoted Go-style
regexp to be matched. For example, the following test:

  func Sqrt(x float64) float64 {
  	   // amd64:"SQRTSD"
  	   // arm64:"FSQRTD"
  	   return math.Sqrt(x)
  }

verifies that math.Sqrt calls are intrinsified to a SQRTSD instruction
on amd64, and to a FSQRTD instruction on arm64.

It is possible to put multiple architectures checks into the same
line, as:

  // amd64:"SQRTSD" arm64:"FSQRTD"

although this form should be avoided when doing so would make the
regexps line excessively long and difficult to read.

Comments that are on their own line will be matched against the first
subsequent non-comment line. Inline comments are also supported; the
regexp will be matched against the code found on the same line:

  func Sqrt(x float64) float64 {
  	   return math.Sqrt(x) // arm:"SQRTD"
  }

It's possible to specify a comma-separated list of regexps to be
matched. For example, the following test:

  func TZ8(n uint8) int {
  	   // amd64:"BSFQ","ORQ\t\\$256"
  	   return bits.TrailingZeros8(n)
  }

verifies that the code generated for a bits.TrailingZeros8 call on
amd64 contains both a "BSFQ" instruction and an "ORQ $256".

Note how the ORQ regex includes a tab char (\t). In the Go assembly
syntax, operands are separated from opcodes by a tabulation.

Regexps can be quoted using either " or `. Special characters must be
escaped accordingly. Both of these are accepted, and equivalent:

  // amd64:"ADDQ\t\\$3"
  // amd64:`ADDQ\t\$3`

and they'll match this assembly line:

  ADDQ	$3

Negative matches can be specified using a - before the quoted regexp.
For example:

  func MoveSmall() {
  	   x := [...]byte{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}
  	   copy(x[1:], x[:]) // arm64:-".*memmove"
  }

verifies that NO memmove call is present in the assembly generated for
the copy() line.


- Architecture specifiers

There are three different ways to specify on which architecture a test
should be run:

* Specify only the architecture (eg: "amd64"). This indicates that the
  check should be run on all the supported architecture variants. For
  instance, arm checks will be run against all supported GOARM
  variations (5,6,7).
* Specify both the architecture and a variant, separated by a slash
  (eg: "arm/7"). This means that the check will be run only on that
  specific variant.
* Specify the operating system, the architecture and the variant,
  separated by slashes (eg: "plan9/386/sse2", "plan9/amd64/"). This is
  needed in the rare case that you need to do a codegen test affected
  by a specific operating system; by default, tests are compiled only
  targeting linux.


- Remarks, and Caveats

-- Write small test functions

As a general guideline, test functions should be small, to avoid
possible interactions between unrelated lines of code that may be
introduced, for example, by the compiler's optimization passes.

Any given line of Go code could get assigned more instructions that it
may appear from reading the source. In particular, matching all MOV
instructions should be avoided; the compiler may add them for
unrelated reasons and this may render the test ineffective.

-- Line matching logic

Regexps are always matched from the start of the instructions line.
This means, for example, that the "MULQ" regexp is equivalent to
"^MULQ" (^ representing the start of the line), and it will NOT match
the following assembly line:

  IMULQ	$99, AX

To force a match at any point of the line, ".*MULQ" should be used.

For the same reason, a negative regexp like -"memmove" is not enough
to make sure that no memmove call is included in the assembly. A
memmove call looks like this:

  CALL	runtime.memmove(SB)

To make sure that the "memmove" symbol does not appear anywhere in the
assembly, the negative regexp to be used is -".*memmove".