The Go project welcomes all contributors. The process of contributing to the Go project may be different than many projects you are used to. This document is intended as a guide to help you through the contribution process. This guide assumes you have a basic understanding of Git and Go.
In addition to the information here, the Go community maintains a CodeReview wiki page. Feel free to contribute to the wiki as you learn the review process.
Note that the gccgo
front end lives elsewhere;
see Contributing to gccgo.
The first step is registering as a Go contributor and configuring your environment. Here is a very quick checklist of the required steps, that you will need to follow:
git
is configured to create commits with that account's e-mail address.
git
repository.
Go to go.googlesource.com, click
on "Generate Password" (top right), and follow the instructions.
git-codereview
by running
go get -u golang.org/x/review/git-codereview
If you prefer, we have an automated tool that walks through these steps. Just run:
$ go get -u golang.org/x/tools/cmd/go-contrib-init $ cd /code/to/edit $ go-contrib-init
The rest of this chapter elaborates on these steps. If you have completed the steps above (either manually or through the tool), jump to Making a change.
A contribution to Go is made through a Google account, with a specific e-mail address. Make sure to pick one and use it throughout the process and for all your contributions. You may need to decide whether to use a personal address or a corporate address. The choice will depend on who will own the copyright for the code that you will be writing and submitting. Consider discussing this with your employer.
Google Accounts can either be Gmail email accounts, G-Suite organization accounts, or accounts associated with an external e-mail address. For instance, if you need to use an existing corporate e-mail that is not managed through G-Suite, you can create an account associated with your existing email address.
You also need to make sure that git
is configured to author commits
using the same e-mail address. You can either configure it globally
(as a default for all projects), or locally (for a single specific project).
You can check the current configuration with this command:
$ git config --global user.email # check current global config $ git config user.email # check current local config
To change the configured address:
$ git config --global user.email name@example.com # change global config $ git config user.email name@example.com # change local config
Before sending your first change to the Go project you must have completed one of the following two CLAs. Which CLA you should sign depends on who owns the copyright to your work.
You can check your currently signed agreements and sign new ones, through the Google Developers Contributor License Agreements website. If the copyright holder for your contribution has already completed the agreement in connection with another Google open source project, it does not need to be completed again.
If the copyright holder for the code you are submitting changes — for example,
if you start contributing code on behalf of a new company — please send email
to golang-dev and let us know, so that we can make sure an appropriate agreement is
completed and update the AUTHORS
file.
Go development happens on go.googlesource.com,
a git
server hosted by Google.
Authentication on the web server is made through your Google account, but
you also need to configure git
on your computer to access it.
Follow this steps:
.gitcookies
file.
(On a Windows computer using cmd
you should instead follow the instructions
in the yellow box to run the command. If you are using git-bash
use the same
script as *nix.).
Gerrit is an open-source tool used by Go maintainers to discuss and review code submissions.
To register your account, visit go-review.googlesource.com/login/ and sign in once using the same Google Account you used above.
Changes to Go must be reviewed before they are accepted, no matter who makes the change.
A custom git command called git-codereview
, discussed below,
helps to send changes to Gerrit.
Install the git-codereview
command by running,
$ go get -u golang.org/x/review/git-codereview
Make sure git-codereview
is installed in your shell path, so that the
git
command can find it. Check that
$ git codereview help
prints help text, not an error.
On Windows, when using git-bash you must make sure that
git-codereview.exe
is in your git exec-path.
Run git --exec-path
to discover the right location then create a
symbolic link or simply copy the executable from $GOPATH/bin to this directory.
The project welcomes submissions but please let everyone know what you're working on if you want to change or add to the Go repositories.
Before undertaking to write something new for the Go project, please file an issue (or claim an existing issue).
Whether you already know what contribution to make, or you are searching for an idea, the issue tracker is always the first place to go. Issues are triaged to categorize them and manage the workflow.
Most issues will be marked with one of the following workflow labels:
Excluding very trivial changes, all contributions should be connected to an existing issue. Feel free to open one and discuss what your plans are. This process gives everyone a chance to validate the design, helps prevent duplication of effort, and ensures that the idea fits inside the goals for the language and tools. It also checks that the design is sound before code is written; the code review tool is not the place for high-level discussions.
When planning work, please note that the Go project follows a six-month development cycle. The latter half of each cycle is a three-month feature freeze during which only bug fixes and doc updates are accepted. New contributions can be sent during a feature freeze but will not be accepted until the freeze thaws.
Significant changes must go through the change proposal process before they can be accepted.
