mirror of
https://github.com/golang/go
synced 2024-11-23 18:30:06 -07:00
e8f5a33191
Some ARM64 rewriting rules convert 'comparing to zero' conditions of if statements to a simplified version utilizing CMN and CMP instructions to branch over condition flags, in order to save one Add or Sub caculation. Such optimizations lead to wrong branching in case an overflow/underflow occurs when executing CMN or CMP. Fix the issue by introducing new block opcodes that don't honor the overflow/underflow flag, in the following categories: Block-Op Meaning ARM condition codes 1. LTnoov less than MI 2. GEnoov greater than or equal PL 3. LEnoov less than or equal MI || EQ 4. GTnoov greater than NEQ & PL The backend generates two consecutive branch instructions for 'LEnoov' and 'GTnoov' to model their expected behavior. A slight change to 'gc' and amd64/386 backends is made to unify the code generation. Add a test 'TestCondRewrite' as justification, it covers 32 incorrect rules identified on arm64, more might be needed on other arches, like 32-bit arm. Add two benchmarks profiling the aforementioned category 1&2 and category 3&4 separetely, we expect the first two categories will show performance improvement and the second will not result in visible regression compared with the non-optimized version. This change also updates TestFormats to support using %#x. Examples exhibiting where does the issue come from: 1: 'if x + 3 < 0' might be converted to: before: CMN $3, R0 BGE <else branch> // wrong branch is taken if 'x+3' overflows after: CMN $3, R0 BPL <else branch> 2: 'if y - 3 > 0' might be converted to: before: CMP $3, R0 BLE <else branch> // wrong branch is taken if 'y-3' underflows after: CMP $3, R0 BMI <else branch> BEQ <else branch> Benchmark data from different kinds of arm64 servers, 'old' is the non-optimized version (not the parent commit), generally the optimization version outperforms. S1: name old time/op new time/op delta CondRewrite/SoloJump 13.6ns ± 0% 12.9ns ± 0% -5.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) CondRewrite/CombJump 13.8ns ± 1% 12.9ns ± 0% -6.32% (p=0.000 n=10+10) S2: name old time/op new time/op delta CondRewrite/SoloJump 11.6ns ± 0% 10.9ns ± 0% -6.03% (p=0.000 n=10+10) CondRewrite/CombJump 11.4ns ± 0% 10.8ns ± 1% -5.53% (p=0.000 n=10+10) S3: name old time/op new time/op delta CondRewrite/SoloJump 7.36ns ± 0% 7.50ns ± 0% +1.79% (p=0.000 n=9+10) CondRewrite/CombJump 7.35ns ± 0% 7.75ns ± 0% +5.51% (p=0.000 n=8+9) S4: name old time/op new time/op delta CondRewrite/SoloJump-224 11.5ns ± 1% 10.9ns ± 0% -4.97% (p=0.000 n=10+10) CondRewrite/CombJump-224 11.9ns ± 0% 11.5ns ± 0% -2.95% (p=0.000 n=10+10) S5: name old time/op new time/op delta CondRewrite/SoloJump 10.0ns ± 0% 10.0ns ± 0% -0.45% (p=0.000 n=9+10) CondRewrite/CombJump 9.93ns ± 0% 9.77ns ± 0% -1.53% (p=0.000 n=10+9) Go1 perf. data: name old time/op new time/op delta BinaryTree17 6.29s ± 1% 6.30s ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5) Fannkuch11 5.40s ± 0% 5.40s ± 0% ~ (p=0.841 n=5+5) FmtFprintfEmpty 97.9ns ± 0% 98.9ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.937 n=4+5) FmtFprintfString 171ns ± 3% 171ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.754 n=5+5) FmtFprintfInt 212ns ± 0% 217ns ± 6% +2.55% (p=0.008 n=5+5) FmtFprintfIntInt 296ns ± 1% 297ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.516 n=5+5) FmtFprintfPrefixedInt 371ns ± 2% 374ns ± 7% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5) FmtFprintfFloat 435ns ± 1% 439ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.056 n=5+5) FmtManyArgs 1.37µs ± 1% 1.36µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.730 n=5+5) GobDecode 14.6ms ± 4% 14.4ms ± 4% ~ (p=0.690 n=5+5) GobEncode 11.8ms ±20% 11.6ms ±15% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5) Gzip 507ms ± 0% 491ms ± 0% -3.22% (p=0.008 n=5+5) Gunzip 73.8ms ± 0% 73.9ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.690 n=5+5) HTTPClientServer 116µs ± 0% 116µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.686 n=4+4) JSONEncode 21.8ms ± 1% 21.6ms ± 2% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5) JSONDecode 104ms ± 1% 103ms ± 1% -1.08% (p=0.016 n=5+5) Mandelbrot200 9.53ms ± 0% 9.53ms ± 0% ~ (p=0.421 n=5+5) GoParse 7.55ms ± 1% 7.51ms ± 1% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5) RegexpMatchEasy0_32 158ns ± 0% 158ns ± 0% ~ (all equal) RegexpMatchEasy0_1K 606ns ± 1% 608ns ± 3% ~ (p=0.937 n=5+5) RegexpMatchEasy1_32 143ns ± 0% 144ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.095 n=5+4) RegexpMatchEasy1_1K 927ns ± 2% 944ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.056 n=5+5) RegexpMatchMedium_32 16.0ns ± 0% 16.0ns ± 0% ~ (all equal) RegexpMatchMedium_1K 69.3µs ± 2% 69.7µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.690 n=5+5) RegexpMatchHard_32 3.73µs ± 0% 3.73µs ± 1% ~ (p=0.984 n=5+5) RegexpMatchHard_1K 111µs ± 1% 110µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5) Revcomp 1.91s ±47% 1.77s ±68% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5) Template 138ms ± 1% 138ms ± 1% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+5) TimeParse 787ns ± 2% 785ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.540 n=5+5) TimeFormat 729ns ± 1% 726ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5) Updates #38740 Change-Id: I06c604874acdc1e63e66452dadee5df053045222 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/233097 Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
addrcalc.go | ||
alloc.go | ||
arithmetic.go | ||
bitfield.go | ||
bits.go | ||
bool.go | ||
compare_and_branch.go | ||
comparisons.go | ||
condmove.go | ||
