In cases like:
func _() {
if fo<>
}
func foo() {}
Completing at "<>" does not include "foo" because the missing "if"
opening curly brace renders the rest of the file unparseable. "foo"
doesn't exist in the AST, so as far as gopls is concerned it doesn't
exist at all.
To fix this, we detect when a block is missing opening "{" and we
insert stub "{}" to make things parse better. This is a different kind
of fix than our previous *ast.BadExpr handling because we must reparse
the file after tweaking the source. After reparsing we maintain the
original syntax error so the user sees consistent error messages. This
also avoids having the "{}" spring into existence when the user
formats the file.
Fixesgolang/go#31907.
Updates golang/go#31687.
Change-Id: I95ba60a11f7dd23dc484c063b4fd7ad77daa4e08
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/216482
Run-TryBot: Muir Manders <muir@mnd.rs>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
2f0693cea3