Sensitive security-related issues should be reported to security@golang.org.
First-time contributors that are already familiar with the GitHub flow are encouraged to use the same process for Go contributions. Even though Go maintainers use Gerrit for code review, a bot has been created to sync GitHub pull requests to Gerrit.
Open a pull request as you would normally do. Gopherbot will automatically sync the code and post a link to Gerrit. When somebody comments on the change, it will be posted in the pull request, so you will also get a notification.
Some things to keep in mind:
It is not possible to fully sync Gerrit and GitHub, at least at the moment, so we recommend learning Gerrit. It's different but powerful and familiarity with help you understand the flow.
This is an overview of the overall process:
$ git clone https://github.com/golang/go # or https://go.googlesource.com/go $ cd go/src $ ./all.bash # compile and test
git
codereview
change
, that
will create or amend a single commit in the branch.
$ git checkout -b mybranch $ [edit files...] $ git add [files...] $ git codereview change # create commit in the branch $ [edit again...] $ git add [files...] $ git codereview change # amend the existing commit with new changes $ [etc.]
all.bash
.
$ ./all.bash # recompile and test
git
codereview
mail
(which doesn't use e-mail, despite the name).
$ git codereview mail # send changes to Gerrit
$ [edit files...] $ git add [files...] $ git codereview change # update same commit $ git codereview mail # send to Gerrit again
The rest of this chapter describes these steps in more detail.
In addition to a recent Go installation, you need to have a local copy of the source
checked out from the correct repository. You should check out the Go source repo anywhere
you want as long as it's outside of your GOPATH
. Either clone from
go.googlesource.com
or GitHub:
$ git clone https://github.com/golang/go # or https://go.googlesource.com/go $ cd go
Each Go change must be made in a separate branch, created from the master branch. You can use
the normal git
commands to create a branch and add changes to the
staging area:
$ git checkout -b mybranch $ [edit files...] $ git add [files...]
To commit changes, instead of git commit
, use git codereview change
.
$ git codereview change (open $EDITOR)
You can edit the commit description in your favorite editor as usual.
git
codereview
change
will automatically
add a Change-Id
line near the bottom. That line is used by
Gerrit to match successive uploads of the same change. Do not edit or delete it.
This is an example:
commit fef82cf89a34935a41bd0e3c1e0c2d9d6de29ee2 (HEAD -> test) Author: Giovanni BajoDate: Tue Feb 13 01:07:15 2018 +0100 cmd/compile: test Change-Id: I2fbdbffb3aab626c4b6f56348861b7909e3e8990
git
codereview
change
also checks that you've
run go
fmt
over the source code, and that
the commit message follows the suggested format.
If you need to edit the files again, you can stage the new changes and
re-run git
codereview
change
: each subsequent
run will amend the existing commit.
Make sure that you always keep a single commit in each branch. If you add more
commits by mistake, you can use git
rebase
to
squash them together
into a single one.
You've written and tested your code, but before sending code out for review, run all the tests for the whole tree to make sure the changes don't break other packages or programs:
$ cd go/src $ ./all.bash
(To build under Windows use all.bat
; this also requires
setting the environment variable GOROOT_BOOTSTRAP
to the
bootstrap compiler)
After running for a while, the command should print:
"ALL TESTS PASSED".
Notice that you can use make.bash
instead of all.bash
to just build the compiler without running the testsuite. Once the compiler is
built, you can run it directly from <GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go
; see also
the section on quickly test your changes.
Once the change is ready, send it for review.
This is done via the mail
sub-command which despite its name, doesn't
directly mail anything, it just sends the change to Gerrit:
$ git codereview mail
Gerrit assigns your change a number and URL, which git
codereview
mail
will print, something like:
remote: New Changes: remote: https://go-review.googlesource.com/99999 math: improved Sin, Cos and Tan precision for very large arguments
If you get an error instead, check the Troubleshooting mail errors section.
If your change relates to an open GitHub issue and you have followed the suggested commit message format, the issue will be updated in a few minutes by a bot, linking your Gerrit change in it.
Go maintainers will review your code on Gerrit, and you will get notifications via email. You can see the review on Gerrit, and comment on them. You can also reply via email if you prefer.
When you're ready to revise your submitted code, edit the files in correct branch,
add them to the git staging area, and then amend the commit with
git
codereview
change
:
$ git codereview change # amend current commit (open $EDITOR) $ git codereview mail # send new changes to Gerrit
If you don't need to change the commit description, just save and exit from the editor.
Remember not to touch the special Change-Id
line.