copy.go | ||
floats.go | ||
fuse.go | ||
issue22703.go | ||
issue25378.go | ||
issue31618.go | ||
issue33580.go | ||
issue38554.go | ||
mapaccess.go | ||
maps.go | ||
math.go | ||
mathbits.go | ||
memcombine.go | ||
memops.go | ||
noextend.go | ||
race.go | ||
README | ||
retpoline.go | ||
rotate.go | ||
shift.go | ||
shortcircuit.go | ||
slices.go | ||
smallintiface.go | ||
spectre.go | ||
stack.go | ||
strings.go | ||
structs.go | ||
switch.go | ||
zerosize.go |
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style // license that can be found in the LICENSE file. The codegen directory contains code generation tests for the gc compiler. - Introduction The test harness compiles Go code inside files in this directory and matches the generated assembly (the output of `go tool compile -S`) against a set of regexps to be specified in comments that follow a special syntax (described below). The test driver is implemented as a step of the top-level test/run.go suite, called "asmcheck". The codegen harness is part of the all.bash test suite, but for performance reasons only the codegen tests for the host machine's GOARCH are enabled by default, and only on GOOS=linux. To perform comprehensive tests for all the supported architectures (even on a non-Linux system), one can run the following command $ ../bin/go run run.go -all_codegen -v codegen in the top-level test directory. This is recommended after any change that affect the compiler's code. The test harness compiles the tests with the same go toolchain that is used to run run.go. After writing tests for a newly added codegen transformation, it can be useful to first run the test harness with a toolchain from a released Go version (and verify that the new tests fail), and then re-runnig the tests using the devel toolchain. - Regexps comments syntax Instructions to match are specified inside plain comments that start with an architecture tag, followed by a colon and a quoted Go-style regexp to be matched. For example, the following test: func Sqrt(x float64) float64 { // amd64:"SQRTSD" // arm64:"FSQRTD" return math.Sqrt(x) } verifies that math.Sqrt calls are intrinsified to a SQRTSD instruction on amd64, and to a FSQRTD instruction on arm64. It is possible to put multiple architectures checks into the same line, as: // amd64:"SQRTSD" arm64:"FSQRTD" although this form should be avoided when doing so would make the regexps line excessively long and difficult to read. Comments that are on their own line will be matched against the first subsequent non-comment line. Inline comments are also supported; the regexp will be matched against the code found on the same line: func Sqrt(x float64) float64 { return math.Sqrt(x) // arm:"SQRTD" } It's possible to specify a comma-separated list of regexps to be matched. For example, the following test: func TZ8(n uint8) int { // amd64:"BSFQ","ORQ\t\\$256" return bits.TrailingZeros8(n) } verifies that the code generated for a bits.TrailingZeros8 call on amd64 contains both a "BSFQ" instruction and an "ORQ $256". Note how the ORQ regex includes a tab char (\t). In the Go assembly syntax, operands are separated from opcodes by a tabulation. Regexps can be quoted using either " or `. Special characters must be escaped accordingly. Both of these are accepted, and equivalent: // amd64:"ADDQ\t\\$3" // amd64:`ADDQ\t\$3` and they'll match this assembly line: ADDQ $3 Negative matches can be specified using a - before the quoted regexp. For example: func MoveSmall() { x := [...]byte{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} copy(x[1:], x[:]) // arm64:-".*memmove" } verifies that NO memmove call is present in the assembly generated for the copy() line. - Architecture specifiers There are three different ways to specify on which architecture a test should be run: * Specify only the architecture (eg: "amd64"). This indicates that the check should be run on all the supported architecture variants. For instance, arm checks will be run against all supported GOARM variations (5,6,7). * Specify both the architecture and a variant, separated by a slash (eg: "arm/7"). This means that the check will be run only on that specific variant. * Specify the operating system, the architecture and the variant, separated by slashes (eg: "plan9/386/sse2", "plan9/amd64/"). This is needed in the rare case that you need to do a codegen test affected by a specific operating system; by default, tests are compiled only targeting linux. - Remarks, and Caveats -- Write small test functions As a general guideline, test functions should be small, to avoid possible interactions between unrelated lines of code that may be introduced, for example, by the compiler's optimization passes. Any given line of Go code could get assigned more instructions than it may appear from reading the source. In particular, matching all MOV instructions should be avoided; the compiler may add them for unrelated reasons and this may render the test ineffective. -- Line matching logic Regexps are always matched from the start of the instructions line. This means, for example, that the "MULQ" regexp is equivalent to "^MULQ" (^ representing the start of the line), and it will NOT match the following assembly line: IMULQ $99, AX To force a match at any point of the line, ".*MULQ" should be used. For the same reason, a negative regexp like -"memmove" is not enough to make sure that no memmove call is included in the assembly. A memmove call looks like this: CALL runtime.memmove(SB) To make sure that the "memmove" symbol does not appear anywhere in the assembly, the negative regexp to be used is -".*memmove".