Some code lenses may be undesirable for certain users or editors -- for
example a code lens that runs tests, when VSCode already supports this
functionality outside of the LSP. To handle such situations, support
configuring code lenses via a new 'codelens' gopls option.
Add support for code lens in regtests, and use this to test the new
configuration. To achieve this, thread through a new 'EditorConfig' type
that configures the fake editor's LSP session. It made sense to move the
test Env overlay onto this config object as well.
While looking at them, document some types in source.Options.
Change-Id: I961077422a273829c5cbd83c3b87fae29f77eeda
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/232680
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
We were previously sending diagnostics for nonexistent files, and then
adding them to the snapshot in the process. Remove this behavior, and
add a regression test. Case insensitive filesystems were too confusing
to write a test for, but fortunately, Filippo reported another instance
of this bug, so I used that for the regression test.
Fixesgolang/go#38602
Change-Id: I4ef6b51944f3338e838875a5aafffd066e8392f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/230315
Run-TryBot: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
The Workspace type has accumulated too much additional functionality of
late: managing the Env, GOPATH, and GOPROXY in addition to the working
directory. Additionally, the name 'Workspace' can easily be confused
with 'workspaceFolder' in the LSP spec, and they're not quite
equivalent.
Split off a Proxy type to be responsible for the fake module proxy, and
a Workdir type to be responsible for working with the temporary
directory. Rename what remains of 'Workspace' to a more appropriate name
for such a collection of resources: Sandbox.
This is mostly just moving things around, with one significant change in
functionality: previously our three temporary directories (workdir,
gopath, and goproxy) were in separate toplevel directories below
$TMPDIR. Now they are all below a new sandbox temp directory, so that
they are correlated in the filesystem and can be cleaned up with one
call to os.RemoveAll.
Change-Id: I1e160a31ae22f0132355117df941fe65822900eb
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/230758
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Certain regtests require referencing external data. To support this, add
the ability to use a file-based proxy populated with testdata.
To expose this configuration, augment the regtest runner with variadic
options. Also use this to replace the Runner.RunInMode function.
Add a simple regtest that uses this functionality.
Updates golang/go#36879
Change-Id: I7e6314430abcd127dbb7bca12574ef9935bf1f83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/228235
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
Expressing regtests in terms of textual coordinates is hard to read: the
reader ends up counting lines and characters to understand the text edit
or assertion.
To address, this, add two new functions for fake.Editor: RegexpSearch
and RegexpReplace, as well as a symmetric RegexpSearch function for
workspace files and wrappers for regtext.Env.
This allows expressing edits as well as buffer locations in terms of
easily scannable regexps.
An alternative solution to this problem is to integrate markers ala
packagestest. I tried this, but it ended up being cumbersome to
implement and less usable than regexps, due to the static nature of
markers: after the buffer has been edited all markers must be
updated.
Updates golang/go#36879
Change-Id: Iad087cf0d529737034197beef7b729816a159c69
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/224757
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
Add two new fake editor commands: Formatting and OrganizeImports, which
delegate to textDocument/formatting and textDocument/codeAction
respectively. Use this in simple regtests, as well as on save.
Implementing this required fixing a broken assumption about text edits
in the editor: previously these edits were incrementally mutating the
buffer, but the correct implementation should simultaneously mutate the
buffer (i.e., all positions in an edit set refer to the starting buffer
state). This never mattered before because we were only operating on one
edit at a time.
Updates golang/go#36879
Change-Id: I6dec343c4e202288fa20c26df2fbafe9340a1bce
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/221539
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rohan Challa <rohan@golang.org>
A lot of bug reports originating from LSP clients are related to either
the timing or sequence of editor interactions with gopls (or at least
they're originally reported this way). For example: "when I open a
package and then create a new file, I lose diagnostics for existing
files". These conditions are often hard to reproduce, and to isolate as
either a gopls bug or a bug in the editor.
Right now we're relying on govim integration tests to catch these
regressions, but it's important to also have a testing framework that
can exercise this functionality in-process. As a starting point this CL
adds test fakes that implement a high level API for scripting editor
interactions. A fake workspace can be used to sandbox file operations; a
fake editor provides an interface for text editing operations; a fake
LSP client can be used to connect the fake editor to a gopls instance.
Some tests are added to the lsprpc package to demonstrate the API.
The primary goal of these fakes should be to simulate an client that
complies to the LSP spec. Put another way: if we have a bug report that
we can't reproduce with our regression tests, it should either be a bug
in our test fakes or a bug in the LSP client originating the report.
I did my best to comply with the spec in this implementation, but it
will certainly develop as we write more tests. We will also need to add
to the editor API in the future for testing more language features.
Updates golang/go#36879
Updates golang/go#34111
Change-Id: Ib81188683a7066184b8a254275ed5525191a2d68
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/217598
Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