Make sure that you always keep a single commit in each branch. If you add more
commits by mistake, you can use git rebase
to
squash them together
into a single one.
Commit messages in Go follow a specific convention. Read this chapter to learn more about it. This is an example of a good one:
math: improve Sin, Cos and Tan precision for very large arguments The existing implementation has poor numerical properties for large arguments, so use the McGillicutty algorithm to improve accuracy above 1e10. The algorithm is described at http://wikipedia.org/wiki/McGillicutty_Algorithm Fixes #159
The first line of the change description is conventionally a one-line summary of the change, prefixed by the primary affected package. Keep the first line as short as possible (ideally, under 76 characters).
It should be written so to complete the sentence "This change modifies Go to _____."
The rest of the description elaborates and should provide context for the change and explain what it does. Write in complete sentences with correct punctuation, just like for your comments in Go. No Markdown should be used.
The special notation "Fixes #159" associates the change with issue 159 in the Go issue tracker. When this change is eventually applied, the issue tracker will automatically mark the issue as fixed.
If the change is a partial step towards the resolution of the issue, uses the notation "Updates #159". This will leave a comment in the issue linking back to the change in Gerrit, but it will not close the issue when the change is applied.
If you are sending a change against a subrepository, you must use the fully-qualified syntax supported by GitHub, to make sure the change is linked to the issue in the main repository. The correct form is "Fixes golang/go#159".
This section explains the review process in details, and how to approach reviews after a change was submitted.
When a change is submitted to Gerrit, it is usually triaged in the next few days. A maintainer will give a look and submit some initial review, that for first-time contributors usually focus on basic cosmetics and common mistakes. For instance:
R=go1.11
,
which means that it will be reviewed later when the tree opens for a new
development window. You can add R=go1.XX
as a comment yourself
if you know that it's not the correct timeframe for the change and help the
maintainers.
After an initial reading of your patch, maintainers will trigger trybots, a cluster of servers that will run the full testsuite on several different architectures. Most trybots run complete in a few minutes, and a link will be posted in Gerrit where you can see the results.
If the trybot run fails, follow the link and check the full logs of the platforms on which the tests failed. Try to understand what broke, and update your patch. Maintainers will trigger a new trybot run to see if the problem was fixed.
Sometimes, the tree can be broken on some platforms for a few hours; if the failure in trybot logs doesn't seem related to your patch, go to the Build Dashboard and check if the same failures appears in the recent commits, on the same platform. In this case, feel free to write a comment in Gerrit to mention that the failure is unrelated to your change, to help maintainers understanding the situation.
The Go team values very thorough reviews. Consider each line comment like a ticket: you are expected to somehow "close" it by acting on it, either by implementing the suggestion or convincing the reviewer otherwise.
After you update the change, go through line comments and make sure to reply on every one. You can click the "Done" button to reply indicating that you've implemented the reviewer's suggestion; otherwise, click on "Reply" and explain why you have not.
It is absolutely normal for changes to go through several round of reviews, in which the reviewer make new comments every time and then wait for an updated change to be uploaded. This also happens for experienced contributors, so don't feel discouraged by it.
At some point, reviewers will express a vote on your change. This is the voting convention:
After the code has been +2'ed, an approver will apply it to the master branch using the Gerrit UI. This is called "submission".
The two steps are separate because in some cases maintainers may want to approve it but not to submit it right away (e.g. the tree could be temporarily frozen).
Submission checks the change into the repository. The change description will include a link to the code review, and the code review will be updated with a link to the change in the repository. Since the method used to integrate the changes is "Cherry Pick", the commit hashes in the repository will be changed by the "Submit" operation.
If your change has been approved for a few days without being submitted, feel free to write a comment in Gerrit requesting submission.
In addition to the information here, the Go community maintains a CodeReview wiki page. Feel free to contribute to this page as you learn the review process.
This section contains more in-depth topics on how to contribute to Go. Read it to get a better understanding of the contribution process.
Files in the Go repository don't list author names, both to avoid clutter
and to avoid having to keep the lists up to date.
Instead, your name will appear in the
change log and in the CONTRIBUTORS
file and perhaps the AUTHORS
file.
These files are automatically generated from the commit logs periodically.
The AUTHORS
file defines who “The Go
Authors”—the copyright holders—are.
New files that you contribute should use the standard copyright header:
// Copyright 2018 The Go Authors. All rights reserved. // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style // license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
Files in the repository are copyright the year they are added. Do not update the copyright year on files that you change.
