I moved the "usePlaceholders" config field on to CompletionOptions.
This way the completion code generates a single snippet with a little
conditional logic based on the "WantPlaceholders" option instead of
juggling the generation of two almost identical "plain" and
"placeholder" snippets at the same time. It also reduces the work done
generating completion candidates a little.
I also made a minor tweak to the snippet builder where empty
placeholders are now always represented as e.g "${1:}" instead of
"${1}" or "${1:}", depending on if you passed a callback to
WritePlaceholder() or not.
Change-Id: Ib84cc0cd729a11b9e13ad3ac4b6fd2d82460acd5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/193697
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
*snippet.Builder helps you construct lsp completion snippet strings.
It handles escaping for you, and it gives a convenient interface for
writing nested placeholders.
Note that the builder does not support snippet "variables" or
associated features. They add a lot of complexity and don't seem very
useful at this point (plus they aren't supported in many editors).
Change-Id: I492ab2f6f0e08ed952154cbc0a17c86f32abf40a
GitHub-Last-Rev: 35a3f5d1cd0b6fda81b2c942a02aa1bd25c90acd
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/tools#90
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/173661
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
