67d6be139c
The following Value methods are now inlineable: Bool for ~bool String for ~string (but not other kinds) Bytes for []byte (but not ~[]byte or ~[N]byte) Len for ~[]T (but not ~[N]T, ~chan T, ~map[K]V, or ~string) Cap for ~[]T (but not ~[N]T or ~chan T) For Bytes, we only have enough inline budget to inline one type, so we optimize for unnamed []byte, which is far more common than named []byte or [N]byte. For Len and Cap, we only have enough inline budget to inline one kind, so we optimize for ~[]T, which is more common than the others. The exception is string, but the size of a string can be obtained through len(v.String()). Performance: Bool 1.65ns ± 0% 0.51ns ± 3% -68.81% (p=0.008 n=5+5) String 1.97ns ± 1% 0.70ns ± 1% -64.25% (p=0.008 n=5+5) Bytes 8.90ns ± 2% 0.89ns ± 1% -89.95% (p=0.008 n=5+5) NamedBytes 8.89ns ± 1% 8.88ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.548 n=5+5) BytesArray 10.0ns ± 2% 10.2ns ± 1% +1.58% (p=0.048 n=5+5) SliceLen 1.97ns ± 1% 0.45ns ± 1% -77.22% (p=0.008 n=5+5) MapLen 2.62ns ± 1% 3.07ns ± 1% +17.24% (p=0.008 n=5+5) StringLen 1.96ns ± 1% 1.98ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.151 n=5+5) ArrayLen 1.96ns ± 1% 2.19ns ± 1% +11.46% (p=0.008 n=5+5) SliceCap 1.76ns ± 1% 0.45ns ± 2% -74.28% (p=0.008 n=5+5) There's a slight slowdown (~10-20%) for obtaining the length of a string or map, but a substantial improvement for slices. Performance according to encoding/json: CodeMarshal 555µs ± 2% 562µs ± 4% ~ (p=0.421 n=5+5) MarshalBytes/32 163ns ± 1% 157ns ± 1% -3.82% (p=0.008 n=5+5) MarshalBytes/256 453ns ± 1% 447ns ± 1% ~ (p=0.056 n=5+5) MarshalBytes/4096 4.10µs ± 1% 4.09µs ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=5+4) CodeUnmarshal 3.16ms ± 2% 3.02ms ± 1% -4.18% (p=0.008 n=5+5) CodeUnmarshalReuse 2.64ms ± 3% 2.51ms ± 2% -4.81% (p=0.016 n=5+5) UnmarshalString 65.4ns ± 4% 64.1ns ± 0% ~ (p=0.190 n=5+4) UnmarshalFloat64 59.8ns ± 5% 58.9ns ± 2% ~ (p=0.222 n=5+5) UnmarshalInt64 51.7ns ± 1% 50.0ns ± 2% -3.26% (p=0.008 n=5+5) EncodeMarshaler 23.6ns ±11% 20.8ns ± 1% -12.10% (p=0.016 n=5+4) Add all inlineable methods of Value to cmd/compile/internal/test/inl_test.go. Change-Id: Ifc192491918af6b62f7fe3a094a5a5256bfb326d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/400676 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> Auto-Submit: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.github | ||
api | ||
doc | ||
lib/time | ||
misc | ||
src | ||
test | ||
.gitattributes | ||
.gitignore | ||
AUTHORS | ||
codereview.cfg | ||
CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
CONTRIBUTORS | ||
LICENSE | ||
PATENTS | ||
README.md | ||
SECURITY.md |
The Go Programming Language
Go is an open source programming language that makes it easy to build simple, reliable, and efficient software.
Gopher image by Renee French, licensed under Creative Commons 3.0 Attributions license.
Our canonical Git repository is located at https://go.googlesource.com/go. There is a mirror of the repository at https://github.com/golang/go.
Unless otherwise noted, the Go source files are distributed under the BSD-style license found in the LICENSE file.
Download and Install
Binary Distributions
Official binary distributions are available at https://go.dev/dl/.
After downloading a binary release, visit https://go.dev/doc/install for installation instructions.
Install From Source
If a binary distribution is not available for your combination of operating system and architecture, visit https://go.dev/doc/install/source for source installation instructions.
Contributing
Go is the work of thousands of contributors. We appreciate your help!
To contribute, please read the contribution guidelines at https://go.dev/doc/contribute.
Note that the Go project uses the issue tracker for bug reports and proposals only. See https://golang.org/wiki/Questions for a list of places to ask questions about the Go language.