The most common way that the git
codereview
mail
command fails is because the email address in the commit does not match the one
that you used during the registration process.
If you see something like...
remote: Processing changes: refs: 1, done remote: remote: ERROR: In commit ab13517fa29487dcf8b0d48916c51639426c5ee9 remote: ERROR: author email address XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX remote: ERROR: does not match your user account.
You need to set this repo to use the email address that you registered with. First, let's change the email address for this repo so this doesn't happen again. You can change your email address for this repo with the following command:
$ git config user.email email@address.com
Then change the commit to use this alternative email address. You can do that with:
$ git commit --amend --author="Author Name <email@address.com>"
Finally try to resend with:
$ git codereview mail
Running all.bash
for every single change to the code tree
is burdensome. Even though it is strongly suggested to run it before
sending a change, during the normal development cycle you may want
to quickly compile and locally test your change.
make.bash
instead of all.bash
to only rebuild the Go toolchain without running the whole testsuite. Or you
can run run.bash
to only run the whole testsuite without rebuilding
the toolchain. You can think of all.bash
as make.bash
followed by run.bash
.
<GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go
; you
can run it directly to test whatever you want to test. For instance, if you
have modified the compiler and you want to test how it affects the
testsuite of your own project, just run go
test
using it:
$ cd <MYPROJECTDIR> $ <GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go test
$ cd <GOCLONEDIR>/src/hash/sha1 $ [make changes...] $ <GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go test .
compile
tool (which is the internal binary invoked
by go
build
to compile each single package).
After that, you will want to test it by compiling or running something.
$ cd <GOCLONEDIR>/src $ [make changes...] $ <GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go install cmd/compile $ <GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go build [something...] # test the new compiler $ <GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go run [something...] # test the new compiler $ <GOCLONEDIR>/bin/go test [something...] # test the new compilerThe same applies to other internal tools of the Go toolchain, such as
asm
, cover
, link
,
etc. Just recompile and install the tool using go
install
cmd/<TOOL>
and then use
the built Go binary to test it.
<GOCLONEDIR>/test
that contains
several black-box and regression tests. The testsuite is run
by all.bash
but you can also run it manually:
$ cd <GOCLONEDIR>/test $ go run run.goNote that this will use the Go compiler found in
PATH
.
If you are contributing a change to a subrepository, obtain the
Go package using go get
. For example, to contribute
to golang.org/x/oauth2
, check out the code by running:
$ go get -d golang.org/x/oauth2/...
Then, change your directory to the package's source directory
($GOPATH/src/golang.org/x/oauth2
), and follow the
normal contribution flow.
Unless explicitly told otherwise, such as in the discussion leading up to sending in the change, it's better not to specify a reviewer. All changes are automatically CC'ed to the golang-codereviews@googlegroups.com mailing list. If this is your first ever change, there may be a moderation delay before it appears on the mailing list, to prevent spam.
You can specify a reviewer or CC interested parties
using the -r
or -cc
options.
Both accept a comma-separated list of email addresses:
$ git codereview mail -r joe@golang.org -cc mabel@example.com,math-nuts@swtch.com
While you were working, others might have submitted changes to the repository. To update your local branch, run
$ git sync
(In git terms, git
sync
runs
git
pull
-r
.)
As part of the review process reviewers can propose changes directly (in the GitHub workflow this would be someone else attaching commits to a pull request). You can import these changes proposed by someone else into your local Git repository. On the Gerrit review page, click the "Download ▼" link in the upper right corner, copy the "Checkout" command and run it from your local Git repo. It should look something like this:
$ git fetch https://go.googlesource.com/review refs/changes/21/1221/1 && git checkout FETCH_HEAD
To revert, change back to the branch you were working in.
The git-codereview
command can be run directly from the shell
by typing, for instance,
$ git codereview sync
but it is more convenient to set up aliases for git-codereview
's own
subcommands, so that the above becomes,
$ git sync
The git-codereview
subcommands have been chosen to be distinct from
Git's own, so it's safe to do so. To install them, copy this text into your
Git configuration file (usually .gitconfig
in your home directory):
[alias] change = codereview change gofmt = codereview gofmt mail = codereview mail pending = codereview pending submit = codereview submit sync = codereview sync
Gerrit allows for changes to be dependent on each other, forming a dependency chain. This is an indication for maintainers to better review your code, even though each change will technically need to be approved and submitted separately.
To submit a group of dependent changes, keep each change as a different commit under the same branch, and then run:
$ git codereview mail HEADMake sure to explicitly specify
HEAD
, which is usually not required when sending
single changes.